Epsilon Delta Proof of Limits Being Equal
up vote
-3
down vote
favorite
I have a question about this Epsilon-Delta Proof of Limits Being Equal
Why did the person that answered this assume that δ=δ0?
Thank you!
calculus limits
asked Nov 23 at 18:01
noam Azulay
11
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
favorite
I have a question about this Epsilon-Delta Proof of Limits Being Equal
Why did the person that answered this assume that δ=δ0?
Thank you!
calculus limits
asked Nov 23 at 18:01
noam Azulay
11
He chose $delta = delta_0$. This can be assumed because he originally assumed $lim_{x rightarrow 0} f(x) = L$ which ensures such $delta$ exists.
– Hongyu Wang
Nov 23 at 18:13
2
No, the answerer didn't assume it, they simply set $delta$ to be $delta_0$. To do an $varepsilon$-$delta$ proof, you are given an $varepsilon$, and you need to find a $delta$ satisfying certain conditions depending on $varepsilon$ and $delta$. In the answer, the answerer first fixes some $varepsilon$, and then obtain a $delta_0$ using the limit, and after that take $delta$ to be the $delta_0$ obtained previously.
– Alex Vong
Nov 23 at 18:19
3
Why is this question urgent, exactly?
– Noah Schweber
Nov 23 at 18:25
1
He's saying you can use the same $delta$ for the second limit as you did for the first.
– saulspatz
Nov 23 at 18:35
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
favorite
up vote
-3
down vote
favorite
I have a question about this Epsilon-Delta Proof of Limits Being Equal
Why did the person that answered this assume that δ=δ0?
Thank you!
calculus limits
asked Nov 23 at 18:01
noam Azulay
11
I have a question about this Epsilon-Delta Proof of Limits Being Equal
Why did the person that answered this assume that δ=δ0?
Thank you!
calculus limits
calculus limits
asked Nov 23 at 18:01
noam Azulay
11
asked Nov 23 at 18:01
noam Azulay
11
edited Nov 23 at 18:37
asked Nov 23 at 18:01
noam Azulay
11
asked Nov 23 at 18:01
noam Azulay
11
asked Nov 23 at 18:01
noam Azulay
11
11
He chose $delta = delta_0$. This can be assumed because he originally assumed $lim_{x rightarrow 0} f(x) = L$ which ensures such $delta$ exists.
– Hongyu Wang
Nov 23 at 18:13
2
No, the answerer didn't assume it, they simply set $delta$ to be $delta_0$. To do an $varepsilon$-$delta$ proof, you are given an $varepsilon$, and you need to find a $delta$ satisfying certain conditions depending on $varepsilon$ and $delta$. In the answer, the answerer first fixes some $varepsilon$, and then obtain a $delta_0$ using the limit, and after that take $delta$ to be the $delta_0$ obtained previously.
– Alex Vong
Nov 23 at 18:19
3
Why is this question urgent, exactly?
– Noah Schweber
Nov 23 at 18:25
1
He's saying you can use the same $delta$ for the second limit as you did for the first.
– saulspatz
Nov 23 at 18:35
add a comment |
He chose $delta = delta_0$. This can be assumed because he originally assumed $lim_{x rightarrow 0} f(x) = L$ which ensures such $delta$ exists.
– Hongyu Wang
Nov 23 at 18:13
2
No, the answerer didn't assume it, they simply set $delta$ to be $delta_0$. To do an $varepsilon$-$delta$ proof, you are given an $varepsilon$, and you need to find a $delta$ satisfying certain conditions depending on $varepsilon$ and $delta$. In the answer, the answerer first fixes some $varepsilon$, and then obtain a $delta_0$ using the limit, and after that take $delta$ to be the $delta_0$ obtained previously.
– Alex Vong
Nov 23 at 18:19
3
Why is this question urgent, exactly?
– Noah Schweber
Nov 23 at 18:25
1
He's saying you can use the same $delta$ for the second limit as you did for the first.
– saulspatz
Nov 23 at 18:35
He chose $delta = delta_0$. This can be assumed because he originally assumed $lim_{x rightarrow 0} f(x) = L$ which ensures such $delta$ exists.
– Hongyu Wang
Nov 23 at 18:13
He chose $delta = delta_0$. This can be assumed because he originally assumed $lim_{x rightarrow 0} f(x) = L$ which ensures such $delta$ exists.
– Hongyu Wang
Nov 23 at 18:13
2
2
No, the answerer didn't assume it, they simply set $delta$ to be $delta_0$. To do an $varepsilon$-$delta$ proof, you are given an $varepsilon$, and you need to find a $delta$ satisfying certain conditions depending on $varepsilon$ and $delta$. In the answer, the answerer first fixes some $varepsilon$, and then obtain a $delta_0$ using the limit, and after that take $delta$ to be the $delta_0$ obtained previously.
– Alex Vong
Nov 23 at 18:19
No, the answerer didn't assume it, they simply set $delta$ to be $delta_0$. To do an $varepsilon$-$delta$ proof, you are given an $varepsilon$, and you need to find a $delta$ satisfying certain conditions depending on $varepsilon$ and $delta$. In the answer, the answerer first fixes some $varepsilon$, and then obtain a $delta_0$ using the limit, and after that take $delta$ to be the $delta_0$ obtained previously.
– Alex Vong
Nov 23 at 18:19
3
3
Why is this question urgent, exactly?
– Noah Schweber
Nov 23 at 18:25
Why is this question urgent, exactly?
– Noah Schweber
Nov 23 at 18:25
1
1
He's saying you can use the same $delta$ for the second limit as you did for the first.
– saulspatz
Nov 23 at 18:35
He's saying you can use the same $delta$ for the second limit as you did for the first.
– saulspatz
Nov 23 at 18:35
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010655%2fepsilon-delta-proof-of-limits-being-equal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
He chose $delta = delta_0$. This can be assumed because he originally assumed $lim_{x rightarrow 0} f(x) = L$ which ensures such $delta$ exists.
– Hongyu Wang
Nov 23 at 18:13
2
No, the answerer didn't assume it, they simply set $delta$ to be $delta_0$. To do an $varepsilon$-$delta$ proof, you are given an $varepsilon$, and you need to find a $delta$ satisfying certain conditions depending on $varepsilon$ and $delta$. In the answer, the answerer first fixes some $varepsilon$, and then obtain a $delta_0$ using the limit, and after that take $delta$ to be the $delta_0$ obtained previously.
– Alex Vong
Nov 23 at 18:19
3
Why is this question urgent, exactly?
– Noah Schweber
Nov 23 at 18:25
1
He's saying you can use the same $delta$ for the second limit as you did for the first.
– saulspatz
Nov 23 at 18:35