Prove that $f(n)ge 2^{n-1}$
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
This is from a Brazilian math contest for college students (OBMU):
Let $f: (0,+infty) to (0,+infty)$ be a infinitely differentiable function such that
- For all positive integer $k$ and positive real $x$, $f^{(k)}(x)> 0$ (where $f^{(k)}$ is the kth derivative).
- For all positive integer $m$, $f(m)$ is a positive integer.
Prove that $f(n)ge 2^{n-1}$ for all positive integer $n$.
Attempt
By the mean value theorem, we have
$$f(2)-f(1) = f'(c_1),space c_1 in (1,2)$$
$$f(3)-f(2) = f'(c_2),space c_2 in (2,3)$$
$$vdots $$
$$f(n)-f(n-1) = f'(c_{n-1}),space c_2 in (n,n-1) $$
Then, $f'(c_k)$ is positive integer for all $k in {1,2,cdots, n-1}$. Besides, $f'$ is strictly increasing. Thus, $f'(c_k) ge k$. Adding all the inequalities, we get
$$f(n) ge sum_{k=1}^{n-1}k + f(1) = frac{n(n-1)}{2} + f(1) $$
real-analysis inequality contest-math
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
This is from a Brazilian math contest for college students (OBMU):
Let $f: (0,+infty) to (0,+infty)$ be a infinitely differentiable function such that
- For all positive integer $k$ and positive real $x$, $f^{(k)}(x)> 0$ (where $f^{(k)}$ is the kth derivative).
- For all positive integer $m$, $f(m)$ is a positive integer.
Prove that $f(n)ge 2^{n-1}$ for all positive integer $n$.
Attempt
By the mean value theorem, we have
$$f(2)-f(1) = f'(c_1),space c_1 in (1,2)$$
$$f(3)-f(2) = f'(c_2),space c_2 in (2,3)$$
$$vdots $$
$$f(n)-f(n-1) = f'(c_{n-1}),space c_2 in (n,n-1) $$
Then, $f'(c_k)$ is positive integer for all $k in {1,2,cdots, n-1}$. Besides, $f'$ is strictly increasing. Thus, $f'(c_k) ge k$. Adding all the inequalities, we get
$$f(n) ge sum_{k=1}^{n-1}k + f(1) = frac{n(n-1)}{2} + f(1) $$
real-analysis inequality contest-math
Hint: Induct on $n$.
– user10354138
Nov 21 at 15:36
@user10354138 could you be more specific?
– Rafael Deiga
Nov 21 at 17:07
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
This is from a Brazilian math contest for college students (OBMU):
Let $f: (0,+infty) to (0,+infty)$ be a infinitely differentiable function such that
- For all positive integer $k$ and positive real $x$, $f^{(k)}(x)> 0$ (where $f^{(k)}$ is the kth derivative).
- For all positive integer $m$, $f(m)$ is a positive integer.
Prove that $f(n)ge 2^{n-1}$ for all positive integer $n$.
Attempt
By the mean value theorem, we have
$$f(2)-f(1) = f'(c_1),space c_1 in (1,2)$$
$$f(3)-f(2) = f'(c_2),space c_2 in (2,3)$$
$$vdots $$
$$f(n)-f(n-1) = f'(c_{n-1}),space c_2 in (n,n-1) $$
Then, $f'(c_k)$ is positive integer for all $k in {1,2,cdots, n-1}$. Besides, $f'$ is strictly increasing. Thus, $f'(c_k) ge k$. Adding all the inequalities, we get
$$f(n) ge sum_{k=1}^{n-1}k + f(1) = frac{n(n-1)}{2} + f(1) $$
real-analysis inequality contest-math
This is from a Brazilian math contest for college students (OBMU):
Let $f: (0,+infty) to (0,+infty)$ be a infinitely differentiable function such that
- For all positive integer $k$ and positive real $x$, $f^{(k)}(x)> 0$ (where $f^{(k)}$ is the kth derivative).
- For all positive integer $m$, $f(m)$ is a positive integer.
Prove that $f(n)ge 2^{n-1}$ for all positive integer $n$.
Attempt
By the mean value theorem, we have
$$f(2)-f(1) = f'(c_1),space c_1 in (1,2)$$
$$f(3)-f(2) = f'(c_2),space c_2 in (2,3)$$
$$vdots $$
$$f(n)-f(n-1) = f'(c_{n-1}),space c_2 in (n,n-1) $$
Then, $f'(c_k)$ is positive integer for all $k in {1,2,cdots, n-1}$. Besides, $f'$ is strictly increasing. Thus, $f'(c_k) ge k$. Adding all the inequalities, we get
$$f(n) ge sum_{k=1}^{n-1}k + f(1) = frac{n(n-1)}{2} + f(1) $$
real-analysis inequality contest-math
real-analysis inequality contest-math
asked Nov 21 at 2:39
Rafael Deiga
657311
657311
Hint: Induct on $n$.
– user10354138
Nov 21 at 15:36
@user10354138 could you be more specific?
– Rafael Deiga
Nov 21 at 17:07
add a comment |
Hint: Induct on $n$.
– user10354138
Nov 21 at 15:36
@user10354138 could you be more specific?
– Rafael Deiga
Nov 21 at 17:07
Hint: Induct on $n$.
– user10354138
Nov 21 at 15:36
Hint: Induct on $n$.
– user10354138
Nov 21 at 15:36
@user10354138 could you be more specific?
– Rafael Deiga
Nov 21 at 17:07
@user10354138 could you be more specific?
– Rafael Deiga
Nov 21 at 17:07
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
We have
$$f(n+1) = f(n) + int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$$
Since $f(n+1) > f(n)$, because $f'(x) >0$, and $f(n+1)$ and $f(n)$ are integers, we see that $int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$ is an integer. Define now
$$h_1(x) := int_x^{x+1} f'(t) , dt.$$
Note that $h'_1(x) = f'(x+1)-f'(x)$. Also note that $h_1(x)$ is integer-valued on $mathbb{N}$ and has the property that $h^{(i)}_1(x) >0$, i.e. $h_1$ has the same properties as $f$.
We can proceed in this manner to obtain functions $h_n$ with the properties (1) and (2). (For example, apply the same argument on $h_1$ instead of $f$ in order to get $h_2$.) This construction satisfies $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n).$$
We prove by induction that $h_i(j) ge 2^{j-1}$ for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$, whereby we define $h_0 =f$, simultaneously.
- If $j=1$ then $h_i(1)$ is an integer (for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$) and thus the lower bound is satisfied.
- Assume that the statement was already proven for all $ 1 le j le n$ and $i in mathbb{N}_0$. Then we have
$$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n) ge 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-1} = 2^{n}.$$
As a special case, we get $f(n) = h_0(n) ge 2^{n-1}$.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
We have
$$f(n+1) = f(n) + int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$$
Since $f(n+1) > f(n)$, because $f'(x) >0$, and $f(n+1)$ and $f(n)$ are integers, we see that $int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$ is an integer. Define now
$$h_1(x) := int_x^{x+1} f'(t) , dt.$$
Note that $h'_1(x) = f'(x+1)-f'(x)$. Also note that $h_1(x)$ is integer-valued on $mathbb{N}$ and has the property that $h^{(i)}_1(x) >0$, i.e. $h_1$ has the same properties as $f$.
We can proceed in this manner to obtain functions $h_n$ with the properties (1) and (2). (For example, apply the same argument on $h_1$ instead of $f$ in order to get $h_2$.) This construction satisfies $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n).$$
We prove by induction that $h_i(j) ge 2^{j-1}$ for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$, whereby we define $h_0 =f$, simultaneously.
- If $j=1$ then $h_i(1)$ is an integer (for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$) and thus the lower bound is satisfied.
- Assume that the statement was already proven for all $ 1 le j le n$ and $i in mathbb{N}_0$. Then we have
$$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n) ge 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-1} = 2^{n}.$$
As a special case, we get $f(n) = h_0(n) ge 2^{n-1}$.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
We have
$$f(n+1) = f(n) + int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$$
Since $f(n+1) > f(n)$, because $f'(x) >0$, and $f(n+1)$ and $f(n)$ are integers, we see that $int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$ is an integer. Define now
$$h_1(x) := int_x^{x+1} f'(t) , dt.$$
Note that $h'_1(x) = f'(x+1)-f'(x)$. Also note that $h_1(x)$ is integer-valued on $mathbb{N}$ and has the property that $h^{(i)}_1(x) >0$, i.e. $h_1$ has the same properties as $f$.
We can proceed in this manner to obtain functions $h_n$ with the properties (1) and (2). (For example, apply the same argument on $h_1$ instead of $f$ in order to get $h_2$.) This construction satisfies $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n).$$
We prove by induction that $h_i(j) ge 2^{j-1}$ for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$, whereby we define $h_0 =f$, simultaneously.
- If $j=1$ then $h_i(1)$ is an integer (for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$) and thus the lower bound is satisfied.
- Assume that the statement was already proven for all $ 1 le j le n$ and $i in mathbb{N}_0$. Then we have
$$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n) ge 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-1} = 2^{n}.$$
As a special case, we get $f(n) = h_0(n) ge 2^{n-1}$.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
We have
$$f(n+1) = f(n) + int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$$
Since $f(n+1) > f(n)$, because $f'(x) >0$, and $f(n+1)$ and $f(n)$ are integers, we see that $int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$ is an integer. Define now
$$h_1(x) := int_x^{x+1} f'(t) , dt.$$
Note that $h'_1(x) = f'(x+1)-f'(x)$. Also note that $h_1(x)$ is integer-valued on $mathbb{N}$ and has the property that $h^{(i)}_1(x) >0$, i.e. $h_1$ has the same properties as $f$.
We can proceed in this manner to obtain functions $h_n$ with the properties (1) and (2). (For example, apply the same argument on $h_1$ instead of $f$ in order to get $h_2$.) This construction satisfies $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n).$$
We prove by induction that $h_i(j) ge 2^{j-1}$ for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$, whereby we define $h_0 =f$, simultaneously.
- If $j=1$ then $h_i(1)$ is an integer (for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$) and thus the lower bound is satisfied.
- Assume that the statement was already proven for all $ 1 le j le n$ and $i in mathbb{N}_0$. Then we have
$$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n) ge 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-1} = 2^{n}.$$
As a special case, we get $f(n) = h_0(n) ge 2^{n-1}$.
We have
$$f(n+1) = f(n) + int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$$
Since $f(n+1) > f(n)$, because $f'(x) >0$, and $f(n+1)$ and $f(n)$ are integers, we see that $int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$ is an integer. Define now
$$h_1(x) := int_x^{x+1} f'(t) , dt.$$
Note that $h'_1(x) = f'(x+1)-f'(x)$. Also note that $h_1(x)$ is integer-valued on $mathbb{N}$ and has the property that $h^{(i)}_1(x) >0$, i.e. $h_1$ has the same properties as $f$.
We can proceed in this manner to obtain functions $h_n$ with the properties (1) and (2). (For example, apply the same argument on $h_1$ instead of $f$ in order to get $h_2$.) This construction satisfies $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n).$$
We prove by induction that $h_i(j) ge 2^{j-1}$ for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$, whereby we define $h_0 =f$, simultaneously.
- If $j=1$ then $h_i(1)$ is an integer (for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$) and thus the lower bound is satisfied.
- Assume that the statement was already proven for all $ 1 le j le n$ and $i in mathbb{N}_0$. Then we have
$$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n) ge 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-1} = 2^{n}.$$
As a special case, we get $f(n) = h_0(n) ge 2^{n-1}$.
edited Nov 22 at 9:58
answered Nov 22 at 9:39
p4sch
3,715216
3,715216
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007181%2fprove-that-fn-ge-2n-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Hint: Induct on $n$.
– user10354138
Nov 21 at 15:36
@user10354138 could you be more specific?
– Rafael Deiga
Nov 21 at 17:07