Getting ERR_SPDY_INADEQUATE_TRANSPORT_SECURITY in Chrome using azure-iothub SDK
I have a simple javascript class which creates/deletes devices inside an Azure IoT Hub, using the azure-iothub Node.js module.
class AzureManager {
constructor(options) {
const { connectionString } = options;
this.registry = iothub.Registry.fromConnectionString(connectionString);
}
/**
* Gets some stats about the Iot Hub selected
* @returns {Object} an object with the following properties:
* totalDeviceCount, enabledDeviceCount, disabledDeviceCount
*/
getStats() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
this.registry.getRegistryStatistics((err, stats, res) => {
if (err) {
return reject(err);
}
return resolve(stats);
});
});
}
}
I have developed a Jest test for this class and when I execute it, all tests pass without problems.
When I execute the code inside Chrome, I get the following error.
request.js:150 OPTIONS
https://pysensors.azure-devices.net/statistics/devices?api-version=2018-06-30
net::ERR_SPDY_INADEQUATE_TRANSPORT_SECURITY
I don't know if I have to configure something to make it works on all the recent versions of the browsers.
I've found this forum post (somehow similar to this blog post) which talks about a cipher suite problem on the server side and to force the client to use HTTP1/1, but since I'm using the SDK, I have no control on how the request is performed.
Thanks
EDIT: Just discovered that the module I'm using is intended to be used just server side. Using Firefox I don't have the SPDY issue, anyway I get CORS issues since the Azure doesn't support it. I've read somewhere that it's on their roadmap, but not a top priority.
azure-iot-hub azure-iot-sdk
add a comment |
I have a simple javascript class which creates/deletes devices inside an Azure IoT Hub, using the azure-iothub Node.js module.
class AzureManager {
constructor(options) {
const { connectionString } = options;
this.registry = iothub.Registry.fromConnectionString(connectionString);
}
/**
* Gets some stats about the Iot Hub selected
* @returns {Object} an object with the following properties:
* totalDeviceCount, enabledDeviceCount, disabledDeviceCount
*/
getStats() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
this.registry.getRegistryStatistics((err, stats, res) => {
if (err) {
return reject(err);
}
return resolve(stats);
});
});
}
}
I have developed a Jest test for this class and when I execute it, all tests pass without problems.
When I execute the code inside Chrome, I get the following error.
request.js:150 OPTIONS
https://pysensors.azure-devices.net/statistics/devices?api-version=2018-06-30
net::ERR_SPDY_INADEQUATE_TRANSPORT_SECURITY
I don't know if I have to configure something to make it works on all the recent versions of the browsers.
I've found this forum post (somehow similar to this blog post) which talks about a cipher suite problem on the server side and to force the client to use HTTP1/1, but since I'm using the SDK, I have no control on how the request is performed.
Thanks
EDIT: Just discovered that the module I'm using is intended to be used just server side. Using Firefox I don't have the SPDY issue, anyway I get CORS issues since the Azure doesn't support it. I've read somewhere that it's on their roadmap, but not a top priority.
azure-iot-hub azure-iot-sdk
add a comment |
I have a simple javascript class which creates/deletes devices inside an Azure IoT Hub, using the azure-iothub Node.js module.
class AzureManager {
constructor(options) {
const { connectionString } = options;
this.registry = iothub.Registry.fromConnectionString(connectionString);
}
/**
* Gets some stats about the Iot Hub selected
* @returns {Object} an object with the following properties:
* totalDeviceCount, enabledDeviceCount, disabledDeviceCount
*/
getStats() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
this.registry.getRegistryStatistics((err, stats, res) => {
if (err) {
return reject(err);
}
return resolve(stats);
});
});
}
}
I have developed a Jest test for this class and when I execute it, all tests pass without problems.
When I execute the code inside Chrome, I get the following error.
request.js:150 OPTIONS
https://pysensors.azure-devices.net/statistics/devices?api-version=2018-06-30
net::ERR_SPDY_INADEQUATE_TRANSPORT_SECURITY
I don't know if I have to configure something to make it works on all the recent versions of the browsers.
I've found this forum post (somehow similar to this blog post) which talks about a cipher suite problem on the server side and to force the client to use HTTP1/1, but since I'm using the SDK, I have no control on how the request is performed.
Thanks
EDIT: Just discovered that the module I'm using is intended to be used just server side. Using Firefox I don't have the SPDY issue, anyway I get CORS issues since the Azure doesn't support it. I've read somewhere that it's on their roadmap, but not a top priority.
azure-iot-hub azure-iot-sdk
I have a simple javascript class which creates/deletes devices inside an Azure IoT Hub, using the azure-iothub Node.js module.
class AzureManager {
constructor(options) {
const { connectionString } = options;
this.registry = iothub.Registry.fromConnectionString(connectionString);
}
/**
* Gets some stats about the Iot Hub selected
* @returns {Object} an object with the following properties:
* totalDeviceCount, enabledDeviceCount, disabledDeviceCount
*/
getStats() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
this.registry.getRegistryStatistics((err, stats, res) => {
if (err) {
return reject(err);
}
return resolve(stats);
});
});
}
}
I have developed a Jest test for this class and when I execute it, all tests pass without problems.
When I execute the code inside Chrome, I get the following error.
request.js:150 OPTIONS
https://pysensors.azure-devices.net/statistics/devices?api-version=2018-06-30
net::ERR_SPDY_INADEQUATE_TRANSPORT_SECURITY
I don't know if I have to configure something to make it works on all the recent versions of the browsers.
I've found this forum post (somehow similar to this blog post) which talks about a cipher suite problem on the server side and to force the client to use HTTP1/1, but since I'm using the SDK, I have no control on how the request is performed.
Thanks
EDIT: Just discovered that the module I'm using is intended to be used just server side. Using Firefox I don't have the SPDY issue, anyway I get CORS issues since the Azure doesn't support it. I've read somewhere that it's on their roadmap, but not a top priority.
azure-iot-hub azure-iot-sdk
azure-iot-hub azure-iot-sdk
edited Nov 22 '18 at 13:48
Chris
asked Nov 22 '18 at 11:44
ChrisChris
348316
348316
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Official Microsoft's response:
This happens to be a bug on IoTHub service side. IoTHub service does
not support HTTP/2 protocol yet but due to the bug, we do return
HTTP/2 as a supported protocol in ALPN extension during initial
handshake. We are going to fix this bug soon but until then, you can
configure your client to always use HTTP/1 protocol which is supported
and works well.
Please vote for this feature on Azure IoT Feedback channel so that we
can prioritize it. Thanks!
HTTP 2.0 support
https://feedback.azure.com/forums/321918-azure-iot/suggestions/9958737-http-2-0-support
Details:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/azure/en-US/0cf59124-f8f0-4fb2-ba20-5666894341cb/errspdyinadequatetransportsecurity-error-on-rest-api-call-in-chrome?forum=azureiothub
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53430294%2fgetting-err-spdy-inadequate-transport-security-in-chrome-using-azure-iothub-sdk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Official Microsoft's response:
This happens to be a bug on IoTHub service side. IoTHub service does
not support HTTP/2 protocol yet but due to the bug, we do return
HTTP/2 as a supported protocol in ALPN extension during initial
handshake. We are going to fix this bug soon but until then, you can
configure your client to always use HTTP/1 protocol which is supported
and works well.
Please vote for this feature on Azure IoT Feedback channel so that we
can prioritize it. Thanks!
HTTP 2.0 support
https://feedback.azure.com/forums/321918-azure-iot/suggestions/9958737-http-2-0-support
Details:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/azure/en-US/0cf59124-f8f0-4fb2-ba20-5666894341cb/errspdyinadequatetransportsecurity-error-on-rest-api-call-in-chrome?forum=azureiothub
add a comment |
Official Microsoft's response:
This happens to be a bug on IoTHub service side. IoTHub service does
not support HTTP/2 protocol yet but due to the bug, we do return
HTTP/2 as a supported protocol in ALPN extension during initial
handshake. We are going to fix this bug soon but until then, you can
configure your client to always use HTTP/1 protocol which is supported
and works well.
Please vote for this feature on Azure IoT Feedback channel so that we
can prioritize it. Thanks!
HTTP 2.0 support
https://feedback.azure.com/forums/321918-azure-iot/suggestions/9958737-http-2-0-support
Details:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/azure/en-US/0cf59124-f8f0-4fb2-ba20-5666894341cb/errspdyinadequatetransportsecurity-error-on-rest-api-call-in-chrome?forum=azureiothub
add a comment |
Official Microsoft's response:
This happens to be a bug on IoTHub service side. IoTHub service does
not support HTTP/2 protocol yet but due to the bug, we do return
HTTP/2 as a supported protocol in ALPN extension during initial
handshake. We are going to fix this bug soon but until then, you can
configure your client to always use HTTP/1 protocol which is supported
and works well.
Please vote for this feature on Azure IoT Feedback channel so that we
can prioritize it. Thanks!
HTTP 2.0 support
https://feedback.azure.com/forums/321918-azure-iot/suggestions/9958737-http-2-0-support
Details:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/azure/en-US/0cf59124-f8f0-4fb2-ba20-5666894341cb/errspdyinadequatetransportsecurity-error-on-rest-api-call-in-chrome?forum=azureiothub
Official Microsoft's response:
This happens to be a bug on IoTHub service side. IoTHub service does
not support HTTP/2 protocol yet but due to the bug, we do return
HTTP/2 as a supported protocol in ALPN extension during initial
handshake. We are going to fix this bug soon but until then, you can
configure your client to always use HTTP/1 protocol which is supported
and works well.
Please vote for this feature on Azure IoT Feedback channel so that we
can prioritize it. Thanks!
HTTP 2.0 support
https://feedback.azure.com/forums/321918-azure-iot/suggestions/9958737-http-2-0-support
Details:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/azure/en-US/0cf59124-f8f0-4fb2-ba20-5666894341cb/errspdyinadequatetransportsecurity-error-on-rest-api-call-in-chrome?forum=azureiothub
answered Nov 22 '18 at 16:36
ChrisChris
348316
348316
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53430294%2fgetting-err-spdy-inadequate-transport-security-in-chrome-using-azure-iothub-sdk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown