Prove that $f(n)ge 2^{n-1}$











up vote
9
down vote

favorite
6












This is from a Brazilian math contest for college students (OBMU):



Let $f: (0,+infty) to (0,+infty)$ be a infinitely differentiable function such that




  1. For all positive integer $k$ and positive real $x$, $f^{(k)}(x)> 0$ (where $f^{(k)}$ is the kth derivative).

  2. For all positive integer $m$, $f(m)$ is a positive integer.


Prove that $f(n)ge 2^{n-1}$ for all positive integer $n$.



Attempt



By the mean value theorem, we have



$$f(2)-f(1) = f'(c_1),space c_1 in (1,2)$$
$$f(3)-f(2) = f'(c_2),space c_2 in (2,3)$$
$$vdots $$
$$f(n)-f(n-1) = f'(c_{n-1}),space c_2 in (n,n-1) $$



Then, $f'(c_k)$ is positive integer for all $k in {1,2,cdots, n-1}$. Besides, $f'$ is strictly increasing. Thus, $f'(c_k) ge k$. Adding all the inequalities, we get



$$f(n) ge sum_{k=1}^{n-1}k + f(1) = frac{n(n-1)}{2} + f(1) $$










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Hint: Induct on $n$.
    – user10354138
    Nov 21 at 15:36










  • @user10354138 could you be more specific?
    – Rafael Deiga
    Nov 21 at 17:07















up vote
9
down vote

favorite
6












This is from a Brazilian math contest for college students (OBMU):



Let $f: (0,+infty) to (0,+infty)$ be a infinitely differentiable function such that




  1. For all positive integer $k$ and positive real $x$, $f^{(k)}(x)> 0$ (where $f^{(k)}$ is the kth derivative).

  2. For all positive integer $m$, $f(m)$ is a positive integer.


Prove that $f(n)ge 2^{n-1}$ for all positive integer $n$.



Attempt



By the mean value theorem, we have



$$f(2)-f(1) = f'(c_1),space c_1 in (1,2)$$
$$f(3)-f(2) = f'(c_2),space c_2 in (2,3)$$
$$vdots $$
$$f(n)-f(n-1) = f'(c_{n-1}),space c_2 in (n,n-1) $$



Then, $f'(c_k)$ is positive integer for all $k in {1,2,cdots, n-1}$. Besides, $f'$ is strictly increasing. Thus, $f'(c_k) ge k$. Adding all the inequalities, we get



$$f(n) ge sum_{k=1}^{n-1}k + f(1) = frac{n(n-1)}{2} + f(1) $$










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Hint: Induct on $n$.
    – user10354138
    Nov 21 at 15:36










  • @user10354138 could you be more specific?
    – Rafael Deiga
    Nov 21 at 17:07













up vote
9
down vote

favorite
6









up vote
9
down vote

favorite
6






6





This is from a Brazilian math contest for college students (OBMU):



Let $f: (0,+infty) to (0,+infty)$ be a infinitely differentiable function such that




  1. For all positive integer $k$ and positive real $x$, $f^{(k)}(x)> 0$ (where $f^{(k)}$ is the kth derivative).

  2. For all positive integer $m$, $f(m)$ is a positive integer.


Prove that $f(n)ge 2^{n-1}$ for all positive integer $n$.



Attempt



By the mean value theorem, we have



$$f(2)-f(1) = f'(c_1),space c_1 in (1,2)$$
$$f(3)-f(2) = f'(c_2),space c_2 in (2,3)$$
$$vdots $$
$$f(n)-f(n-1) = f'(c_{n-1}),space c_2 in (n,n-1) $$



Then, $f'(c_k)$ is positive integer for all $k in {1,2,cdots, n-1}$. Besides, $f'$ is strictly increasing. Thus, $f'(c_k) ge k$. Adding all the inequalities, we get



$$f(n) ge sum_{k=1}^{n-1}k + f(1) = frac{n(n-1)}{2} + f(1) $$










share|cite|improve this question













This is from a Brazilian math contest for college students (OBMU):



Let $f: (0,+infty) to (0,+infty)$ be a infinitely differentiable function such that




  1. For all positive integer $k$ and positive real $x$, $f^{(k)}(x)> 0$ (where $f^{(k)}$ is the kth derivative).

  2. For all positive integer $m$, $f(m)$ is a positive integer.


Prove that $f(n)ge 2^{n-1}$ for all positive integer $n$.



Attempt



By the mean value theorem, we have



$$f(2)-f(1) = f'(c_1),space c_1 in (1,2)$$
$$f(3)-f(2) = f'(c_2),space c_2 in (2,3)$$
$$vdots $$
$$f(n)-f(n-1) = f'(c_{n-1}),space c_2 in (n,n-1) $$



Then, $f'(c_k)$ is positive integer for all $k in {1,2,cdots, n-1}$. Besides, $f'$ is strictly increasing. Thus, $f'(c_k) ge k$. Adding all the inequalities, we get



$$f(n) ge sum_{k=1}^{n-1}k + f(1) = frac{n(n-1)}{2} + f(1) $$







real-analysis inequality contest-math






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 21 at 2:39









Rafael Deiga

657311




657311












  • Hint: Induct on $n$.
    – user10354138
    Nov 21 at 15:36










  • @user10354138 could you be more specific?
    – Rafael Deiga
    Nov 21 at 17:07


















  • Hint: Induct on $n$.
    – user10354138
    Nov 21 at 15:36










  • @user10354138 could you be more specific?
    – Rafael Deiga
    Nov 21 at 17:07
















Hint: Induct on $n$.
– user10354138
Nov 21 at 15:36




Hint: Induct on $n$.
– user10354138
Nov 21 at 15:36












@user10354138 could you be more specific?
– Rafael Deiga
Nov 21 at 17:07




@user10354138 could you be more specific?
– Rafael Deiga
Nov 21 at 17:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










We have
$$f(n+1) = f(n) + int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$$
Since $f(n+1) > f(n)$, because $f'(x) >0$, and $f(n+1)$ and $f(n)$ are integers, we see that $int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$ is an integer. Define now
$$h_1(x) := int_x^{x+1} f'(t) , dt.$$
Note that $h'_1(x) = f'(x+1)-f'(x)$. Also note that $h_1(x)$ is integer-valued on $mathbb{N}$ and has the property that $h^{(i)}_1(x) >0$, i.e. $h_1$ has the same properties as $f$.



We can proceed in this manner to obtain functions $h_n$ with the properties (1) and (2). (For example, apply the same argument on $h_1$ instead of $f$ in order to get $h_2$.) This construction satisfies $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n).$$
We prove by induction that $h_i(j) ge 2^{j-1}$ for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$, whereby we define $h_0 =f$, simultaneously.




  1. If $j=1$ then $h_i(1)$ is an integer (for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$) and thus the lower bound is satisfied.

  2. Assume that the statement was already proven for all $ 1 le j le n$ and $i in mathbb{N}_0$. Then we have
    $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n) ge 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-1} = 2^{n}.$$


As a special case, we get $f(n) = h_0(n) ge 2^{n-1}$.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007181%2fprove-that-fn-ge-2n-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    We have
    $$f(n+1) = f(n) + int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$$
    Since $f(n+1) > f(n)$, because $f'(x) >0$, and $f(n+1)$ and $f(n)$ are integers, we see that $int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$ is an integer. Define now
    $$h_1(x) := int_x^{x+1} f'(t) , dt.$$
    Note that $h'_1(x) = f'(x+1)-f'(x)$. Also note that $h_1(x)$ is integer-valued on $mathbb{N}$ and has the property that $h^{(i)}_1(x) >0$, i.e. $h_1$ has the same properties as $f$.



    We can proceed in this manner to obtain functions $h_n$ with the properties (1) and (2). (For example, apply the same argument on $h_1$ instead of $f$ in order to get $h_2$.) This construction satisfies $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n).$$
    We prove by induction that $h_i(j) ge 2^{j-1}$ for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$, whereby we define $h_0 =f$, simultaneously.




    1. If $j=1$ then $h_i(1)$ is an integer (for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$) and thus the lower bound is satisfied.

    2. Assume that the statement was already proven for all $ 1 le j le n$ and $i in mathbb{N}_0$. Then we have
      $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n) ge 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-1} = 2^{n}.$$


    As a special case, we get $f(n) = h_0(n) ge 2^{n-1}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      We have
      $$f(n+1) = f(n) + int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$$
      Since $f(n+1) > f(n)$, because $f'(x) >0$, and $f(n+1)$ and $f(n)$ are integers, we see that $int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$ is an integer. Define now
      $$h_1(x) := int_x^{x+1} f'(t) , dt.$$
      Note that $h'_1(x) = f'(x+1)-f'(x)$. Also note that $h_1(x)$ is integer-valued on $mathbb{N}$ and has the property that $h^{(i)}_1(x) >0$, i.e. $h_1$ has the same properties as $f$.



      We can proceed in this manner to obtain functions $h_n$ with the properties (1) and (2). (For example, apply the same argument on $h_1$ instead of $f$ in order to get $h_2$.) This construction satisfies $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n).$$
      We prove by induction that $h_i(j) ge 2^{j-1}$ for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$, whereby we define $h_0 =f$, simultaneously.




      1. If $j=1$ then $h_i(1)$ is an integer (for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$) and thus the lower bound is satisfied.

      2. Assume that the statement was already proven for all $ 1 le j le n$ and $i in mathbb{N}_0$. Then we have
        $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n) ge 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-1} = 2^{n}.$$


      As a special case, we get $f(n) = h_0(n) ge 2^{n-1}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted






        We have
        $$f(n+1) = f(n) + int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$$
        Since $f(n+1) > f(n)$, because $f'(x) >0$, and $f(n+1)$ and $f(n)$ are integers, we see that $int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$ is an integer. Define now
        $$h_1(x) := int_x^{x+1} f'(t) , dt.$$
        Note that $h'_1(x) = f'(x+1)-f'(x)$. Also note that $h_1(x)$ is integer-valued on $mathbb{N}$ and has the property that $h^{(i)}_1(x) >0$, i.e. $h_1$ has the same properties as $f$.



        We can proceed in this manner to obtain functions $h_n$ with the properties (1) and (2). (For example, apply the same argument on $h_1$ instead of $f$ in order to get $h_2$.) This construction satisfies $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n).$$
        We prove by induction that $h_i(j) ge 2^{j-1}$ for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$, whereby we define $h_0 =f$, simultaneously.




        1. If $j=1$ then $h_i(1)$ is an integer (for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$) and thus the lower bound is satisfied.

        2. Assume that the statement was already proven for all $ 1 le j le n$ and $i in mathbb{N}_0$. Then we have
          $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n) ge 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-1} = 2^{n}.$$


        As a special case, we get $f(n) = h_0(n) ge 2^{n-1}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        We have
        $$f(n+1) = f(n) + int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$$
        Since $f(n+1) > f(n)$, because $f'(x) >0$, and $f(n+1)$ and $f(n)$ are integers, we see that $int_n^{n+1} f'(t) , d t$ is an integer. Define now
        $$h_1(x) := int_x^{x+1} f'(t) , dt.$$
        Note that $h'_1(x) = f'(x+1)-f'(x)$. Also note that $h_1(x)$ is integer-valued on $mathbb{N}$ and has the property that $h^{(i)}_1(x) >0$, i.e. $h_1$ has the same properties as $f$.



        We can proceed in this manner to obtain functions $h_n$ with the properties (1) and (2). (For example, apply the same argument on $h_1$ instead of $f$ in order to get $h_2$.) This construction satisfies $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n).$$
        We prove by induction that $h_i(j) ge 2^{j-1}$ for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$, whereby we define $h_0 =f$, simultaneously.




        1. If $j=1$ then $h_i(1)$ is an integer (for all $i in mathbb{N}_0$) and thus the lower bound is satisfied.

        2. Assume that the statement was already proven for all $ 1 le j le n$ and $i in mathbb{N}_0$. Then we have
          $$h_i(n+1) = h_i(n) + h_{i+1}(n) ge 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-1} = 2^{n}.$$


        As a special case, we get $f(n) = h_0(n) ge 2^{n-1}$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 22 at 9:58

























        answered Nov 22 at 9:39









        p4sch

        3,715216




        3,715216






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007181%2fprove-that-fn-ge-2n-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Tonle Sap (See)

            I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

            Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft