How to factor this quadratic expression?
$begingroup$
A bit confused on how to factor $2x^2 + 5x − 3 = 0$. Firstly, I multiplied $a cdot c$, so $2(-3)=-6$, however couldn't find two numbers that will add up to $5$. Then, I thought of the factors could be $6(-1)=-6$, and $6+-1=5$. However, shouldn't the $a$ and $c$ values always be multiplied together, (the $(2)(-3)$, rather than $6(-1)$?
When following the factors $-1$ and $6$. I have
$(2x^2-1x)(6x-3)$
$x(2x-1)+3(2x-1)$
Is this correct, if not; what is the best way to solve a leading coefficient when factoring?
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A bit confused on how to factor $2x^2 + 5x − 3 = 0$. Firstly, I multiplied $a cdot c$, so $2(-3)=-6$, however couldn't find two numbers that will add up to $5$. Then, I thought of the factors could be $6(-1)=-6$, and $6+-1=5$. However, shouldn't the $a$ and $c$ values always be multiplied together, (the $(2)(-3)$, rather than $6(-1)$?
When following the factors $-1$ and $6$. I have
$(2x^2-1x)(6x-3)$
$x(2x-1)+3(2x-1)$
Is this correct, if not; what is the best way to solve a leading coefficient when factoring?
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to MathSE. This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A bit confused on how to factor $2x^2 + 5x − 3 = 0$. Firstly, I multiplied $a cdot c$, so $2(-3)=-6$, however couldn't find two numbers that will add up to $5$. Then, I thought of the factors could be $6(-1)=-6$, and $6+-1=5$. However, shouldn't the $a$ and $c$ values always be multiplied together, (the $(2)(-3)$, rather than $6(-1)$?
When following the factors $-1$ and $6$. I have
$(2x^2-1x)(6x-3)$
$x(2x-1)+3(2x-1)$
Is this correct, if not; what is the best way to solve a leading coefficient when factoring?
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
A bit confused on how to factor $2x^2 + 5x − 3 = 0$. Firstly, I multiplied $a cdot c$, so $2(-3)=-6$, however couldn't find two numbers that will add up to $5$. Then, I thought of the factors could be $6(-1)=-6$, and $6+-1=5$. However, shouldn't the $a$ and $c$ values always be multiplied together, (the $(2)(-3)$, rather than $6(-1)$?
When following the factors $-1$ and $6$. I have
$(2x^2-1x)(6x-3)$
$x(2x-1)+3(2x-1)$
Is this correct, if not; what is the best way to solve a leading coefficient when factoring?
algebra-precalculus
algebra-precalculus
edited Dec 23 '18 at 5:18
Sara
asked Dec 22 '18 at 11:01
SaraSara
245
245
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to MathSE. This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:06
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to MathSE. This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:06
1
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to MathSE. This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:06
$begingroup$
Welcome to MathSE. This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:06
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We need to find two numbers with product $2(-3) = -6$ and sum $5$. You are correct that the numbers are $-1$ and $6$. Splitting the linear term yields
begin{align*}
2x^2 + 5x - 3 & = 2x^2 - x + 6x - 3 && text{split the linear term}\
& = x(2x - 1) + 3(2x - 1) && text{factor by grouping}\
& = (x + 3)(2x - 1) && text{extract the common factor}
end{align*}
which you can verify by multiplying the factors.
You should not write $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x - 3)$ since
begin{align*}
(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3) & = 2x^2(6x + 3) - 1x(6x + 3)\
& = 12x^3 + 6x^2 - 6x^2 -3x\
& = 12x^3 - 3x\
& neq 2x^2 + 5x - 3
end{align*}
Instead, you can write $(2x^2 - 1x) + (6x - 3)$ or $2x^2 - 1x + 6x - 3$.
Also, you should be including equals signs since you are asserting that
$$2x^2 + 5x - 3 = 2x^2 - x + 6x - 3$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes your solution is correct.
Further, note that if you know how to solve a quadratic equation, it's much more easier to factorise in those cases. Suppose the equation is $ax^2+bx+c=0$, and you can find it's roots, $x_1,x_2$. Then, you can simply write $$ax^2+bx+c=a(x-x_1)(x-x_2)=0$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The line $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3)$ is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:16
$begingroup$
It's $+$ I think. It's a typo
$endgroup$
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 22 '18 at 11:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is worth reviewing the theory behind the OP's technique.
Assume always that $a$ is a positive integer, $a ge 1$.
Suppose
$tag 1 ax^2+bx+c= (d_1x+e_1)(d_2x+e_2)$
where the constants $b, c, d_1. e_1, d_2 text{ and } e_2$ are all integers.
If $text{(1)}$ holds true then we can write
$tag 2 ax^2+bx+c= (d_1'x+e_1')(d_2'x+e_2')$
with integer constants $d_1', e_1', d_2' text{ and } e_2'$ such that $d_1' text{ and } d_2'$ are both positive.
Hint: If necessary, apply $(-1)(-1) = 1$ to the rhs of $text{(1)}$
Now we are looking for a '$text{(1)}$ factorization' of $2x^2 + 5x − 3$. Since $a =2$ is prime, we let $d_1 = 2$ and renaming the (unknown) constants, write,
$tag 3 2x^2 + 5x − 3= (2x+u)(x+v)=2x^2 + (2v+u)x + uv$
Noticing that $uv = -3$ restricts things considerably, we create a google spreadsheet,
and find the answer:
$tag 4 u = -1 text{ and } v = 3$
so
$tag 5 2x^2 + 5x − 3= (2x-1)(x+3)$
This technique, with the same size spreadsheet, can be used whenever both $a$ and $c$ are prime numbers. In general, you'll have to organize your work and break things down into more cases to find the solution (c.f. the BOX METHOD). However, the approach discussed here, can be extended and methodically applied to handle any of these problems.
Note 1: If you are lazy, just fill in the first row of the spreadsheet for the choices available for $u$, and then use cell formulas:
Note 2: These factorization techniques can come up 'empty handed' - there may be no solutions.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$2x^2 + 5x − 3 = 0$$
$$ac = 2(-3) = -6$$
$$text{$^-1times 6 =phantom .^-6 $ and $ ^-1+6 = 5$}$$
$-1$ and $6$ are correct. What you did after that is wrong.
Here are two methods that I know of for proceeding from $-1$ and $6$.
Method 1. Replace $5x$ with $-1x+6x$ and factor-by-pairing-off.
begin{array}{c}
2x^2 + 5x − 3 \
2x^2 -1x + 6x - 3 \
(2x^2 -1x) + (6x - 3) \
x(2x-1) + 3(2x-1) \
(x+3)(2x-1)
end{array}
Method 2. Write out $(ax-1)(ax+6)$ and then divide out the greatest common divisors.
begin{array}{c}
(2x-1)(2x+6) &{gcd(2,-1)=1 text{and} gcd(2,6)=2}\
dfrac{(2x-1)}{1} cdot dfrac{(2x+6)}{2} \
(2x-1)(x+3)
end{array}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have that $(2x+a)(x+b)=2x^2+5x-3$, where $x=-frac a2$ and $x=-b$ are the solutions you require.
Then $$(2x^2+(a+2b)x+ab=2x^2+5x-3$$
leads to $$a+2b=5; ab=-3$$
We set $b=frac12(5-a)tofrac12a(5-a)=-3 to a^2-5a-6=0$
$$to a=-1, 6$$
$$to b= 3, -frac 12$$
So $$2x^2+5x-3=(2x-1)(x+3)=(2x+6)(x-frac12)$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One could start with multiplying the polynomial with $2$ and get $$4x^2+10x-6=(2x)^2+5(2x)-6$$ which can be seen as a simple equation in $2x$ with factoring $((2x)+6)((2x)-1)$.
Taking out the added factor $2$ leaves $(x+3)(2x-1).$
For the general quadratic polynomial with integer coefficients $ax^2+bx+c$ the same approach requires the factoring of $a(ax^2+bx+c)=(ax)^2+b(ax)+ac$.
If a factoring $((ax)+m)((ax)+n)$ with integers $m$ and $n$ exists, then general theory guarantees that the extra factor $a$ can be taken out and still leave a factoring with only integer coefficients.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Nice idea. Could you expand your idea to explain how the values of $a$ and $c$ in the original polynomial relate to the coefficients of the new associated polynomial?
$endgroup$
– John Joy
Dec 23 '18 at 14:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So we can actually generalize this. Say we have the polynomial
$$p(x)=ax^2+bx+c$$
Fact:
$$p(x)=bigg(ax+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)bigg(ax+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)$$
Proof:
Let's assume the existence of three real numbers $r_1$, $r_2$, and $e_1$ such that
$$ax^2+bx+c=e_1(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$
If we expand the product on the right hand side and then compare coefficients,
$$ax^2+bx+c=e_1x^2-e_1(r_1+r_2)x+e_1r_1r_2$$
we get a system of equations
$$e_1=a\-e_1(r_1+r_2)=b\e_1r_1r_2=c$$
Evidently, we get $e_1=a$ for free. So we update our system of equations:
$$r_1+r_2=-frac{b}{a}\r_1r_2=frac{c}{a}$$
We can solve each equation for $r_2$:
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-r_1\r_2=frac{c}{ar_1}$$
So we can set the two equations equal to each-other:
$$-frac{b}{a}-r_1=frac{c}{ar_1}$$
$$r_1+frac{c}{ar_1}=-frac{b}{a}$$
multiplying both sides by $ar_1$,
$$ar_1^2+br_1=-c$$
Then we add $frac{b^2}{4a}$ to both sides:
$$ar_1^2+br_1+frac{b^2}{4a}=frac{b^2}{4a}-c$$
Then we note that
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=ar_1^2+br_1+frac{b^2}{4a}$$
So we plug it in:
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2}{4a}-c$$
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2-4ac}{4a}$$
$$(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=sqrt{frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=frac{sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{sqrt{4a^2}}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=frac{sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_1=frac{-b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
And since we know that
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-r_1$$
We know that
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-bigg(frac{-b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)$$
$$r_2=-frac{2b}{2a}+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_2=frac{b-2b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_2=frac{-b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
And by definition,
$$ax^2+bx+c=abigg(x+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)bigg(x+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)$$
$$ax^2+bx+c=bigg(ax+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)bigg(ax+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)$$
And with that our proof is complete :)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049315%2fhow-to-factor-this-quadratic-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We need to find two numbers with product $2(-3) = -6$ and sum $5$. You are correct that the numbers are $-1$ and $6$. Splitting the linear term yields
begin{align*}
2x^2 + 5x - 3 & = 2x^2 - x + 6x - 3 && text{split the linear term}\
& = x(2x - 1) + 3(2x - 1) && text{factor by grouping}\
& = (x + 3)(2x - 1) && text{extract the common factor}
end{align*}
which you can verify by multiplying the factors.
You should not write $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x - 3)$ since
begin{align*}
(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3) & = 2x^2(6x + 3) - 1x(6x + 3)\
& = 12x^3 + 6x^2 - 6x^2 -3x\
& = 12x^3 - 3x\
& neq 2x^2 + 5x - 3
end{align*}
Instead, you can write $(2x^2 - 1x) + (6x - 3)$ or $2x^2 - 1x + 6x - 3$.
Also, you should be including equals signs since you are asserting that
$$2x^2 + 5x - 3 = 2x^2 - x + 6x - 3$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We need to find two numbers with product $2(-3) = -6$ and sum $5$. You are correct that the numbers are $-1$ and $6$. Splitting the linear term yields
begin{align*}
2x^2 + 5x - 3 & = 2x^2 - x + 6x - 3 && text{split the linear term}\
& = x(2x - 1) + 3(2x - 1) && text{factor by grouping}\
& = (x + 3)(2x - 1) && text{extract the common factor}
end{align*}
which you can verify by multiplying the factors.
You should not write $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x - 3)$ since
begin{align*}
(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3) & = 2x^2(6x + 3) - 1x(6x + 3)\
& = 12x^3 + 6x^2 - 6x^2 -3x\
& = 12x^3 - 3x\
& neq 2x^2 + 5x - 3
end{align*}
Instead, you can write $(2x^2 - 1x) + (6x - 3)$ or $2x^2 - 1x + 6x - 3$.
Also, you should be including equals signs since you are asserting that
$$2x^2 + 5x - 3 = 2x^2 - x + 6x - 3$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We need to find two numbers with product $2(-3) = -6$ and sum $5$. You are correct that the numbers are $-1$ and $6$. Splitting the linear term yields
begin{align*}
2x^2 + 5x - 3 & = 2x^2 - x + 6x - 3 && text{split the linear term}\
& = x(2x - 1) + 3(2x - 1) && text{factor by grouping}\
& = (x + 3)(2x - 1) && text{extract the common factor}
end{align*}
which you can verify by multiplying the factors.
You should not write $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x - 3)$ since
begin{align*}
(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3) & = 2x^2(6x + 3) - 1x(6x + 3)\
& = 12x^3 + 6x^2 - 6x^2 -3x\
& = 12x^3 - 3x\
& neq 2x^2 + 5x - 3
end{align*}
Instead, you can write $(2x^2 - 1x) + (6x - 3)$ or $2x^2 - 1x + 6x - 3$.
Also, you should be including equals signs since you are asserting that
$$2x^2 + 5x - 3 = 2x^2 - x + 6x - 3$$
$endgroup$
We need to find two numbers with product $2(-3) = -6$ and sum $5$. You are correct that the numbers are $-1$ and $6$. Splitting the linear term yields
begin{align*}
2x^2 + 5x - 3 & = 2x^2 - x + 6x - 3 && text{split the linear term}\
& = x(2x - 1) + 3(2x - 1) && text{factor by grouping}\
& = (x + 3)(2x - 1) && text{extract the common factor}
end{align*}
which you can verify by multiplying the factors.
You should not write $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x - 3)$ since
begin{align*}
(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3) & = 2x^2(6x + 3) - 1x(6x + 3)\
& = 12x^3 + 6x^2 - 6x^2 -3x\
& = 12x^3 - 3x\
& neq 2x^2 + 5x - 3
end{align*}
Instead, you can write $(2x^2 - 1x) + (6x - 3)$ or $2x^2 - 1x + 6x - 3$.
Also, you should be including equals signs since you are asserting that
$$2x^2 + 5x - 3 = 2x^2 - x + 6x - 3$$
edited Dec 22 '18 at 12:36
answered Dec 22 '18 at 11:09
N. F. TaussigN. F. Taussig
44.5k103357
44.5k103357
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes your solution is correct.
Further, note that if you know how to solve a quadratic equation, it's much more easier to factorise in those cases. Suppose the equation is $ax^2+bx+c=0$, and you can find it's roots, $x_1,x_2$. Then, you can simply write $$ax^2+bx+c=a(x-x_1)(x-x_2)=0$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The line $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3)$ is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:16
$begingroup$
It's $+$ I think. It's a typo
$endgroup$
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 22 '18 at 11:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes your solution is correct.
Further, note that if you know how to solve a quadratic equation, it's much more easier to factorise in those cases. Suppose the equation is $ax^2+bx+c=0$, and you can find it's roots, $x_1,x_2$. Then, you can simply write $$ax^2+bx+c=a(x-x_1)(x-x_2)=0$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The line $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3)$ is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:16
$begingroup$
It's $+$ I think. It's a typo
$endgroup$
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 22 '18 at 11:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes your solution is correct.
Further, note that if you know how to solve a quadratic equation, it's much more easier to factorise in those cases. Suppose the equation is $ax^2+bx+c=0$, and you can find it's roots, $x_1,x_2$. Then, you can simply write $$ax^2+bx+c=a(x-x_1)(x-x_2)=0$$
$endgroup$
Yes your solution is correct.
Further, note that if you know how to solve a quadratic equation, it's much more easier to factorise in those cases. Suppose the equation is $ax^2+bx+c=0$, and you can find it's roots, $x_1,x_2$. Then, you can simply write $$ax^2+bx+c=a(x-x_1)(x-x_2)=0$$
answered Dec 22 '18 at 11:14
Ankit KumarAnkit Kumar
1,514221
1,514221
$begingroup$
The line $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3)$ is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:16
$begingroup$
It's $+$ I think. It's a typo
$endgroup$
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 22 '18 at 11:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The line $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3)$ is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:16
$begingroup$
It's $+$ I think. It's a typo
$endgroup$
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 22 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
The line $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3)$ is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:16
$begingroup$
The line $(2x^2 - 1x)(6x + 3)$ is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:16
$begingroup$
It's $+$ I think. It's a typo
$endgroup$
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 22 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
It's $+$ I think. It's a typo
$endgroup$
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 22 '18 at 11:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is worth reviewing the theory behind the OP's technique.
Assume always that $a$ is a positive integer, $a ge 1$.
Suppose
$tag 1 ax^2+bx+c= (d_1x+e_1)(d_2x+e_2)$
where the constants $b, c, d_1. e_1, d_2 text{ and } e_2$ are all integers.
If $text{(1)}$ holds true then we can write
$tag 2 ax^2+bx+c= (d_1'x+e_1')(d_2'x+e_2')$
with integer constants $d_1', e_1', d_2' text{ and } e_2'$ such that $d_1' text{ and } d_2'$ are both positive.
Hint: If necessary, apply $(-1)(-1) = 1$ to the rhs of $text{(1)}$
Now we are looking for a '$text{(1)}$ factorization' of $2x^2 + 5x − 3$. Since $a =2$ is prime, we let $d_1 = 2$ and renaming the (unknown) constants, write,
$tag 3 2x^2 + 5x − 3= (2x+u)(x+v)=2x^2 + (2v+u)x + uv$
Noticing that $uv = -3$ restricts things considerably, we create a google spreadsheet,
and find the answer:
$tag 4 u = -1 text{ and } v = 3$
so
$tag 5 2x^2 + 5x − 3= (2x-1)(x+3)$
This technique, with the same size spreadsheet, can be used whenever both $a$ and $c$ are prime numbers. In general, you'll have to organize your work and break things down into more cases to find the solution (c.f. the BOX METHOD). However, the approach discussed here, can be extended and methodically applied to handle any of these problems.
Note 1: If you are lazy, just fill in the first row of the spreadsheet for the choices available for $u$, and then use cell formulas:
Note 2: These factorization techniques can come up 'empty handed' - there may be no solutions.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is worth reviewing the theory behind the OP's technique.
Assume always that $a$ is a positive integer, $a ge 1$.
Suppose
$tag 1 ax^2+bx+c= (d_1x+e_1)(d_2x+e_2)$
where the constants $b, c, d_1. e_1, d_2 text{ and } e_2$ are all integers.
If $text{(1)}$ holds true then we can write
$tag 2 ax^2+bx+c= (d_1'x+e_1')(d_2'x+e_2')$
with integer constants $d_1', e_1', d_2' text{ and } e_2'$ such that $d_1' text{ and } d_2'$ are both positive.
Hint: If necessary, apply $(-1)(-1) = 1$ to the rhs of $text{(1)}$
Now we are looking for a '$text{(1)}$ factorization' of $2x^2 + 5x − 3$. Since $a =2$ is prime, we let $d_1 = 2$ and renaming the (unknown) constants, write,
$tag 3 2x^2 + 5x − 3= (2x+u)(x+v)=2x^2 + (2v+u)x + uv$
Noticing that $uv = -3$ restricts things considerably, we create a google spreadsheet,
and find the answer:
$tag 4 u = -1 text{ and } v = 3$
so
$tag 5 2x^2 + 5x − 3= (2x-1)(x+3)$
This technique, with the same size spreadsheet, can be used whenever both $a$ and $c$ are prime numbers. In general, you'll have to organize your work and break things down into more cases to find the solution (c.f. the BOX METHOD). However, the approach discussed here, can be extended and methodically applied to handle any of these problems.
Note 1: If you are lazy, just fill in the first row of the spreadsheet for the choices available for $u$, and then use cell formulas:
Note 2: These factorization techniques can come up 'empty handed' - there may be no solutions.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is worth reviewing the theory behind the OP's technique.
Assume always that $a$ is a positive integer, $a ge 1$.
Suppose
$tag 1 ax^2+bx+c= (d_1x+e_1)(d_2x+e_2)$
where the constants $b, c, d_1. e_1, d_2 text{ and } e_2$ are all integers.
If $text{(1)}$ holds true then we can write
$tag 2 ax^2+bx+c= (d_1'x+e_1')(d_2'x+e_2')$
with integer constants $d_1', e_1', d_2' text{ and } e_2'$ such that $d_1' text{ and } d_2'$ are both positive.
Hint: If necessary, apply $(-1)(-1) = 1$ to the rhs of $text{(1)}$
Now we are looking for a '$text{(1)}$ factorization' of $2x^2 + 5x − 3$. Since $a =2$ is prime, we let $d_1 = 2$ and renaming the (unknown) constants, write,
$tag 3 2x^2 + 5x − 3= (2x+u)(x+v)=2x^2 + (2v+u)x + uv$
Noticing that $uv = -3$ restricts things considerably, we create a google spreadsheet,
and find the answer:
$tag 4 u = -1 text{ and } v = 3$
so
$tag 5 2x^2 + 5x − 3= (2x-1)(x+3)$
This technique, with the same size spreadsheet, can be used whenever both $a$ and $c$ are prime numbers. In general, you'll have to organize your work and break things down into more cases to find the solution (c.f. the BOX METHOD). However, the approach discussed here, can be extended and methodically applied to handle any of these problems.
Note 1: If you are lazy, just fill in the first row of the spreadsheet for the choices available for $u$, and then use cell formulas:
Note 2: These factorization techniques can come up 'empty handed' - there may be no solutions.
$endgroup$
It is worth reviewing the theory behind the OP's technique.
Assume always that $a$ is a positive integer, $a ge 1$.
Suppose
$tag 1 ax^2+bx+c= (d_1x+e_1)(d_2x+e_2)$
where the constants $b, c, d_1. e_1, d_2 text{ and } e_2$ are all integers.
If $text{(1)}$ holds true then we can write
$tag 2 ax^2+bx+c= (d_1'x+e_1')(d_2'x+e_2')$
with integer constants $d_1', e_1', d_2' text{ and } e_2'$ such that $d_1' text{ and } d_2'$ are both positive.
Hint: If necessary, apply $(-1)(-1) = 1$ to the rhs of $text{(1)}$
Now we are looking for a '$text{(1)}$ factorization' of $2x^2 + 5x − 3$. Since $a =2$ is prime, we let $d_1 = 2$ and renaming the (unknown) constants, write,
$tag 3 2x^2 + 5x − 3= (2x+u)(x+v)=2x^2 + (2v+u)x + uv$
Noticing that $uv = -3$ restricts things considerably, we create a google spreadsheet,
and find the answer:
$tag 4 u = -1 text{ and } v = 3$
so
$tag 5 2x^2 + 5x − 3= (2x-1)(x+3)$
This technique, with the same size spreadsheet, can be used whenever both $a$ and $c$ are prime numbers. In general, you'll have to organize your work and break things down into more cases to find the solution (c.f. the BOX METHOD). However, the approach discussed here, can be extended and methodically applied to handle any of these problems.
Note 1: If you are lazy, just fill in the first row of the spreadsheet for the choices available for $u$, and then use cell formulas:
Note 2: These factorization techniques can come up 'empty handed' - there may be no solutions.
edited Dec 22 '18 at 15:37
answered Dec 22 '18 at 13:44
CopyPasteItCopyPasteIt
4,2031628
4,2031628
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$2x^2 + 5x − 3 = 0$$
$$ac = 2(-3) = -6$$
$$text{$^-1times 6 =phantom .^-6 $ and $ ^-1+6 = 5$}$$
$-1$ and $6$ are correct. What you did after that is wrong.
Here are two methods that I know of for proceeding from $-1$ and $6$.
Method 1. Replace $5x$ with $-1x+6x$ and factor-by-pairing-off.
begin{array}{c}
2x^2 + 5x − 3 \
2x^2 -1x + 6x - 3 \
(2x^2 -1x) + (6x - 3) \
x(2x-1) + 3(2x-1) \
(x+3)(2x-1)
end{array}
Method 2. Write out $(ax-1)(ax+6)$ and then divide out the greatest common divisors.
begin{array}{c}
(2x-1)(2x+6) &{gcd(2,-1)=1 text{and} gcd(2,6)=2}\
dfrac{(2x-1)}{1} cdot dfrac{(2x+6)}{2} \
(2x-1)(x+3)
end{array}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$2x^2 + 5x − 3 = 0$$
$$ac = 2(-3) = -6$$
$$text{$^-1times 6 =phantom .^-6 $ and $ ^-1+6 = 5$}$$
$-1$ and $6$ are correct. What you did after that is wrong.
Here are two methods that I know of for proceeding from $-1$ and $6$.
Method 1. Replace $5x$ with $-1x+6x$ and factor-by-pairing-off.
begin{array}{c}
2x^2 + 5x − 3 \
2x^2 -1x + 6x - 3 \
(2x^2 -1x) + (6x - 3) \
x(2x-1) + 3(2x-1) \
(x+3)(2x-1)
end{array}
Method 2. Write out $(ax-1)(ax+6)$ and then divide out the greatest common divisors.
begin{array}{c}
(2x-1)(2x+6) &{gcd(2,-1)=1 text{and} gcd(2,6)=2}\
dfrac{(2x-1)}{1} cdot dfrac{(2x+6)}{2} \
(2x-1)(x+3)
end{array}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$2x^2 + 5x − 3 = 0$$
$$ac = 2(-3) = -6$$
$$text{$^-1times 6 =phantom .^-6 $ and $ ^-1+6 = 5$}$$
$-1$ and $6$ are correct. What you did after that is wrong.
Here are two methods that I know of for proceeding from $-1$ and $6$.
Method 1. Replace $5x$ with $-1x+6x$ and factor-by-pairing-off.
begin{array}{c}
2x^2 + 5x − 3 \
2x^2 -1x + 6x - 3 \
(2x^2 -1x) + (6x - 3) \
x(2x-1) + 3(2x-1) \
(x+3)(2x-1)
end{array}
Method 2. Write out $(ax-1)(ax+6)$ and then divide out the greatest common divisors.
begin{array}{c}
(2x-1)(2x+6) &{gcd(2,-1)=1 text{and} gcd(2,6)=2}\
dfrac{(2x-1)}{1} cdot dfrac{(2x+6)}{2} \
(2x-1)(x+3)
end{array}
$endgroup$
$$2x^2 + 5x − 3 = 0$$
$$ac = 2(-3) = -6$$
$$text{$^-1times 6 =phantom .^-6 $ and $ ^-1+6 = 5$}$$
$-1$ and $6$ are correct. What you did after that is wrong.
Here are two methods that I know of for proceeding from $-1$ and $6$.
Method 1. Replace $5x$ with $-1x+6x$ and factor-by-pairing-off.
begin{array}{c}
2x^2 + 5x − 3 \
2x^2 -1x + 6x - 3 \
(2x^2 -1x) + (6x - 3) \
x(2x-1) + 3(2x-1) \
(x+3)(2x-1)
end{array}
Method 2. Write out $(ax-1)(ax+6)$ and then divide out the greatest common divisors.
begin{array}{c}
(2x-1)(2x+6) &{gcd(2,-1)=1 text{and} gcd(2,6)=2}\
dfrac{(2x-1)}{1} cdot dfrac{(2x+6)}{2} \
(2x-1)(x+3)
end{array}
edited Dec 25 '18 at 1:29
answered Dec 24 '18 at 2:34
steven gregorysteven gregory
18.2k32258
18.2k32258
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have that $(2x+a)(x+b)=2x^2+5x-3$, where $x=-frac a2$ and $x=-b$ are the solutions you require.
Then $$(2x^2+(a+2b)x+ab=2x^2+5x-3$$
leads to $$a+2b=5; ab=-3$$
We set $b=frac12(5-a)tofrac12a(5-a)=-3 to a^2-5a-6=0$
$$to a=-1, 6$$
$$to b= 3, -frac 12$$
So $$2x^2+5x-3=(2x-1)(x+3)=(2x+6)(x-frac12)$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have that $(2x+a)(x+b)=2x^2+5x-3$, where $x=-frac a2$ and $x=-b$ are the solutions you require.
Then $$(2x^2+(a+2b)x+ab=2x^2+5x-3$$
leads to $$a+2b=5; ab=-3$$
We set $b=frac12(5-a)tofrac12a(5-a)=-3 to a^2-5a-6=0$
$$to a=-1, 6$$
$$to b= 3, -frac 12$$
So $$2x^2+5x-3=(2x-1)(x+3)=(2x+6)(x-frac12)$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have that $(2x+a)(x+b)=2x^2+5x-3$, where $x=-frac a2$ and $x=-b$ are the solutions you require.
Then $$(2x^2+(a+2b)x+ab=2x^2+5x-3$$
leads to $$a+2b=5; ab=-3$$
We set $b=frac12(5-a)tofrac12a(5-a)=-3 to a^2-5a-6=0$
$$to a=-1, 6$$
$$to b= 3, -frac 12$$
So $$2x^2+5x-3=(2x-1)(x+3)=(2x+6)(x-frac12)$$
$endgroup$
We have that $(2x+a)(x+b)=2x^2+5x-3$, where $x=-frac a2$ and $x=-b$ are the solutions you require.
Then $$(2x^2+(a+2b)x+ab=2x^2+5x-3$$
leads to $$a+2b=5; ab=-3$$
We set $b=frac12(5-a)tofrac12a(5-a)=-3 to a^2-5a-6=0$
$$to a=-1, 6$$
$$to b= 3, -frac 12$$
So $$2x^2+5x-3=(2x-1)(x+3)=(2x+6)(x-frac12)$$
edited Dec 22 '18 at 11:30
answered Dec 22 '18 at 11:19
Rhys HughesRhys Hughes
6,9441530
6,9441530
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One could start with multiplying the polynomial with $2$ and get $$4x^2+10x-6=(2x)^2+5(2x)-6$$ which can be seen as a simple equation in $2x$ with factoring $((2x)+6)((2x)-1)$.
Taking out the added factor $2$ leaves $(x+3)(2x-1).$
For the general quadratic polynomial with integer coefficients $ax^2+bx+c$ the same approach requires the factoring of $a(ax^2+bx+c)=(ax)^2+b(ax)+ac$.
If a factoring $((ax)+m)((ax)+n)$ with integers $m$ and $n$ exists, then general theory guarantees that the extra factor $a$ can be taken out and still leave a factoring with only integer coefficients.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Nice idea. Could you expand your idea to explain how the values of $a$ and $c$ in the original polynomial relate to the coefficients of the new associated polynomial?
$endgroup$
– John Joy
Dec 23 '18 at 14:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One could start with multiplying the polynomial with $2$ and get $$4x^2+10x-6=(2x)^2+5(2x)-6$$ which can be seen as a simple equation in $2x$ with factoring $((2x)+6)((2x)-1)$.
Taking out the added factor $2$ leaves $(x+3)(2x-1).$
For the general quadratic polynomial with integer coefficients $ax^2+bx+c$ the same approach requires the factoring of $a(ax^2+bx+c)=(ax)^2+b(ax)+ac$.
If a factoring $((ax)+m)((ax)+n)$ with integers $m$ and $n$ exists, then general theory guarantees that the extra factor $a$ can be taken out and still leave a factoring with only integer coefficients.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Nice idea. Could you expand your idea to explain how the values of $a$ and $c$ in the original polynomial relate to the coefficients of the new associated polynomial?
$endgroup$
– John Joy
Dec 23 '18 at 14:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One could start with multiplying the polynomial with $2$ and get $$4x^2+10x-6=(2x)^2+5(2x)-6$$ which can be seen as a simple equation in $2x$ with factoring $((2x)+6)((2x)-1)$.
Taking out the added factor $2$ leaves $(x+3)(2x-1).$
For the general quadratic polynomial with integer coefficients $ax^2+bx+c$ the same approach requires the factoring of $a(ax^2+bx+c)=(ax)^2+b(ax)+ac$.
If a factoring $((ax)+m)((ax)+n)$ with integers $m$ and $n$ exists, then general theory guarantees that the extra factor $a$ can be taken out and still leave a factoring with only integer coefficients.
$endgroup$
One could start with multiplying the polynomial with $2$ and get $$4x^2+10x-6=(2x)^2+5(2x)-6$$ which can be seen as a simple equation in $2x$ with factoring $((2x)+6)((2x)-1)$.
Taking out the added factor $2$ leaves $(x+3)(2x-1).$
For the general quadratic polynomial with integer coefficients $ax^2+bx+c$ the same approach requires the factoring of $a(ax^2+bx+c)=(ax)^2+b(ax)+ac$.
If a factoring $((ax)+m)((ax)+n)$ with integers $m$ and $n$ exists, then general theory guarantees that the extra factor $a$ can be taken out and still leave a factoring with only integer coefficients.
edited Dec 24 '18 at 1:30
answered Dec 22 '18 at 12:19
randomrandom
57626
57626
$begingroup$
Nice idea. Could you expand your idea to explain how the values of $a$ and $c$ in the original polynomial relate to the coefficients of the new associated polynomial?
$endgroup$
– John Joy
Dec 23 '18 at 14:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Nice idea. Could you expand your idea to explain how the values of $a$ and $c$ in the original polynomial relate to the coefficients of the new associated polynomial?
$endgroup$
– John Joy
Dec 23 '18 at 14:13
$begingroup$
Nice idea. Could you expand your idea to explain how the values of $a$ and $c$ in the original polynomial relate to the coefficients of the new associated polynomial?
$endgroup$
– John Joy
Dec 23 '18 at 14:13
$begingroup$
Nice idea. Could you expand your idea to explain how the values of $a$ and $c$ in the original polynomial relate to the coefficients of the new associated polynomial?
$endgroup$
– John Joy
Dec 23 '18 at 14:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So we can actually generalize this. Say we have the polynomial
$$p(x)=ax^2+bx+c$$
Fact:
$$p(x)=bigg(ax+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)bigg(ax+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)$$
Proof:
Let's assume the existence of three real numbers $r_1$, $r_2$, and $e_1$ such that
$$ax^2+bx+c=e_1(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$
If we expand the product on the right hand side and then compare coefficients,
$$ax^2+bx+c=e_1x^2-e_1(r_1+r_2)x+e_1r_1r_2$$
we get a system of equations
$$e_1=a\-e_1(r_1+r_2)=b\e_1r_1r_2=c$$
Evidently, we get $e_1=a$ for free. So we update our system of equations:
$$r_1+r_2=-frac{b}{a}\r_1r_2=frac{c}{a}$$
We can solve each equation for $r_2$:
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-r_1\r_2=frac{c}{ar_1}$$
So we can set the two equations equal to each-other:
$$-frac{b}{a}-r_1=frac{c}{ar_1}$$
$$r_1+frac{c}{ar_1}=-frac{b}{a}$$
multiplying both sides by $ar_1$,
$$ar_1^2+br_1=-c$$
Then we add $frac{b^2}{4a}$ to both sides:
$$ar_1^2+br_1+frac{b^2}{4a}=frac{b^2}{4a}-c$$
Then we note that
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=ar_1^2+br_1+frac{b^2}{4a}$$
So we plug it in:
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2}{4a}-c$$
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2-4ac}{4a}$$
$$(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=sqrt{frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=frac{sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{sqrt{4a^2}}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=frac{sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_1=frac{-b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
And since we know that
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-r_1$$
We know that
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-bigg(frac{-b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)$$
$$r_2=-frac{2b}{2a}+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_2=frac{b-2b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_2=frac{-b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
And by definition,
$$ax^2+bx+c=abigg(x+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)bigg(x+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)$$
$$ax^2+bx+c=bigg(ax+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)bigg(ax+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)$$
And with that our proof is complete :)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So we can actually generalize this. Say we have the polynomial
$$p(x)=ax^2+bx+c$$
Fact:
$$p(x)=bigg(ax+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)bigg(ax+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)$$
Proof:
Let's assume the existence of three real numbers $r_1$, $r_2$, and $e_1$ such that
$$ax^2+bx+c=e_1(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$
If we expand the product on the right hand side and then compare coefficients,
$$ax^2+bx+c=e_1x^2-e_1(r_1+r_2)x+e_1r_1r_2$$
we get a system of equations
$$e_1=a\-e_1(r_1+r_2)=b\e_1r_1r_2=c$$
Evidently, we get $e_1=a$ for free. So we update our system of equations:
$$r_1+r_2=-frac{b}{a}\r_1r_2=frac{c}{a}$$
We can solve each equation for $r_2$:
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-r_1\r_2=frac{c}{ar_1}$$
So we can set the two equations equal to each-other:
$$-frac{b}{a}-r_1=frac{c}{ar_1}$$
$$r_1+frac{c}{ar_1}=-frac{b}{a}$$
multiplying both sides by $ar_1$,
$$ar_1^2+br_1=-c$$
Then we add $frac{b^2}{4a}$ to both sides:
$$ar_1^2+br_1+frac{b^2}{4a}=frac{b^2}{4a}-c$$
Then we note that
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=ar_1^2+br_1+frac{b^2}{4a}$$
So we plug it in:
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2}{4a}-c$$
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2-4ac}{4a}$$
$$(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=sqrt{frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=frac{sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{sqrt{4a^2}}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=frac{sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_1=frac{-b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
And since we know that
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-r_1$$
We know that
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-bigg(frac{-b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)$$
$$r_2=-frac{2b}{2a}+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_2=frac{b-2b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_2=frac{-b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
And by definition,
$$ax^2+bx+c=abigg(x+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)bigg(x+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)$$
$$ax^2+bx+c=bigg(ax+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)bigg(ax+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)$$
And with that our proof is complete :)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So we can actually generalize this. Say we have the polynomial
$$p(x)=ax^2+bx+c$$
Fact:
$$p(x)=bigg(ax+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)bigg(ax+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)$$
Proof:
Let's assume the existence of three real numbers $r_1$, $r_2$, and $e_1$ such that
$$ax^2+bx+c=e_1(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$
If we expand the product on the right hand side and then compare coefficients,
$$ax^2+bx+c=e_1x^2-e_1(r_1+r_2)x+e_1r_1r_2$$
we get a system of equations
$$e_1=a\-e_1(r_1+r_2)=b\e_1r_1r_2=c$$
Evidently, we get $e_1=a$ for free. So we update our system of equations:
$$r_1+r_2=-frac{b}{a}\r_1r_2=frac{c}{a}$$
We can solve each equation for $r_2$:
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-r_1\r_2=frac{c}{ar_1}$$
So we can set the two equations equal to each-other:
$$-frac{b}{a}-r_1=frac{c}{ar_1}$$
$$r_1+frac{c}{ar_1}=-frac{b}{a}$$
multiplying both sides by $ar_1$,
$$ar_1^2+br_1=-c$$
Then we add $frac{b^2}{4a}$ to both sides:
$$ar_1^2+br_1+frac{b^2}{4a}=frac{b^2}{4a}-c$$
Then we note that
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=ar_1^2+br_1+frac{b^2}{4a}$$
So we plug it in:
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2}{4a}-c$$
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2-4ac}{4a}$$
$$(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=sqrt{frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=frac{sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{sqrt{4a^2}}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=frac{sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_1=frac{-b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
And since we know that
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-r_1$$
We know that
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-bigg(frac{-b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)$$
$$r_2=-frac{2b}{2a}+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_2=frac{b-2b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_2=frac{-b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
And by definition,
$$ax^2+bx+c=abigg(x+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)bigg(x+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)$$
$$ax^2+bx+c=bigg(ax+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)bigg(ax+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)$$
And with that our proof is complete :)
$endgroup$
So we can actually generalize this. Say we have the polynomial
$$p(x)=ax^2+bx+c$$
Fact:
$$p(x)=bigg(ax+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)bigg(ax+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)$$
Proof:
Let's assume the existence of three real numbers $r_1$, $r_2$, and $e_1$ such that
$$ax^2+bx+c=e_1(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$
If we expand the product on the right hand side and then compare coefficients,
$$ax^2+bx+c=e_1x^2-e_1(r_1+r_2)x+e_1r_1r_2$$
we get a system of equations
$$e_1=a\-e_1(r_1+r_2)=b\e_1r_1r_2=c$$
Evidently, we get $e_1=a$ for free. So we update our system of equations:
$$r_1+r_2=-frac{b}{a}\r_1r_2=frac{c}{a}$$
We can solve each equation for $r_2$:
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-r_1\r_2=frac{c}{ar_1}$$
So we can set the two equations equal to each-other:
$$-frac{b}{a}-r_1=frac{c}{ar_1}$$
$$r_1+frac{c}{ar_1}=-frac{b}{a}$$
multiplying both sides by $ar_1$,
$$ar_1^2+br_1=-c$$
Then we add $frac{b^2}{4a}$ to both sides:
$$ar_1^2+br_1+frac{b^2}{4a}=frac{b^2}{4a}-c$$
Then we note that
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=ar_1^2+br_1+frac{b^2}{4a}$$
So we plug it in:
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2}{4a}-c$$
$$a(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2-4ac}{4a}$$
$$(r_1+b/2a)^2=frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=sqrt{frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=frac{sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{sqrt{4a^2}}$$
$$r_1+b/2a=frac{sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_1=frac{-b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
And since we know that
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-r_1$$
We know that
$$r_2=-frac{b}{a}-bigg(frac{-b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)$$
$$r_2=-frac{2b}{2a}+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_2=frac{b-2b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
$$r_2=frac{-b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
And by definition,
$$ax^2+bx+c=abigg(x+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)bigg(x+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}bigg)$$
$$ax^2+bx+c=bigg(ax+frac{b-sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)bigg(ax+frac{b+sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2}bigg)$$
And with that our proof is complete :)
answered Dec 25 '18 at 3:07
clathratusclathratus
4,745337
4,745337
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049315%2fhow-to-factor-this-quadratic-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to MathSE. This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Dec 22 '18 at 11:06