Chaining melt and groupby in pandas causes integer values to be cast to boolean











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to reshape the following dataframe:



df = pd.DataFrame({'feature': [True,False,False,True], 
'id': [1,0,1,2]})


enter image description here



...to create a dataframe similar to the example below. Column names should now be the index, and the frequency of each unique value should be provided as a count.



enter image description here



Using melt and groupby almost achieves this, except that 0 and 1 (integers) are cast to False and True (boolean).



df.melt().groupby(['variable','value']).size().to_frame(name='freq')


enter image description here



Any suggestions for achieving the desired dataframe (without the 0 and 1 being cast to boolean) would be greatly appreciated!










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Index with type object. Since you have bool and int , it will convert to object , and in pandas 0 treat as False 1 treat as True for object conversion .
    – W-B
    Nov 19 at 23:42










  • makes sense, thanks for the explanation!
    – tomp
    Nov 20 at 2:29















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to reshape the following dataframe:



df = pd.DataFrame({'feature': [True,False,False,True], 
'id': [1,0,1,2]})


enter image description here



...to create a dataframe similar to the example below. Column names should now be the index, and the frequency of each unique value should be provided as a count.



enter image description here



Using melt and groupby almost achieves this, except that 0 and 1 (integers) are cast to False and True (boolean).



df.melt().groupby(['variable','value']).size().to_frame(name='freq')


enter image description here



Any suggestions for achieving the desired dataframe (without the 0 and 1 being cast to boolean) would be greatly appreciated!










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Index with type object. Since you have bool and int , it will convert to object , and in pandas 0 treat as False 1 treat as True for object conversion .
    – W-B
    Nov 19 at 23:42










  • makes sense, thanks for the explanation!
    – tomp
    Nov 20 at 2:29













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I'm trying to reshape the following dataframe:



df = pd.DataFrame({'feature': [True,False,False,True], 
'id': [1,0,1,2]})


enter image description here



...to create a dataframe similar to the example below. Column names should now be the index, and the frequency of each unique value should be provided as a count.



enter image description here



Using melt and groupby almost achieves this, except that 0 and 1 (integers) are cast to False and True (boolean).



df.melt().groupby(['variable','value']).size().to_frame(name='freq')


enter image description here



Any suggestions for achieving the desired dataframe (without the 0 and 1 being cast to boolean) would be greatly appreciated!










share|improve this question













I'm trying to reshape the following dataframe:



df = pd.DataFrame({'feature': [True,False,False,True], 
'id': [1,0,1,2]})


enter image description here



...to create a dataframe similar to the example below. Column names should now be the index, and the frequency of each unique value should be provided as a count.



enter image description here



Using melt and groupby almost achieves this, except that 0 and 1 (integers) are cast to False and True (boolean).



df.melt().groupby(['variable','value']).size().to_frame(name='freq')


enter image description here



Any suggestions for achieving the desired dataframe (without the 0 and 1 being cast to boolean) would be greatly appreciated!







python pandas pandas-groupby






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 19 at 23:26









tomp

435313




435313








  • 1




    Index with type object. Since you have bool and int , it will convert to object , and in pandas 0 treat as False 1 treat as True for object conversion .
    – W-B
    Nov 19 at 23:42










  • makes sense, thanks for the explanation!
    – tomp
    Nov 20 at 2:29














  • 1




    Index with type object. Since you have bool and int , it will convert to object , and in pandas 0 treat as False 1 treat as True for object conversion .
    – W-B
    Nov 19 at 23:42










  • makes sense, thanks for the explanation!
    – tomp
    Nov 20 at 2:29








1




1




Index with type object. Since you have bool and int , it will convert to object , and in pandas 0 treat as False 1 treat as True for object conversion .
– W-B
Nov 19 at 23:42




Index with type object. Since you have bool and int , it will convert to object , and in pandas 0 treat as False 1 treat as True for object conversion .
– W-B
Nov 19 at 23:42












makes sense, thanks for the explanation!
– tomp
Nov 20 at 2:29




makes sense, thanks for the explanation!
– tomp
Nov 20 at 2:29












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Using dtype convert id to str



df.id=df.id.astype(str)
df.melt().groupby(['variable','value']).size().to_frame(name='freq')
Out[81]:
freq
variable value
feature False 2
True 2
id 0 1
1 2
2 1





share|improve this answer





















  • This answers the question as it is phrased, but changing the data type to a string isn't ideal. e.g. df.id.sum() now returns '1012', rather than 4.
    – tomp
    Nov 20 at 15:52










  • @tomp that is true
    – W-B
    Nov 20 at 16:25











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53384109%2fchaining-melt-and-groupby-in-pandas-causes-integer-values-to-be-cast-to-boolean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Using dtype convert id to str



df.id=df.id.astype(str)
df.melt().groupby(['variable','value']).size().to_frame(name='freq')
Out[81]:
freq
variable value
feature False 2
True 2
id 0 1
1 2
2 1





share|improve this answer





















  • This answers the question as it is phrased, but changing the data type to a string isn't ideal. e.g. df.id.sum() now returns '1012', rather than 4.
    – tomp
    Nov 20 at 15:52










  • @tomp that is true
    – W-B
    Nov 20 at 16:25















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Using dtype convert id to str



df.id=df.id.astype(str)
df.melt().groupby(['variable','value']).size().to_frame(name='freq')
Out[81]:
freq
variable value
feature False 2
True 2
id 0 1
1 2
2 1





share|improve this answer





















  • This answers the question as it is phrased, but changing the data type to a string isn't ideal. e.g. df.id.sum() now returns '1012', rather than 4.
    – tomp
    Nov 20 at 15:52










  • @tomp that is true
    – W-B
    Nov 20 at 16:25













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






Using dtype convert id to str



df.id=df.id.astype(str)
df.melt().groupby(['variable','value']).size().to_frame(name='freq')
Out[81]:
freq
variable value
feature False 2
True 2
id 0 1
1 2
2 1





share|improve this answer












Using dtype convert id to str



df.id=df.id.astype(str)
df.melt().groupby(['variable','value']).size().to_frame(name='freq')
Out[81]:
freq
variable value
feature False 2
True 2
id 0 1
1 2
2 1






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 19 at 23:43









W-B

96k72961




96k72961












  • This answers the question as it is phrased, but changing the data type to a string isn't ideal. e.g. df.id.sum() now returns '1012', rather than 4.
    – tomp
    Nov 20 at 15:52










  • @tomp that is true
    – W-B
    Nov 20 at 16:25


















  • This answers the question as it is phrased, but changing the data type to a string isn't ideal. e.g. df.id.sum() now returns '1012', rather than 4.
    – tomp
    Nov 20 at 15:52










  • @tomp that is true
    – W-B
    Nov 20 at 16:25
















This answers the question as it is phrased, but changing the data type to a string isn't ideal. e.g. df.id.sum() now returns '1012', rather than 4.
– tomp
Nov 20 at 15:52




This answers the question as it is phrased, but changing the data type to a string isn't ideal. e.g. df.id.sum() now returns '1012', rather than 4.
– tomp
Nov 20 at 15:52












@tomp that is true
– W-B
Nov 20 at 16:25




@tomp that is true
– W-B
Nov 20 at 16:25


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53384109%2fchaining-melt-and-groupby-in-pandas-causes-integer-values-to-be-cast-to-boolean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen