Determine maximal ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(x^2)$












0












$begingroup$


Artin Algebra Chapter 11



enter image description here



For (b), a solution can be found here, which I think is the same as Takumi Murayama here. I have a question about the solution of Brian Bi here.



enter image description here




  1. What does it mean that "Obviously $I$ can't contain any nonzero constant without being the entire ring." ?


My confusion is that the elements of $R$ are of this form $$[p(x)+(x^2)]$$ rather than real numbers. So constants in $R$ are $[p(x)+(x^2)]$ for $p(x)=x^2+k$ for some $k in mathbb R$?



I think it means that for $a in mathbb R$, if $[a+(x^2)] in I$, then $I = R$. But I think we can also have $p(x) in mathbb R[x]$ such that $[p(x)+(x^2)]=[b+(x^2)]$ for some $b in mathbb R$ such as $p(x)=x^2-17$ and $b=-17$. If I'm right, then is this correct?



$$[a+(x^2)] in I implies [a+(x^2)][frac1a+(x^2)] = [1+(x^2)] in I implies I = R$$




  1. Why exactly do we have


$$forall c in I setminus (alpha), exists a,b in R: c = aalpha + b, a ne 0 ne b?$$



I think I understand intuitively, for finitely generated $I=(alpha, beta_1, ..., beta_n)$, we have $$c=a alpha + sum_{i=1}^{n} b_i beta_i$$



where at least one of the $b_i$'s is not zero, but




  • Why is $a ne 0$?


  • What if $I$ is not finitely generated?











share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Artin Algebra Chapter 11



    enter image description here



    For (b), a solution can be found here, which I think is the same as Takumi Murayama here. I have a question about the solution of Brian Bi here.



    enter image description here




    1. What does it mean that "Obviously $I$ can't contain any nonzero constant without being the entire ring." ?


    My confusion is that the elements of $R$ are of this form $$[p(x)+(x^2)]$$ rather than real numbers. So constants in $R$ are $[p(x)+(x^2)]$ for $p(x)=x^2+k$ for some $k in mathbb R$?



    I think it means that for $a in mathbb R$, if $[a+(x^2)] in I$, then $I = R$. But I think we can also have $p(x) in mathbb R[x]$ such that $[p(x)+(x^2)]=[b+(x^2)]$ for some $b in mathbb R$ such as $p(x)=x^2-17$ and $b=-17$. If I'm right, then is this correct?



    $$[a+(x^2)] in I implies [a+(x^2)][frac1a+(x^2)] = [1+(x^2)] in I implies I = R$$




    1. Why exactly do we have


    $$forall c in I setminus (alpha), exists a,b in R: c = aalpha + b, a ne 0 ne b?$$



    I think I understand intuitively, for finitely generated $I=(alpha, beta_1, ..., beta_n)$, we have $$c=a alpha + sum_{i=1}^{n} b_i beta_i$$



    where at least one of the $b_i$'s is not zero, but




    • Why is $a ne 0$?


    • What if $I$ is not finitely generated?











    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Artin Algebra Chapter 11



      enter image description here



      For (b), a solution can be found here, which I think is the same as Takumi Murayama here. I have a question about the solution of Brian Bi here.



      enter image description here




      1. What does it mean that "Obviously $I$ can't contain any nonzero constant without being the entire ring." ?


      My confusion is that the elements of $R$ are of this form $$[p(x)+(x^2)]$$ rather than real numbers. So constants in $R$ are $[p(x)+(x^2)]$ for $p(x)=x^2+k$ for some $k in mathbb R$?



      I think it means that for $a in mathbb R$, if $[a+(x^2)] in I$, then $I = R$. But I think we can also have $p(x) in mathbb R[x]$ such that $[p(x)+(x^2)]=[b+(x^2)]$ for some $b in mathbb R$ such as $p(x)=x^2-17$ and $b=-17$. If I'm right, then is this correct?



      $$[a+(x^2)] in I implies [a+(x^2)][frac1a+(x^2)] = [1+(x^2)] in I implies I = R$$




      1. Why exactly do we have


      $$forall c in I setminus (alpha), exists a,b in R: c = aalpha + b, a ne 0 ne b?$$



      I think I understand intuitively, for finitely generated $I=(alpha, beta_1, ..., beta_n)$, we have $$c=a alpha + sum_{i=1}^{n} b_i beta_i$$



      where at least one of the $b_i$'s is not zero, but




      • Why is $a ne 0$?


      • What if $I$ is not finitely generated?











      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Artin Algebra Chapter 11



      enter image description here



      For (b), a solution can be found here, which I think is the same as Takumi Murayama here. I have a question about the solution of Brian Bi here.



      enter image description here




      1. What does it mean that "Obviously $I$ can't contain any nonzero constant without being the entire ring." ?


      My confusion is that the elements of $R$ are of this form $$[p(x)+(x^2)]$$ rather than real numbers. So constants in $R$ are $[p(x)+(x^2)]$ for $p(x)=x^2+k$ for some $k in mathbb R$?



      I think it means that for $a in mathbb R$, if $[a+(x^2)] in I$, then $I = R$. But I think we can also have $p(x) in mathbb R[x]$ such that $[p(x)+(x^2)]=[b+(x^2)]$ for some $b in mathbb R$ such as $p(x)=x^2-17$ and $b=-17$. If I'm right, then is this correct?



      $$[a+(x^2)] in I implies [a+(x^2)][frac1a+(x^2)] = [1+(x^2)] in I implies I = R$$




      1. Why exactly do we have


      $$forall c in I setminus (alpha), exists a,b in R: c = aalpha + b, a ne 0 ne b?$$



      I think I understand intuitively, for finitely generated $I=(alpha, beta_1, ..., beta_n)$, we have $$c=a alpha + sum_{i=1}^{n} b_i beta_i$$



      where at least one of the $b_i$'s is not zero, but




      • Why is $a ne 0$?


      • What if $I$ is not finitely generated?








      abstract-algebra ideals maximal-and-prime-ideals finitely-generated






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 22 '18 at 11:43







      user198044





























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The simplest way to approach these questions is by using the isomorphism theorem, in the form




          The ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(f(x))$ correspond to the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.




          Then use that $mathbb R[x]$ is a PID to find the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
            $endgroup$
            – user198044
            Dec 25 '18 at 20:33











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049347%2fdetermine-maximal-ideals-of-mathbb-rx-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          The simplest way to approach these questions is by using the isomorphism theorem, in the form




          The ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(f(x))$ correspond to the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.




          Then use that $mathbb R[x]$ is a PID to find the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
            $endgroup$
            – user198044
            Dec 25 '18 at 20:33
















          0












          $begingroup$

          The simplest way to approach these questions is by using the isomorphism theorem, in the form




          The ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(f(x))$ correspond to the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.




          Then use that $mathbb R[x]$ is a PID to find the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
            $endgroup$
            – user198044
            Dec 25 '18 at 20:33














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          The simplest way to approach these questions is by using the isomorphism theorem, in the form




          The ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(f(x))$ correspond to the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.




          Then use that $mathbb R[x]$ is a PID to find the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The simplest way to approach these questions is by using the isomorphism theorem, in the form




          The ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(f(x))$ correspond to the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.




          Then use that $mathbb R[x]$ is a PID to find the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 22 '18 at 12:08









          lhflhf

          166k10171396




          166k10171396












          • $begingroup$
            That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
            $endgroup$
            – user198044
            Dec 25 '18 at 20:33


















          • $begingroup$
            That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
            $endgroup$
            – user198044
            Dec 25 '18 at 20:33
















          $begingroup$
          That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
          $endgroup$
          – user198044
          Dec 25 '18 at 20:33




          $begingroup$
          That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
          $endgroup$
          – user198044
          Dec 25 '18 at 20:33


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049347%2fdetermine-maximal-ideals-of-mathbb-rx-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen