Determine maximal ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(x^2)$
$begingroup$
Artin Algebra Chapter 11
For (b), a solution can be found here, which I think is the same as Takumi Murayama here. I have a question about the solution of Brian Bi here.
- What does it mean that "Obviously $I$ can't contain any nonzero constant without being the entire ring." ?
My confusion is that the elements of $R$ are of this form $$[p(x)+(x^2)]$$ rather than real numbers. So constants in $R$ are $[p(x)+(x^2)]$ for $p(x)=x^2+k$ for some $k in mathbb R$?
I think it means that for $a in mathbb R$, if $[a+(x^2)] in I$, then $I = R$. But I think we can also have $p(x) in mathbb R[x]$ such that $[p(x)+(x^2)]=[b+(x^2)]$ for some $b in mathbb R$ such as $p(x)=x^2-17$ and $b=-17$. If I'm right, then is this correct?
$$[a+(x^2)] in I implies [a+(x^2)][frac1a+(x^2)] = [1+(x^2)] in I implies I = R$$
- Why exactly do we have
$$forall c in I setminus (alpha), exists a,b in R: c = aalpha + b, a ne 0 ne b?$$
I think I understand intuitively, for finitely generated $I=(alpha, beta_1, ..., beta_n)$, we have $$c=a alpha + sum_{i=1}^{n} b_i beta_i$$
where at least one of the $b_i$'s is not zero, but
Why is $a ne 0$?
What if $I$ is not finitely generated?
abstract-algebra ideals maximal-and-prime-ideals finitely-generated
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Artin Algebra Chapter 11
For (b), a solution can be found here, which I think is the same as Takumi Murayama here. I have a question about the solution of Brian Bi here.
- What does it mean that "Obviously $I$ can't contain any nonzero constant without being the entire ring." ?
My confusion is that the elements of $R$ are of this form $$[p(x)+(x^2)]$$ rather than real numbers. So constants in $R$ are $[p(x)+(x^2)]$ for $p(x)=x^2+k$ for some $k in mathbb R$?
I think it means that for $a in mathbb R$, if $[a+(x^2)] in I$, then $I = R$. But I think we can also have $p(x) in mathbb R[x]$ such that $[p(x)+(x^2)]=[b+(x^2)]$ for some $b in mathbb R$ such as $p(x)=x^2-17$ and $b=-17$. If I'm right, then is this correct?
$$[a+(x^2)] in I implies [a+(x^2)][frac1a+(x^2)] = [1+(x^2)] in I implies I = R$$
- Why exactly do we have
$$forall c in I setminus (alpha), exists a,b in R: c = aalpha + b, a ne 0 ne b?$$
I think I understand intuitively, for finitely generated $I=(alpha, beta_1, ..., beta_n)$, we have $$c=a alpha + sum_{i=1}^{n} b_i beta_i$$
where at least one of the $b_i$'s is not zero, but
Why is $a ne 0$?
What if $I$ is not finitely generated?
abstract-algebra ideals maximal-and-prime-ideals finitely-generated
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Artin Algebra Chapter 11
For (b), a solution can be found here, which I think is the same as Takumi Murayama here. I have a question about the solution of Brian Bi here.
- What does it mean that "Obviously $I$ can't contain any nonzero constant without being the entire ring." ?
My confusion is that the elements of $R$ are of this form $$[p(x)+(x^2)]$$ rather than real numbers. So constants in $R$ are $[p(x)+(x^2)]$ for $p(x)=x^2+k$ for some $k in mathbb R$?
I think it means that for $a in mathbb R$, if $[a+(x^2)] in I$, then $I = R$. But I think we can also have $p(x) in mathbb R[x]$ such that $[p(x)+(x^2)]=[b+(x^2)]$ for some $b in mathbb R$ such as $p(x)=x^2-17$ and $b=-17$. If I'm right, then is this correct?
$$[a+(x^2)] in I implies [a+(x^2)][frac1a+(x^2)] = [1+(x^2)] in I implies I = R$$
- Why exactly do we have
$$forall c in I setminus (alpha), exists a,b in R: c = aalpha + b, a ne 0 ne b?$$
I think I understand intuitively, for finitely generated $I=(alpha, beta_1, ..., beta_n)$, we have $$c=a alpha + sum_{i=1}^{n} b_i beta_i$$
where at least one of the $b_i$'s is not zero, but
Why is $a ne 0$?
What if $I$ is not finitely generated?
abstract-algebra ideals maximal-and-prime-ideals finitely-generated
$endgroup$
Artin Algebra Chapter 11
For (b), a solution can be found here, which I think is the same as Takumi Murayama here. I have a question about the solution of Brian Bi here.
- What does it mean that "Obviously $I$ can't contain any nonzero constant without being the entire ring." ?
My confusion is that the elements of $R$ are of this form $$[p(x)+(x^2)]$$ rather than real numbers. So constants in $R$ are $[p(x)+(x^2)]$ for $p(x)=x^2+k$ for some $k in mathbb R$?
I think it means that for $a in mathbb R$, if $[a+(x^2)] in I$, then $I = R$. But I think we can also have $p(x) in mathbb R[x]$ such that $[p(x)+(x^2)]=[b+(x^2)]$ for some $b in mathbb R$ such as $p(x)=x^2-17$ and $b=-17$. If I'm right, then is this correct?
$$[a+(x^2)] in I implies [a+(x^2)][frac1a+(x^2)] = [1+(x^2)] in I implies I = R$$
- Why exactly do we have
$$forall c in I setminus (alpha), exists a,b in R: c = aalpha + b, a ne 0 ne b?$$
I think I understand intuitively, for finitely generated $I=(alpha, beta_1, ..., beta_n)$, we have $$c=a alpha + sum_{i=1}^{n} b_i beta_i$$
where at least one of the $b_i$'s is not zero, but
Why is $a ne 0$?
What if $I$ is not finitely generated?
abstract-algebra ideals maximal-and-prime-ideals finitely-generated
abstract-algebra ideals maximal-and-prime-ideals finitely-generated
asked Dec 22 '18 at 11:43
user198044
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The simplest way to approach these questions is by using the isomorphism theorem, in the form
The ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(f(x))$ correspond to the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.
Then use that $mathbb R[x]$ is a PID to find the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 25 '18 at 20:33
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049347%2fdetermine-maximal-ideals-of-mathbb-rx-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The simplest way to approach these questions is by using the isomorphism theorem, in the form
The ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(f(x))$ correspond to the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.
Then use that $mathbb R[x]$ is a PID to find the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 25 '18 at 20:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The simplest way to approach these questions is by using the isomorphism theorem, in the form
The ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(f(x))$ correspond to the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.
Then use that $mathbb R[x]$ is a PID to find the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 25 '18 at 20:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The simplest way to approach these questions is by using the isomorphism theorem, in the form
The ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(f(x))$ correspond to the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.
Then use that $mathbb R[x]$ is a PID to find the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.
$endgroup$
The simplest way to approach these questions is by using the isomorphism theorem, in the form
The ideals of $mathbb R[x]/(f(x))$ correspond to the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.
Then use that $mathbb R[x]$ is a PID to find the ideals of $mathbb R[x]$ that contain $(f(x))$.
answered Dec 22 '18 at 12:08
lhflhf
166k10171396
166k10171396
$begingroup$
That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 25 '18 at 20:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 25 '18 at 20:33
$begingroup$
That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 25 '18 at 20:33
$begingroup$
That's the solution of Takumi Murayama. It's probably simpler, but my question is about a different solution.
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 25 '18 at 20:33
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049347%2fdetermine-maximal-ideals-of-mathbb-rx-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown