Taking inverse of a function that contains exponential term












0












$begingroup$


Consider we are given such a function



$$f(x) = 2^{2x-1}+3$$



How does one find $f^{-1}(x)$? Here I noticed that it is a bit different to take inverse of exponential terms. My attempt is as follows



Let $y = 2^{2x-1} +3$



$$ y - 3 = 2^{2x-1}$$



$$2y-6 = 2^{2x}$$



However, I dont think that is how exactly it works. Could you assist me with what I'm missing?



Regards










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
    $endgroup$
    – Enzo
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:44










  • $begingroup$
    @DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Enzo
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean? How would you do that?
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
















0












$begingroup$


Consider we are given such a function



$$f(x) = 2^{2x-1}+3$$



How does one find $f^{-1}(x)$? Here I noticed that it is a bit different to take inverse of exponential terms. My attempt is as follows



Let $y = 2^{2x-1} +3$



$$ y - 3 = 2^{2x-1}$$



$$2y-6 = 2^{2x}$$



However, I dont think that is how exactly it works. Could you assist me with what I'm missing?



Regards










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
    $endgroup$
    – Enzo
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:44










  • $begingroup$
    @DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Enzo
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean? How would you do that?
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:45














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Consider we are given such a function



$$f(x) = 2^{2x-1}+3$$



How does one find $f^{-1}(x)$? Here I noticed that it is a bit different to take inverse of exponential terms. My attempt is as follows



Let $y = 2^{2x-1} +3$



$$ y - 3 = 2^{2x-1}$$



$$2y-6 = 2^{2x}$$



However, I dont think that is how exactly it works. Could you assist me with what I'm missing?



Regards










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Consider we are given such a function



$$f(x) = 2^{2x-1}+3$$



How does one find $f^{-1}(x)$? Here I noticed that it is a bit different to take inverse of exponential terms. My attempt is as follows



Let $y = 2^{2x-1} +3$



$$ y - 3 = 2^{2x-1}$$



$$2y-6 = 2^{2x}$$



However, I dont think that is how exactly it works. Could you assist me with what I'm missing?



Regards







functions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 18 '18 at 20:40









EnzoEnzo

19917




19917








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
    $endgroup$
    – Enzo
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:44










  • $begingroup$
    @DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Enzo
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean? How would you do that?
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:45














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
    $endgroup$
    – Enzo
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:44










  • $begingroup$
    @DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Enzo
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean? How would you do that?
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 18 '18 at 20:45








2




2




$begingroup$
Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43




$begingroup$
Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43












$begingroup$
@Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43




$begingroup$
@Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43












$begingroup$
Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:44




$begingroup$
Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:44












$begingroup$
@DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45




$begingroup$
@DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45












$begingroup$
What do you mean? How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45




$begingroup$
What do you mean? How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Your approach is correct. Note that $2^{2x} >0$ and thus you can always apply the $ln$ function (as mentioned-hinted in the comments). But, you also need that $2y-6 > 0 Leftrightarrow y > 3$ since you apply the $ln$ to that side as well of course. Taking this constrict into consideration, it is :



$$ln(2y-6) = ln 2^{2x} Leftrightarrow ln(2y-6) = 2x ln 2 Leftrightarrow x = frac{ln(2y-6)}{ln 4}$$



Now, interchange $x leftrightarrow y$ and yield :



$$y = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4} implies f^{-1}(x) = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4}$$



Don't forget that it must be $2x-6 >0 Leftrightarrow x > 3$ and $y >3 implies f(x) >3$ from the initial constrict.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045674%2ftaking-inverse-of-a-function-that-contains-exponential-term%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Your approach is correct. Note that $2^{2x} >0$ and thus you can always apply the $ln$ function (as mentioned-hinted in the comments). But, you also need that $2y-6 > 0 Leftrightarrow y > 3$ since you apply the $ln$ to that side as well of course. Taking this constrict into consideration, it is :



    $$ln(2y-6) = ln 2^{2x} Leftrightarrow ln(2y-6) = 2x ln 2 Leftrightarrow x = frac{ln(2y-6)}{ln 4}$$



    Now, interchange $x leftrightarrow y$ and yield :



    $$y = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4} implies f^{-1}(x) = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4}$$



    Don't forget that it must be $2x-6 >0 Leftrightarrow x > 3$ and $y >3 implies f(x) >3$ from the initial constrict.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Your approach is correct. Note that $2^{2x} >0$ and thus you can always apply the $ln$ function (as mentioned-hinted in the comments). But, you also need that $2y-6 > 0 Leftrightarrow y > 3$ since you apply the $ln$ to that side as well of course. Taking this constrict into consideration, it is :



      $$ln(2y-6) = ln 2^{2x} Leftrightarrow ln(2y-6) = 2x ln 2 Leftrightarrow x = frac{ln(2y-6)}{ln 4}$$



      Now, interchange $x leftrightarrow y$ and yield :



      $$y = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4} implies f^{-1}(x) = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4}$$



      Don't forget that it must be $2x-6 >0 Leftrightarrow x > 3$ and $y >3 implies f(x) >3$ from the initial constrict.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Your approach is correct. Note that $2^{2x} >0$ and thus you can always apply the $ln$ function (as mentioned-hinted in the comments). But, you also need that $2y-6 > 0 Leftrightarrow y > 3$ since you apply the $ln$ to that side as well of course. Taking this constrict into consideration, it is :



        $$ln(2y-6) = ln 2^{2x} Leftrightarrow ln(2y-6) = 2x ln 2 Leftrightarrow x = frac{ln(2y-6)}{ln 4}$$



        Now, interchange $x leftrightarrow y$ and yield :



        $$y = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4} implies f^{-1}(x) = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4}$$



        Don't forget that it must be $2x-6 >0 Leftrightarrow x > 3$ and $y >3 implies f(x) >3$ from the initial constrict.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Your approach is correct. Note that $2^{2x} >0$ and thus you can always apply the $ln$ function (as mentioned-hinted in the comments). But, you also need that $2y-6 > 0 Leftrightarrow y > 3$ since you apply the $ln$ to that side as well of course. Taking this constrict into consideration, it is :



        $$ln(2y-6) = ln 2^{2x} Leftrightarrow ln(2y-6) = 2x ln 2 Leftrightarrow x = frac{ln(2y-6)}{ln 4}$$



        Now, interchange $x leftrightarrow y$ and yield :



        $$y = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4} implies f^{-1}(x) = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4}$$



        Don't forget that it must be $2x-6 >0 Leftrightarrow x > 3$ and $y >3 implies f(x) >3$ from the initial constrict.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 18 '18 at 20:49









        RebellosRebellos

        14.8k31248




        14.8k31248






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045674%2ftaking-inverse-of-a-function-that-contains-exponential-term%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen