equations with alignement and with centering between alignement












5















I have the following code:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}
begin{align}
&begin{bmatrix}
a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
end{bmatrix} &&=
begin{bmatrix}
cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
-sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix}
&&cdot
&&begin{bmatrix}
a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
end{bmatrix}
&&cdot
&&begin{bmatrix}
cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix}
\
&textbf{A}' &&= textbf{R}^T &&cdot && textbf{A} &&cdot &&textbf{R}
end{align}
end{document}


It aligns indeed all the argument like this:



enter image description here



But I want to have all the argument centered between the separation as follow + without the equation numeration:



enter image description here










share|improve this question

























  • You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters

    – Raven
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:49











  • And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace{}. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...

    – Raven
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:51











  • indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 18:00











  • Thank you all for comments and answers

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 18:29
















5















I have the following code:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}
begin{align}
&begin{bmatrix}
a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
end{bmatrix} &&=
begin{bmatrix}
cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
-sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix}
&&cdot
&&begin{bmatrix}
a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
end{bmatrix}
&&cdot
&&begin{bmatrix}
cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix}
\
&textbf{A}' &&= textbf{R}^T &&cdot && textbf{A} &&cdot &&textbf{R}
end{align}
end{document}


It aligns indeed all the argument like this:



enter image description here



But I want to have all the argument centered between the separation as follow + without the equation numeration:



enter image description here










share|improve this question

























  • You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters

    – Raven
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:49











  • And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace{}. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...

    – Raven
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:51











  • indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 18:00











  • Thank you all for comments and answers

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 18:29














5












5








5


1






I have the following code:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}
begin{align}
&begin{bmatrix}
a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
end{bmatrix} &&=
begin{bmatrix}
cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
-sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix}
&&cdot
&&begin{bmatrix}
a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
end{bmatrix}
&&cdot
&&begin{bmatrix}
cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix}
\
&textbf{A}' &&= textbf{R}^T &&cdot && textbf{A} &&cdot &&textbf{R}
end{align}
end{document}


It aligns indeed all the argument like this:



enter image description here



But I want to have all the argument centered between the separation as follow + without the equation numeration:



enter image description here










share|improve this question
















I have the following code:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}
begin{align}
&begin{bmatrix}
a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
end{bmatrix} &&=
begin{bmatrix}
cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
-sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix}
&&cdot
&&begin{bmatrix}
a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
end{bmatrix}
&&cdot
&&begin{bmatrix}
cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix}
\
&textbf{A}' &&= textbf{R}^T &&cdot && textbf{A} &&cdot &&textbf{R}
end{align}
end{document}


It aligns indeed all the argument like this:



enter image description here



But I want to have all the argument centered between the separation as follow + without the equation numeration:



enter image description here







horizontal-alignment equations align






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 18 '18 at 18:00







ecjb

















asked Dec 18 '18 at 17:43









ecjbecjb

2956




2956













  • You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters

    – Raven
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:49











  • And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace{}. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...

    – Raven
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:51











  • indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 18:00











  • Thank you all for comments and answers

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 18:29



















  • You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters

    – Raven
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:49











  • And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace{}. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...

    – Raven
    Dec 18 '18 at 17:51











  • indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 18:00











  • Thank you all for comments and answers

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 18:29

















You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters

– Raven
Dec 18 '18 at 17:49





You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters

– Raven
Dec 18 '18 at 17:49













And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace{}. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...

– Raven
Dec 18 '18 at 17:51





And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace{}. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...

– Raven
Dec 18 '18 at 17:51













indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code

– ecjb
Dec 18 '18 at 18:00





indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code

– ecjb
Dec 18 '18 at 18:00













Thank you all for comments and answers

– ecjb
Dec 18 '18 at 18:29





Thank you all for comments and answers

– ecjb
Dec 18 '18 at 18:29










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














A seven column array does the job. The columns for = and cdot are of type >{{}}c<{{}} so the spacing around the items is the expected one. The outer array has no intercolumn spaces.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,array}

begin{document}

begin{equation*}
begin{array}{ @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }
begin{bmatrix}
a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
end{bmatrix}
&=&
begin{bmatrix}
cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
-sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix}
&cdot&
begin{bmatrix}
a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
end{bmatrix}
&cdot&
begin{bmatrix}
cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix}
\[2ex]
textbf{A}' &=& textbf{R}^T &cdot& textbf{A} &cdot &textbf{R}
end{array}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }?

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:19











  • @ecjb @{} means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *{3}{...} it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like {}={} so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.

    – egreg
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:21











  • thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:25











  • @ecjb The *{n}(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >{...} and <{...} look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf

    – egreg
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:31











  • thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and {ccccccc} instead of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } } works also.

    – ecjb
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:12



















5














Here's a suggestion: Take a different approach to denoting what's A', A, R, R^T, by using underbrace directives. This should make it clear to even the most casual readers that they're not dealing with two separate equations.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'bmatrix*' env.
begin{document}
begin{equation}
{underbrace{begin{bmatrix}
a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
end{bmatrix}}_{textstylemathbf{A}'}} =
{underbrace{begin{bmatrix*}[r]
cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
-sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix*}}_{textstylemathbf{R}^T}}
cdot
{underbrace{begin{bmatrix}
a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
end{bmatrix}}_{textstylemathbf{A}}}
cdot
{underbrace{begin{bmatrix*}[r]
cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
end{bmatrix*}}_{textstylemathbf{R}}}
end{equation}
end{document}





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466403%2fequations-with-alignement-and-with-centering-between-alignement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    A seven column array does the job. The columns for = and cdot are of type >{{}}c<{{}} so the spacing around the items is the expected one. The outer array has no intercolumn spaces.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath,array}

    begin{document}

    begin{equation*}
    begin{array}{ @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }
    begin{bmatrix}
    a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
    a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
    end{bmatrix}
    &=&
    begin{bmatrix}
    cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
    -sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
    end{bmatrix}
    &cdot&
    begin{bmatrix}
    a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
    a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
    end{bmatrix}
    &cdot&
    begin{bmatrix}
    cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
    sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
    end{bmatrix}
    \[2ex]
    textbf{A}' &=& textbf{R}^T &cdot& textbf{A} &cdot &textbf{R}
    end{array}
    end{equation*}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer
























    • Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }?

      – ecjb
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:19











    • @ecjb @{} means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *{3}{...} it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like {}={} so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.

      – egreg
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:21











    • thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!

      – ecjb
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:25











    • @ecjb The *{n}(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >{...} and <{...} look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf

      – egreg
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:31











    • thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and {ccccccc} instead of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } } works also.

      – ecjb
      Dec 27 '18 at 15:12
















    5














    A seven column array does the job. The columns for = and cdot are of type >{{}}c<{{}} so the spacing around the items is the expected one. The outer array has no intercolumn spaces.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath,array}

    begin{document}

    begin{equation*}
    begin{array}{ @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }
    begin{bmatrix}
    a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
    a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
    end{bmatrix}
    &=&
    begin{bmatrix}
    cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
    -sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
    end{bmatrix}
    &cdot&
    begin{bmatrix}
    a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
    a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
    end{bmatrix}
    &cdot&
    begin{bmatrix}
    cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
    sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
    end{bmatrix}
    \[2ex]
    textbf{A}' &=& textbf{R}^T &cdot& textbf{A} &cdot &textbf{R}
    end{array}
    end{equation*}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer
























    • Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }?

      – ecjb
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:19











    • @ecjb @{} means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *{3}{...} it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like {}={} so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.

      – egreg
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:21











    • thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!

      – ecjb
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:25











    • @ecjb The *{n}(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >{...} and <{...} look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf

      – egreg
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:31











    • thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and {ccccccc} instead of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } } works also.

      – ecjb
      Dec 27 '18 at 15:12














    5












    5








    5







    A seven column array does the job. The columns for = and cdot are of type >{{}}c<{{}} so the spacing around the items is the expected one. The outer array has no intercolumn spaces.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath,array}

    begin{document}

    begin{equation*}
    begin{array}{ @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }
    begin{bmatrix}
    a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
    a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
    end{bmatrix}
    &=&
    begin{bmatrix}
    cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
    -sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
    end{bmatrix}
    &cdot&
    begin{bmatrix}
    a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
    a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
    end{bmatrix}
    &cdot&
    begin{bmatrix}
    cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
    sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
    end{bmatrix}
    \[2ex]
    textbf{A}' &=& textbf{R}^T &cdot& textbf{A} &cdot &textbf{R}
    end{array}
    end{equation*}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer













    A seven column array does the job. The columns for = and cdot are of type >{{}}c<{{}} so the spacing around the items is the expected one. The outer array has no intercolumn spaces.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath,array}

    begin{document}

    begin{equation*}
    begin{array}{ @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }
    begin{bmatrix}
    a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
    a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
    end{bmatrix}
    &=&
    begin{bmatrix}
    cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
    -sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
    end{bmatrix}
    &cdot&
    begin{bmatrix}
    a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
    a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
    end{bmatrix}
    &cdot&
    begin{bmatrix}
    cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
    sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
    end{bmatrix}
    \[2ex]
    textbf{A}' &=& textbf{R}^T &cdot& textbf{A} &cdot &textbf{R}
    end{array}
    end{equation*}

    end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Dec 18 '18 at 18:18









    egregegreg

    721k8719123212




    721k8719123212













    • Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }?

      – ecjb
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:19











    • @ecjb @{} means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *{3}{...} it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like {}={} so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.

      – egreg
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:21











    • thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!

      – ecjb
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:25











    • @ecjb The *{n}(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >{...} and <{...} look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf

      – egreg
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:31











    • thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and {ccccccc} instead of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } } works also.

      – ecjb
      Dec 27 '18 at 15:12



















    • Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }?

      – ecjb
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:19











    • @ecjb @{} means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *{3}{...} it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like {}={} so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.

      – egreg
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:21











    • thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!

      – ecjb
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:25











    • @ecjb The *{n}(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >{...} and <{...} look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf

      – egreg
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:31











    • thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and {ccccccc} instead of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } } works also.

      – ecjb
      Dec 27 '18 at 15:12

















    Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }?

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:19





    Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } }?

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:19













    @ecjb @{} means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *{3}{...} it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like {}={} so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.

    – egreg
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:21





    @ecjb @{} means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *{3}{...} it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like {}={} so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.

    – egreg
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:21













    thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:25





    thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!

    – ecjb
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:25













    @ecjb The *{n}(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >{...} and <{...} look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf

    – egreg
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:31





    @ecjb The *{n}(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >{...} and <{...} look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf

    – egreg
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:31













    thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and {ccccccc} instead of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } } works also.

    – ecjb
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:12





    thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and {ccccccc} instead of { @{}c *{3} { >{{}}c<{{}} @{} c @{} } } works also.

    – ecjb
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:12











    5














    Here's a suggestion: Take a different approach to denoting what's A', A, R, R^T, by using underbrace directives. This should make it clear to even the most casual readers that they're not dealing with two separate equations.



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{mathtools} % for 'bmatrix*' env.
    begin{document}
    begin{equation}
    {underbrace{begin{bmatrix}
    a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
    a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
    end{bmatrix}}_{textstylemathbf{A}'}} =
    {underbrace{begin{bmatrix*}[r]
    cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
    -sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
    end{bmatrix*}}_{textstylemathbf{R}^T}}
    cdot
    {underbrace{begin{bmatrix}
    a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
    a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
    end{bmatrix}}_{textstylemathbf{A}}}
    cdot
    {underbrace{begin{bmatrix*}[r]
    cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
    sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
    end{bmatrix*}}_{textstylemathbf{R}}}
    end{equation}
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer




























      5














      Here's a suggestion: Take a different approach to denoting what's A', A, R, R^T, by using underbrace directives. This should make it clear to even the most casual readers that they're not dealing with two separate equations.



      enter image description here



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools} % for 'bmatrix*' env.
      begin{document}
      begin{equation}
      {underbrace{begin{bmatrix}
      a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
      a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
      end{bmatrix}}_{textstylemathbf{A}'}} =
      {underbrace{begin{bmatrix*}[r]
      cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
      -sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
      end{bmatrix*}}_{textstylemathbf{R}^T}}
      cdot
      {underbrace{begin{bmatrix}
      a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
      a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
      end{bmatrix}}_{textstylemathbf{A}}}
      cdot
      {underbrace{begin{bmatrix*}[r]
      cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
      sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
      end{bmatrix*}}_{textstylemathbf{R}}}
      end{equation}
      end{document}





      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5







        Here's a suggestion: Take a different approach to denoting what's A', A, R, R^T, by using underbrace directives. This should make it clear to even the most casual readers that they're not dealing with two separate equations.



        enter image description here



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools} % for 'bmatrix*' env.
        begin{document}
        begin{equation}
        {underbrace{begin{bmatrix}
        a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
        a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
        end{bmatrix}}_{textstylemathbf{A}'}} =
        {underbrace{begin{bmatrix*}[r]
        cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
        -sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
        end{bmatrix*}}_{textstylemathbf{R}^T}}
        cdot
        {underbrace{begin{bmatrix}
        a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
        a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
        end{bmatrix}}_{textstylemathbf{A}}}
        cdot
        {underbrace{begin{bmatrix*}[r]
        cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
        sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
        end{bmatrix*}}_{textstylemathbf{R}}}
        end{equation}
        end{document}





        share|improve this answer













        Here's a suggestion: Take a different approach to denoting what's A', A, R, R^T, by using underbrace directives. This should make it clear to even the most casual readers that they're not dealing with two separate equations.



        enter image description here



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools} % for 'bmatrix*' env.
        begin{document}
        begin{equation}
        {underbrace{begin{bmatrix}
        a'_{1,1} & a'_{1,2}\
        a'_{2,1} & a'_{2,2}
        end{bmatrix}}_{textstylemathbf{A}'}} =
        {underbrace{begin{bmatrix*}[r]
        cos{alpha} & sin{alpha} \
        -sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
        end{bmatrix*}}_{textstylemathbf{R}^T}}
        cdot
        {underbrace{begin{bmatrix}
        a_{1,1} & a_{1,2}\
        a_{2,1} & a_{2,2}
        end{bmatrix}}_{textstylemathbf{A}}}
        cdot
        {underbrace{begin{bmatrix*}[r]
        cos{alpha} & -sin{alpha} \
        sin{alpha} & cos{alpha} \
        end{bmatrix*}}_{textstylemathbf{R}}}
        end{equation}
        end{document}






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 18 '18 at 18:07









        MicoMico

        280k31381770




        280k31381770






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466403%2fequations-with-alignement-and-with-centering-between-alignement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen