$mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $S(X) = X^2 +X+1 in mathbb{F}_2[X]$



Prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $



What I did:



${1, X }$ is a basis of $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)$ and S is irreducible in $mathbb{F}_2$ so $ |mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)| = 2^2 = 4$



I need help to prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $.
Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
    – Trevor Gunn
    Nov 21 at 3:14










  • Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
    – PerelMan
    Nov 21 at 9:58






  • 2




    What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Nov 21 at 11:25















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $S(X) = X^2 +X+1 in mathbb{F}_2[X]$



Prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $



What I did:



${1, X }$ is a basis of $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)$ and S is irreducible in $mathbb{F}_2$ so $ |mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)| = 2^2 = 4$



I need help to prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $.
Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
    – Trevor Gunn
    Nov 21 at 3:14










  • Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
    – PerelMan
    Nov 21 at 9:58






  • 2




    What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Nov 21 at 11:25













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $S(X) = X^2 +X+1 in mathbb{F}_2[X]$



Prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $



What I did:



${1, X }$ is a basis of $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)$ and S is irreducible in $mathbb{F}_2$ so $ |mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)| = 2^2 = 4$



I need help to prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $.
Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $S(X) = X^2 +X+1 in mathbb{F}_2[X]$



Prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $



What I did:



${1, X }$ is a basis of $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)$ and S is irreducible in $mathbb{F}_2$ so $ |mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)| = 2^2 = 4$



I need help to prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $.
Thank you.







abstract-algebra quotient-group






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 9:58

























asked Nov 21 at 3:06









PerelMan

405111




405111








  • 3




    Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
    – Trevor Gunn
    Nov 21 at 3:14










  • Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
    – PerelMan
    Nov 21 at 9:58






  • 2




    What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Nov 21 at 11:25














  • 3




    Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
    – Trevor Gunn
    Nov 21 at 3:14










  • Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
    – PerelMan
    Nov 21 at 9:58






  • 2




    What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Nov 21 at 11:25








3




3




Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
– Trevor Gunn
Nov 21 at 3:14




Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
– Trevor Gunn
Nov 21 at 3:14












Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 9:58




Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 9:58




2




2




What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 21 at 11:25




What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 21 at 11:25










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










What Trevor Gunn said is right. The statement you want to prove is not correct. First you need to show that $S(X) = X^5 + X^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_2$. Then it will follow that $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X, X^2, X^3, X^4$ and is thus isomorphic to $mathbb{F}_{32}$ (remember that there is exactly one field with 32 elements).



Edit: OP has now changed the polynomial in question to $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$. In this case the quotient ring $F[X]/langle S(X) rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X$ and thus has cardinality $2^2 = 4$, as mentioned in the question. The identification with $mathbb{F}_4$ then comes from the fact that, up to isomorphism, there is only one field of cardinality $4$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
    – PerelMan
    Nov 21 at 10:00


















up vote
2
down vote













It is easy to see that $x^2+x+1$ is irreducible since it has degree $2$ and it has no root. Hence the quotient ring is necessarily a field. Since the quotient has $4$ elements and a finite field is uniquely determined by the number of its elements, you get $mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1)congmathbb{F}_4$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007202%2fmathbbf-2x-s-cong-mathbbf-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    What Trevor Gunn said is right. The statement you want to prove is not correct. First you need to show that $S(X) = X^5 + X^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_2$. Then it will follow that $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X, X^2, X^3, X^4$ and is thus isomorphic to $mathbb{F}_{32}$ (remember that there is exactly one field with 32 elements).



    Edit: OP has now changed the polynomial in question to $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$. In this case the quotient ring $F[X]/langle S(X) rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X$ and thus has cardinality $2^2 = 4$, as mentioned in the question. The identification with $mathbb{F}_4$ then comes from the fact that, up to isomorphism, there is only one field of cardinality $4$.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
      – PerelMan
      Nov 21 at 10:00















    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    What Trevor Gunn said is right. The statement you want to prove is not correct. First you need to show that $S(X) = X^5 + X^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_2$. Then it will follow that $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X, X^2, X^3, X^4$ and is thus isomorphic to $mathbb{F}_{32}$ (remember that there is exactly one field with 32 elements).



    Edit: OP has now changed the polynomial in question to $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$. In this case the quotient ring $F[X]/langle S(X) rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X$ and thus has cardinality $2^2 = 4$, as mentioned in the question. The identification with $mathbb{F}_4$ then comes from the fact that, up to isomorphism, there is only one field of cardinality $4$.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
      – PerelMan
      Nov 21 at 10:00













    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted






    What Trevor Gunn said is right. The statement you want to prove is not correct. First you need to show that $S(X) = X^5 + X^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_2$. Then it will follow that $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X, X^2, X^3, X^4$ and is thus isomorphic to $mathbb{F}_{32}$ (remember that there is exactly one field with 32 elements).



    Edit: OP has now changed the polynomial in question to $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$. In this case the quotient ring $F[X]/langle S(X) rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X$ and thus has cardinality $2^2 = 4$, as mentioned in the question. The identification with $mathbb{F}_4$ then comes from the fact that, up to isomorphism, there is only one field of cardinality $4$.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    What Trevor Gunn said is right. The statement you want to prove is not correct. First you need to show that $S(X) = X^5 + X^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_2$. Then it will follow that $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X, X^2, X^3, X^4$ and is thus isomorphic to $mathbb{F}_{32}$ (remember that there is exactly one field with 32 elements).



    Edit: OP has now changed the polynomial in question to $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$. In this case the quotient ring $F[X]/langle S(X) rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X$ and thus has cardinality $2^2 = 4$, as mentioned in the question. The identification with $mathbb{F}_4$ then comes from the fact that, up to isomorphism, there is only one field of cardinality $4$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Nov 21 at 17:36

























    answered Nov 21 at 3:32









    Monstrous Moonshiner

    2,25911337




    2,25911337












    • I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
      – PerelMan
      Nov 21 at 10:00


















    • I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
      – PerelMan
      Nov 21 at 10:00
















    I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
    – PerelMan
    Nov 21 at 10:00




    I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
    – PerelMan
    Nov 21 at 10:00










    up vote
    2
    down vote













    It is easy to see that $x^2+x+1$ is irreducible since it has degree $2$ and it has no root. Hence the quotient ring is necessarily a field. Since the quotient has $4$ elements and a finite field is uniquely determined by the number of its elements, you get $mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1)congmathbb{F}_4$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      It is easy to see that $x^2+x+1$ is irreducible since it has degree $2$ and it has no root. Hence the quotient ring is necessarily a field. Since the quotient has $4$ elements and a finite field is uniquely determined by the number of its elements, you get $mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1)congmathbb{F}_4$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        It is easy to see that $x^2+x+1$ is irreducible since it has degree $2$ and it has no root. Hence the quotient ring is necessarily a field. Since the quotient has $4$ elements and a finite field is uniquely determined by the number of its elements, you get $mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1)congmathbb{F}_4$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        It is easy to see that $x^2+x+1$ is irreducible since it has degree $2$ and it has no root. Hence the quotient ring is necessarily a field. Since the quotient has $4$ elements and a finite field is uniquely determined by the number of its elements, you get $mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1)congmathbb{F}_4$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 at 10:28









        Levent

        3,386825




        3,386825






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007202%2fmathbbf-2x-s-cong-mathbbf-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Tonle Sap (See)

            I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

            Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft