Is $L_4$ a CFL?












0












$begingroup$



Consider the following language: $$L_4 = {a^ib^jc^kd^l : i,j,k,l
ge0 wedge i=1 Rightarrow j=k=l}.$$

Prove or disprove: $L_4$ is a context-free language.




To me, it looks like $L_4$ can be accepted using a PDA, but I don't know how to construct it.
appreciate a hint here.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The sub-language for $i=1$ is not context.free
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Dec 22 '18 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    Can you give me a hint of how to disprove it then?
    $endgroup$
    – Yotam Raz
    Dec 22 '18 at 14:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The pumping lemma for context-free languages would do it.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Dec 22 '18 at 14:54










  • $begingroup$
    is $w = ab^kc^kd^k$ a good choice? for $k$ being the constant from the pumping lemma.
    $endgroup$
    – Yotam Raz
    Dec 22 '18 at 15:03








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    More precisely, what the pumping lemma shows directly is @Wuestenfux's claim. To get all the way to $L_4$, note that "the sub-language for $i=1$" is the intersection of $L_4$ and a regular language.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Dec 22 '18 at 15:50
















0












$begingroup$



Consider the following language: $$L_4 = {a^ib^jc^kd^l : i,j,k,l
ge0 wedge i=1 Rightarrow j=k=l}.$$

Prove or disprove: $L_4$ is a context-free language.




To me, it looks like $L_4$ can be accepted using a PDA, but I don't know how to construct it.
appreciate a hint here.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The sub-language for $i=1$ is not context.free
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Dec 22 '18 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    Can you give me a hint of how to disprove it then?
    $endgroup$
    – Yotam Raz
    Dec 22 '18 at 14:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The pumping lemma for context-free languages would do it.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Dec 22 '18 at 14:54










  • $begingroup$
    is $w = ab^kc^kd^k$ a good choice? for $k$ being the constant from the pumping lemma.
    $endgroup$
    – Yotam Raz
    Dec 22 '18 at 15:03








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    More precisely, what the pumping lemma shows directly is @Wuestenfux's claim. To get all the way to $L_4$, note that "the sub-language for $i=1$" is the intersection of $L_4$ and a regular language.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Dec 22 '18 at 15:50














0












0








0





$begingroup$



Consider the following language: $$L_4 = {a^ib^jc^kd^l : i,j,k,l
ge0 wedge i=1 Rightarrow j=k=l}.$$

Prove or disprove: $L_4$ is a context-free language.




To me, it looks like $L_4$ can be accepted using a PDA, but I don't know how to construct it.
appreciate a hint here.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Consider the following language: $$L_4 = {a^ib^jc^kd^l : i,j,k,l
ge0 wedge i=1 Rightarrow j=k=l}.$$

Prove or disprove: $L_4$ is a context-free language.




To me, it looks like $L_4$ can be accepted using a PDA, but I don't know how to construct it.
appreciate a hint here.







formal-languages automata context-free-grammar formal-grammar pumping-lemma






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 16 at 21:21









Yuval Filmus

48.7k471145




48.7k471145










asked Dec 22 '18 at 11:53









Yotam RazYotam Raz

235




235








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The sub-language for $i=1$ is not context.free
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Dec 22 '18 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    Can you give me a hint of how to disprove it then?
    $endgroup$
    – Yotam Raz
    Dec 22 '18 at 14:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The pumping lemma for context-free languages would do it.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Dec 22 '18 at 14:54










  • $begingroup$
    is $w = ab^kc^kd^k$ a good choice? for $k$ being the constant from the pumping lemma.
    $endgroup$
    – Yotam Raz
    Dec 22 '18 at 15:03








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    More precisely, what the pumping lemma shows directly is @Wuestenfux's claim. To get all the way to $L_4$, note that "the sub-language for $i=1$" is the intersection of $L_4$ and a regular language.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Dec 22 '18 at 15:50














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The sub-language for $i=1$ is not context.free
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Dec 22 '18 at 13:42










  • $begingroup$
    Can you give me a hint of how to disprove it then?
    $endgroup$
    – Yotam Raz
    Dec 22 '18 at 14:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The pumping lemma for context-free languages would do it.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Dec 22 '18 at 14:54










  • $begingroup$
    is $w = ab^kc^kd^k$ a good choice? for $k$ being the constant from the pumping lemma.
    $endgroup$
    – Yotam Raz
    Dec 22 '18 at 15:03








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    More precisely, what the pumping lemma shows directly is @Wuestenfux's claim. To get all the way to $L_4$, note that "the sub-language for $i=1$" is the intersection of $L_4$ and a regular language.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Dec 22 '18 at 15:50








3




3




$begingroup$
The sub-language for $i=1$ is not context.free
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Dec 22 '18 at 13:42




$begingroup$
The sub-language for $i=1$ is not context.free
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Dec 22 '18 at 13:42












$begingroup$
Can you give me a hint of how to disprove it then?
$endgroup$
– Yotam Raz
Dec 22 '18 at 14:48




$begingroup$
Can you give me a hint of how to disprove it then?
$endgroup$
– Yotam Raz
Dec 22 '18 at 14:48




1




1




$begingroup$
The pumping lemma for context-free languages would do it.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 22 '18 at 14:54




$begingroup$
The pumping lemma for context-free languages would do it.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 22 '18 at 14:54












$begingroup$
is $w = ab^kc^kd^k$ a good choice? for $k$ being the constant from the pumping lemma.
$endgroup$
– Yotam Raz
Dec 22 '18 at 15:03






$begingroup$
is $w = ab^kc^kd^k$ a good choice? for $k$ being the constant from the pumping lemma.
$endgroup$
– Yotam Raz
Dec 22 '18 at 15:03






1




1




$begingroup$
More precisely, what the pumping lemma shows directly is @Wuestenfux's claim. To get all the way to $L_4$, note that "the sub-language for $i=1$" is the intersection of $L_4$ and a regular language.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 22 '18 at 15:50




$begingroup$
More precisely, what the pumping lemma shows directly is @Wuestenfux's claim. To get all the way to $L_4$, note that "the sub-language for $i=1$" is the intersection of $L_4$ and a regular language.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 22 '18 at 15:50










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Since the context-free languages are closed under intersection with a regular language and under homomorphism, if $L_4$ were context-free then so would the following language be, for the homomorphism given by $h(a) = epsilon$ and $h(sigma) = sigma$ for $sigma neq a$:
$$
h(L_4 cap a(b+c+d)^*) = { b^nc^nd^n : n geq 0 }.
$$

However, the latter language is well-known not to be context-free.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049362%2fis-l-4-a-cfl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Since the context-free languages are closed under intersection with a regular language and under homomorphism, if $L_4$ were context-free then so would the following language be, for the homomorphism given by $h(a) = epsilon$ and $h(sigma) = sigma$ for $sigma neq a$:
    $$
    h(L_4 cap a(b+c+d)^*) = { b^nc^nd^n : n geq 0 }.
    $$

    However, the latter language is well-known not to be context-free.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Since the context-free languages are closed under intersection with a regular language and under homomorphism, if $L_4$ were context-free then so would the following language be, for the homomorphism given by $h(a) = epsilon$ and $h(sigma) = sigma$ for $sigma neq a$:
      $$
      h(L_4 cap a(b+c+d)^*) = { b^nc^nd^n : n geq 0 }.
      $$

      However, the latter language is well-known not to be context-free.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Since the context-free languages are closed under intersection with a regular language and under homomorphism, if $L_4$ were context-free then so would the following language be, for the homomorphism given by $h(a) = epsilon$ and $h(sigma) = sigma$ for $sigma neq a$:
        $$
        h(L_4 cap a(b+c+d)^*) = { b^nc^nd^n : n geq 0 }.
        $$

        However, the latter language is well-known not to be context-free.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Since the context-free languages are closed under intersection with a regular language and under homomorphism, if $L_4$ were context-free then so would the following language be, for the homomorphism given by $h(a) = epsilon$ and $h(sigma) = sigma$ for $sigma neq a$:
        $$
        h(L_4 cap a(b+c+d)^*) = { b^nc^nd^n : n geq 0 }.
        $$

        However, the latter language is well-known not to be context-free.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 19 at 16:43

























        answered Jan 16 at 21:23









        Yuval FilmusYuval Filmus

        48.7k471145




        48.7k471145






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049362%2fis-l-4-a-cfl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen