How many irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ exist over $mathbb{F}_p$?












11














I know that for every $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, there exists $p(x)inmathbb{F}_p[x]$ s.t. $deg p(x)=n$ and $p(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_p$.




I am interested in counting how many such $p(x)$ there exist (that is, given $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, how many irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ exist over $mathbb{F}_p$).




I don't have a counting strategy and I don't expect a closed formula, but maybe we can find something like "there exist $X$ irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ where $X$ is the number of...".



What are your thoughts ?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jun 2 '12 at 16:16












  • @JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
    – user386627
    May 8 '17 at 13:39
















11














I know that for every $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, there exists $p(x)inmathbb{F}_p[x]$ s.t. $deg p(x)=n$ and $p(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_p$.




I am interested in counting how many such $p(x)$ there exist (that is, given $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, how many irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ exist over $mathbb{F}_p$).




I don't have a counting strategy and I don't expect a closed formula, but maybe we can find something like "there exist $X$ irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ where $X$ is the number of...".



What are your thoughts ?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jun 2 '12 at 16:16












  • @JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
    – user386627
    May 8 '17 at 13:39














11












11








11


18





I know that for every $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, there exists $p(x)inmathbb{F}_p[x]$ s.t. $deg p(x)=n$ and $p(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_p$.




I am interested in counting how many such $p(x)$ there exist (that is, given $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, how many irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ exist over $mathbb{F}_p$).




I don't have a counting strategy and I don't expect a closed formula, but maybe we can find something like "there exist $X$ irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ where $X$ is the number of...".



What are your thoughts ?










share|cite|improve this question















I know that for every $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, there exists $p(x)inmathbb{F}_p[x]$ s.t. $deg p(x)=n$ and $p(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_p$.




I am interested in counting how many such $p(x)$ there exist (that is, given $ninmathbb{N}$, $nge 1$, how many irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ exist over $mathbb{F}_p$).




I don't have a counting strategy and I don't expect a closed formula, but maybe we can find something like "there exist $X$ irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ where $X$ is the number of...".



What are your thoughts ?







abstract-algebra polynomials field-theory finite-fields irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 22 '16 at 15:50









Watson

15.8k92970




15.8k92970










asked Jun 2 '12 at 14:46









Belgi

14.5k954112




14.5k954112








  • 2




    This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jun 2 '12 at 16:16












  • @JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
    – user386627
    May 8 '17 at 13:39














  • 2




    This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jun 2 '12 at 16:16












  • @JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
    – user386627
    May 8 '17 at 13:39








2




2




This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jun 2 '12 at 16:16






This question is ok, but has appeared here many times: At least here, here and also here. Voting to close as a duplicate. +1 to you all, though!
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jun 2 '12 at 16:16














@JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
– user386627
May 8 '17 at 13:39




@JyrkiLahtonen: I was wondering if there is as much monic irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ on $mathbb F_{p}[X]$ than irreducible polynomial of degree $d$ (not necessarily monic). I would say yes since if $X^d+a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $alpha X^d+alpha a_{d-1}X^{d-1}+...+alpha a_1 X+a_0$ is irreducible and reciprocally if $a_nX^n+...+a_1X+a_0$ is irreducible, then $X^n+frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}X^{n-1}X^{n-1}+...+frac{a_0}{a_n}$ is irreducible. But I'm not sure if it's true...
– user386627
May 8 '17 at 13:39










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















27














Theorem: Let $mu(n)$ denote the Möbius function. The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ is the necklace polynomial
$$M_n(q) = frac{1}{n} sum_{d | n} mu(d) q^{n/d}.$$



(To get the number of irreducible polynomials just multiply by $q - 1$.)



Proof. Let $M_n(q)$ denote the number in question. Recall that $x^{q^n} - x$ is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree dividing $n$. By counting degrees, it follows that
$$q^n = sum_{d | n} d M_d(q)$$



(since each polynomial of degree $d$ contributes $d$ to the total degree). By Möbius inversion, the result follows.



As it turns out, $M_n(q)$ has a combinatorial interpretation for all values of $q$: it counts the number of aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters, where a necklace is a word considered up to cyclic permutation and an aperiodic necklace of length $n$ is a word which is not invariant under a cyclic permutation by $d$ for any $d < n$. More precisely, the cyclic group $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ acts by cyclic permutation on the set of functions $[n] to [q]$, and $M_n(q)$ counts the number of orbits of size $n$ of this group action. This result also follows from Möbius inversion.



One might therefore ask for an explicit bijection between aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters and monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ when $q$ is a prime power, or at least I did a few years ago and it turns out to be quite elegant.



Let me also mention that the above closed form immediately leads to the "function field prime number theorem." Let the absolute value of a polynomial of degree $d$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ be $q^d$. (You can think of this as the size of the quotient $mathbb{F}_q[x]/f(x)$, so in that sense it is analogous to the norm of an element of the ring of integers of a number field.) Then the above formula shows that the number of monic irreducible polynomials $pi(n)$ of absolute value less than or equal to $n$ satisfies
$$pi(n) sim frac{n}{log_q n}.$$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
    – Pedro Tamaroff
    Aug 4 '13 at 21:39








  • 1




    @Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Aug 4 '13 at 21:54



















8














With regards to your question, this paper has a formula for counting the number of monic irreducibles over a finite field.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    6














    The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ equals



    $$frac{1}{n} cdot sum_{d|n} p^d muleft(frac{n}{d}right)$$



    where $mu$ is the Möbius function. This follows rather easily from the Möbius inversion formula. You can find details here. Note that this in particular implies the existence of one irreducible polynomial and therefore of the field with $p^n$ elements.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152880%2fhow-many-irreducible-polynomials-of-degree-n-exist-over-mathbbf-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      27














      Theorem: Let $mu(n)$ denote the Möbius function. The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ is the necklace polynomial
      $$M_n(q) = frac{1}{n} sum_{d | n} mu(d) q^{n/d}.$$



      (To get the number of irreducible polynomials just multiply by $q - 1$.)



      Proof. Let $M_n(q)$ denote the number in question. Recall that $x^{q^n} - x$ is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree dividing $n$. By counting degrees, it follows that
      $$q^n = sum_{d | n} d M_d(q)$$



      (since each polynomial of degree $d$ contributes $d$ to the total degree). By Möbius inversion, the result follows.



      As it turns out, $M_n(q)$ has a combinatorial interpretation for all values of $q$: it counts the number of aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters, where a necklace is a word considered up to cyclic permutation and an aperiodic necklace of length $n$ is a word which is not invariant under a cyclic permutation by $d$ for any $d < n$. More precisely, the cyclic group $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ acts by cyclic permutation on the set of functions $[n] to [q]$, and $M_n(q)$ counts the number of orbits of size $n$ of this group action. This result also follows from Möbius inversion.



      One might therefore ask for an explicit bijection between aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters and monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ when $q$ is a prime power, or at least I did a few years ago and it turns out to be quite elegant.



      Let me also mention that the above closed form immediately leads to the "function field prime number theorem." Let the absolute value of a polynomial of degree $d$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ be $q^d$. (You can think of this as the size of the quotient $mathbb{F}_q[x]/f(x)$, so in that sense it is analogous to the norm of an element of the ring of integers of a number field.) Then the above formula shows that the number of monic irreducible polynomials $pi(n)$ of absolute value less than or equal to $n$ satisfies
      $$pi(n) sim frac{n}{log_q n}.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer



















      • 1




        Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
        – Pedro Tamaroff
        Aug 4 '13 at 21:39








      • 1




        @Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
        – Qiaochu Yuan
        Aug 4 '13 at 21:54
















      27














      Theorem: Let $mu(n)$ denote the Möbius function. The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ is the necklace polynomial
      $$M_n(q) = frac{1}{n} sum_{d | n} mu(d) q^{n/d}.$$



      (To get the number of irreducible polynomials just multiply by $q - 1$.)



      Proof. Let $M_n(q)$ denote the number in question. Recall that $x^{q^n} - x$ is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree dividing $n$. By counting degrees, it follows that
      $$q^n = sum_{d | n} d M_d(q)$$



      (since each polynomial of degree $d$ contributes $d$ to the total degree). By Möbius inversion, the result follows.



      As it turns out, $M_n(q)$ has a combinatorial interpretation for all values of $q$: it counts the number of aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters, where a necklace is a word considered up to cyclic permutation and an aperiodic necklace of length $n$ is a word which is not invariant under a cyclic permutation by $d$ for any $d < n$. More precisely, the cyclic group $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ acts by cyclic permutation on the set of functions $[n] to [q]$, and $M_n(q)$ counts the number of orbits of size $n$ of this group action. This result also follows from Möbius inversion.



      One might therefore ask for an explicit bijection between aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters and monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ when $q$ is a prime power, or at least I did a few years ago and it turns out to be quite elegant.



      Let me also mention that the above closed form immediately leads to the "function field prime number theorem." Let the absolute value of a polynomial of degree $d$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ be $q^d$. (You can think of this as the size of the quotient $mathbb{F}_q[x]/f(x)$, so in that sense it is analogous to the norm of an element of the ring of integers of a number field.) Then the above formula shows that the number of monic irreducible polynomials $pi(n)$ of absolute value less than or equal to $n$ satisfies
      $$pi(n) sim frac{n}{log_q n}.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer



















      • 1




        Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
        – Pedro Tamaroff
        Aug 4 '13 at 21:39








      • 1




        @Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
        – Qiaochu Yuan
        Aug 4 '13 at 21:54














      27












      27








      27






      Theorem: Let $mu(n)$ denote the Möbius function. The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ is the necklace polynomial
      $$M_n(q) = frac{1}{n} sum_{d | n} mu(d) q^{n/d}.$$



      (To get the number of irreducible polynomials just multiply by $q - 1$.)



      Proof. Let $M_n(q)$ denote the number in question. Recall that $x^{q^n} - x$ is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree dividing $n$. By counting degrees, it follows that
      $$q^n = sum_{d | n} d M_d(q)$$



      (since each polynomial of degree $d$ contributes $d$ to the total degree). By Möbius inversion, the result follows.



      As it turns out, $M_n(q)$ has a combinatorial interpretation for all values of $q$: it counts the number of aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters, where a necklace is a word considered up to cyclic permutation and an aperiodic necklace of length $n$ is a word which is not invariant under a cyclic permutation by $d$ for any $d < n$. More precisely, the cyclic group $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ acts by cyclic permutation on the set of functions $[n] to [q]$, and $M_n(q)$ counts the number of orbits of size $n$ of this group action. This result also follows from Möbius inversion.



      One might therefore ask for an explicit bijection between aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters and monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ when $q$ is a prime power, or at least I did a few years ago and it turns out to be quite elegant.



      Let me also mention that the above closed form immediately leads to the "function field prime number theorem." Let the absolute value of a polynomial of degree $d$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ be $q^d$. (You can think of this as the size of the quotient $mathbb{F}_q[x]/f(x)$, so in that sense it is analogous to the norm of an element of the ring of integers of a number field.) Then the above formula shows that the number of monic irreducible polynomials $pi(n)$ of absolute value less than or equal to $n$ satisfies
      $$pi(n) sim frac{n}{log_q n}.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer














      Theorem: Let $mu(n)$ denote the Möbius function. The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ is the necklace polynomial
      $$M_n(q) = frac{1}{n} sum_{d | n} mu(d) q^{n/d}.$$



      (To get the number of irreducible polynomials just multiply by $q - 1$.)



      Proof. Let $M_n(q)$ denote the number in question. Recall that $x^{q^n} - x$ is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree dividing $n$. By counting degrees, it follows that
      $$q^n = sum_{d | n} d M_d(q)$$



      (since each polynomial of degree $d$ contributes $d$ to the total degree). By Möbius inversion, the result follows.



      As it turns out, $M_n(q)$ has a combinatorial interpretation for all values of $q$: it counts the number of aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters, where a necklace is a word considered up to cyclic permutation and an aperiodic necklace of length $n$ is a word which is not invariant under a cyclic permutation by $d$ for any $d < n$. More precisely, the cyclic group $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ acts by cyclic permutation on the set of functions $[n] to [q]$, and $M_n(q)$ counts the number of orbits of size $n$ of this group action. This result also follows from Möbius inversion.



      One might therefore ask for an explicit bijection between aperiodic necklaces of length $n$ on $q$ letters and monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ when $q$ is a prime power, or at least I did a few years ago and it turns out to be quite elegant.



      Let me also mention that the above closed form immediately leads to the "function field prime number theorem." Let the absolute value of a polynomial of degree $d$ over $mathbb{F}_q$ be $q^d$. (You can think of this as the size of the quotient $mathbb{F}_q[x]/f(x)$, so in that sense it is analogous to the norm of an element of the ring of integers of a number field.) Then the above formula shows that the number of monic irreducible polynomials $pi(n)$ of absolute value less than or equal to $n$ satisfies
      $$pi(n) sim frac{n}{log_q n}.$$







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:58









      Community

      1




      1










      answered Jun 2 '12 at 14:53









      Qiaochu Yuan

      277k32581919




      277k32581919








      • 1




        Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
        – Pedro Tamaroff
        Aug 4 '13 at 21:39








      • 1




        @Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
        – Qiaochu Yuan
        Aug 4 '13 at 21:54














      • 1




        Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
        – Pedro Tamaroff
        Aug 4 '13 at 21:39








      • 1




        @Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
        – Qiaochu Yuan
        Aug 4 '13 at 21:54








      1




      1




      Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
      – Pedro Tamaroff
      Aug 4 '13 at 21:39






      Shouldn't the first sum read $mu(d)$ instead of $mu(n)$?
      – Pedro Tamaroff
      Aug 4 '13 at 21:39






      1




      1




      @Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
      – Qiaochu Yuan
      Aug 4 '13 at 21:54




      @Peter: yep. Thanks for the correction!
      – Qiaochu Yuan
      Aug 4 '13 at 21:54











      8














      With regards to your question, this paper has a formula for counting the number of monic irreducibles over a finite field.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        8














        With regards to your question, this paper has a formula for counting the number of monic irreducibles over a finite field.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          8












          8








          8






          With regards to your question, this paper has a formula for counting the number of monic irreducibles over a finite field.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          With regards to your question, this paper has a formula for counting the number of monic irreducibles over a finite field.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jun 2 '12 at 14:52









          Eugene

          5,01112362




          5,01112362























              6














              The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ equals



              $$frac{1}{n} cdot sum_{d|n} p^d muleft(frac{n}{d}right)$$



              where $mu$ is the Möbius function. This follows rather easily from the Möbius inversion formula. You can find details here. Note that this in particular implies the existence of one irreducible polynomial and therefore of the field with $p^n$ elements.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                6














                The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ equals



                $$frac{1}{n} cdot sum_{d|n} p^d muleft(frac{n}{d}right)$$



                where $mu$ is the Möbius function. This follows rather easily from the Möbius inversion formula. You can find details here. Note that this in particular implies the existence of one irreducible polynomial and therefore of the field with $p^n$ elements.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  6












                  6








                  6






                  The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ equals



                  $$frac{1}{n} cdot sum_{d|n} p^d muleft(frac{n}{d}right)$$



                  where $mu$ is the Möbius function. This follows rather easily from the Möbius inversion formula. You can find details here. Note that this in particular implies the existence of one irreducible polynomial and therefore of the field with $p^n$ elements.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  The number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ equals



                  $$frac{1}{n} cdot sum_{d|n} p^d muleft(frac{n}{d}right)$$



                  where $mu$ is the Möbius function. This follows rather easily from the Möbius inversion formula. You can find details here. Note that this in particular implies the existence of one irreducible polynomial and therefore of the field with $p^n$ elements.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jun 2 '12 at 14:52









                  Martin Brandenburg

                  107k13157326




                  107k13157326






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152880%2fhow-many-irreducible-polynomials-of-degree-n-exist-over-mathbbf-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Tonle Sap (See)

                      I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

                      Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft