Is there an extension of Wald's Equation to the expectation of a product of random variables?












1












$begingroup$


So Wald's Equation states that for a real-values, independent and identically distributed sequence of random variables $(X_{n})_{ninmathbb{N}}$ and a nonnegative integer $N$, which is independent of the sequence, we have that:



$mathbb{E}[X_{1}+dots+X_{N}]=mathbb{E}[N]mathbb{E}[X_{1}]$



Under the assumption that both have finite expectation.



My question is if there exists some extension or similar identity that can be applied to the same type of problem except then with multiplication. I'm not sure if this simply follows from independence in most cases though. For example, given the same setting as earlier, do we have that:



$mathbb{E}[prod^{N}_{i=1}X_{i}]=prod^{N}_{i=1}mathbb{E}[X_{i}]$



Or is the outcome something comparable to the Wald's Equation?



Any help is appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    So Wald's Equation states that for a real-values, independent and identically distributed sequence of random variables $(X_{n})_{ninmathbb{N}}$ and a nonnegative integer $N$, which is independent of the sequence, we have that:



    $mathbb{E}[X_{1}+dots+X_{N}]=mathbb{E}[N]mathbb{E}[X_{1}]$



    Under the assumption that both have finite expectation.



    My question is if there exists some extension or similar identity that can be applied to the same type of problem except then with multiplication. I'm not sure if this simply follows from independence in most cases though. For example, given the same setting as earlier, do we have that:



    $mathbb{E}[prod^{N}_{i=1}X_{i}]=prod^{N}_{i=1}mathbb{E}[X_{i}]$



    Or is the outcome something comparable to the Wald's Equation?



    Any help is appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      So Wald's Equation states that for a real-values, independent and identically distributed sequence of random variables $(X_{n})_{ninmathbb{N}}$ and a nonnegative integer $N$, which is independent of the sequence, we have that:



      $mathbb{E}[X_{1}+dots+X_{N}]=mathbb{E}[N]mathbb{E}[X_{1}]$



      Under the assumption that both have finite expectation.



      My question is if there exists some extension or similar identity that can be applied to the same type of problem except then with multiplication. I'm not sure if this simply follows from independence in most cases though. For example, given the same setting as earlier, do we have that:



      $mathbb{E}[prod^{N}_{i=1}X_{i}]=prod^{N}_{i=1}mathbb{E}[X_{i}]$



      Or is the outcome something comparable to the Wald's Equation?



      Any help is appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      So Wald's Equation states that for a real-values, independent and identically distributed sequence of random variables $(X_{n})_{ninmathbb{N}}$ and a nonnegative integer $N$, which is independent of the sequence, we have that:



      $mathbb{E}[X_{1}+dots+X_{N}]=mathbb{E}[N]mathbb{E}[X_{1}]$



      Under the assumption that both have finite expectation.



      My question is if there exists some extension or similar identity that can be applied to the same type of problem except then with multiplication. I'm not sure if this simply follows from independence in most cases though. For example, given the same setting as earlier, do we have that:



      $mathbb{E}[prod^{N}_{i=1}X_{i}]=prod^{N}_{i=1}mathbb{E}[X_{i}]$



      Or is the outcome something comparable to the Wald's Equation?



      Any help is appreciated!







      probability probability-theory expected-value






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 13 '18 at 17:54









      S. CrimS. Crim

      358112




      358112






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Let $ N, X_1, X_2, dots $ independent random variables, $ (X_i) $ identically distributed and integrable, $N$ is integer valued and $ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N$ is integrable. Then
          $$ mathbb{E}left[Pi_{i=1}^NX_iright] =mathbb{E}left[{mathbb{E}[X_1]}^Nright].$$
          In fact,
          $$mathbb{E}left[ |Pi_{i=1}^NX_i| right] =mathbb{E}left[sum_{n=1}^infty 1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^N |X_i|right]= sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{E}left[1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^N |X_i|right]=sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{E}left[1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^n |X_i|right]=sum_{n=1}^infty {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^n mathbb{P}(N=n)
          =mathbb{E}left[ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^Nright].$$

          Note that in the penultimate equality we require independence and in the last equality we need a hypothesis of integrability over
          $ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N$. Since
          $$ left|{mathbb{E}[X_1]}^N right| le {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N $$
          we have ${mathbb{E}[X_1]}^N$ is integrable and the claim is verified.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is there a proof of this, or a reason that it works?
            $endgroup$
            – S. Crim
            Nov 14 '18 at 6:38













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997056%2fis-there-an-extension-of-walds-equation-to-the-expectation-of-a-product-of-rand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Let $ N, X_1, X_2, dots $ independent random variables, $ (X_i) $ identically distributed and integrable, $N$ is integer valued and $ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N$ is integrable. Then
          $$ mathbb{E}left[Pi_{i=1}^NX_iright] =mathbb{E}left[{mathbb{E}[X_1]}^Nright].$$
          In fact,
          $$mathbb{E}left[ |Pi_{i=1}^NX_i| right] =mathbb{E}left[sum_{n=1}^infty 1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^N |X_i|right]= sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{E}left[1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^N |X_i|right]=sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{E}left[1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^n |X_i|right]=sum_{n=1}^infty {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^n mathbb{P}(N=n)
          =mathbb{E}left[ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^Nright].$$

          Note that in the penultimate equality we require independence and in the last equality we need a hypothesis of integrability over
          $ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N$. Since
          $$ left|{mathbb{E}[X_1]}^N right| le {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N $$
          we have ${mathbb{E}[X_1]}^N$ is integrable and the claim is verified.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is there a proof of this, or a reason that it works?
            $endgroup$
            – S. Crim
            Nov 14 '18 at 6:38


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Let $ N, X_1, X_2, dots $ independent random variables, $ (X_i) $ identically distributed and integrable, $N$ is integer valued and $ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N$ is integrable. Then
          $$ mathbb{E}left[Pi_{i=1}^NX_iright] =mathbb{E}left[{mathbb{E}[X_1]}^Nright].$$
          In fact,
          $$mathbb{E}left[ |Pi_{i=1}^NX_i| right] =mathbb{E}left[sum_{n=1}^infty 1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^N |X_i|right]= sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{E}left[1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^N |X_i|right]=sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{E}left[1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^n |X_i|right]=sum_{n=1}^infty {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^n mathbb{P}(N=n)
          =mathbb{E}left[ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^Nright].$$

          Note that in the penultimate equality we require independence and in the last equality we need a hypothesis of integrability over
          $ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N$. Since
          $$ left|{mathbb{E}[X_1]}^N right| le {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N $$
          we have ${mathbb{E}[X_1]}^N$ is integrable and the claim is verified.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is there a proof of this, or a reason that it works?
            $endgroup$
            – S. Crim
            Nov 14 '18 at 6:38
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Let $ N, X_1, X_2, dots $ independent random variables, $ (X_i) $ identically distributed and integrable, $N$ is integer valued and $ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N$ is integrable. Then
          $$ mathbb{E}left[Pi_{i=1}^NX_iright] =mathbb{E}left[{mathbb{E}[X_1]}^Nright].$$
          In fact,
          $$mathbb{E}left[ |Pi_{i=1}^NX_i| right] =mathbb{E}left[sum_{n=1}^infty 1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^N |X_i|right]= sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{E}left[1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^N |X_i|right]=sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{E}left[1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^n |X_i|right]=sum_{n=1}^infty {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^n mathbb{P}(N=n)
          =mathbb{E}left[ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^Nright].$$

          Note that in the penultimate equality we require independence and in the last equality we need a hypothesis of integrability over
          $ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N$. Since
          $$ left|{mathbb{E}[X_1]}^N right| le {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N $$
          we have ${mathbb{E}[X_1]}^N$ is integrable and the claim is verified.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Let $ N, X_1, X_2, dots $ independent random variables, $ (X_i) $ identically distributed and integrable, $N$ is integer valued and $ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N$ is integrable. Then
          $$ mathbb{E}left[Pi_{i=1}^NX_iright] =mathbb{E}left[{mathbb{E}[X_1]}^Nright].$$
          In fact,
          $$mathbb{E}left[ |Pi_{i=1}^NX_i| right] =mathbb{E}left[sum_{n=1}^infty 1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^N |X_i|right]= sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{E}left[1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^N |X_i|right]=sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{E}left[1_{{N=n}}Pi_{i=1}^n |X_i|right]=sum_{n=1}^infty {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^n mathbb{P}(N=n)
          =mathbb{E}left[ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^Nright].$$

          Note that in the penultimate equality we require independence and in the last equality we need a hypothesis of integrability over
          $ {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N$. Since
          $$ left|{mathbb{E}[X_1]}^N right| le {(mathbb{E}|X_1|)}^N $$
          we have ${mathbb{E}[X_1]}^N$ is integrable and the claim is verified.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 10 '18 at 17:10

























          answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:33









          Daniel Camarena PerezDaniel Camarena Perez

          57738




          57738












          • $begingroup$
            Is there a proof of this, or a reason that it works?
            $endgroup$
            – S. Crim
            Nov 14 '18 at 6:38




















          • $begingroup$
            Is there a proof of this, or a reason that it works?
            $endgroup$
            – S. Crim
            Nov 14 '18 at 6:38


















          $begingroup$
          Is there a proof of this, or a reason that it works?
          $endgroup$
          – S. Crim
          Nov 14 '18 at 6:38






          $begingroup$
          Is there a proof of this, or a reason that it works?
          $endgroup$
          – S. Crim
          Nov 14 '18 at 6:38




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997056%2fis-there-an-extension-of-walds-equation-to-the-expectation-of-a-product-of-rand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen