Taking inverse of a function that contains exponential term
$begingroup$
Consider we are given such a function
$$f(x) = 2^{2x-1}+3$$
How does one find $f^{-1}(x)$? Here I noticed that it is a bit different to take inverse of exponential terms. My attempt is as follows
Let $y = 2^{2x-1} +3$
$$ y - 3 = 2^{2x-1}$$
$$2y-6 = 2^{2x}$$
However, I dont think that is how exactly it works. Could you assist me with what I'm missing?
Regards
functions
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Consider we are given such a function
$$f(x) = 2^{2x-1}+3$$
How does one find $f^{-1}(x)$? Here I noticed that it is a bit different to take inverse of exponential terms. My attempt is as follows
Let $y = 2^{2x-1} +3$
$$ y - 3 = 2^{2x-1}$$
$$2y-6 = 2^{2x}$$
However, I dont think that is how exactly it works. Could you assist me with what I'm missing?
Regards
functions
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
@DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
What do you mean? How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Consider we are given such a function
$$f(x) = 2^{2x-1}+3$$
How does one find $f^{-1}(x)$? Here I noticed that it is a bit different to take inverse of exponential terms. My attempt is as follows
Let $y = 2^{2x-1} +3$
$$ y - 3 = 2^{2x-1}$$
$$2y-6 = 2^{2x}$$
However, I dont think that is how exactly it works. Could you assist me with what I'm missing?
Regards
functions
$endgroup$
Consider we are given such a function
$$f(x) = 2^{2x-1}+3$$
How does one find $f^{-1}(x)$? Here I noticed that it is a bit different to take inverse of exponential terms. My attempt is as follows
Let $y = 2^{2x-1} +3$
$$ y - 3 = 2^{2x-1}$$
$$2y-6 = 2^{2x}$$
However, I dont think that is how exactly it works. Could you assist me with what I'm missing?
Regards
functions
functions
asked Dec 18 '18 at 20:40
EnzoEnzo
19917
19917
2
$begingroup$
Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
@DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
What do you mean? How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
|
show 2 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
@DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
What do you mean? How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
2
2
$begingroup$
Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
@DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
@DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
What do you mean? How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
What do you mean? How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your approach is correct. Note that $2^{2x} >0$ and thus you can always apply the $ln$ function (as mentioned-hinted in the comments). But, you also need that $2y-6 > 0 Leftrightarrow y > 3$ since you apply the $ln$ to that side as well of course. Taking this constrict into consideration, it is :
$$ln(2y-6) = ln 2^{2x} Leftrightarrow ln(2y-6) = 2x ln 2 Leftrightarrow x = frac{ln(2y-6)}{ln 4}$$
Now, interchange $x leftrightarrow y$ and yield :
$$y = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4} implies f^{-1}(x) = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4}$$
Don't forget that it must be $2x-6 >0 Leftrightarrow x > 3$ and $y >3 implies f(x) >3$ from the initial constrict.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045674%2ftaking-inverse-of-a-function-that-contains-exponential-term%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your approach is correct. Note that $2^{2x} >0$ and thus you can always apply the $ln$ function (as mentioned-hinted in the comments). But, you also need that $2y-6 > 0 Leftrightarrow y > 3$ since you apply the $ln$ to that side as well of course. Taking this constrict into consideration, it is :
$$ln(2y-6) = ln 2^{2x} Leftrightarrow ln(2y-6) = 2x ln 2 Leftrightarrow x = frac{ln(2y-6)}{ln 4}$$
Now, interchange $x leftrightarrow y$ and yield :
$$y = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4} implies f^{-1}(x) = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4}$$
Don't forget that it must be $2x-6 >0 Leftrightarrow x > 3$ and $y >3 implies f(x) >3$ from the initial constrict.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your approach is correct. Note that $2^{2x} >0$ and thus you can always apply the $ln$ function (as mentioned-hinted in the comments). But, you also need that $2y-6 > 0 Leftrightarrow y > 3$ since you apply the $ln$ to that side as well of course. Taking this constrict into consideration, it is :
$$ln(2y-6) = ln 2^{2x} Leftrightarrow ln(2y-6) = 2x ln 2 Leftrightarrow x = frac{ln(2y-6)}{ln 4}$$
Now, interchange $x leftrightarrow y$ and yield :
$$y = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4} implies f^{-1}(x) = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4}$$
Don't forget that it must be $2x-6 >0 Leftrightarrow x > 3$ and $y >3 implies f(x) >3$ from the initial constrict.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your approach is correct. Note that $2^{2x} >0$ and thus you can always apply the $ln$ function (as mentioned-hinted in the comments). But, you also need that $2y-6 > 0 Leftrightarrow y > 3$ since you apply the $ln$ to that side as well of course. Taking this constrict into consideration, it is :
$$ln(2y-6) = ln 2^{2x} Leftrightarrow ln(2y-6) = 2x ln 2 Leftrightarrow x = frac{ln(2y-6)}{ln 4}$$
Now, interchange $x leftrightarrow y$ and yield :
$$y = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4} implies f^{-1}(x) = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4}$$
Don't forget that it must be $2x-6 >0 Leftrightarrow x > 3$ and $y >3 implies f(x) >3$ from the initial constrict.
$endgroup$
Your approach is correct. Note that $2^{2x} >0$ and thus you can always apply the $ln$ function (as mentioned-hinted in the comments). But, you also need that $2y-6 > 0 Leftrightarrow y > 3$ since you apply the $ln$ to that side as well of course. Taking this constrict into consideration, it is :
$$ln(2y-6) = ln 2^{2x} Leftrightarrow ln(2y-6) = 2x ln 2 Leftrightarrow x = frac{ln(2y-6)}{ln 4}$$
Now, interchange $x leftrightarrow y$ and yield :
$$y = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4} implies f^{-1}(x) = frac{ln(2x-6)}{ln 4}$$
Don't forget that it must be $2x-6 >0 Leftrightarrow x > 3$ and $y >3 implies f(x) >3$ from the initial constrict.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 20:49
RebellosRebellos
14.8k31248
14.8k31248
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045674%2ftaking-inverse-of-a-function-that-contains-exponential-term%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Looks good. Now take the $log()$ of both sides.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@Michael Are we supposed to take the log? I dont also know that.
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Yea, you take the log to deal with the exponent.
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
@DonThousand Cannot we also just substitute $2^{2x}$ in $f(x)$?
$endgroup$
– Enzo
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
What do you mean? How would you do that?
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 18 '18 at 20:45