Direct Summands of Invariant Subspaces












3












$begingroup$


Let $T$ be a linear endomorphism on the vector space $F^3$, where $F$ is the finite field with $p$ elements, whose minimal polynomial is $x^2$.



How many $1$-dimensional and $2$-dimensional $T$-invariant subspaces are there? And how many of these $1$-dimensional and $2$-dimensional invariant subspaces are direct summands with a $T$-invariant subspace?



For the second question, I think that the number of $1$-dimensional $T$-invariant and the number of $2$-dimensional $T$-invariant subspaces should be the same.



I am not sure if it helps, but since the minimal polynomial is $x^2$ and the dimension of the vector space is $3$, the characteristic polynomial is $x^3$.



I am looking for the intuition/understanding more so than the actual answer (although the actual answer might help a lot).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Let $T$ be a linear endomorphism on the vector space $F^3$, where $F$ is the finite field with $p$ elements, whose minimal polynomial is $x^2$.



    How many $1$-dimensional and $2$-dimensional $T$-invariant subspaces are there? And how many of these $1$-dimensional and $2$-dimensional invariant subspaces are direct summands with a $T$-invariant subspace?



    For the second question, I think that the number of $1$-dimensional $T$-invariant and the number of $2$-dimensional $T$-invariant subspaces should be the same.



    I am not sure if it helps, but since the minimal polynomial is $x^2$ and the dimension of the vector space is $3$, the characteristic polynomial is $x^3$.



    I am looking for the intuition/understanding more so than the actual answer (although the actual answer might help a lot).










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $T$ be a linear endomorphism on the vector space $F^3$, where $F$ is the finite field with $p$ elements, whose minimal polynomial is $x^2$.



      How many $1$-dimensional and $2$-dimensional $T$-invariant subspaces are there? And how many of these $1$-dimensional and $2$-dimensional invariant subspaces are direct summands with a $T$-invariant subspace?



      For the second question, I think that the number of $1$-dimensional $T$-invariant and the number of $2$-dimensional $T$-invariant subspaces should be the same.



      I am not sure if it helps, but since the minimal polynomial is $x^2$ and the dimension of the vector space is $3$, the characteristic polynomial is $x^3$.



      I am looking for the intuition/understanding more so than the actual answer (although the actual answer might help a lot).










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $T$ be a linear endomorphism on the vector space $F^3$, where $F$ is the finite field with $p$ elements, whose minimal polynomial is $x^2$.



      How many $1$-dimensional and $2$-dimensional $T$-invariant subspaces are there? And how many of these $1$-dimensional and $2$-dimensional invariant subspaces are direct summands with a $T$-invariant subspace?



      For the second question, I think that the number of $1$-dimensional $T$-invariant and the number of $2$-dimensional $T$-invariant subspaces should be the same.



      I am not sure if it helps, but since the minimal polynomial is $x^2$ and the dimension of the vector space is $3$, the characteristic polynomial is $x^3$.



      I am looking for the intuition/understanding more so than the actual answer (although the actual answer might help a lot).







      linear-algebra abstract-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 9 '18 at 18:29







      LinearGuy

















      asked Dec 7 '18 at 18:54









      LinearGuyLinearGuy

      13211




      13211






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Let's consider the kernel and image of $T$. The kernel of $T$ must be two dimensional, since it cannot be three dimensional since $Tne 0$, and if it were one dimensional, then we would have that the rank of $T$ would be two by rank-nullity, so we couldn't have $T^2=0$. Hence the dimension of the image of $T$ must be one dimensional. Also it is clear that the image of $T$ is a one dimensional subspace of $ker T$.



          Now, if $Vsubseteq F^3$ is $T$-invariant, then $T(V)subseteq V$. Since the image of $T$ is one dimensional, either $V$ contains the image of $T$, or $V$ lies in the kernel of $T$.



          If $V$ is two dimensional, then if it lies in the kernel of $T$, then it is the kernel of $T$, and hence contains the image of $T$. Thus the two dimensional invariant subspaces are precisely those containing the image of $T$. To count the number of planes containing a line in $F^3$, fix a complement of the line. Then planes containing the line in $F^3$ correspond to lines in that complement, of which there are $(p^2-1)/(p-1)=p+1$.



          Conversely if $V$ is one dimensional, then if it contains the image of $T$, it is the image of $T$, so it lies in the kernel. Thus the one dimensional invariant subspaces for $T$ are the one dimensional subspaces of the kernel of $T$. We just counted the number of one dimensional subspaces of a two dimensional $F$ vector space. There are $p+1$ one-dimensional invariant subspaces.



          I'm not sure exactly what the second question is asking us to count at all, but if you can clarify that it'd be cool. Might be because it's late, since I'm having trouble even formulating guesses as to what it might be supposed to mean, which suggests my brain is about to cease functioning.



          Intuition?



          Hard to say exactly what the intuition is, but I guess the idea is that since $T$ has nontrivial kernel, that is easily invariant (as is any subspace contained in it), so let's start looking into that. Similarly, since the kernel is nontrivial, $T$ is not surjective, and the image of $T$ will also be invariant (and any subspace containing it), so it's worth looking into that.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030242%2fdirect-summands-of-invariant-subspaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Let's consider the kernel and image of $T$. The kernel of $T$ must be two dimensional, since it cannot be three dimensional since $Tne 0$, and if it were one dimensional, then we would have that the rank of $T$ would be two by rank-nullity, so we couldn't have $T^2=0$. Hence the dimension of the image of $T$ must be one dimensional. Also it is clear that the image of $T$ is a one dimensional subspace of $ker T$.



            Now, if $Vsubseteq F^3$ is $T$-invariant, then $T(V)subseteq V$. Since the image of $T$ is one dimensional, either $V$ contains the image of $T$, or $V$ lies in the kernel of $T$.



            If $V$ is two dimensional, then if it lies in the kernel of $T$, then it is the kernel of $T$, and hence contains the image of $T$. Thus the two dimensional invariant subspaces are precisely those containing the image of $T$. To count the number of planes containing a line in $F^3$, fix a complement of the line. Then planes containing the line in $F^3$ correspond to lines in that complement, of which there are $(p^2-1)/(p-1)=p+1$.



            Conversely if $V$ is one dimensional, then if it contains the image of $T$, it is the image of $T$, so it lies in the kernel. Thus the one dimensional invariant subspaces for $T$ are the one dimensional subspaces of the kernel of $T$. We just counted the number of one dimensional subspaces of a two dimensional $F$ vector space. There are $p+1$ one-dimensional invariant subspaces.



            I'm not sure exactly what the second question is asking us to count at all, but if you can clarify that it'd be cool. Might be because it's late, since I'm having trouble even formulating guesses as to what it might be supposed to mean, which suggests my brain is about to cease functioning.



            Intuition?



            Hard to say exactly what the intuition is, but I guess the idea is that since $T$ has nontrivial kernel, that is easily invariant (as is any subspace contained in it), so let's start looking into that. Similarly, since the kernel is nontrivial, $T$ is not surjective, and the image of $T$ will also be invariant (and any subspace containing it), so it's worth looking into that.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Let's consider the kernel and image of $T$. The kernel of $T$ must be two dimensional, since it cannot be three dimensional since $Tne 0$, and if it were one dimensional, then we would have that the rank of $T$ would be two by rank-nullity, so we couldn't have $T^2=0$. Hence the dimension of the image of $T$ must be one dimensional. Also it is clear that the image of $T$ is a one dimensional subspace of $ker T$.



              Now, if $Vsubseteq F^3$ is $T$-invariant, then $T(V)subseteq V$. Since the image of $T$ is one dimensional, either $V$ contains the image of $T$, or $V$ lies in the kernel of $T$.



              If $V$ is two dimensional, then if it lies in the kernel of $T$, then it is the kernel of $T$, and hence contains the image of $T$. Thus the two dimensional invariant subspaces are precisely those containing the image of $T$. To count the number of planes containing a line in $F^3$, fix a complement of the line. Then planes containing the line in $F^3$ correspond to lines in that complement, of which there are $(p^2-1)/(p-1)=p+1$.



              Conversely if $V$ is one dimensional, then if it contains the image of $T$, it is the image of $T$, so it lies in the kernel. Thus the one dimensional invariant subspaces for $T$ are the one dimensional subspaces of the kernel of $T$. We just counted the number of one dimensional subspaces of a two dimensional $F$ vector space. There are $p+1$ one-dimensional invariant subspaces.



              I'm not sure exactly what the second question is asking us to count at all, but if you can clarify that it'd be cool. Might be because it's late, since I'm having trouble even formulating guesses as to what it might be supposed to mean, which suggests my brain is about to cease functioning.



              Intuition?



              Hard to say exactly what the intuition is, but I guess the idea is that since $T$ has nontrivial kernel, that is easily invariant (as is any subspace contained in it), so let's start looking into that. Similarly, since the kernel is nontrivial, $T$ is not surjective, and the image of $T$ will also be invariant (and any subspace containing it), so it's worth looking into that.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Let's consider the kernel and image of $T$. The kernel of $T$ must be two dimensional, since it cannot be three dimensional since $Tne 0$, and if it were one dimensional, then we would have that the rank of $T$ would be two by rank-nullity, so we couldn't have $T^2=0$. Hence the dimension of the image of $T$ must be one dimensional. Also it is clear that the image of $T$ is a one dimensional subspace of $ker T$.



                Now, if $Vsubseteq F^3$ is $T$-invariant, then $T(V)subseteq V$. Since the image of $T$ is one dimensional, either $V$ contains the image of $T$, or $V$ lies in the kernel of $T$.



                If $V$ is two dimensional, then if it lies in the kernel of $T$, then it is the kernel of $T$, and hence contains the image of $T$. Thus the two dimensional invariant subspaces are precisely those containing the image of $T$. To count the number of planes containing a line in $F^3$, fix a complement of the line. Then planes containing the line in $F^3$ correspond to lines in that complement, of which there are $(p^2-1)/(p-1)=p+1$.



                Conversely if $V$ is one dimensional, then if it contains the image of $T$, it is the image of $T$, so it lies in the kernel. Thus the one dimensional invariant subspaces for $T$ are the one dimensional subspaces of the kernel of $T$. We just counted the number of one dimensional subspaces of a two dimensional $F$ vector space. There are $p+1$ one-dimensional invariant subspaces.



                I'm not sure exactly what the second question is asking us to count at all, but if you can clarify that it'd be cool. Might be because it's late, since I'm having trouble even formulating guesses as to what it might be supposed to mean, which suggests my brain is about to cease functioning.



                Intuition?



                Hard to say exactly what the intuition is, but I guess the idea is that since $T$ has nontrivial kernel, that is easily invariant (as is any subspace contained in it), so let's start looking into that. Similarly, since the kernel is nontrivial, $T$ is not surjective, and the image of $T$ will also be invariant (and any subspace containing it), so it's worth looking into that.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Let's consider the kernel and image of $T$. The kernel of $T$ must be two dimensional, since it cannot be three dimensional since $Tne 0$, and if it were one dimensional, then we would have that the rank of $T$ would be two by rank-nullity, so we couldn't have $T^2=0$. Hence the dimension of the image of $T$ must be one dimensional. Also it is clear that the image of $T$ is a one dimensional subspace of $ker T$.



                Now, if $Vsubseteq F^3$ is $T$-invariant, then $T(V)subseteq V$. Since the image of $T$ is one dimensional, either $V$ contains the image of $T$, or $V$ lies in the kernel of $T$.



                If $V$ is two dimensional, then if it lies in the kernel of $T$, then it is the kernel of $T$, and hence contains the image of $T$. Thus the two dimensional invariant subspaces are precisely those containing the image of $T$. To count the number of planes containing a line in $F^3$, fix a complement of the line. Then planes containing the line in $F^3$ correspond to lines in that complement, of which there are $(p^2-1)/(p-1)=p+1$.



                Conversely if $V$ is one dimensional, then if it contains the image of $T$, it is the image of $T$, so it lies in the kernel. Thus the one dimensional invariant subspaces for $T$ are the one dimensional subspaces of the kernel of $T$. We just counted the number of one dimensional subspaces of a two dimensional $F$ vector space. There are $p+1$ one-dimensional invariant subspaces.



                I'm not sure exactly what the second question is asking us to count at all, but if you can clarify that it'd be cool. Might be because it's late, since I'm having trouble even formulating guesses as to what it might be supposed to mean, which suggests my brain is about to cease functioning.



                Intuition?



                Hard to say exactly what the intuition is, but I guess the idea is that since $T$ has nontrivial kernel, that is easily invariant (as is any subspace contained in it), so let's start looking into that. Similarly, since the kernel is nontrivial, $T$ is not surjective, and the image of $T$ will also be invariant (and any subspace containing it), so it's worth looking into that.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 8 '18 at 6:44









                jgonjgon

                13.6k22041




                13.6k22041






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030242%2fdirect-summands-of-invariant-subspaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen