In $triangle ABC$ with $D$ on $overline{AC}$, if $angle CBD=2angle ABD$ and the circumcenter lies on...












1












$begingroup$


enter image description here





  • Let $alpha$ be $measuredangle ABD$

  • Let $beta$ be $measuredangle DBC$

  • Let D be a point on AC such that BD passes through the origin point O


Prove that $frac{AD}{DC}$ cannot be equal to $frac{1}{2}$ when $alpha = frac{1}{2}beta$




Here's what I have:



$$measuredangle AOD = 2alpha$$
$$measuredangle DOC = 2beta$$



From this information I completed all the angles and reached the following (correct) equation by using the law of sines on triangles AOD and DOC, which share the equal length OC = AO:



$$frac{AD}{DC} = frac{sin 2beta}{sin 2alpha}$$



Given that $alpha = frac{1}{2}beta$:



$$frac{AD}{DC} = frac{sin 2beta}{sin beta} = frac{2sin beta cos beta}{sin beta} = 2cosbeta$$
$$downarrow$$
$$2cosbeta = 1/2$$
$$downarrow$$
$$beta = 75.52^circ$$



If $beta = 75.52^circ$, then $2alpha + 2beta > 180^circ$, and the triangle will now look like this:



enter image description here



In this situation, BD cannot pass through O, which breaks the definition of the problem.



This is the best proof I can come up with. I tried first to prove it numerically by summing up angles to 180, but that did not work as all the statements were true. I feel that my proof is borderline illegal and that I do not address all cases, so I am asking if anyone could figure out a more elegant, preferably algebraic alternative.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Blue If AC is the diameter, how is $AD/DC = 1/2$? Both AD and DC become radii of the circle and therefore their ratio should be 1.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Whoops. .......
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Jan 4 at 15:17
















1












$begingroup$


enter image description here





  • Let $alpha$ be $measuredangle ABD$

  • Let $beta$ be $measuredangle DBC$

  • Let D be a point on AC such that BD passes through the origin point O


Prove that $frac{AD}{DC}$ cannot be equal to $frac{1}{2}$ when $alpha = frac{1}{2}beta$




Here's what I have:



$$measuredangle AOD = 2alpha$$
$$measuredangle DOC = 2beta$$



From this information I completed all the angles and reached the following (correct) equation by using the law of sines on triangles AOD and DOC, which share the equal length OC = AO:



$$frac{AD}{DC} = frac{sin 2beta}{sin 2alpha}$$



Given that $alpha = frac{1}{2}beta$:



$$frac{AD}{DC} = frac{sin 2beta}{sin beta} = frac{2sin beta cos beta}{sin beta} = 2cosbeta$$
$$downarrow$$
$$2cosbeta = 1/2$$
$$downarrow$$
$$beta = 75.52^circ$$



If $beta = 75.52^circ$, then $2alpha + 2beta > 180^circ$, and the triangle will now look like this:



enter image description here



In this situation, BD cannot pass through O, which breaks the definition of the problem.



This is the best proof I can come up with. I tried first to prove it numerically by summing up angles to 180, but that did not work as all the statements were true. I feel that my proof is borderline illegal and that I do not address all cases, so I am asking if anyone could figure out a more elegant, preferably algebraic alternative.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Blue If AC is the diameter, how is $AD/DC = 1/2$? Both AD and DC become radii of the circle and therefore their ratio should be 1.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Whoops. .......
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Jan 4 at 15:17














1












1








1





$begingroup$


enter image description here





  • Let $alpha$ be $measuredangle ABD$

  • Let $beta$ be $measuredangle DBC$

  • Let D be a point on AC such that BD passes through the origin point O


Prove that $frac{AD}{DC}$ cannot be equal to $frac{1}{2}$ when $alpha = frac{1}{2}beta$




Here's what I have:



$$measuredangle AOD = 2alpha$$
$$measuredangle DOC = 2beta$$



From this information I completed all the angles and reached the following (correct) equation by using the law of sines on triangles AOD and DOC, which share the equal length OC = AO:



$$frac{AD}{DC} = frac{sin 2beta}{sin 2alpha}$$



Given that $alpha = frac{1}{2}beta$:



$$frac{AD}{DC} = frac{sin 2beta}{sin beta} = frac{2sin beta cos beta}{sin beta} = 2cosbeta$$
$$downarrow$$
$$2cosbeta = 1/2$$
$$downarrow$$
$$beta = 75.52^circ$$



If $beta = 75.52^circ$, then $2alpha + 2beta > 180^circ$, and the triangle will now look like this:



enter image description here



In this situation, BD cannot pass through O, which breaks the definition of the problem.



This is the best proof I can come up with. I tried first to prove it numerically by summing up angles to 180, but that did not work as all the statements were true. I feel that my proof is borderline illegal and that I do not address all cases, so I am asking if anyone could figure out a more elegant, preferably algebraic alternative.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




enter image description here





  • Let $alpha$ be $measuredangle ABD$

  • Let $beta$ be $measuredangle DBC$

  • Let D be a point on AC such that BD passes through the origin point O


Prove that $frac{AD}{DC}$ cannot be equal to $frac{1}{2}$ when $alpha = frac{1}{2}beta$




Here's what I have:



$$measuredangle AOD = 2alpha$$
$$measuredangle DOC = 2beta$$



From this information I completed all the angles and reached the following (correct) equation by using the law of sines on triangles AOD and DOC, which share the equal length OC = AO:



$$frac{AD}{DC} = frac{sin 2beta}{sin 2alpha}$$



Given that $alpha = frac{1}{2}beta$:



$$frac{AD}{DC} = frac{sin 2beta}{sin beta} = frac{2sin beta cos beta}{sin beta} = 2cosbeta$$
$$downarrow$$
$$2cosbeta = 1/2$$
$$downarrow$$
$$beta = 75.52^circ$$



If $beta = 75.52^circ$, then $2alpha + 2beta > 180^circ$, and the triangle will now look like this:



enter image description here



In this situation, BD cannot pass through O, which breaks the definition of the problem.



This is the best proof I can come up with. I tried first to prove it numerically by summing up angles to 180, but that did not work as all the statements were true. I feel that my proof is borderline illegal and that I do not address all cases, so I am asking if anyone could figure out a more elegant, preferably algebraic alternative.







geometry trigonometry euclidean-geometry circles






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 4 at 15:26









Michael Rozenberg

109k1896201




109k1896201










asked Jan 4 at 14:37









daedsidogdaedsidog

31617




31617












  • $begingroup$
    @Blue If AC is the diameter, how is $AD/DC = 1/2$? Both AD and DC become radii of the circle and therefore their ratio should be 1.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Whoops. .......
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Jan 4 at 15:17


















  • $begingroup$
    @Blue If AC is the diameter, how is $AD/DC = 1/2$? Both AD and DC become radii of the circle and therefore their ratio should be 1.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Whoops. .......
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Jan 4 at 15:17
















$begingroup$
@Blue If AC is the diameter, how is $AD/DC = 1/2$? Both AD and DC become radii of the circle and therefore their ratio should be 1.
$endgroup$
– daedsidog
Jan 4 at 15:15




$begingroup$
@Blue If AC is the diameter, how is $AD/DC = 1/2$? Both AD and DC become radii of the circle and therefore their ratio should be 1.
$endgroup$
– daedsidog
Jan 4 at 15:15




1




1




$begingroup$
Whoops. .......
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 4 at 15:17




$begingroup$
Whoops. .......
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 4 at 15:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

If $frac{AD}{DC}=frac{1}{2}$ by the law of sines we obtain:
$$frac{1}{2}=frac{AD}{DC}=frac{frac{AD}{BD}}{frac{DC}{BD}}=frac{frac{sinalpha}{sinmeasuredangle A}}{frac{sin2alpha}{sinmeasuredangle C}}=frac{frac{sinalpha}{sin(90^{circ}-2a)}}{frac{sin2alpha}{sin(90^{circ}-alpha)}}=frac{sinalphacosalpha}{cos2alphasin2alpha}=frac{1}{2cos2alpha}.$$
Id est, $cos2alpha=1,$ which is impossible.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Strictly out of interest, could you share the thought process which lead you to this?
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:22










  • $begingroup$
    @daedsidog It's law of sines. Which step is not clear?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Jan 4 at 15:25










  • $begingroup$
    It's perfectly clear, I was asking for clues on how would one even realize to use law of sines in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:26












  • $begingroup$
    @daedsidog See the second step (the second equlity). It's a preparation to using of the law of sines.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Jan 4 at 15:30












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061710%2fin-triangle-abc-with-d-on-overlineac-if-angle-cbd-2-angle-abd-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

If $frac{AD}{DC}=frac{1}{2}$ by the law of sines we obtain:
$$frac{1}{2}=frac{AD}{DC}=frac{frac{AD}{BD}}{frac{DC}{BD}}=frac{frac{sinalpha}{sinmeasuredangle A}}{frac{sin2alpha}{sinmeasuredangle C}}=frac{frac{sinalpha}{sin(90^{circ}-2a)}}{frac{sin2alpha}{sin(90^{circ}-alpha)}}=frac{sinalphacosalpha}{cos2alphasin2alpha}=frac{1}{2cos2alpha}.$$
Id est, $cos2alpha=1,$ which is impossible.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Strictly out of interest, could you share the thought process which lead you to this?
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:22










  • $begingroup$
    @daedsidog It's law of sines. Which step is not clear?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Jan 4 at 15:25










  • $begingroup$
    It's perfectly clear, I was asking for clues on how would one even realize to use law of sines in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:26












  • $begingroup$
    @daedsidog See the second step (the second equlity). It's a preparation to using of the law of sines.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Jan 4 at 15:30
















1












$begingroup$

If $frac{AD}{DC}=frac{1}{2}$ by the law of sines we obtain:
$$frac{1}{2}=frac{AD}{DC}=frac{frac{AD}{BD}}{frac{DC}{BD}}=frac{frac{sinalpha}{sinmeasuredangle A}}{frac{sin2alpha}{sinmeasuredangle C}}=frac{frac{sinalpha}{sin(90^{circ}-2a)}}{frac{sin2alpha}{sin(90^{circ}-alpha)}}=frac{sinalphacosalpha}{cos2alphasin2alpha}=frac{1}{2cos2alpha}.$$
Id est, $cos2alpha=1,$ which is impossible.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Strictly out of interest, could you share the thought process which lead you to this?
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:22










  • $begingroup$
    @daedsidog It's law of sines. Which step is not clear?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Jan 4 at 15:25










  • $begingroup$
    It's perfectly clear, I was asking for clues on how would one even realize to use law of sines in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:26












  • $begingroup$
    @daedsidog See the second step (the second equlity). It's a preparation to using of the law of sines.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Jan 4 at 15:30














1












1








1





$begingroup$

If $frac{AD}{DC}=frac{1}{2}$ by the law of sines we obtain:
$$frac{1}{2}=frac{AD}{DC}=frac{frac{AD}{BD}}{frac{DC}{BD}}=frac{frac{sinalpha}{sinmeasuredangle A}}{frac{sin2alpha}{sinmeasuredangle C}}=frac{frac{sinalpha}{sin(90^{circ}-2a)}}{frac{sin2alpha}{sin(90^{circ}-alpha)}}=frac{sinalphacosalpha}{cos2alphasin2alpha}=frac{1}{2cos2alpha}.$$
Id est, $cos2alpha=1,$ which is impossible.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If $frac{AD}{DC}=frac{1}{2}$ by the law of sines we obtain:
$$frac{1}{2}=frac{AD}{DC}=frac{frac{AD}{BD}}{frac{DC}{BD}}=frac{frac{sinalpha}{sinmeasuredangle A}}{frac{sin2alpha}{sinmeasuredangle C}}=frac{frac{sinalpha}{sin(90^{circ}-2a)}}{frac{sin2alpha}{sin(90^{circ}-alpha)}}=frac{sinalphacosalpha}{cos2alphasin2alpha}=frac{1}{2cos2alpha}.$$
Id est, $cos2alpha=1,$ which is impossible.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 4 at 15:18









Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg

109k1896201




109k1896201












  • $begingroup$
    Strictly out of interest, could you share the thought process which lead you to this?
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:22










  • $begingroup$
    @daedsidog It's law of sines. Which step is not clear?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Jan 4 at 15:25










  • $begingroup$
    It's perfectly clear, I was asking for clues on how would one even realize to use law of sines in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:26












  • $begingroup$
    @daedsidog See the second step (the second equlity). It's a preparation to using of the law of sines.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Jan 4 at 15:30


















  • $begingroup$
    Strictly out of interest, could you share the thought process which lead you to this?
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:22










  • $begingroup$
    @daedsidog It's law of sines. Which step is not clear?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Jan 4 at 15:25










  • $begingroup$
    It's perfectly clear, I was asking for clues on how would one even realize to use law of sines in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 4 at 15:26












  • $begingroup$
    @daedsidog See the second step (the second equlity). It's a preparation to using of the law of sines.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Jan 4 at 15:30
















$begingroup$
Strictly out of interest, could you share the thought process which lead you to this?
$endgroup$
– daedsidog
Jan 4 at 15:22




$begingroup$
Strictly out of interest, could you share the thought process which lead you to this?
$endgroup$
– daedsidog
Jan 4 at 15:22












$begingroup$
@daedsidog It's law of sines. Which step is not clear?
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 4 at 15:25




$begingroup$
@daedsidog It's law of sines. Which step is not clear?
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 4 at 15:25












$begingroup$
It's perfectly clear, I was asking for clues on how would one even realize to use law of sines in this case.
$endgroup$
– daedsidog
Jan 4 at 15:26






$begingroup$
It's perfectly clear, I was asking for clues on how would one even realize to use law of sines in this case.
$endgroup$
– daedsidog
Jan 4 at 15:26














$begingroup$
@daedsidog See the second step (the second equlity). It's a preparation to using of the law of sines.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 4 at 15:30




$begingroup$
@daedsidog See the second step (the second equlity). It's a preparation to using of the law of sines.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 4 at 15:30


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061710%2fin-triangle-abc-with-d-on-overlineac-if-angle-cbd-2-angle-abd-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen