How many irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ exist over $mathbb{F}_p$?
I know that for every $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, there exists $p(x)inmathbb{F}_p[x]$ s.t. $deg p(x)=n$ and $p(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_p$.
I am interested in counting how many such $p(x)$ there exist (that is, given $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, how many irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ exist over $mathbb{F}_p$).
I don't have a counting strategy and I don't expect a closed formula, but maybe we can find something like "there exist $X$ irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ where $X$ is the number of...".
What are your thoughts ?
abstract-algebra polynomials field-theory finite-fields irreducible-polynomials
add a comment |
I know that for every $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, there exists $p(x)inmathbb{F}_p[x]$ s.t. $deg p(x)=n$ and $p(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_p$.
I am interested in counting how many such $p(x)$ there exist (that is, given $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, how many irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ exist over $mathbb{F}_p$).
I don't have a counting strategy and I don't expect a closed formula, but maybe we can find something like "there exist $X$ irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ where $X$ is the number of...".
What are your thoughts ?
abstract-algebra polynomials field-theory finite-fields irreducible-polynomials
2
This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jun 2 '12 at 16:16
@JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
– user386627
May 8 '17 at 13:39
add a comment |
I know that for every $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, there exists $p(x)inmathbb{F}_p[x]$ s.t. $deg p(x)=n$ and $p(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_p$.
I am interested in counting how many such $p(x)$ there exist (that is, given $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, how many irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ exist over $mathbb{F}_p$).
I don't have a counting strategy and I don't expect a closed formula, but maybe we can find something like "there exist $X$ irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ where $X$ is the number of...".
What are your thoughts ?
abstract-algebra polynomials field-theory finite-fields irreducible-polynomials
I know that for every $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, there exists $p(x)inmathbb{F}_p[x]$ s.t. $deg p(x)=n$ and $p(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_p$.
I am interested in counting how many such $p(x)$ there exist (that is, given $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, how many irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ exist over $mathbb{F}_p$).
I don't have a counting strategy and I don't expect a closed formula, but maybe we can find something like "there exist $X$ irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ where $X$ is the number of...".
What are your thoughts ?
abstract-algebra polynomials field-theory finite-fields irreducible-polynomials
abstract-algebra polynomials field-theory finite-fields irreducible-polynomials
edited Jul 22 '16 at 15:50
Watson
15.8k92970
15.8k92970
asked Jun 2 '12 at 14:46
Belgi
14.5k954112
14.5k954112
2
This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jun 2 '12 at 16:16
@JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
– user386627
May 8 '17 at 13:39
add a comment |
2
This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jun 2 '12 at 16:16
@JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
– user386627
May 8 '17 at 13:39
2
2
This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jun 2 '12 at 16:16
This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jun 2 '12 at 16:16
@JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
– user386627
May 8 '17 at 13:39
@JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
– user386627
May 8 '17 at 13:39
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Theorem: Let $mu(n)$ denote the Möbius function. The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ is the necklace polynomial
$$M_n(q) = frac{1}{n} sum_{d | n} mu(d) q^{n/d}.$$
(To get the number of irreducible polynomials just multiply by $q - 1$.)
Proof. Let $M_n(q)$ denote the number in question. Recall that $x^{q^n} - x$ is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree dividing $n$. By counting degrees, it follows that
$$q^n = sum_{d | n} d M_d(q)$$
(since each polynomial of degree $d$ contributes $d$ to the total degree). By Möbius inversion, the result follows.
As it turns out, $M_n(q)$ has a combinatorial interpretation for all values of $q$: it counts the number of aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters, where a necklace is a word considered up to cyclic permutation and an aperiodic necklace of length $n$ is a word which is not invariant under a cyclic permutation by $d$ for any $d < n$. More precisely, the cyclic group $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ acts by cyclic permutation on the set of functions $[n] to [q]$, and $M_n(q)$ counts the number of orbits of size $n$ of this group action. This result also follows from Möbius inversion.
One might therefore ask for an explicit bijection between aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters and monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ when $q$ is a prime power, or at least I did a few years ago and it turns out to be quite elegant.
Let me also mention that the above closed form immediately leads to the "function field prime number theorem." Let the absolute value of a polynomial of degree $d$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ be $q^d$. (You can think of this as the size of the quotient $mathbb{F}_q[x]/f(x)$, so in that sense it is analogous to the norm of an element of the ring of integers of a number field.) Then the above formula shows that the number of monic irreducible polynomials $pi(n)$ of absolute value less than or equal to $n$ satisfies
$$pi(n) sim frac{n}{log_q n}.$$
1
Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Aug 4 '13 at 21:39
1
@Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
– Qiaochu Yuan
Aug 4 '13 at 21:54
add a comment |
With regards to your question, this paper has a formula for counting the number of monic irreducibles over a finite field.
add a comment |
The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ equals
$$frac{1}{n} cdot sum_{d|n} p^d muleft(frac{n}{d}right)$$
where $mu$ is the Möbius function. This follows rather easily from the Möbius inversion formula. You can find details here. Note that this in particular implies the existence of one irreducible polynomial and therefore of the field with $p^n$ elements.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152880%2fhow-many-irreducible-polynomials-of-degree-n-exist-over-mathbbf-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Theorem: Let $mu(n)$ denote the Möbius function. The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ is the necklace polynomial
$$M_n(q) = frac{1}{n} sum_{d | n} mu(d) q^{n/d}.$$
(To get the number of irreducible polynomials just multiply by $q - 1$.)
Proof. Let $M_n(q)$ denote the number in question. Recall that $x^{q^n} - x$ is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree dividing $n$. By counting degrees, it follows that
$$q^n = sum_{d | n} d M_d(q)$$
(since each polynomial of degree $d$ contributes $d$ to the total degree). By Möbius inversion, the result follows.
As it turns out, $M_n(q)$ has a combinatorial interpretation for all values of $q$: it counts the number of aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters, where a necklace is a word considered up to cyclic permutation and an aperiodic necklace of length $n$ is a word which is not invariant under a cyclic permutation by $d$ for any $d < n$. More precisely, the cyclic group $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ acts by cyclic permutation on the set of functions $[n] to [q]$, and $M_n(q)$ counts the number of orbits of size $n$ of this group action. This result also follows from Möbius inversion.
One might therefore ask for an explicit bijection between aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters and monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ when $q$ is a prime power, or at least I did a few years ago and it turns out to be quite elegant.
Let me also mention that the above closed form immediately leads to the "function field prime number theorem." Let the absolute value of a polynomial of degree $d$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ be $q^d$. (You can think of this as the size of the quotient $mathbb{F}_q[x]/f(x)$, so in that sense it is analogous to the norm of an element of the ring of integers of a number field.) Then the above formula shows that the number of monic irreducible polynomials $pi(n)$ of absolute value less than or equal to $n$ satisfies
$$pi(n) sim frac{n}{log_q n}.$$
1
Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Aug 4 '13 at 21:39
1
@Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
– Qiaochu Yuan
Aug 4 '13 at 21:54
add a comment |
Theorem: Let $mu(n)$ denote the Möbius function. The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ is the necklace polynomial
$$M_n(q) = frac{1}{n} sum_{d | n} mu(d) q^{n/d}.$$
(To get the number of irreducible polynomials just multiply by $q - 1$.)
Proof. Let $M_n(q)$ denote the number in question. Recall that $x^{q^n} - x$ is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree dividing $n$. By counting degrees, it follows that
$$q^n = sum_{d | n} d M_d(q)$$
(since each polynomial of degree $d$ contributes $d$ to the total degree). By Möbius inversion, the result follows.
As it turns out, $M_n(q)$ has a combinatorial interpretation for all values of $q$: it counts the number of aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters, where a necklace is a word considered up to cyclic permutation and an aperiodic necklace of length $n$ is a word which is not invariant under a cyclic permutation by $d$ for any $d < n$. More precisely, the cyclic group $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ acts by cyclic permutation on the set of functions $[n] to [q]$, and $M_n(q)$ counts the number of orbits of size $n$ of this group action. This result also follows from Möbius inversion.
One might therefore ask for an explicit bijection between aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters and monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ when $q$ is a prime power, or at least I did a few years ago and it turns out to be quite elegant.
Let me also mention that the above closed form immediately leads to the "function field prime number theorem." Let the absolute value of a polynomial of degree $d$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ be $q^d$. (You can think of this as the size of the quotient $mathbb{F}_q[x]/f(x)$, so in that sense it is analogous to the norm of an element of the ring of integers of a number field.) Then the above formula shows that the number of monic irreducible polynomials $pi(n)$ of absolute value less than or equal to $n$ satisfies
$$pi(n) sim frac{n}{log_q n}.$$
1
Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Aug 4 '13 at 21:39
1
@Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
– Qiaochu Yuan
Aug 4 '13 at 21:54
add a comment |
Theorem: Let $mu(n)$ denote the Möbius function. The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ is the necklace polynomial
$$M_n(q) = frac{1}{n} sum_{d | n} mu(d) q^{n/d}.$$
(To get the number of irreducible polynomials just multiply by $q - 1$.)
Proof. Let $M_n(q)$ denote the number in question. Recall that $x^{q^n} - x$ is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree dividing $n$. By counting degrees, it follows that
$$q^n = sum_{d | n} d M_d(q)$$
(since each polynomial of degree $d$ contributes $d$ to the total degree). By Möbius inversion, the result follows.
As it turns out, $M_n(q)$ has a combinatorial interpretation for all values of $q$: it counts the number of aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters, where a necklace is a word considered up to cyclic permutation and an aperiodic necklace of length $n$ is a word which is not invariant under a cyclic permutation by $d$ for any $d < n$. More precisely, the cyclic group $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ acts by cyclic permutation on the set of functions $[n] to [q]$, and $M_n(q)$ counts the number of orbits of size $n$ of this group action. This result also follows from Möbius inversion.
One might therefore ask for an explicit bijection between aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters and monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ when $q$ is a prime power, or at least I did a few years ago and it turns out to be quite elegant.
Let me also mention that the above closed form immediately leads to the "function field prime number theorem." Let the absolute value of a polynomial of degree $d$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ be $q^d$. (You can think of this as the size of the quotient $mathbb{F}_q[x]/f(x)$, so in that sense it is analogous to the norm of an element of the ring of integers of a number field.) Then the above formula shows that the number of monic irreducible polynomials $pi(n)$ of absolute value less than or equal to $n$ satisfies
$$pi(n) sim frac{n}{log_q n}.$$
Theorem: Let $mu(n)$ denote the Möbius function. The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ is the necklace polynomial
$$M_n(q) = frac{1}{n} sum_{d | n} mu(d) q^{n/d}.$$
(To get the number of irreducible polynomials just multiply by $q - 1$.)
Proof. Let $M_n(q)$ denote the number in question. Recall that $x^{q^n} - x$ is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree dividing $n$. By counting degrees, it follows that
$$q^n = sum_{d | n} d M_d(q)$$
(since each polynomial of degree $d$ contributes $d$ to the total degree). By Möbius inversion, the result follows.
As it turns out, $M_n(q)$ has a combinatorial interpretation for all values of $q$: it counts the number of aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters, where a necklace is a word considered up to cyclic permutation and an aperiodic necklace of length $n$ is a word which is not invariant under a cyclic permutation by $d$ for any $d < n$. More precisely, the cyclic group $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ acts by cyclic permutation on the set of functions $[n] to [q]$, and $M_n(q)$ counts the number of orbits of size $n$ of this group action. This result also follows from Möbius inversion.
One might therefore ask for an explicit bijection between aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters and monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ when $q$ is a prime power, or at least I did a few years ago and it turns out to be quite elegant.
Let me also mention that the above closed form immediately leads to the "function field prime number theorem." Let the absolute value of a polynomial of degree $d$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ be $q^d$. (You can think of this as the size of the quotient $mathbb{F}_q[x]/f(x)$, so in that sense it is analogous to the norm of an element of the ring of integers of a number field.) Then the above formula shows that the number of monic irreducible polynomials $pi(n)$ of absolute value less than or equal to $n$ satisfies
$$pi(n) sim frac{n}{log_q n}.$$
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:58
Community♦
1
1
answered Jun 2 '12 at 14:53
Qiaochu Yuan
277k32581919
277k32581919
1
Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Aug 4 '13 at 21:39
1
@Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
– Qiaochu Yuan
Aug 4 '13 at 21:54
add a comment |
1
Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Aug 4 '13 at 21:39
1
@Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
– Qiaochu Yuan
Aug 4 '13 at 21:54
1
1
Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Aug 4 '13 at 21:39
Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Aug 4 '13 at 21:39
1
1
@Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
– Qiaochu Yuan
Aug 4 '13 at 21:54
@Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
– Qiaochu Yuan
Aug 4 '13 at 21:54
add a comment |
With regards to your question, this paper has a formula for counting the number of monic irreducibles over a finite field.
add a comment |
With regards to your question, this paper has a formula for counting the number of monic irreducibles over a finite field.
add a comment |
With regards to your question, this paper has a formula for counting the number of monic irreducibles over a finite field.
With regards to your question, this paper has a formula for counting the number of monic irreducibles over a finite field.
answered Jun 2 '12 at 14:52
Eugene
5,01112362
5,01112362
add a comment |
add a comment |
The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ equals
$$frac{1}{n} cdot sum_{d|n} p^d muleft(frac{n}{d}right)$$
where $mu$ is the Möbius function. This follows rather easily from the Möbius inversion formula. You can find details here. Note that this in particular implies the existence of one irreducible polynomial and therefore of the field with $p^n$ elements.
add a comment |
The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ equals
$$frac{1}{n} cdot sum_{d|n} p^d muleft(frac{n}{d}right)$$
where $mu$ is the Möbius function. This follows rather easily from the Möbius inversion formula. You can find details here. Note that this in particular implies the existence of one irreducible polynomial and therefore of the field with $p^n$ elements.
add a comment |
The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ equals
$$frac{1}{n} cdot sum_{d|n} p^d muleft(frac{n}{d}right)$$
where $mu$ is the Möbius function. This follows rather easily from the Möbius inversion formula. You can find details here. Note that this in particular implies the existence of one irreducible polynomial and therefore of the field with $p^n$ elements.
The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ equals
$$frac{1}{n} cdot sum_{d|n} p^d muleft(frac{n}{d}right)$$
where $mu$ is the Möbius function. This follows rather easily from the Möbius inversion formula. You can find details here. Note that this in particular implies the existence of one irreducible polynomial and therefore of the field with $p^n$ elements.
answered Jun 2 '12 at 14:52
Martin Brandenburg
107k13157326
107k13157326
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152880%2fhow-many-irreducible-polynomials-of-degree-n-exist-over-mathbbf-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jun 2 '12 at 16:16
@JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
– user386627
May 8 '17 at 13:39