If $H$ is of finite index, Prove that, there is a subgroup $N$ of $H$ and of finite index in $G$ such that...
$begingroup$
If $H$ is of finite index, Prove that, there is a subgroup $N$ of $H$ and of finite index in $G$ such that $aNa^{-1}= N$ for all $a$ in $G$. Can you find an upper bound for $[G:N]$?
Let, $a_1H,a_2H,..,a_mH$ is the complete list of left cosets of $H$ in $G$.
Then, $cup_{i=1}^{m} a_i H=G$
$implies cup_{i=1}^{m} a_i H a_j^{-1}=Gimplies cup_{i=1}^{m} b_i(a_j H a_j^{-1})=G$
for each $j=1,2,..m$ and $b_iin G$ such that, $b_ia_j=a_i$ for $i=1,2,..,m$.
Now, we consider the subgroup,
$N=cap_{xin G} xHx^{-1}=cap_{i=1}^{m} a_iHa_i^{-1}$.
Then, clearly $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ which is contained in $H$.
Since, each of $a_iHa_i^{-1}$ is of finite index in $G$.
Then, $cap a_iHa_i^{-1}$ has also finite index in $G$.
And we are done.
Also, it's easy to see that,
$[G:N]le[G:a_1Ha_1^{-1}][G:a_2Ha_2^{-1}]..........[G:a_mHa_m^{-1}]$
Can anyone check it?
group-theory proof-verification
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $H$ is of finite index, Prove that, there is a subgroup $N$ of $H$ and of finite index in $G$ such that $aNa^{-1}= N$ for all $a$ in $G$. Can you find an upper bound for $[G:N]$?
Let, $a_1H,a_2H,..,a_mH$ is the complete list of left cosets of $H$ in $G$.
Then, $cup_{i=1}^{m} a_i H=G$
$implies cup_{i=1}^{m} a_i H a_j^{-1}=Gimplies cup_{i=1}^{m} b_i(a_j H a_j^{-1})=G$
for each $j=1,2,..m$ and $b_iin G$ such that, $b_ia_j=a_i$ for $i=1,2,..,m$.
Now, we consider the subgroup,
$N=cap_{xin G} xHx^{-1}=cap_{i=1}^{m} a_iHa_i^{-1}$.
Then, clearly $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ which is contained in $H$.
Since, each of $a_iHa_i^{-1}$ is of finite index in $G$.
Then, $cap a_iHa_i^{-1}$ has also finite index in $G$.
And we are done.
Also, it's easy to see that,
$[G:N]le[G:a_1Ha_1^{-1}][G:a_2Ha_2^{-1}]..........[G:a_mHa_m^{-1}]$
Can anyone check it?
group-theory proof-verification
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There's at least one hole. The intersection of two finite index subgroups could be empty, for example, yielding a subgroup that is not of finite index.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $H$ is of finite index, Prove that, there is a subgroup $N$ of $H$ and of finite index in $G$ such that $aNa^{-1}= N$ for all $a$ in $G$. Can you find an upper bound for $[G:N]$?
Let, $a_1H,a_2H,..,a_mH$ is the complete list of left cosets of $H$ in $G$.
Then, $cup_{i=1}^{m} a_i H=G$
$implies cup_{i=1}^{m} a_i H a_j^{-1}=Gimplies cup_{i=1}^{m} b_i(a_j H a_j^{-1})=G$
for each $j=1,2,..m$ and $b_iin G$ such that, $b_ia_j=a_i$ for $i=1,2,..,m$.
Now, we consider the subgroup,
$N=cap_{xin G} xHx^{-1}=cap_{i=1}^{m} a_iHa_i^{-1}$.
Then, clearly $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ which is contained in $H$.
Since, each of $a_iHa_i^{-1}$ is of finite index in $G$.
Then, $cap a_iHa_i^{-1}$ has also finite index in $G$.
And we are done.
Also, it's easy to see that,
$[G:N]le[G:a_1Ha_1^{-1}][G:a_2Ha_2^{-1}]..........[G:a_mHa_m^{-1}]$
Can anyone check it?
group-theory proof-verification
$endgroup$
If $H$ is of finite index, Prove that, there is a subgroup $N$ of $H$ and of finite index in $G$ such that $aNa^{-1}= N$ for all $a$ in $G$. Can you find an upper bound for $[G:N]$?
Let, $a_1H,a_2H,..,a_mH$ is the complete list of left cosets of $H$ in $G$.
Then, $cup_{i=1}^{m} a_i H=G$
$implies cup_{i=1}^{m} a_i H a_j^{-1}=Gimplies cup_{i=1}^{m} b_i(a_j H a_j^{-1})=G$
for each $j=1,2,..m$ and $b_iin G$ such that, $b_ia_j=a_i$ for $i=1,2,..,m$.
Now, we consider the subgroup,
$N=cap_{xin G} xHx^{-1}=cap_{i=1}^{m} a_iHa_i^{-1}$.
Then, clearly $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ which is contained in $H$.
Since, each of $a_iHa_i^{-1}$ is of finite index in $G$.
Then, $cap a_iHa_i^{-1}$ has also finite index in $G$.
And we are done.
Also, it's easy to see that,
$[G:N]le[G:a_1Ha_1^{-1}][G:a_2Ha_2^{-1}]..........[G:a_mHa_m^{-1}]$
Can anyone check it?
group-theory proof-verification
group-theory proof-verification
asked Dec 10 '18 at 17:28
Tom.Tom.
15619
15619
$begingroup$
There's at least one hole. The intersection of two finite index subgroups could be empty, for example, yielding a subgroup that is not of finite index.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's at least one hole. The intersection of two finite index subgroups could be empty, for example, yielding a subgroup that is not of finite index.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:08
$begingroup$
There's at least one hole. The intersection of two finite index subgroups could be empty, for example, yielding a subgroup that is not of finite index.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:08
$begingroup$
There's at least one hole. The intersection of two finite index subgroups could be empty, for example, yielding a subgroup that is not of finite index.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You proof works, but the end of the first paragraph (with the $b_j$'s) is superfluous. You also might want to spell out in more detail why the in the index of H in G is an upper bound on the index of an intersection of m+1 conjugates in an intersection of m of those m+1.
Finally, the simple proof is that H acts transitively on its left cosets in G. This provides a homomorphism from G to $S_{[G:H]}$. The kerner N is contained in every point stabilizer, one of which is H, and N has finite index since the image of the homomorphism is finite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034223%2fif-h-is-of-finite-index-prove-that-there-is-a-subgroup-n-of-h-and-of-fin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You proof works, but the end of the first paragraph (with the $b_j$'s) is superfluous. You also might want to spell out in more detail why the in the index of H in G is an upper bound on the index of an intersection of m+1 conjugates in an intersection of m of those m+1.
Finally, the simple proof is that H acts transitively on its left cosets in G. This provides a homomorphism from G to $S_{[G:H]}$. The kerner N is contained in every point stabilizer, one of which is H, and N has finite index since the image of the homomorphism is finite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You proof works, but the end of the first paragraph (with the $b_j$'s) is superfluous. You also might want to spell out in more detail why the in the index of H in G is an upper bound on the index of an intersection of m+1 conjugates in an intersection of m of those m+1.
Finally, the simple proof is that H acts transitively on its left cosets in G. This provides a homomorphism from G to $S_{[G:H]}$. The kerner N is contained in every point stabilizer, one of which is H, and N has finite index since the image of the homomorphism is finite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You proof works, but the end of the first paragraph (with the $b_j$'s) is superfluous. You also might want to spell out in more detail why the in the index of H in G is an upper bound on the index of an intersection of m+1 conjugates in an intersection of m of those m+1.
Finally, the simple proof is that H acts transitively on its left cosets in G. This provides a homomorphism from G to $S_{[G:H]}$. The kerner N is contained in every point stabilizer, one of which is H, and N has finite index since the image of the homomorphism is finite.
$endgroup$
You proof works, but the end of the first paragraph (with the $b_j$'s) is superfluous. You also might want to spell out in more detail why the in the index of H in G is an upper bound on the index of an intersection of m+1 conjugates in an intersection of m of those m+1.
Finally, the simple proof is that H acts transitively on its left cosets in G. This provides a homomorphism from G to $S_{[G:H]}$. The kerner N is contained in every point stabilizer, one of which is H, and N has finite index since the image of the homomorphism is finite.
edited Dec 11 '18 at 0:51
answered Dec 10 '18 at 18:39
C MonsourC Monsour
6,2191325
6,2191325
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034223%2fif-h-is-of-finite-index-prove-that-there-is-a-subgroup-n-of-h-and-of-fin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
There's at least one hole. The intersection of two finite index subgroups could be empty, for example, yielding a subgroup that is not of finite index.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:08