If d = gcd(a, m) and d|c, then show that the congruence ax ≡ c (mod m) is equivalent to (a/d)x ≡ (c/d)...

Multi tool use
Multi tool use











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












If $d = gcd(a, m)$ and $d|c$, then show that the congruence $ax equiv c$ (mod $m$) is equivalent to



$$frac{a}{d} x equiv frac{c}{d} mod frac{m}{d} .$$



This is a question for my math proof class transitions to advanced mathematics. There was no other supporting information.










share|cite|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Gibbs, Dave, amWhy, Leucippus Dec 7 at 1:48


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Gibbs, Dave, amWhy, Leucippus

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • The titled question differs from that in the body. Please correct.
    – Bill Dubuque
    Nov 14 at 16:14










  • Fixed it, Idk how I messed that up.
    – N.Luscomb
    Nov 25 at 0:11










  • This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
    – Carl Mummert
    Dec 6 at 17:50















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












If $d = gcd(a, m)$ and $d|c$, then show that the congruence $ax equiv c$ (mod $m$) is equivalent to



$$frac{a}{d} x equiv frac{c}{d} mod frac{m}{d} .$$



This is a question for my math proof class transitions to advanced mathematics. There was no other supporting information.










share|cite|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Gibbs, Dave, amWhy, Leucippus Dec 7 at 1:48


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Gibbs, Dave, amWhy, Leucippus

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • The titled question differs from that in the body. Please correct.
    – Bill Dubuque
    Nov 14 at 16:14










  • Fixed it, Idk how I messed that up.
    – N.Luscomb
    Nov 25 at 0:11










  • This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
    – Carl Mummert
    Dec 6 at 17:50













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











If $d = gcd(a, m)$ and $d|c$, then show that the congruence $ax equiv c$ (mod $m$) is equivalent to



$$frac{a}{d} x equiv frac{c}{d} mod frac{m}{d} .$$



This is a question for my math proof class transitions to advanced mathematics. There was no other supporting information.










share|cite|improve this question















If $d = gcd(a, m)$ and $d|c$, then show that the congruence $ax equiv c$ (mod $m$) is equivalent to



$$frac{a}{d} x equiv frac{c}{d} mod frac{m}{d} .$$



This is a question for my math proof class transitions to advanced mathematics. There was no other supporting information.







proof-writing modular-arithmetic congruence-relations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Community

1




1










asked Nov 14 at 15:58









N.Luscomb

11




11




put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Gibbs, Dave, amWhy, Leucippus Dec 7 at 1:48


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Gibbs, Dave, amWhy, Leucippus

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Gibbs, Dave, amWhy, Leucippus Dec 7 at 1:48


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Gibbs, Dave, amWhy, Leucippus

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • The titled question differs from that in the body. Please correct.
    – Bill Dubuque
    Nov 14 at 16:14










  • Fixed it, Idk how I messed that up.
    – N.Luscomb
    Nov 25 at 0:11










  • This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
    – Carl Mummert
    Dec 6 at 17:50


















  • The titled question differs from that in the body. Please correct.
    – Bill Dubuque
    Nov 14 at 16:14










  • Fixed it, Idk how I messed that up.
    – N.Luscomb
    Nov 25 at 0:11










  • This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
    – Carl Mummert
    Dec 6 at 17:50
















The titled question differs from that in the body. Please correct.
– Bill Dubuque
Nov 14 at 16:14




The titled question differs from that in the body. Please correct.
– Bill Dubuque
Nov 14 at 16:14












Fixed it, Idk how I messed that up.
– N.Luscomb
Nov 25 at 0:11




Fixed it, Idk how I messed that up.
– N.Luscomb
Nov 25 at 0:11












This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
– Carl Mummert
Dec 6 at 17:50




This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
– Carl Mummert
Dec 6 at 17:50















active

oldest

votes






















active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

OjvnKnx1vvzKWCH i0uKX,wj5CrjSyu5bY8,tyeHs6 CdQIpQHfBP4 zWeUxKCIIvcWVGw5odV02NJoqmWT 2N40r
oQwH,LY36GRzX68 f,LAlAT3xmKL,dRUeMgs

Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

27. Oktober

Sommerrodelbahn