Surjective ring homomorphism from $M_n(R)$ to $M_n(R/I)$ where $R$ is a ring and $I$ is an ideal for R?












1














I'm looking for such a surjective homomorphism. I was thinking of starting from the canonical surjection from $R$ to $R/I$ and induce one but somehow I get stuck... Can you help me?



Thank you very much!










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    Apply $Rto R/I$ to each entry.
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Oct 15 '14 at 16:36










  • @HagenvonEitzen That'd make a good hint-answer. If you really hate rep you can always CW it.
    – rschwieb
    Oct 15 '14 at 16:52










  • Don't I get cosets as entries then? I don't understand that...
    – Noome
    Oct 15 '14 at 18:01










  • @Noome Don't I get cosets as entries then yes, and $R/I$ is a set of cosets. What's unexpected about this? :)
    – rschwieb
    Oct 15 '14 at 18:28










  • Example: let $n = 2$, $R=mathbb{Z}$, and $I= 2mathbb{Z}$, then for each 2x2 matrix, take the map that sends each entry to $mathbb{Z} /2mathbb{Z}$. That is, sends entries divisible by $2$ to $0$ and all other entries to $1$.
    – Kevin Johnson
    Oct 27 '14 at 6:23
















1














I'm looking for such a surjective homomorphism. I was thinking of starting from the canonical surjection from $R$ to $R/I$ and induce one but somehow I get stuck... Can you help me?



Thank you very much!










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    Apply $Rto R/I$ to each entry.
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Oct 15 '14 at 16:36










  • @HagenvonEitzen That'd make a good hint-answer. If you really hate rep you can always CW it.
    – rschwieb
    Oct 15 '14 at 16:52










  • Don't I get cosets as entries then? I don't understand that...
    – Noome
    Oct 15 '14 at 18:01










  • @Noome Don't I get cosets as entries then yes, and $R/I$ is a set of cosets. What's unexpected about this? :)
    – rschwieb
    Oct 15 '14 at 18:28










  • Example: let $n = 2$, $R=mathbb{Z}$, and $I= 2mathbb{Z}$, then for each 2x2 matrix, take the map that sends each entry to $mathbb{Z} /2mathbb{Z}$. That is, sends entries divisible by $2$ to $0$ and all other entries to $1$.
    – Kevin Johnson
    Oct 27 '14 at 6:23














1












1








1


1





I'm looking for such a surjective homomorphism. I was thinking of starting from the canonical surjection from $R$ to $R/I$ and induce one but somehow I get stuck... Can you help me?



Thank you very much!










share|cite|improve this question













I'm looking for such a surjective homomorphism. I was thinking of starting from the canonical surjection from $R$ to $R/I$ and induce one but somehow I get stuck... Can you help me?



Thank you very much!







linear-algebra ring-theory abstract-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Oct 15 '14 at 16:27









Noome

15719




15719








  • 2




    Apply $Rto R/I$ to each entry.
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Oct 15 '14 at 16:36










  • @HagenvonEitzen That'd make a good hint-answer. If you really hate rep you can always CW it.
    – rschwieb
    Oct 15 '14 at 16:52










  • Don't I get cosets as entries then? I don't understand that...
    – Noome
    Oct 15 '14 at 18:01










  • @Noome Don't I get cosets as entries then yes, and $R/I$ is a set of cosets. What's unexpected about this? :)
    – rschwieb
    Oct 15 '14 at 18:28










  • Example: let $n = 2$, $R=mathbb{Z}$, and $I= 2mathbb{Z}$, then for each 2x2 matrix, take the map that sends each entry to $mathbb{Z} /2mathbb{Z}$. That is, sends entries divisible by $2$ to $0$ and all other entries to $1$.
    – Kevin Johnson
    Oct 27 '14 at 6:23














  • 2




    Apply $Rto R/I$ to each entry.
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Oct 15 '14 at 16:36










  • @HagenvonEitzen That'd make a good hint-answer. If you really hate rep you can always CW it.
    – rschwieb
    Oct 15 '14 at 16:52










  • Don't I get cosets as entries then? I don't understand that...
    – Noome
    Oct 15 '14 at 18:01










  • @Noome Don't I get cosets as entries then yes, and $R/I$ is a set of cosets. What's unexpected about this? :)
    – rschwieb
    Oct 15 '14 at 18:28










  • Example: let $n = 2$, $R=mathbb{Z}$, and $I= 2mathbb{Z}$, then for each 2x2 matrix, take the map that sends each entry to $mathbb{Z} /2mathbb{Z}$. That is, sends entries divisible by $2$ to $0$ and all other entries to $1$.
    – Kevin Johnson
    Oct 27 '14 at 6:23








2




2




Apply $Rto R/I$ to each entry.
– Hagen von Eitzen
Oct 15 '14 at 16:36




Apply $Rto R/I$ to each entry.
– Hagen von Eitzen
Oct 15 '14 at 16:36












@HagenvonEitzen That'd make a good hint-answer. If you really hate rep you can always CW it.
– rschwieb
Oct 15 '14 at 16:52




@HagenvonEitzen That'd make a good hint-answer. If you really hate rep you can always CW it.
– rschwieb
Oct 15 '14 at 16:52












Don't I get cosets as entries then? I don't understand that...
– Noome
Oct 15 '14 at 18:01




Don't I get cosets as entries then? I don't understand that...
– Noome
Oct 15 '14 at 18:01












@Noome Don't I get cosets as entries then yes, and $R/I$ is a set of cosets. What's unexpected about this? :)
– rschwieb
Oct 15 '14 at 18:28




@Noome Don't I get cosets as entries then yes, and $R/I$ is a set of cosets. What's unexpected about this? :)
– rschwieb
Oct 15 '14 at 18:28












Example: let $n = 2$, $R=mathbb{Z}$, and $I= 2mathbb{Z}$, then for each 2x2 matrix, take the map that sends each entry to $mathbb{Z} /2mathbb{Z}$. That is, sends entries divisible by $2$ to $0$ and all other entries to $1$.
– Kevin Johnson
Oct 27 '14 at 6:23




Example: let $n = 2$, $R=mathbb{Z}$, and $I= 2mathbb{Z}$, then for each 2x2 matrix, take the map that sends each entry to $mathbb{Z} /2mathbb{Z}$. That is, sends entries divisible by $2$ to $0$ and all other entries to $1$.
– Kevin Johnson
Oct 27 '14 at 6:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














If $n > 0$, we have a functor $M_n : operatorname{Ring} to operatorname{Ring}$ where $M_n(R)$ is the ring of $n times n$ matrices with entries in $R$. If $f : R to S$ is a ring homomorphism, then $M_n(f) : M_n(R) to M_n(S)$ is a ring homomorphism defined by $$M_n(f)Bigg( begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}Bigg) = begin{bmatrix} f(a_{11}) & cdots & f(a_{1n}) \ vdots & & vdots \ f(a_{n1}) & cdots & f(a_{nn})end{bmatrix}.$$



In our specific case, we let $R$ be a ring and $I$ an ideal, so we can consider the ring $R/I$ and the quotient homomorphism: $f : R to R/I$ defined by $f(r) = overline r = r + I$. Notice that our homormorphism is clearly surjective.



Let's pick an arbitrary element in $M_n(R/I)$: $$begin{bmatrix} overline {a_{11}} & cdots &overline{ a_{1n}} \ vdots & & vdots \ overline{a_{n1}} & cdots & overline{a_{nn}}end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} a_{11} + I & cdots & a_{1n} + I \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} + I & cdots & a_{nn} + Iend{bmatrix}$$ where we can choose the obvious representatives: for $overline{a_{ij}}$ we pick $a_{ij} in R$ and notice that $f(a_{ij}) = overline{a_{ij}} = a_{ij} + I$.



It should be clear that $$begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}$$ is an element such that $$M_n(f)Bigg(begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}Bigg) = begin{bmatrix} overline {a_{11}} & cdots &overline{ a_{1n}} \ vdots & & vdots \ overline{a_{n1}} & cdots & overline{a_{nn}}end{bmatrix}.$$



Hence the surjective homomorphism you requested should be $M_n(f)$ where $f$ is the canonical quotient map.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f975219%2fsurjective-ring-homomorphism-from-m-nr-to-m-nr-i-where-r-is-a-ring-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    If $n > 0$, we have a functor $M_n : operatorname{Ring} to operatorname{Ring}$ where $M_n(R)$ is the ring of $n times n$ matrices with entries in $R$. If $f : R to S$ is a ring homomorphism, then $M_n(f) : M_n(R) to M_n(S)$ is a ring homomorphism defined by $$M_n(f)Bigg( begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}Bigg) = begin{bmatrix} f(a_{11}) & cdots & f(a_{1n}) \ vdots & & vdots \ f(a_{n1}) & cdots & f(a_{nn})end{bmatrix}.$$



    In our specific case, we let $R$ be a ring and $I$ an ideal, so we can consider the ring $R/I$ and the quotient homomorphism: $f : R to R/I$ defined by $f(r) = overline r = r + I$. Notice that our homormorphism is clearly surjective.



    Let's pick an arbitrary element in $M_n(R/I)$: $$begin{bmatrix} overline {a_{11}} & cdots &overline{ a_{1n}} \ vdots & & vdots \ overline{a_{n1}} & cdots & overline{a_{nn}}end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} a_{11} + I & cdots & a_{1n} + I \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} + I & cdots & a_{nn} + Iend{bmatrix}$$ where we can choose the obvious representatives: for $overline{a_{ij}}$ we pick $a_{ij} in R$ and notice that $f(a_{ij}) = overline{a_{ij}} = a_{ij} + I$.



    It should be clear that $$begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}$$ is an element such that $$M_n(f)Bigg(begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}Bigg) = begin{bmatrix} overline {a_{11}} & cdots &overline{ a_{1n}} \ vdots & & vdots \ overline{a_{n1}} & cdots & overline{a_{nn}}end{bmatrix}.$$



    Hence the surjective homomorphism you requested should be $M_n(f)$ where $f$ is the canonical quotient map.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      1














      If $n > 0$, we have a functor $M_n : operatorname{Ring} to operatorname{Ring}$ where $M_n(R)$ is the ring of $n times n$ matrices with entries in $R$. If $f : R to S$ is a ring homomorphism, then $M_n(f) : M_n(R) to M_n(S)$ is a ring homomorphism defined by $$M_n(f)Bigg( begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}Bigg) = begin{bmatrix} f(a_{11}) & cdots & f(a_{1n}) \ vdots & & vdots \ f(a_{n1}) & cdots & f(a_{nn})end{bmatrix}.$$



      In our specific case, we let $R$ be a ring and $I$ an ideal, so we can consider the ring $R/I$ and the quotient homomorphism: $f : R to R/I$ defined by $f(r) = overline r = r + I$. Notice that our homormorphism is clearly surjective.



      Let's pick an arbitrary element in $M_n(R/I)$: $$begin{bmatrix} overline {a_{11}} & cdots &overline{ a_{1n}} \ vdots & & vdots \ overline{a_{n1}} & cdots & overline{a_{nn}}end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} a_{11} + I & cdots & a_{1n} + I \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} + I & cdots & a_{nn} + Iend{bmatrix}$$ where we can choose the obvious representatives: for $overline{a_{ij}}$ we pick $a_{ij} in R$ and notice that $f(a_{ij}) = overline{a_{ij}} = a_{ij} + I$.



      It should be clear that $$begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}$$ is an element such that $$M_n(f)Bigg(begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}Bigg) = begin{bmatrix} overline {a_{11}} & cdots &overline{ a_{1n}} \ vdots & & vdots \ overline{a_{n1}} & cdots & overline{a_{nn}}end{bmatrix}.$$



      Hence the surjective homomorphism you requested should be $M_n(f)$ where $f$ is the canonical quotient map.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        If $n > 0$, we have a functor $M_n : operatorname{Ring} to operatorname{Ring}$ where $M_n(R)$ is the ring of $n times n$ matrices with entries in $R$. If $f : R to S$ is a ring homomorphism, then $M_n(f) : M_n(R) to M_n(S)$ is a ring homomorphism defined by $$M_n(f)Bigg( begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}Bigg) = begin{bmatrix} f(a_{11}) & cdots & f(a_{1n}) \ vdots & & vdots \ f(a_{n1}) & cdots & f(a_{nn})end{bmatrix}.$$



        In our specific case, we let $R$ be a ring and $I$ an ideal, so we can consider the ring $R/I$ and the quotient homomorphism: $f : R to R/I$ defined by $f(r) = overline r = r + I$. Notice that our homormorphism is clearly surjective.



        Let's pick an arbitrary element in $M_n(R/I)$: $$begin{bmatrix} overline {a_{11}} & cdots &overline{ a_{1n}} \ vdots & & vdots \ overline{a_{n1}} & cdots & overline{a_{nn}}end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} a_{11} + I & cdots & a_{1n} + I \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} + I & cdots & a_{nn} + Iend{bmatrix}$$ where we can choose the obvious representatives: for $overline{a_{ij}}$ we pick $a_{ij} in R$ and notice that $f(a_{ij}) = overline{a_{ij}} = a_{ij} + I$.



        It should be clear that $$begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}$$ is an element such that $$M_n(f)Bigg(begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}Bigg) = begin{bmatrix} overline {a_{11}} & cdots &overline{ a_{1n}} \ vdots & & vdots \ overline{a_{n1}} & cdots & overline{a_{nn}}end{bmatrix}.$$



        Hence the surjective homomorphism you requested should be $M_n(f)$ where $f$ is the canonical quotient map.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        If $n > 0$, we have a functor $M_n : operatorname{Ring} to operatorname{Ring}$ where $M_n(R)$ is the ring of $n times n$ matrices with entries in $R$. If $f : R to S$ is a ring homomorphism, then $M_n(f) : M_n(R) to M_n(S)$ is a ring homomorphism defined by $$M_n(f)Bigg( begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}Bigg) = begin{bmatrix} f(a_{11}) & cdots & f(a_{1n}) \ vdots & & vdots \ f(a_{n1}) & cdots & f(a_{nn})end{bmatrix}.$$



        In our specific case, we let $R$ be a ring and $I$ an ideal, so we can consider the ring $R/I$ and the quotient homomorphism: $f : R to R/I$ defined by $f(r) = overline r = r + I$. Notice that our homormorphism is clearly surjective.



        Let's pick an arbitrary element in $M_n(R/I)$: $$begin{bmatrix} overline {a_{11}} & cdots &overline{ a_{1n}} \ vdots & & vdots \ overline{a_{n1}} & cdots & overline{a_{nn}}end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} a_{11} + I & cdots & a_{1n} + I \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} + I & cdots & a_{nn} + Iend{bmatrix}$$ where we can choose the obvious representatives: for $overline{a_{ij}}$ we pick $a_{ij} in R$ and notice that $f(a_{ij}) = overline{a_{ij}} = a_{ij} + I$.



        It should be clear that $$begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}$$ is an element such that $$M_n(f)Bigg(begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & cdots & a_{1n} \ vdots & & vdots \ a_{n1} & cdots & a_{nn}end{bmatrix}Bigg) = begin{bmatrix} overline {a_{11}} & cdots &overline{ a_{1n}} \ vdots & & vdots \ overline{a_{n1}} & cdots & overline{a_{nn}}end{bmatrix}.$$



        Hence the surjective homomorphism you requested should be $M_n(f)$ where $f$ is the canonical quotient map.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Feb 15 '15 at 5:31









        Robert Cardona

        5,23023498




        5,23023498






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f975219%2fsurjective-ring-homomorphism-from-m-nr-to-m-nr-i-where-r-is-a-ring-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen