$mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $S(X) = X^2 +X+1 in mathbb{F}_2[X]$
Prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $
What I did:
${1, X }$ is a basis of $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)$ and S is irreducible in $mathbb{F}_2$ so $ |mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)| = 2^2 = 4$
I need help to prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $.
Thank you.
abstract-algebra quotient-group
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $S(X) = X^2 +X+1 in mathbb{F}_2[X]$
Prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $
What I did:
${1, X }$ is a basis of $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)$ and S is irreducible in $mathbb{F}_2$ so $ |mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)| = 2^2 = 4$
I need help to prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $.
Thank you.
abstract-algebra quotient-group
3
Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
– Trevor Gunn
Nov 21 at 3:14
Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 9:58
2
What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 21 at 11:25
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $S(X) = X^2 +X+1 in mathbb{F}_2[X]$
Prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $
What I did:
${1, X }$ is a basis of $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)$ and S is irreducible in $mathbb{F}_2$ so $ |mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)| = 2^2 = 4$
I need help to prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $.
Thank you.
abstract-algebra quotient-group
Let $S(X) = X^2 +X+1 in mathbb{F}_2[X]$
Prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $
What I did:
${1, X }$ is a basis of $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)$ and S is irreducible in $mathbb{F}_2$ so $ |mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S)| = 2^2 = 4$
I need help to prove that $mathbb{F}_2[X]/(S) cong mathbb{F}_4 $.
Thank you.
abstract-algebra quotient-group
abstract-algebra quotient-group
edited Nov 21 at 9:58
asked Nov 21 at 3:06
PerelMan
405111
405111
3
Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
– Trevor Gunn
Nov 21 at 3:14
Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 9:58
2
What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 21 at 11:25
add a comment |
3
Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
– Trevor Gunn
Nov 21 at 3:14
Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 9:58
2
What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 21 at 11:25
3
3
Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
– Trevor Gunn
Nov 21 at 3:14
Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
– Trevor Gunn
Nov 21 at 3:14
Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 9:58
Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 9:58
2
2
What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 21 at 11:25
What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 21 at 11:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
What Trevor Gunn said is right. The statement you want to prove is not correct. First you need to show that $S(X) = X^5 + X^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_2$. Then it will follow that $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X, X^2, X^3, X^4$ and is thus isomorphic to $mathbb{F}_{32}$ (remember that there is exactly one field with 32 elements).
Edit: OP has now changed the polynomial in question to $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$. In this case the quotient ring $F[X]/langle S(X) rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X$ and thus has cardinality $2^2 = 4$, as mentioned in the question. The identification with $mathbb{F}_4$ then comes from the fact that, up to isomorphism, there is only one field of cardinality $4$.
I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 10:00
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It is easy to see that $x^2+x+1$ is irreducible since it has degree $2$ and it has no root. Hence the quotient ring is necessarily a field. Since the quotient has $4$ elements and a finite field is uniquely determined by the number of its elements, you get $mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1)congmathbb{F}_4$.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
What Trevor Gunn said is right. The statement you want to prove is not correct. First you need to show that $S(X) = X^5 + X^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_2$. Then it will follow that $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X, X^2, X^3, X^4$ and is thus isomorphic to $mathbb{F}_{32}$ (remember that there is exactly one field with 32 elements).
Edit: OP has now changed the polynomial in question to $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$. In this case the quotient ring $F[X]/langle S(X) rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X$ and thus has cardinality $2^2 = 4$, as mentioned in the question. The identification with $mathbb{F}_4$ then comes from the fact that, up to isomorphism, there is only one field of cardinality $4$.
I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 10:00
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
What Trevor Gunn said is right. The statement you want to prove is not correct. First you need to show that $S(X) = X^5 + X^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_2$. Then it will follow that $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X, X^2, X^3, X^4$ and is thus isomorphic to $mathbb{F}_{32}$ (remember that there is exactly one field with 32 elements).
Edit: OP has now changed the polynomial in question to $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$. In this case the quotient ring $F[X]/langle S(X) rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X$ and thus has cardinality $2^2 = 4$, as mentioned in the question. The identification with $mathbb{F}_4$ then comes from the fact that, up to isomorphism, there is only one field of cardinality $4$.
I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 10:00
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
What Trevor Gunn said is right. The statement you want to prove is not correct. First you need to show that $S(X) = X^5 + X^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_2$. Then it will follow that $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X, X^2, X^3, X^4$ and is thus isomorphic to $mathbb{F}_{32}$ (remember that there is exactly one field with 32 elements).
Edit: OP has now changed the polynomial in question to $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$. In this case the quotient ring $F[X]/langle S(X) rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X$ and thus has cardinality $2^2 = 4$, as mentioned in the question. The identification with $mathbb{F}_4$ then comes from the fact that, up to isomorphism, there is only one field of cardinality $4$.
What Trevor Gunn said is right. The statement you want to prove is not correct. First you need to show that $S(X) = X^5 + X^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $mathbb{F}_2$. Then it will follow that $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X, X^2, X^3, X^4$ and is thus isomorphic to $mathbb{F}_{32}$ (remember that there is exactly one field with 32 elements).
Edit: OP has now changed the polynomial in question to $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$. In this case the quotient ring $F[X]/langle S(X) rangle$ is a field spanned by the elements $1, X$ and thus has cardinality $2^2 = 4$, as mentioned in the question. The identification with $mathbb{F}_4$ then comes from the fact that, up to isomorphism, there is only one field of cardinality $4$.
edited Nov 21 at 17:36
answered Nov 21 at 3:32
Monstrous Moonshiner
2,25911337
2,25911337
I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 10:00
add a comment |
I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 10:00
I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 10:00
I fixed my question thank you. Now $F[X]/langle S rangle$ is a field spawned by $1,X $
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 10:00
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It is easy to see that $x^2+x+1$ is irreducible since it has degree $2$ and it has no root. Hence the quotient ring is necessarily a field. Since the quotient has $4$ elements and a finite field is uniquely determined by the number of its elements, you get $mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1)congmathbb{F}_4$.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It is easy to see that $x^2+x+1$ is irreducible since it has degree $2$ and it has no root. Hence the quotient ring is necessarily a field. Since the quotient has $4$ elements and a finite field is uniquely determined by the number of its elements, you get $mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1)congmathbb{F}_4$.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
It is easy to see that $x^2+x+1$ is irreducible since it has degree $2$ and it has no root. Hence the quotient ring is necessarily a field. Since the quotient has $4$ elements and a finite field is uniquely determined by the number of its elements, you get $mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1)congmathbb{F}_4$.
It is easy to see that $x^2+x+1$ is irreducible since it has degree $2$ and it has no root. Hence the quotient ring is necessarily a field. Since the quotient has $4$ elements and a finite field is uniquely determined by the number of its elements, you get $mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1)congmathbb{F}_4$.
answered Nov 21 at 10:28
Levent
3,386825
3,386825
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007202%2fmathbbf-2x-s-cong-mathbbf-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Do you mean $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$? Otherwise your basis would be $1,X,X^2,X^3,X^4$ and the quotient would be $mathbb{F}_{2^5}$.
– Trevor Gunn
Nov 21 at 3:14
Thank you, indeed I was wrong and $S(X) = X^2 + X + 1$
– PerelMan
Nov 21 at 9:58
2
What is your definition of $Bbb{F}_4$? Many would define $Bbb{F}_4$ as the quotient ring $Bbb{F}_2[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 21 at 11:25