Exponential map on the Fisher manifold for exponential family distribution
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
So, I don't really understand too well Diff. Geometry and Manifolds currently. Hence, I've started studying it and it is very interesting. However, atm I just need to understand how to compute the exponential map for the Fisher manifold of exponential family distributions. Unfortunately, this is a timely manner so I'm afaraid I will need to do this before I actually learn it properly following my study.
Essentially, I'm interested in understanding given that we have a predefined Riemannian metric tensor (in this case the Fisher matrix), as I understand the exponential map will give me given a tangent vector a point $p$ the unique geodesic that is in the same direction as the tangent vector at unit speed. To me this suggest that one should be able to setup this as an optimization problem, whose solution (if anayltically exists) defines the exponential map. However, for some reason I don't seem to be able to derive this accordingly.
For instance consider a Gaussian distribution with fixed mean 0 and a covariance matrix $Sigma$. Consider the Fisher Manifold with respect to the covariance. The Fisher matrix is
$$frac{Sigma^{-1} otimes Sigma^{-1}}{2}$$
Given this information what is the actual mathematical problem that one needs to setup in order to arrive at (taken from http://www.dima.unige.it/~riccomag/Pistone-2017-01-23.pdf):
$$
Exp(tM;Sigma) = Sigma^{frac{1}{2}} exp left[Sigma^{-frac{1}{2}} (tV) Sigma^{-frac{1}{2}} right] Sigma^{frac{1}{2}}
$$
manifolds riemannian-geometry fisher-information information-geometry
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
So, I don't really understand too well Diff. Geometry and Manifolds currently. Hence, I've started studying it and it is very interesting. However, atm I just need to understand how to compute the exponential map for the Fisher manifold of exponential family distributions. Unfortunately, this is a timely manner so I'm afaraid I will need to do this before I actually learn it properly following my study.
Essentially, I'm interested in understanding given that we have a predefined Riemannian metric tensor (in this case the Fisher matrix), as I understand the exponential map will give me given a tangent vector a point $p$ the unique geodesic that is in the same direction as the tangent vector at unit speed. To me this suggest that one should be able to setup this as an optimization problem, whose solution (if anayltically exists) defines the exponential map. However, for some reason I don't seem to be able to derive this accordingly.
For instance consider a Gaussian distribution with fixed mean 0 and a covariance matrix $Sigma$. Consider the Fisher Manifold with respect to the covariance. The Fisher matrix is
$$frac{Sigma^{-1} otimes Sigma^{-1}}{2}$$
Given this information what is the actual mathematical problem that one needs to setup in order to arrive at (taken from http://www.dima.unige.it/~riccomag/Pistone-2017-01-23.pdf):
$$
Exp(tM;Sigma) = Sigma^{frac{1}{2}} exp left[Sigma^{-frac{1}{2}} (tV) Sigma^{-frac{1}{2}} right] Sigma^{frac{1}{2}}
$$
manifolds riemannian-geometry fisher-information information-geometry
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
So, I don't really understand too well Diff. Geometry and Manifolds currently. Hence, I've started studying it and it is very interesting. However, atm I just need to understand how to compute the exponential map for the Fisher manifold of exponential family distributions. Unfortunately, this is a timely manner so I'm afaraid I will need to do this before I actually learn it properly following my study.
Essentially, I'm interested in understanding given that we have a predefined Riemannian metric tensor (in this case the Fisher matrix), as I understand the exponential map will give me given a tangent vector a point $p$ the unique geodesic that is in the same direction as the tangent vector at unit speed. To me this suggest that one should be able to setup this as an optimization problem, whose solution (if anayltically exists) defines the exponential map. However, for some reason I don't seem to be able to derive this accordingly.
For instance consider a Gaussian distribution with fixed mean 0 and a covariance matrix $Sigma$. Consider the Fisher Manifold with respect to the covariance. The Fisher matrix is
$$frac{Sigma^{-1} otimes Sigma^{-1}}{2}$$
Given this information what is the actual mathematical problem that one needs to setup in order to arrive at (taken from http://www.dima.unige.it/~riccomag/Pistone-2017-01-23.pdf):
$$
Exp(tM;Sigma) = Sigma^{frac{1}{2}} exp left[Sigma^{-frac{1}{2}} (tV) Sigma^{-frac{1}{2}} right] Sigma^{frac{1}{2}}
$$
manifolds riemannian-geometry fisher-information information-geometry
So, I don't really understand too well Diff. Geometry and Manifolds currently. Hence, I've started studying it and it is very interesting. However, atm I just need to understand how to compute the exponential map for the Fisher manifold of exponential family distributions. Unfortunately, this is a timely manner so I'm afaraid I will need to do this before I actually learn it properly following my study.
Essentially, I'm interested in understanding given that we have a predefined Riemannian metric tensor (in this case the Fisher matrix), as I understand the exponential map will give me given a tangent vector a point $p$ the unique geodesic that is in the same direction as the tangent vector at unit speed. To me this suggest that one should be able to setup this as an optimization problem, whose solution (if anayltically exists) defines the exponential map. However, for some reason I don't seem to be able to derive this accordingly.
For instance consider a Gaussian distribution with fixed mean 0 and a covariance matrix $Sigma$. Consider the Fisher Manifold with respect to the covariance. The Fisher matrix is
$$frac{Sigma^{-1} otimes Sigma^{-1}}{2}$$
Given this information what is the actual mathematical problem that one needs to setup in order to arrive at (taken from http://www.dima.unige.it/~riccomag/Pistone-2017-01-23.pdf):
$$
Exp(tM;Sigma) = Sigma^{frac{1}{2}} exp left[Sigma^{-frac{1}{2}} (tV) Sigma^{-frac{1}{2}} right] Sigma^{frac{1}{2}}
$$
manifolds riemannian-geometry fisher-information information-geometry
manifolds riemannian-geometry fisher-information information-geometry
asked Nov 21 at 20:06
Alex Botev
674314
674314
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
"Geodesic shooting" method for computating gesodesic distance between 2 multivariate densities of different means aand different covariance matrices:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7497346
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
"Geodesic shooting" method for computating gesodesic distance between 2 multivariate densities of different means aand different covariance matrices:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7497346
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
"Geodesic shooting" method for computating gesodesic distance between 2 multivariate densities of different means aand different covariance matrices:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7497346
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
"Geodesic shooting" method for computating gesodesic distance between 2 multivariate densities of different means aand different covariance matrices:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7497346
"Geodesic shooting" method for computating gesodesic distance between 2 multivariate densities of different means aand different covariance matrices:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7497346
answered Nov 22 at 20:22
Frederic Barbaresco
362
362
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008277%2fexponential-map-on-the-fisher-manifold-for-exponential-family-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown