In PostGreSQL should the back references of a regexp_replace work in a CASE statement?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Example (the ELSE always gets chosen):



SELECT regexp_replace('ABCDEFG','(C)(D)', CASE WHEN '1' = 'C' THEN '+21+' ELSE '-12-' END);
**returns =>** AB-CD-EFG

SELECT regexp_replace('ABCDEFG','(C)(D)', CASE '1' WHEN 'C' THEN '+21+' ELSE '-12-' END);
**returns =>** AB-CD-EFG


Is there a way to make this work?










share|improve this question






















  • It seems the '1' in the WHEN is a literal and not a back-reference but the result in the THEN can contain back-references. I am using PostGres 9.4.
    – Pete
    Nov 19 at 22:27

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Example (the ELSE always gets chosen):



SELECT regexp_replace('ABCDEFG','(C)(D)', CASE WHEN '1' = 'C' THEN '+21+' ELSE '-12-' END);
**returns =>** AB-CD-EFG

SELECT regexp_replace('ABCDEFG','(C)(D)', CASE '1' WHEN 'C' THEN '+21+' ELSE '-12-' END);
**returns =>** AB-CD-EFG


Is there a way to make this work?










share|improve this question






















  • It seems the '1' in the WHEN is a literal and not a back-reference but the result in the THEN can contain back-references. I am using PostGres 9.4.
    – Pete
    Nov 19 at 22:27















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Example (the ELSE always gets chosen):



SELECT regexp_replace('ABCDEFG','(C)(D)', CASE WHEN '1' = 'C' THEN '+21+' ELSE '-12-' END);
**returns =>** AB-CD-EFG

SELECT regexp_replace('ABCDEFG','(C)(D)', CASE '1' WHEN 'C' THEN '+21+' ELSE '-12-' END);
**returns =>** AB-CD-EFG


Is there a way to make this work?










share|improve this question













Example (the ELSE always gets chosen):



SELECT regexp_replace('ABCDEFG','(C)(D)', CASE WHEN '1' = 'C' THEN '+21+' ELSE '-12-' END);
**returns =>** AB-CD-EFG

SELECT regexp_replace('ABCDEFG','(C)(D)', CASE '1' WHEN 'C' THEN '+21+' ELSE '-12-' END);
**returns =>** AB-CD-EFG


Is there a way to make this work?







regex postgresql switch-statement






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 19 at 21:42









Pete

34036




34036












  • It seems the '1' in the WHEN is a literal and not a back-reference but the result in the THEN can contain back-references. I am using PostGres 9.4.
    – Pete
    Nov 19 at 22:27




















  • It seems the '1' in the WHEN is a literal and not a back-reference but the result in the THEN can contain back-references. I am using PostGres 9.4.
    – Pete
    Nov 19 at 22:27


















It seems the '1' in the WHEN is a literal and not a back-reference but the result in the THEN can contain back-references. I am using PostGres 9.4.
– Pete
Nov 19 at 22:27






It seems the '1' in the WHEN is a literal and not a back-reference but the result in the THEN can contain back-references. I am using PostGres 9.4.
– Pete
Nov 19 at 22:27














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













No it shouldn't.



I would use regexp_match with groups for the stuff before C and after D as well, and then construct the result from the matched parts using CASE and concatenation.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53383060%2fin-postgresql-should-the-back-references-of-a-regexp-replace-work-in-a-case-stat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    No it shouldn't.



    I would use regexp_match with groups for the stuff before C and after D as well, and then construct the result from the matched parts using CASE and concatenation.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      No it shouldn't.



      I would use regexp_match with groups for the stuff before C and after D as well, and then construct the result from the matched parts using CASE and concatenation.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        No it shouldn't.



        I would use regexp_match with groups for the stuff before C and after D as well, and then construct the result from the matched parts using CASE and concatenation.






        share|improve this answer












        No it shouldn't.



        I would use regexp_match with groups for the stuff before C and after D as well, and then construct the result from the matched parts using CASE and concatenation.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 19 at 22:29









        Alexey Bashtanov

        37435




        37435






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53383060%2fin-postgresql-should-the-back-references-of-a-regexp-replace-work-in-a-case-stat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen