Equivalence of definition of symplectic form












0















Suppose that $V$ is a vector space of dimension $2n$, and let $omega in Lambda^2(V)$. Prove that the following two statements are equivalent.



(1) $tilde{omega} : V rightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xmapsto omega(X,cdot)$ is an isomorphism.



(2) $omega^n=omega wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero.




What I have tried is




Suppose that the map $tilde{omega}: Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xrightarrow i_X omega$ is an isomorphism. Then we have the basis $(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)$ of $V$ such that
begin{align*}
&(1) text{ }omega(e^i,e^j)=omega(f^i,f^j)=0 hspace{3mm}forall i,j\
&(2)text{ } omega(e^i,f^j)=begin{cases} 1 &i=j\ 0 &ineq j end{cases}.
end{align*}



Then observe that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)
end{align*}



and that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega (e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)=omega(e^1,f^1)wedge omega(e^2,f^2)wedge cdots omega(e^n,f^n)=1neq 0.
end{align*}



Therefore, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega $ is nonzero.



Conversely, suppose that $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero. Clearly, note that $tilde{omega}:Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $tilde{omega}(X)=i_X(omega)$ is a homomorphism since $i_{X+Y}omega(Z)=omega(X+Y,Z)=omega(X,Z)+omega(Y,Z)=i_Xomega(Z)+i_Yomega(Z)$. We need to prove that $tilde{omega}$ is a bijection.
And assume that $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)=0$ for some $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. Then we can build a basis ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$. Since $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega(X,r^1,r^2,dots,r^{2n-1})=0$ and ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ is a basis of $V$, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega=0$ and it is a contradiction. Thus, $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)$ is nonzero for any $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. Then note that, for given $Xin Vsetminus {0}$, we have $Yin V$ such that $i_Xomega(Y)=omega(X,Y)neq 0$ (otherwise, for any collection ${Y^1,dots, Y^{2n-1}}subseteq V$, $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)(Y^1,dots, Y^{2n-1})=0wedge omega(Y^{2},Y^{3})wedge dots wedge omega(Y^{2n-2},Y^{2n-1})=0$). Then $ker tilde{omega}=0$, so $tilde{omega}$ is an injection. Then since $V$ and $V^*$ has same dimension, $tilde{omega}$ is a surjection so is a bijection. Therefore, $tilde{omega}$ is an isomorphism.




I mistakenly used the wrong computation of wedge product of alternating tensors.
I am pretty sure that I can adjust a little bit from here to make solid proof. I am still thinking about but seems I am missing something. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    You seem to think that for instance $(omega wedge omega)(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4) = omega(X_1, X_2)omega(X_3,X_4)$, but this is usually wrong as the wedges (the explicit one plus the implicit ones inside $omega$) force you to evaluate on every permutations of the $X_i$'s. There are different conventions in use for the wedge discarding or not the redundant evaluations coming from the (anti)symmetry of $omega$... In any case you should have obtained $factor * n! neq 0$, and later a sum also with terms involving $Y^1$ in place of other $Y^j$'s should appear when you aim to prove injectivity.
    – Jordan Payette
    Nov 29 at 15:59


















0















Suppose that $V$ is a vector space of dimension $2n$, and let $omega in Lambda^2(V)$. Prove that the following two statements are equivalent.



(1) $tilde{omega} : V rightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xmapsto omega(X,cdot)$ is an isomorphism.



(2) $omega^n=omega wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero.




What I have tried is




Suppose that the map $tilde{omega}: Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xrightarrow i_X omega$ is an isomorphism. Then we have the basis $(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)$ of $V$ such that
begin{align*}
&(1) text{ }omega(e^i,e^j)=omega(f^i,f^j)=0 hspace{3mm}forall i,j\
&(2)text{ } omega(e^i,f^j)=begin{cases} 1 &i=j\ 0 &ineq j end{cases}.
end{align*}



Then observe that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)
end{align*}



and that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega (e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)=omega(e^1,f^1)wedge omega(e^2,f^2)wedge cdots omega(e^n,f^n)=1neq 0.
end{align*}



Therefore, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega $ is nonzero.



Conversely, suppose that $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero. Clearly, note that $tilde{omega}:Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $tilde{omega}(X)=i_X(omega)$ is a homomorphism since $i_{X+Y}omega(Z)=omega(X+Y,Z)=omega(X,Z)+omega(Y,Z)=i_Xomega(Z)+i_Yomega(Z)$. We need to prove that $tilde{omega}$ is a bijection.
And assume that $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)=0$ for some $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. Then we can build a basis ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$. Since $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega(X,r^1,r^2,dots,r^{2n-1})=0$ and ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ is a basis of $V$, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega=0$ and it is a contradiction. Thus, $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)$ is nonzero for any $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. Then note that, for given $Xin Vsetminus {0}$, we have $Yin V$ such that $i_Xomega(Y)=omega(X,Y)neq 0$ (otherwise, for any collection ${Y^1,dots, Y^{2n-1}}subseteq V$, $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)(Y^1,dots, Y^{2n-1})=0wedge omega(Y^{2},Y^{3})wedge dots wedge omega(Y^{2n-2},Y^{2n-1})=0$). Then $ker tilde{omega}=0$, so $tilde{omega}$ is an injection. Then since $V$ and $V^*$ has same dimension, $tilde{omega}$ is a surjection so is a bijection. Therefore, $tilde{omega}$ is an isomorphism.




I mistakenly used the wrong computation of wedge product of alternating tensors.
I am pretty sure that I can adjust a little bit from here to make solid proof. I am still thinking about but seems I am missing something. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    You seem to think that for instance $(omega wedge omega)(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4) = omega(X_1, X_2)omega(X_3,X_4)$, but this is usually wrong as the wedges (the explicit one plus the implicit ones inside $omega$) force you to evaluate on every permutations of the $X_i$'s. There are different conventions in use for the wedge discarding or not the redundant evaluations coming from the (anti)symmetry of $omega$... In any case you should have obtained $factor * n! neq 0$, and later a sum also with terms involving $Y^1$ in place of other $Y^j$'s should appear when you aim to prove injectivity.
    – Jordan Payette
    Nov 29 at 15:59
















0












0








0








Suppose that $V$ is a vector space of dimension $2n$, and let $omega in Lambda^2(V)$. Prove that the following two statements are equivalent.



(1) $tilde{omega} : V rightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xmapsto omega(X,cdot)$ is an isomorphism.



(2) $omega^n=omega wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero.




What I have tried is




Suppose that the map $tilde{omega}: Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xrightarrow i_X omega$ is an isomorphism. Then we have the basis $(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)$ of $V$ such that
begin{align*}
&(1) text{ }omega(e^i,e^j)=omega(f^i,f^j)=0 hspace{3mm}forall i,j\
&(2)text{ } omega(e^i,f^j)=begin{cases} 1 &i=j\ 0 &ineq j end{cases}.
end{align*}



Then observe that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)
end{align*}



and that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega (e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)=omega(e^1,f^1)wedge omega(e^2,f^2)wedge cdots omega(e^n,f^n)=1neq 0.
end{align*}



Therefore, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega $ is nonzero.



Conversely, suppose that $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero. Clearly, note that $tilde{omega}:Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $tilde{omega}(X)=i_X(omega)$ is a homomorphism since $i_{X+Y}omega(Z)=omega(X+Y,Z)=omega(X,Z)+omega(Y,Z)=i_Xomega(Z)+i_Yomega(Z)$. We need to prove that $tilde{omega}$ is a bijection.
And assume that $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)=0$ for some $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. Then we can build a basis ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$. Since $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega(X,r^1,r^2,dots,r^{2n-1})=0$ and ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ is a basis of $V$, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega=0$ and it is a contradiction. Thus, $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)$ is nonzero for any $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. Then note that, for given $Xin Vsetminus {0}$, we have $Yin V$ such that $i_Xomega(Y)=omega(X,Y)neq 0$ (otherwise, for any collection ${Y^1,dots, Y^{2n-1}}subseteq V$, $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)(Y^1,dots, Y^{2n-1})=0wedge omega(Y^{2},Y^{3})wedge dots wedge omega(Y^{2n-2},Y^{2n-1})=0$). Then $ker tilde{omega}=0$, so $tilde{omega}$ is an injection. Then since $V$ and $V^*$ has same dimension, $tilde{omega}$ is a surjection so is a bijection. Therefore, $tilde{omega}$ is an isomorphism.




I mistakenly used the wrong computation of wedge product of alternating tensors.
I am pretty sure that I can adjust a little bit from here to make solid proof. I am still thinking about but seems I am missing something. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question














Suppose that $V$ is a vector space of dimension $2n$, and let $omega in Lambda^2(V)$. Prove that the following two statements are equivalent.



(1) $tilde{omega} : V rightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xmapsto omega(X,cdot)$ is an isomorphism.



(2) $omega^n=omega wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero.




What I have tried is




Suppose that the map $tilde{omega}: Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xrightarrow i_X omega$ is an isomorphism. Then we have the basis $(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)$ of $V$ such that
begin{align*}
&(1) text{ }omega(e^i,e^j)=omega(f^i,f^j)=0 hspace{3mm}forall i,j\
&(2)text{ } omega(e^i,f^j)=begin{cases} 1 &i=j\ 0 &ineq j end{cases}.
end{align*}



Then observe that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)
end{align*}



and that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega (e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)=omega(e^1,f^1)wedge omega(e^2,f^2)wedge cdots omega(e^n,f^n)=1neq 0.
end{align*}



Therefore, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega $ is nonzero.



Conversely, suppose that $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero. Clearly, note that $tilde{omega}:Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $tilde{omega}(X)=i_X(omega)$ is a homomorphism since $i_{X+Y}omega(Z)=omega(X+Y,Z)=omega(X,Z)+omega(Y,Z)=i_Xomega(Z)+i_Yomega(Z)$. We need to prove that $tilde{omega}$ is a bijection.
And assume that $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)=0$ for some $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. Then we can build a basis ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$. Since $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega(X,r^1,r^2,dots,r^{2n-1})=0$ and ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ is a basis of $V$, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega=0$ and it is a contradiction. Thus, $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)$ is nonzero for any $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. Then note that, for given $Xin Vsetminus {0}$, we have $Yin V$ such that $i_Xomega(Y)=omega(X,Y)neq 0$ (otherwise, for any collection ${Y^1,dots, Y^{2n-1}}subseteq V$, $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)(Y^1,dots, Y^{2n-1})=0wedge omega(Y^{2},Y^{3})wedge dots wedge omega(Y^{2n-2},Y^{2n-1})=0$). Then $ker tilde{omega}=0$, so $tilde{omega}$ is an injection. Then since $V$ and $V^*$ has same dimension, $tilde{omega}$ is a surjection so is a bijection. Therefore, $tilde{omega}$ is an isomorphism.




I mistakenly used the wrong computation of wedge product of alternating tensors.
I am pretty sure that I can adjust a little bit from here to make solid proof. I am still thinking about but seems I am missing something. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.







proof-verification exterior-algebra symplectic-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 28 at 22:59









LeB

955217




955217








  • 1




    You seem to think that for instance $(omega wedge omega)(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4) = omega(X_1, X_2)omega(X_3,X_4)$, but this is usually wrong as the wedges (the explicit one plus the implicit ones inside $omega$) force you to evaluate on every permutations of the $X_i$'s. There are different conventions in use for the wedge discarding or not the redundant evaluations coming from the (anti)symmetry of $omega$... In any case you should have obtained $factor * n! neq 0$, and later a sum also with terms involving $Y^1$ in place of other $Y^j$'s should appear when you aim to prove injectivity.
    – Jordan Payette
    Nov 29 at 15:59
















  • 1




    You seem to think that for instance $(omega wedge omega)(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4) = omega(X_1, X_2)omega(X_3,X_4)$, but this is usually wrong as the wedges (the explicit one plus the implicit ones inside $omega$) force you to evaluate on every permutations of the $X_i$'s. There are different conventions in use for the wedge discarding or not the redundant evaluations coming from the (anti)symmetry of $omega$... In any case you should have obtained $factor * n! neq 0$, and later a sum also with terms involving $Y^1$ in place of other $Y^j$'s should appear when you aim to prove injectivity.
    – Jordan Payette
    Nov 29 at 15:59










1




1




You seem to think that for instance $(omega wedge omega)(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4) = omega(X_1, X_2)omega(X_3,X_4)$, but this is usually wrong as the wedges (the explicit one plus the implicit ones inside $omega$) force you to evaluate on every permutations of the $X_i$'s. There are different conventions in use for the wedge discarding or not the redundant evaluations coming from the (anti)symmetry of $omega$... In any case you should have obtained $factor * n! neq 0$, and later a sum also with terms involving $Y^1$ in place of other $Y^j$'s should appear when you aim to prove injectivity.
– Jordan Payette
Nov 29 at 15:59






You seem to think that for instance $(omega wedge omega)(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4) = omega(X_1, X_2)omega(X_3,X_4)$, but this is usually wrong as the wedges (the explicit one plus the implicit ones inside $omega$) force you to evaluate on every permutations of the $X_i$'s. There are different conventions in use for the wedge discarding or not the redundant evaluations coming from the (anti)symmetry of $omega$... In any case you should have obtained $factor * n! neq 0$, and later a sum also with terms involving $Y^1$ in place of other $Y^j$'s should appear when you aim to prove injectivity.
– Jordan Payette
Nov 29 at 15:59












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I think I figure it out. I posted this solution for future.



Suppose that the map $tilde{omega}: Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xrightarrow i_X omega$ is an isomorphism. Then we have the basis $(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)$ of $V$ such that
begin{align*}
&(1) text{ }omega(e^i,e^j)=omega(f^i,f^j)=0 hspace{3mm}forall i,j\
&(2)text{ } omega(e^i,f^j)=begin{cases} 1 &i=j\ 0 &ineq j end{cases}.
end{align*}



Let ${epsilon^i,delta^i}$ be a dual basis such that
begin{align*}
&(1) epsilon^i(e^j)=begin{cases}1 &i=j \0 &ineq j end{cases} &(2) delta^i(f^j)=begin{cases}1 &i=j \0 &ineq j end{cases}\
&(3) epsilon^i(f^j)=0 hspace{4mm}forall i,j &(4) delta^i(e^j)=0 hspace{4mm}forall i,j.
end{align*}



Then observe that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)
end{align*}



and that, since $dim(Lambda^{2n}(V))=bigg(begin{matrix}
2n\2n
end{matrix} bigg)=1$
, for some integer $alphain mathbb{R}$,



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega (e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)&=alpha(epsilon^1wedge delta^1wedge epsilon^2wedge delta^2wedgecdots epsilon^nwedge delta^n)(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)\ &=alphasum_{sigma}sgn(sigma)epsilon^1(v_{sigma(1)})delta^1(v_{sigma(2)})cdots epsilon^n(v_{sigma(2n-1)})delta^n(v_{sigma(2n)})\
&=alpha(epsilon^1(e^1)delta^1(f^1)cdots epsilon^n(e^n)delta^n(f^n))\
&=alphaneq 0,
end{align*}

where
begin{align*}
v_i=begin{cases} e^m &text{ if }i=2m-1\ f^m &text{ if } i=2m end{cases} hspace{2cm} forall i in mathbb{Z}cap [1,2n].
end{align*}



Therefore, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega $ is nonzero.



Conversely, suppose that $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero. Clearly, note that $tilde{omega}:Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $tilde{omega}(X)=i_X(omega)$ is a homomorphism since $i_{X+Y}omega(Z)=omega(X+Y,Z)=omega(X,Z)+omega(Y,Z)=i_Xomega(Z)+i_Yomega(Z)$. We need to prove that $tilde{omega}$ is a bijection.



Assume that $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)=0$ for some $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. and $alphain mathbb{R}$ since $dim(Lambda^{2n}(V))=1$. Then we can build a basis ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$. Then, $forall vin V$, $v$ can be represented as linear combination of the elements in basis. Then, for any ${a^1,dots, a^{2n}}subseteq V$, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega(a^1,dots,a^{2n})=0$ since $omega$ is multilinear map. It contradicts to our assumption. Therefore, $i_X (omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)neq 0$ $forall Xin Vsetminus {0}$.



Let $Xin Vsetminus {0}$ be given. Note that
begin{align*}
i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)= (i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega+cdots + omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge (i_Xomega)=n{ (i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega }neq 0.
end{align*}



It implies that $(i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omeganeq 0$, thus, we should have $(i_Xomega)neq 0$. Thus, we have $Yin V$ such that $(i_Xomega)(Y)=omega(X,Y)neq 0$. Since $Xin Vsetminus {0}$ was arbitrary, $i_Xomega =0 iff X=0$. Then $ker tilde{omega}=0$, so $tilde{omega}$ is an injection. Then since $V$ and $V^*$ has same dimension, $tilde{omega}$ is a surjection so is a bijection. Therefore, $tilde{omega}$ is an isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I'd say that your original attempt was closer to a proof, since you really only had to take my comment on permutations into account. In this new attempt, to be thorough, you should explain why $omega = sum_i epsilon^i wedge delta^i$. Then you should note that the 2-forms $epsilon^i wedge delta^i$ commute, thus $omega ^n$ can be evaluated via the multinomial theorem: you should get that $omega^n = (n!) prod_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$. Then regardless of the convention for the wedge, evaluation on $prod_{i=1}^n e_i wedge f_i$ is nonzero (btw $n$ already denotes dimension)
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 2 at 23:45






  • 1




    Next the basis ${X, r^1, dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$ induces the basis ${X wedge r^1 wedge dots wedge r^{2n-1}}$ of $Lambda^n V$, so no real need to mention the $a^{j}$s. More importantly, it's not true that for any given nonzero $X$ there is $Y$ as you stated. And even if that were true, the terms $epsilon^i(X) delta^i(Y)$ could change sign so that $omega(X,Y)$ could be zero. The only lack of your original attempt was to take account of the permutations, which would give you a sum of terms each vanishing because of the absurd hypothesis $i_X omega = 0$.
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 2 at 23:54










  • @JordanPayette Thank you for letting me know the errors. I made many mistakes because I am new to alternating tensor products. Anyway, I was trying to fix it based on your comment. I could not follow some of your comments(i.e, $$omega=prod_{i=1}^{n}(epsilon^iwedge delta^i)$$) but it seems better and okay. Thank you again! :)
    – LeB
    Dec 3 at 20:12








  • 1




    Oops! I should have written $omega^n = n! wedge_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$, meaning $omega^n = (n!) epsilon^1 wedge delta^1 wedge epsilon^2 wedge dots wedge delta^n$. Hopefully it's more sensible to you this way!
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 3 at 21:58











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017878%2fequivalence-of-definition-of-symplectic-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














I think I figure it out. I posted this solution for future.



Suppose that the map $tilde{omega}: Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xrightarrow i_X omega$ is an isomorphism. Then we have the basis $(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)$ of $V$ such that
begin{align*}
&(1) text{ }omega(e^i,e^j)=omega(f^i,f^j)=0 hspace{3mm}forall i,j\
&(2)text{ } omega(e^i,f^j)=begin{cases} 1 &i=j\ 0 &ineq j end{cases}.
end{align*}



Let ${epsilon^i,delta^i}$ be a dual basis such that
begin{align*}
&(1) epsilon^i(e^j)=begin{cases}1 &i=j \0 &ineq j end{cases} &(2) delta^i(f^j)=begin{cases}1 &i=j \0 &ineq j end{cases}\
&(3) epsilon^i(f^j)=0 hspace{4mm}forall i,j &(4) delta^i(e^j)=0 hspace{4mm}forall i,j.
end{align*}



Then observe that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)
end{align*}



and that, since $dim(Lambda^{2n}(V))=bigg(begin{matrix}
2n\2n
end{matrix} bigg)=1$
, for some integer $alphain mathbb{R}$,



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega (e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)&=alpha(epsilon^1wedge delta^1wedge epsilon^2wedge delta^2wedgecdots epsilon^nwedge delta^n)(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)\ &=alphasum_{sigma}sgn(sigma)epsilon^1(v_{sigma(1)})delta^1(v_{sigma(2)})cdots epsilon^n(v_{sigma(2n-1)})delta^n(v_{sigma(2n)})\
&=alpha(epsilon^1(e^1)delta^1(f^1)cdots epsilon^n(e^n)delta^n(f^n))\
&=alphaneq 0,
end{align*}

where
begin{align*}
v_i=begin{cases} e^m &text{ if }i=2m-1\ f^m &text{ if } i=2m end{cases} hspace{2cm} forall i in mathbb{Z}cap [1,2n].
end{align*}



Therefore, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega $ is nonzero.



Conversely, suppose that $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero. Clearly, note that $tilde{omega}:Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $tilde{omega}(X)=i_X(omega)$ is a homomorphism since $i_{X+Y}omega(Z)=omega(X+Y,Z)=omega(X,Z)+omega(Y,Z)=i_Xomega(Z)+i_Yomega(Z)$. We need to prove that $tilde{omega}$ is a bijection.



Assume that $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)=0$ for some $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. and $alphain mathbb{R}$ since $dim(Lambda^{2n}(V))=1$. Then we can build a basis ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$. Then, $forall vin V$, $v$ can be represented as linear combination of the elements in basis. Then, for any ${a^1,dots, a^{2n}}subseteq V$, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega(a^1,dots,a^{2n})=0$ since $omega$ is multilinear map. It contradicts to our assumption. Therefore, $i_X (omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)neq 0$ $forall Xin Vsetminus {0}$.



Let $Xin Vsetminus {0}$ be given. Note that
begin{align*}
i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)= (i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega+cdots + omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge (i_Xomega)=n{ (i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega }neq 0.
end{align*}



It implies that $(i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omeganeq 0$, thus, we should have $(i_Xomega)neq 0$. Thus, we have $Yin V$ such that $(i_Xomega)(Y)=omega(X,Y)neq 0$. Since $Xin Vsetminus {0}$ was arbitrary, $i_Xomega =0 iff X=0$. Then $ker tilde{omega}=0$, so $tilde{omega}$ is an injection. Then since $V$ and $V^*$ has same dimension, $tilde{omega}$ is a surjection so is a bijection. Therefore, $tilde{omega}$ is an isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I'd say that your original attempt was closer to a proof, since you really only had to take my comment on permutations into account. In this new attempt, to be thorough, you should explain why $omega = sum_i epsilon^i wedge delta^i$. Then you should note that the 2-forms $epsilon^i wedge delta^i$ commute, thus $omega ^n$ can be evaluated via the multinomial theorem: you should get that $omega^n = (n!) prod_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$. Then regardless of the convention for the wedge, evaluation on $prod_{i=1}^n e_i wedge f_i$ is nonzero (btw $n$ already denotes dimension)
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 2 at 23:45






  • 1




    Next the basis ${X, r^1, dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$ induces the basis ${X wedge r^1 wedge dots wedge r^{2n-1}}$ of $Lambda^n V$, so no real need to mention the $a^{j}$s. More importantly, it's not true that for any given nonzero $X$ there is $Y$ as you stated. And even if that were true, the terms $epsilon^i(X) delta^i(Y)$ could change sign so that $omega(X,Y)$ could be zero. The only lack of your original attempt was to take account of the permutations, which would give you a sum of terms each vanishing because of the absurd hypothesis $i_X omega = 0$.
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 2 at 23:54










  • @JordanPayette Thank you for letting me know the errors. I made many mistakes because I am new to alternating tensor products. Anyway, I was trying to fix it based on your comment. I could not follow some of your comments(i.e, $$omega=prod_{i=1}^{n}(epsilon^iwedge delta^i)$$) but it seems better and okay. Thank you again! :)
    – LeB
    Dec 3 at 20:12








  • 1




    Oops! I should have written $omega^n = n! wedge_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$, meaning $omega^n = (n!) epsilon^1 wedge delta^1 wedge epsilon^2 wedge dots wedge delta^n$. Hopefully it's more sensible to you this way!
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 3 at 21:58
















0














I think I figure it out. I posted this solution for future.



Suppose that the map $tilde{omega}: Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xrightarrow i_X omega$ is an isomorphism. Then we have the basis $(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)$ of $V$ such that
begin{align*}
&(1) text{ }omega(e^i,e^j)=omega(f^i,f^j)=0 hspace{3mm}forall i,j\
&(2)text{ } omega(e^i,f^j)=begin{cases} 1 &i=j\ 0 &ineq j end{cases}.
end{align*}



Let ${epsilon^i,delta^i}$ be a dual basis such that
begin{align*}
&(1) epsilon^i(e^j)=begin{cases}1 &i=j \0 &ineq j end{cases} &(2) delta^i(f^j)=begin{cases}1 &i=j \0 &ineq j end{cases}\
&(3) epsilon^i(f^j)=0 hspace{4mm}forall i,j &(4) delta^i(e^j)=0 hspace{4mm}forall i,j.
end{align*}



Then observe that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)
end{align*}



and that, since $dim(Lambda^{2n}(V))=bigg(begin{matrix}
2n\2n
end{matrix} bigg)=1$
, for some integer $alphain mathbb{R}$,



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega (e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)&=alpha(epsilon^1wedge delta^1wedge epsilon^2wedge delta^2wedgecdots epsilon^nwedge delta^n)(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)\ &=alphasum_{sigma}sgn(sigma)epsilon^1(v_{sigma(1)})delta^1(v_{sigma(2)})cdots epsilon^n(v_{sigma(2n-1)})delta^n(v_{sigma(2n)})\
&=alpha(epsilon^1(e^1)delta^1(f^1)cdots epsilon^n(e^n)delta^n(f^n))\
&=alphaneq 0,
end{align*}

where
begin{align*}
v_i=begin{cases} e^m &text{ if }i=2m-1\ f^m &text{ if } i=2m end{cases} hspace{2cm} forall i in mathbb{Z}cap [1,2n].
end{align*}



Therefore, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega $ is nonzero.



Conversely, suppose that $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero. Clearly, note that $tilde{omega}:Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $tilde{omega}(X)=i_X(omega)$ is a homomorphism since $i_{X+Y}omega(Z)=omega(X+Y,Z)=omega(X,Z)+omega(Y,Z)=i_Xomega(Z)+i_Yomega(Z)$. We need to prove that $tilde{omega}$ is a bijection.



Assume that $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)=0$ for some $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. and $alphain mathbb{R}$ since $dim(Lambda^{2n}(V))=1$. Then we can build a basis ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$. Then, $forall vin V$, $v$ can be represented as linear combination of the elements in basis. Then, for any ${a^1,dots, a^{2n}}subseteq V$, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega(a^1,dots,a^{2n})=0$ since $omega$ is multilinear map. It contradicts to our assumption. Therefore, $i_X (omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)neq 0$ $forall Xin Vsetminus {0}$.



Let $Xin Vsetminus {0}$ be given. Note that
begin{align*}
i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)= (i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega+cdots + omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge (i_Xomega)=n{ (i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega }neq 0.
end{align*}



It implies that $(i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omeganeq 0$, thus, we should have $(i_Xomega)neq 0$. Thus, we have $Yin V$ such that $(i_Xomega)(Y)=omega(X,Y)neq 0$. Since $Xin Vsetminus {0}$ was arbitrary, $i_Xomega =0 iff X=0$. Then $ker tilde{omega}=0$, so $tilde{omega}$ is an injection. Then since $V$ and $V^*$ has same dimension, $tilde{omega}$ is a surjection so is a bijection. Therefore, $tilde{omega}$ is an isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I'd say that your original attempt was closer to a proof, since you really only had to take my comment on permutations into account. In this new attempt, to be thorough, you should explain why $omega = sum_i epsilon^i wedge delta^i$. Then you should note that the 2-forms $epsilon^i wedge delta^i$ commute, thus $omega ^n$ can be evaluated via the multinomial theorem: you should get that $omega^n = (n!) prod_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$. Then regardless of the convention for the wedge, evaluation on $prod_{i=1}^n e_i wedge f_i$ is nonzero (btw $n$ already denotes dimension)
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 2 at 23:45






  • 1




    Next the basis ${X, r^1, dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$ induces the basis ${X wedge r^1 wedge dots wedge r^{2n-1}}$ of $Lambda^n V$, so no real need to mention the $a^{j}$s. More importantly, it's not true that for any given nonzero $X$ there is $Y$ as you stated. And even if that were true, the terms $epsilon^i(X) delta^i(Y)$ could change sign so that $omega(X,Y)$ could be zero. The only lack of your original attempt was to take account of the permutations, which would give you a sum of terms each vanishing because of the absurd hypothesis $i_X omega = 0$.
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 2 at 23:54










  • @JordanPayette Thank you for letting me know the errors. I made many mistakes because I am new to alternating tensor products. Anyway, I was trying to fix it based on your comment. I could not follow some of your comments(i.e, $$omega=prod_{i=1}^{n}(epsilon^iwedge delta^i)$$) but it seems better and okay. Thank you again! :)
    – LeB
    Dec 3 at 20:12








  • 1




    Oops! I should have written $omega^n = n! wedge_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$, meaning $omega^n = (n!) epsilon^1 wedge delta^1 wedge epsilon^2 wedge dots wedge delta^n$. Hopefully it's more sensible to you this way!
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 3 at 21:58














0












0








0






I think I figure it out. I posted this solution for future.



Suppose that the map $tilde{omega}: Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xrightarrow i_X omega$ is an isomorphism. Then we have the basis $(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)$ of $V$ such that
begin{align*}
&(1) text{ }omega(e^i,e^j)=omega(f^i,f^j)=0 hspace{3mm}forall i,j\
&(2)text{ } omega(e^i,f^j)=begin{cases} 1 &i=j\ 0 &ineq j end{cases}.
end{align*}



Let ${epsilon^i,delta^i}$ be a dual basis such that
begin{align*}
&(1) epsilon^i(e^j)=begin{cases}1 &i=j \0 &ineq j end{cases} &(2) delta^i(f^j)=begin{cases}1 &i=j \0 &ineq j end{cases}\
&(3) epsilon^i(f^j)=0 hspace{4mm}forall i,j &(4) delta^i(e^j)=0 hspace{4mm}forall i,j.
end{align*}



Then observe that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)
end{align*}



and that, since $dim(Lambda^{2n}(V))=bigg(begin{matrix}
2n\2n
end{matrix} bigg)=1$
, for some integer $alphain mathbb{R}$,



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega (e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)&=alpha(epsilon^1wedge delta^1wedge epsilon^2wedge delta^2wedgecdots epsilon^nwedge delta^n)(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)\ &=alphasum_{sigma}sgn(sigma)epsilon^1(v_{sigma(1)})delta^1(v_{sigma(2)})cdots epsilon^n(v_{sigma(2n-1)})delta^n(v_{sigma(2n)})\
&=alpha(epsilon^1(e^1)delta^1(f^1)cdots epsilon^n(e^n)delta^n(f^n))\
&=alphaneq 0,
end{align*}

where
begin{align*}
v_i=begin{cases} e^m &text{ if }i=2m-1\ f^m &text{ if } i=2m end{cases} hspace{2cm} forall i in mathbb{Z}cap [1,2n].
end{align*}



Therefore, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega $ is nonzero.



Conversely, suppose that $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero. Clearly, note that $tilde{omega}:Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $tilde{omega}(X)=i_X(omega)$ is a homomorphism since $i_{X+Y}omega(Z)=omega(X+Y,Z)=omega(X,Z)+omega(Y,Z)=i_Xomega(Z)+i_Yomega(Z)$. We need to prove that $tilde{omega}$ is a bijection.



Assume that $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)=0$ for some $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. and $alphain mathbb{R}$ since $dim(Lambda^{2n}(V))=1$. Then we can build a basis ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$. Then, $forall vin V$, $v$ can be represented as linear combination of the elements in basis. Then, for any ${a^1,dots, a^{2n}}subseteq V$, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega(a^1,dots,a^{2n})=0$ since $omega$ is multilinear map. It contradicts to our assumption. Therefore, $i_X (omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)neq 0$ $forall Xin Vsetminus {0}$.



Let $Xin Vsetminus {0}$ be given. Note that
begin{align*}
i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)= (i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega+cdots + omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge (i_Xomega)=n{ (i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega }neq 0.
end{align*}



It implies that $(i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omeganeq 0$, thus, we should have $(i_Xomega)neq 0$. Thus, we have $Yin V$ such that $(i_Xomega)(Y)=omega(X,Y)neq 0$. Since $Xin Vsetminus {0}$ was arbitrary, $i_Xomega =0 iff X=0$. Then $ker tilde{omega}=0$, so $tilde{omega}$ is an injection. Then since $V$ and $V^*$ has same dimension, $tilde{omega}$ is a surjection so is a bijection. Therefore, $tilde{omega}$ is an isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer














I think I figure it out. I posted this solution for future.



Suppose that the map $tilde{omega}: Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $Xrightarrow i_X omega$ is an isomorphism. Then we have the basis $(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)$ of $V$ such that
begin{align*}
&(1) text{ }omega(e^i,e^j)=omega(f^i,f^j)=0 hspace{3mm}forall i,j\
&(2)text{ } omega(e^i,f^j)=begin{cases} 1 &i=j\ 0 &ineq j end{cases}.
end{align*}



Let ${epsilon^i,delta^i}$ be a dual basis such that
begin{align*}
&(1) epsilon^i(e^j)=begin{cases}1 &i=j \0 &ineq j end{cases} &(2) delta^i(f^j)=begin{cases}1 &i=j \0 &ineq j end{cases}\
&(3) epsilon^i(f^j)=0 hspace{4mm}forall i,j &(4) delta^i(e^j)=0 hspace{4mm}forall i,j.
end{align*}



Then observe that



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)
end{align*}



and that, since $dim(Lambda^{2n}(V))=bigg(begin{matrix}
2n\2n
end{matrix} bigg)=1$
, for some integer $alphain mathbb{R}$,



begin{align*}
omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega (e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)&=alpha(epsilon^1wedge delta^1wedge epsilon^2wedge delta^2wedgecdots epsilon^nwedge delta^n)(e^1,f^1,e^2,f^2,dots, e^n,f^n)\ &=alphasum_{sigma}sgn(sigma)epsilon^1(v_{sigma(1)})delta^1(v_{sigma(2)})cdots epsilon^n(v_{sigma(2n-1)})delta^n(v_{sigma(2n)})\
&=alpha(epsilon^1(e^1)delta^1(f^1)cdots epsilon^n(e^n)delta^n(f^n))\
&=alphaneq 0,
end{align*}

where
begin{align*}
v_i=begin{cases} e^m &text{ if }i=2m-1\ f^m &text{ if } i=2m end{cases} hspace{2cm} forall i in mathbb{Z}cap [1,2n].
end{align*}



Therefore, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega $ is nonzero.



Conversely, suppose that $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega in Lambda^{2n}(V)$ is nonzero. Clearly, note that $tilde{omega}:Vrightarrow V^*$ defined by $tilde{omega}(X)=i_X(omega)$ is a homomorphism since $i_{X+Y}omega(Z)=omega(X+Y,Z)=omega(X,Z)+omega(Y,Z)=i_Xomega(Z)+i_Yomega(Z)$. We need to prove that $tilde{omega}$ is a bijection.



Assume that $i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)=0$ for some $Xin Vsetminus {0}$. and $alphain mathbb{R}$ since $dim(Lambda^{2n}(V))=1$. Then we can build a basis ${X,r^1,r^2,dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$. Then, $forall vin V$, $v$ can be represented as linear combination of the elements in basis. Then, for any ${a^1,dots, a^{2n}}subseteq V$, $omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega(a^1,dots,a^{2n})=0$ since $omega$ is multilinear map. It contradicts to our assumption. Therefore, $i_X (omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)neq 0$ $forall Xin Vsetminus {0}$.



Let $Xin Vsetminus {0}$ be given. Note that
begin{align*}
i_X(omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega)= (i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega+cdots + omegawedge omega wedge cdots wedge (i_Xomega)=n{ (i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omega }neq 0.
end{align*}



It implies that $(i_Xomega)wedge omega wedge cdots wedge omeganeq 0$, thus, we should have $(i_Xomega)neq 0$. Thus, we have $Yin V$ such that $(i_Xomega)(Y)=omega(X,Y)neq 0$. Since $Xin Vsetminus {0}$ was arbitrary, $i_Xomega =0 iff X=0$. Then $ker tilde{omega}=0$, so $tilde{omega}$ is an injection. Then since $V$ and $V^*$ has same dimension, $tilde{omega}$ is a surjection so is a bijection. Therefore, $tilde{omega}$ is an isomorphism.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 at 20:09

























answered Nov 30 at 21:52









LeB

955217




955217








  • 1




    I'd say that your original attempt was closer to a proof, since you really only had to take my comment on permutations into account. In this new attempt, to be thorough, you should explain why $omega = sum_i epsilon^i wedge delta^i$. Then you should note that the 2-forms $epsilon^i wedge delta^i$ commute, thus $omega ^n$ can be evaluated via the multinomial theorem: you should get that $omega^n = (n!) prod_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$. Then regardless of the convention for the wedge, evaluation on $prod_{i=1}^n e_i wedge f_i$ is nonzero (btw $n$ already denotes dimension)
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 2 at 23:45






  • 1




    Next the basis ${X, r^1, dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$ induces the basis ${X wedge r^1 wedge dots wedge r^{2n-1}}$ of $Lambda^n V$, so no real need to mention the $a^{j}$s. More importantly, it's not true that for any given nonzero $X$ there is $Y$ as you stated. And even if that were true, the terms $epsilon^i(X) delta^i(Y)$ could change sign so that $omega(X,Y)$ could be zero. The only lack of your original attempt was to take account of the permutations, which would give you a sum of terms each vanishing because of the absurd hypothesis $i_X omega = 0$.
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 2 at 23:54










  • @JordanPayette Thank you for letting me know the errors. I made many mistakes because I am new to alternating tensor products. Anyway, I was trying to fix it based on your comment. I could not follow some of your comments(i.e, $$omega=prod_{i=1}^{n}(epsilon^iwedge delta^i)$$) but it seems better and okay. Thank you again! :)
    – LeB
    Dec 3 at 20:12








  • 1




    Oops! I should have written $omega^n = n! wedge_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$, meaning $omega^n = (n!) epsilon^1 wedge delta^1 wedge epsilon^2 wedge dots wedge delta^n$. Hopefully it's more sensible to you this way!
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 3 at 21:58














  • 1




    I'd say that your original attempt was closer to a proof, since you really only had to take my comment on permutations into account. In this new attempt, to be thorough, you should explain why $omega = sum_i epsilon^i wedge delta^i$. Then you should note that the 2-forms $epsilon^i wedge delta^i$ commute, thus $omega ^n$ can be evaluated via the multinomial theorem: you should get that $omega^n = (n!) prod_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$. Then regardless of the convention for the wedge, evaluation on $prod_{i=1}^n e_i wedge f_i$ is nonzero (btw $n$ already denotes dimension)
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 2 at 23:45






  • 1




    Next the basis ${X, r^1, dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$ induces the basis ${X wedge r^1 wedge dots wedge r^{2n-1}}$ of $Lambda^n V$, so no real need to mention the $a^{j}$s. More importantly, it's not true that for any given nonzero $X$ there is $Y$ as you stated. And even if that were true, the terms $epsilon^i(X) delta^i(Y)$ could change sign so that $omega(X,Y)$ could be zero. The only lack of your original attempt was to take account of the permutations, which would give you a sum of terms each vanishing because of the absurd hypothesis $i_X omega = 0$.
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 2 at 23:54










  • @JordanPayette Thank you for letting me know the errors. I made many mistakes because I am new to alternating tensor products. Anyway, I was trying to fix it based on your comment. I could not follow some of your comments(i.e, $$omega=prod_{i=1}^{n}(epsilon^iwedge delta^i)$$) but it seems better and okay. Thank you again! :)
    – LeB
    Dec 3 at 20:12








  • 1




    Oops! I should have written $omega^n = n! wedge_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$, meaning $omega^n = (n!) epsilon^1 wedge delta^1 wedge epsilon^2 wedge dots wedge delta^n$. Hopefully it's more sensible to you this way!
    – Jordan Payette
    Dec 3 at 21:58








1




1




I'd say that your original attempt was closer to a proof, since you really only had to take my comment on permutations into account. In this new attempt, to be thorough, you should explain why $omega = sum_i epsilon^i wedge delta^i$. Then you should note that the 2-forms $epsilon^i wedge delta^i$ commute, thus $omega ^n$ can be evaluated via the multinomial theorem: you should get that $omega^n = (n!) prod_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$. Then regardless of the convention for the wedge, evaluation on $prod_{i=1}^n e_i wedge f_i$ is nonzero (btw $n$ already denotes dimension)
– Jordan Payette
Dec 2 at 23:45




I'd say that your original attempt was closer to a proof, since you really only had to take my comment on permutations into account. In this new attempt, to be thorough, you should explain why $omega = sum_i epsilon^i wedge delta^i$. Then you should note that the 2-forms $epsilon^i wedge delta^i$ commute, thus $omega ^n$ can be evaluated via the multinomial theorem: you should get that $omega^n = (n!) prod_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$. Then regardless of the convention for the wedge, evaluation on $prod_{i=1}^n e_i wedge f_i$ is nonzero (btw $n$ already denotes dimension)
– Jordan Payette
Dec 2 at 23:45




1




1




Next the basis ${X, r^1, dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$ induces the basis ${X wedge r^1 wedge dots wedge r^{2n-1}}$ of $Lambda^n V$, so no real need to mention the $a^{j}$s. More importantly, it's not true that for any given nonzero $X$ there is $Y$ as you stated. And even if that were true, the terms $epsilon^i(X) delta^i(Y)$ could change sign so that $omega(X,Y)$ could be zero. The only lack of your original attempt was to take account of the permutations, which would give you a sum of terms each vanishing because of the absurd hypothesis $i_X omega = 0$.
– Jordan Payette
Dec 2 at 23:54




Next the basis ${X, r^1, dots, r^{2n-1}}$ of $V$ induces the basis ${X wedge r^1 wedge dots wedge r^{2n-1}}$ of $Lambda^n V$, so no real need to mention the $a^{j}$s. More importantly, it's not true that for any given nonzero $X$ there is $Y$ as you stated. And even if that were true, the terms $epsilon^i(X) delta^i(Y)$ could change sign so that $omega(X,Y)$ could be zero. The only lack of your original attempt was to take account of the permutations, which would give you a sum of terms each vanishing because of the absurd hypothesis $i_X omega = 0$.
– Jordan Payette
Dec 2 at 23:54












@JordanPayette Thank you for letting me know the errors. I made many mistakes because I am new to alternating tensor products. Anyway, I was trying to fix it based on your comment. I could not follow some of your comments(i.e, $$omega=prod_{i=1}^{n}(epsilon^iwedge delta^i)$$) but it seems better and okay. Thank you again! :)
– LeB
Dec 3 at 20:12






@JordanPayette Thank you for letting me know the errors. I made many mistakes because I am new to alternating tensor products. Anyway, I was trying to fix it based on your comment. I could not follow some of your comments(i.e, $$omega=prod_{i=1}^{n}(epsilon^iwedge delta^i)$$) but it seems better and okay. Thank you again! :)
– LeB
Dec 3 at 20:12






1




1




Oops! I should have written $omega^n = n! wedge_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$, meaning $omega^n = (n!) epsilon^1 wedge delta^1 wedge epsilon^2 wedge dots wedge delta^n$. Hopefully it's more sensible to you this way!
– Jordan Payette
Dec 3 at 21:58




Oops! I should have written $omega^n = n! wedge_{i=1}^n (epsilon^i wedge delta^i)$, meaning $omega^n = (n!) epsilon^1 wedge delta^1 wedge epsilon^2 wedge dots wedge delta^n$. Hopefully it's more sensible to you this way!
– Jordan Payette
Dec 3 at 21:58


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017878%2fequivalence-of-definition-of-symplectic-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Tonle Sap (See)

I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft