Given that the first two cards drawn are kings, what is the probability that the third is also a king?












1












$begingroup$


Four cards are randomly selected from a pack of 52 cards. If the first two cards are kings, what is the probability that the third card is a king?



The given answer is 2/50.



I was thinking 4 cards can be selected in 52C4 ways, out of which first three kings can be selected in 4P3 ways i.e. 24 ways and last 1 card can be choose by 49 ways. Hence result should be equal to (24*49)/(52C4)



Where am I going wrong?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    4P3 doesn't look correct as you're not using the fact that there were 2 kings already.
    $endgroup$
    – rsadhvika
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:37








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The given answer is correct because you have $2$ kings left in a deck of $50$ cards. You seem to be trying to calculate the probability that the first three cards were kings. This problem is different because you are given that the first two cards are kings.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    Edited the title to match the body. (Sorry, I accidentally typed return and missed out on the opportunity to comment on the edit.)
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Tung
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:49
















1












$begingroup$


Four cards are randomly selected from a pack of 52 cards. If the first two cards are kings, what is the probability that the third card is a king?



The given answer is 2/50.



I was thinking 4 cards can be selected in 52C4 ways, out of which first three kings can be selected in 4P3 ways i.e. 24 ways and last 1 card can be choose by 49 ways. Hence result should be equal to (24*49)/(52C4)



Where am I going wrong?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    4P3 doesn't look correct as you're not using the fact that there were 2 kings already.
    $endgroup$
    – rsadhvika
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:37








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The given answer is correct because you have $2$ kings left in a deck of $50$ cards. You seem to be trying to calculate the probability that the first three cards were kings. This problem is different because you are given that the first two cards are kings.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    Edited the title to match the body. (Sorry, I accidentally typed return and missed out on the opportunity to comment on the edit.)
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Tung
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:49














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Four cards are randomly selected from a pack of 52 cards. If the first two cards are kings, what is the probability that the third card is a king?



The given answer is 2/50.



I was thinking 4 cards can be selected in 52C4 ways, out of which first three kings can be selected in 4P3 ways i.e. 24 ways and last 1 card can be choose by 49 ways. Hence result should be equal to (24*49)/(52C4)



Where am I going wrong?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Four cards are randomly selected from a pack of 52 cards. If the first two cards are kings, what is the probability that the third card is a king?



The given answer is 2/50.



I was thinking 4 cards can be selected in 52C4 ways, out of which first three kings can be selected in 4P3 ways i.e. 24 ways and last 1 card can be choose by 49 ways. Hence result should be equal to (24*49)/(52C4)



Where am I going wrong?







probability






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 10 '18 at 17:48









Brian Tung

25.8k32554




25.8k32554










asked Dec 10 '18 at 17:15









swapnilswapnil

335




335












  • $begingroup$
    4P3 doesn't look correct as you're not using the fact that there were 2 kings already.
    $endgroup$
    – rsadhvika
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:37








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The given answer is correct because you have $2$ kings left in a deck of $50$ cards. You seem to be trying to calculate the probability that the first three cards were kings. This problem is different because you are given that the first two cards are kings.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    Edited the title to match the body. (Sorry, I accidentally typed return and missed out on the opportunity to comment on the edit.)
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Tung
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:49


















  • $begingroup$
    4P3 doesn't look correct as you're not using the fact that there were 2 kings already.
    $endgroup$
    – rsadhvika
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:37








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The given answer is correct because you have $2$ kings left in a deck of $50$ cards. You seem to be trying to calculate the probability that the first three cards were kings. This problem is different because you are given that the first two cards are kings.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    Edited the title to match the body. (Sorry, I accidentally typed return and missed out on the opportunity to comment on the edit.)
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Tung
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:49
















$begingroup$
4P3 doesn't look correct as you're not using the fact that there were 2 kings already.
$endgroup$
– rsadhvika
Dec 10 '18 at 17:37






$begingroup$
4P3 doesn't look correct as you're not using the fact that there were 2 kings already.
$endgroup$
– rsadhvika
Dec 10 '18 at 17:37






2




2




$begingroup$
The given answer is correct because you have $2$ kings left in a deck of $50$ cards. You seem to be trying to calculate the probability that the first three cards were kings. This problem is different because you are given that the first two cards are kings.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Dec 10 '18 at 17:39




$begingroup$
The given answer is correct because you have $2$ kings left in a deck of $50$ cards. You seem to be trying to calculate the probability that the first three cards were kings. This problem is different because you are given that the first two cards are kings.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Dec 10 '18 at 17:39












$begingroup$
Edited the title to match the body. (Sorry, I accidentally typed return and missed out on the opportunity to comment on the edit.)
$endgroup$
– Brian Tung
Dec 10 '18 at 17:49




$begingroup$
Edited the title to match the body. (Sorry, I accidentally typed return and missed out on the opportunity to comment on the edit.)
$endgroup$
– Brian Tung
Dec 10 '18 at 17:49










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You have a deck of $52$ cards and remove $2$ cards which are both kings. You now take a new card out of the $50$ remaining cards and are asked the probability of it being a king. There are $2$ kings left in the pack of $50$ cards. The answer is



$$ frac{2}{50}. $$



Where are you going wrong ?



"I was thinking $4$ cards can be selected in $52$C$4$ ways"



Correct but .... Why are you thinking about $4$ cards ! The question asks you what is the probability upon taking the third card, what happens next is irrelevant to the question. You should focus on extracting the relevant information from the problem. It's sometimes a good idea to imagine yourself taking out the cards of the deck to identify the relevant information.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41



















1












$begingroup$

You almost have it.
Since you want to consider the 4 card subsets, and since you knew that your subset had 2 kings already, you want to look only at 4 card subsets that have 2 kings. If you have 2 kings you can choose the other 2 cards in :
$$50C2$$
ways.



Next you want to fix your third card as king. You can choose the fourth card in $49$ ways.



So the required probability would be
$$dfrac{49}{50C2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41



















0












$begingroup$

After taking two kings there are 50 cards left with 2 kings among them, so the probability that the next card is a king is $2/50$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034197%2fgiven-that-the-first-two-cards-drawn-are-kings-what-is-the-probability-that-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

You have a deck of $52$ cards and remove $2$ cards which are both kings. You now take a new card out of the $50$ remaining cards and are asked the probability of it being a king. There are $2$ kings left in the pack of $50$ cards. The answer is



$$ frac{2}{50}. $$



Where are you going wrong ?



"I was thinking $4$ cards can be selected in $52$C$4$ ways"



Correct but .... Why are you thinking about $4$ cards ! The question asks you what is the probability upon taking the third card, what happens next is irrelevant to the question. You should focus on extracting the relevant information from the problem. It's sometimes a good idea to imagine yourself taking out the cards of the deck to identify the relevant information.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
















1












$begingroup$

You have a deck of $52$ cards and remove $2$ cards which are both kings. You now take a new card out of the $50$ remaining cards and are asked the probability of it being a king. There are $2$ kings left in the pack of $50$ cards. The answer is



$$ frac{2}{50}. $$



Where are you going wrong ?



"I was thinking $4$ cards can be selected in $52$C$4$ ways"



Correct but .... Why are you thinking about $4$ cards ! The question asks you what is the probability upon taking the third card, what happens next is irrelevant to the question. You should focus on extracting the relevant information from the problem. It's sometimes a good idea to imagine yourself taking out the cards of the deck to identify the relevant information.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41














1












1








1





$begingroup$

You have a deck of $52$ cards and remove $2$ cards which are both kings. You now take a new card out of the $50$ remaining cards and are asked the probability of it being a king. There are $2$ kings left in the pack of $50$ cards. The answer is



$$ frac{2}{50}. $$



Where are you going wrong ?



"I was thinking $4$ cards can be selected in $52$C$4$ ways"



Correct but .... Why are you thinking about $4$ cards ! The question asks you what is the probability upon taking the third card, what happens next is irrelevant to the question. You should focus on extracting the relevant information from the problem. It's sometimes a good idea to imagine yourself taking out the cards of the deck to identify the relevant information.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You have a deck of $52$ cards and remove $2$ cards which are both kings. You now take a new card out of the $50$ remaining cards and are asked the probability of it being a king. There are $2$ kings left in the pack of $50$ cards. The answer is



$$ frac{2}{50}. $$



Where are you going wrong ?



"I was thinking $4$ cards can be selected in $52$C$4$ ways"



Correct but .... Why are you thinking about $4$ cards ! The question asks you what is the probability upon taking the third card, what happens next is irrelevant to the question. You should focus on extracting the relevant information from the problem. It's sometimes a good idea to imagine yourself taking out the cards of the deck to identify the relevant information.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 10 '18 at 17:41









DigitalisDigitalis

528216




528216












  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41


















  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
















$begingroup$
thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– swapnil
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41




$begingroup$
thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– swapnil
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41











1












$begingroup$

You almost have it.
Since you want to consider the 4 card subsets, and since you knew that your subset had 2 kings already, you want to look only at 4 card subsets that have 2 kings. If you have 2 kings you can choose the other 2 cards in :
$$50C2$$
ways.



Next you want to fix your third card as king. You can choose the fourth card in $49$ ways.



So the required probability would be
$$dfrac{49}{50C2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
















1












$begingroup$

You almost have it.
Since you want to consider the 4 card subsets, and since you knew that your subset had 2 kings already, you want to look only at 4 card subsets that have 2 kings. If you have 2 kings you can choose the other 2 cards in :
$$50C2$$
ways.



Next you want to fix your third card as king. You can choose the fourth card in $49$ ways.



So the required probability would be
$$dfrac{49}{50C2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41














1












1








1





$begingroup$

You almost have it.
Since you want to consider the 4 card subsets, and since you knew that your subset had 2 kings already, you want to look only at 4 card subsets that have 2 kings. If you have 2 kings you can choose the other 2 cards in :
$$50C2$$
ways.



Next you want to fix your third card as king. You can choose the fourth card in $49$ ways.



So the required probability would be
$$dfrac{49}{50C2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You almost have it.
Since you want to consider the 4 card subsets, and since you knew that your subset had 2 kings already, you want to look only at 4 card subsets that have 2 kings. If you have 2 kings you can choose the other 2 cards in :
$$50C2$$
ways.



Next you want to fix your third card as king. You can choose the fourth card in $49$ ways.



So the required probability would be
$$dfrac{49}{50C2}$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 10 '18 at 17:45









rsadhvikarsadhvika

1,7081228




1,7081228












  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41


















  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
















$begingroup$
thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– swapnil
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41




$begingroup$
thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– swapnil
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41











0












$begingroup$

After taking two kings there are 50 cards left with 2 kings among them, so the probability that the next card is a king is $2/50$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
















0












$begingroup$

After taking two kings there are 50 cards left with 2 kings among them, so the probability that the next card is a king is $2/50$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41














0












0








0





$begingroup$

After taking two kings there are 50 cards left with 2 kings among them, so the probability that the next card is a king is $2/50$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



After taking two kings there are 50 cards left with 2 kings among them, so the probability that the next card is a king is $2/50$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 10 '18 at 17:31









mlerma54mlerma54

1,177148




1,177148












  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41


















  • $begingroup$
    thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – swapnil
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
















$begingroup$
thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– swapnil
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41




$begingroup$
thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– swapnil
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034197%2fgiven-that-the-first-two-cards-drawn-are-kings-what-is-the-probability-that-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen