Explicit exceptional Embedding of $S_5$ in $S_6$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We know $S_5$ acting on its Sylow 5-groups gives an embedding $S_5 rightarrow S_6$. Now $S_6$ acts on ${(x_i) in V=mathbb C^6| sum_{i=1}^{6}x_i=0}$ by permuting the coordinates. $V$ has a basis $v_i=e_{i}-e_{i+1}$ $i=1,dots,5$. Restricted on $S_5$, this is one $5$ dimensional irreducible representation of $S_5$.
My question is, how to write the embedding $S_5$ explicitly with respect to $v_i$ ? In particular, for different $v_i, v_j$ could we always find $sigma in S_5$ such that $sigma(v_i)=v_j$?
group-theory representation-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We know $S_5$ acting on its Sylow 5-groups gives an embedding $S_5 rightarrow S_6$. Now $S_6$ acts on ${(x_i) in V=mathbb C^6| sum_{i=1}^{6}x_i=0}$ by permuting the coordinates. $V$ has a basis $v_i=e_{i}-e_{i+1}$ $i=1,dots,5$. Restricted on $S_5$, this is one $5$ dimensional irreducible representation of $S_5$.
My question is, how to write the embedding $S_5$ explicitly with respect to $v_i$ ? In particular, for different $v_i, v_j$ could we always find $sigma in S_5$ such that $sigma(v_i)=v_j$?
group-theory representation-theory
$S_6$ has $36$ Sylow $5$-subgroups, so I do not understand your first sentence.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 10:17
@DerekHolt Do you know the exceptional embedding from $S_5$ to $S_6$?
– zzy
Nov 20 at 16:00
You could deduce it from the isomorphism $S_5 cong {rm PGL}(2,5)$. Then, since ${rm PGL}(2,5)$ acts $2$-transitively (in fact $3$-transitively) on the six points, the restriction of the representation you describe is irreducible. To get it explicitly, I guess you would need a specific realization of ${rm PGL}(2,5)$, but I don't believe that there is a single natural copy of this kind. For example, in GAP it is the group $langle (3,6,5,4), (1,2,5)(3,4,6) rangle$.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 16:37
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We know $S_5$ acting on its Sylow 5-groups gives an embedding $S_5 rightarrow S_6$. Now $S_6$ acts on ${(x_i) in V=mathbb C^6| sum_{i=1}^{6}x_i=0}$ by permuting the coordinates. $V$ has a basis $v_i=e_{i}-e_{i+1}$ $i=1,dots,5$. Restricted on $S_5$, this is one $5$ dimensional irreducible representation of $S_5$.
My question is, how to write the embedding $S_5$ explicitly with respect to $v_i$ ? In particular, for different $v_i, v_j$ could we always find $sigma in S_5$ such that $sigma(v_i)=v_j$?
group-theory representation-theory
We know $S_5$ acting on its Sylow 5-groups gives an embedding $S_5 rightarrow S_6$. Now $S_6$ acts on ${(x_i) in V=mathbb C^6| sum_{i=1}^{6}x_i=0}$ by permuting the coordinates. $V$ has a basis $v_i=e_{i}-e_{i+1}$ $i=1,dots,5$. Restricted on $S_5$, this is one $5$ dimensional irreducible representation of $S_5$.
My question is, how to write the embedding $S_5$ explicitly with respect to $v_i$ ? In particular, for different $v_i, v_j$ could we always find $sigma in S_5$ such that $sigma(v_i)=v_j$?
group-theory representation-theory
group-theory representation-theory
asked Nov 20 at 9:26
zzy
2,184319
2,184319
$S_6$ has $36$ Sylow $5$-subgroups, so I do not understand your first sentence.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 10:17
@DerekHolt Do you know the exceptional embedding from $S_5$ to $S_6$?
– zzy
Nov 20 at 16:00
You could deduce it from the isomorphism $S_5 cong {rm PGL}(2,5)$. Then, since ${rm PGL}(2,5)$ acts $2$-transitively (in fact $3$-transitively) on the six points, the restriction of the representation you describe is irreducible. To get it explicitly, I guess you would need a specific realization of ${rm PGL}(2,5)$, but I don't believe that there is a single natural copy of this kind. For example, in GAP it is the group $langle (3,6,5,4), (1,2,5)(3,4,6) rangle$.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 16:37
add a comment |
$S_6$ has $36$ Sylow $5$-subgroups, so I do not understand your first sentence.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 10:17
@DerekHolt Do you know the exceptional embedding from $S_5$ to $S_6$?
– zzy
Nov 20 at 16:00
You could deduce it from the isomorphism $S_5 cong {rm PGL}(2,5)$. Then, since ${rm PGL}(2,5)$ acts $2$-transitively (in fact $3$-transitively) on the six points, the restriction of the representation you describe is irreducible. To get it explicitly, I guess you would need a specific realization of ${rm PGL}(2,5)$, but I don't believe that there is a single natural copy of this kind. For example, in GAP it is the group $langle (3,6,5,4), (1,2,5)(3,4,6) rangle$.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 16:37
$S_6$ has $36$ Sylow $5$-subgroups, so I do not understand your first sentence.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 10:17
$S_6$ has $36$ Sylow $5$-subgroups, so I do not understand your first sentence.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 10:17
@DerekHolt Do you know the exceptional embedding from $S_5$ to $S_6$?
– zzy
Nov 20 at 16:00
@DerekHolt Do you know the exceptional embedding from $S_5$ to $S_6$?
– zzy
Nov 20 at 16:00
You could deduce it from the isomorphism $S_5 cong {rm PGL}(2,5)$. Then, since ${rm PGL}(2,5)$ acts $2$-transitively (in fact $3$-transitively) on the six points, the restriction of the representation you describe is irreducible. To get it explicitly, I guess you would need a specific realization of ${rm PGL}(2,5)$, but I don't believe that there is a single natural copy of this kind. For example, in GAP it is the group $langle (3,6,5,4), (1,2,5)(3,4,6) rangle$.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 16:37
You could deduce it from the isomorphism $S_5 cong {rm PGL}(2,5)$. Then, since ${rm PGL}(2,5)$ acts $2$-transitively (in fact $3$-transitively) on the six points, the restriction of the representation you describe is irreducible. To get it explicitly, I guess you would need a specific realization of ${rm PGL}(2,5)$, but I don't believe that there is a single natural copy of this kind. For example, in GAP it is the group $langle (3,6,5,4), (1,2,5)(3,4,6) rangle$.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 16:37
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006112%2fexplicit-exceptional-embedding-of-s-5-in-s-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$S_6$ has $36$ Sylow $5$-subgroups, so I do not understand your first sentence.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 10:17
@DerekHolt Do you know the exceptional embedding from $S_5$ to $S_6$?
– zzy
Nov 20 at 16:00
You could deduce it from the isomorphism $S_5 cong {rm PGL}(2,5)$. Then, since ${rm PGL}(2,5)$ acts $2$-transitively (in fact $3$-transitively) on the six points, the restriction of the representation you describe is irreducible. To get it explicitly, I guess you would need a specific realization of ${rm PGL}(2,5)$, but I don't believe that there is a single natural copy of this kind. For example, in GAP it is the group $langle (3,6,5,4), (1,2,5)(3,4,6) rangle$.
– Derek Holt
Nov 20 at 16:37