Computing degrees and ramification indices of some extensions of $mathbb{Q}_2$
$begingroup$
Let $K=mathbb{Q}_2$ and $F = K(zeta_3,alpha)$ where $zeta$ is a primitive third root of unity and $alpha$ is a cubic root of $2$, i.e. $alpha^3 = 2$.Let $K_1 = K(zeta_3)$, $K_2 = K(alpha)$ and $L=K_1(beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 alpha$.
Now I would like to compute the degrees and ramification indices of $L/K_1$.
Discoveries and attempts:
- I noticed that $L$ contains $F$ since $beta^3/zeta_3 = alpha$.
- I know that $F/K_1$ is a totally ramified extension of degree $3$. This can be seen by taking a look at the extensions $F/K_1/K$ and $F/K_2/K$ and noticing that $K_1/K$ is unramified of degree $2$ and $K_2/K$ is totally ramified of degree $3$.
Could you please explain what can I do now to get information about $L/K_1$ resp. $L/F$? Thank you!
abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field ramification
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $K=mathbb{Q}_2$ and $F = K(zeta_3,alpha)$ where $zeta$ is a primitive third root of unity and $alpha$ is a cubic root of $2$, i.e. $alpha^3 = 2$.Let $K_1 = K(zeta_3)$, $K_2 = K(alpha)$ and $L=K_1(beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 alpha$.
Now I would like to compute the degrees and ramification indices of $L/K_1$.
Discoveries and attempts:
- I noticed that $L$ contains $F$ since $beta^3/zeta_3 = alpha$.
- I know that $F/K_1$ is a totally ramified extension of degree $3$. This can be seen by taking a look at the extensions $F/K_1/K$ and $F/K_2/K$ and noticing that $K_1/K$ is unramified of degree $2$ and $K_2/K$ is totally ramified of degree $3$.
Could you please explain what can I do now to get information about $L/K_1$ resp. $L/F$? Thank you!
abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field ramification
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 23 '18 at 1:43
$begingroup$
@reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 11:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $K=mathbb{Q}_2$ and $F = K(zeta_3,alpha)$ where $zeta$ is a primitive third root of unity and $alpha$ is a cubic root of $2$, i.e. $alpha^3 = 2$.Let $K_1 = K(zeta_3)$, $K_2 = K(alpha)$ and $L=K_1(beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 alpha$.
Now I would like to compute the degrees and ramification indices of $L/K_1$.
Discoveries and attempts:
- I noticed that $L$ contains $F$ since $beta^3/zeta_3 = alpha$.
- I know that $F/K_1$ is a totally ramified extension of degree $3$. This can be seen by taking a look at the extensions $F/K_1/K$ and $F/K_2/K$ and noticing that $K_1/K$ is unramified of degree $2$ and $K_2/K$ is totally ramified of degree $3$.
Could you please explain what can I do now to get information about $L/K_1$ resp. $L/F$? Thank you!
abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field ramification
$endgroup$
Let $K=mathbb{Q}_2$ and $F = K(zeta_3,alpha)$ where $zeta$ is a primitive third root of unity and $alpha$ is a cubic root of $2$, i.e. $alpha^3 = 2$.Let $K_1 = K(zeta_3)$, $K_2 = K(alpha)$ and $L=K_1(beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 alpha$.
Now I would like to compute the degrees and ramification indices of $L/K_1$.
Discoveries and attempts:
- I noticed that $L$ contains $F$ since $beta^3/zeta_3 = alpha$.
- I know that $F/K_1$ is a totally ramified extension of degree $3$. This can be seen by taking a look at the extensions $F/K_1/K$ and $F/K_2/K$ and noticing that $K_1/K$ is unramified of degree $2$ and $K_2/K$ is totally ramified of degree $3$.
Could you please explain what can I do now to get information about $L/K_1$ resp. $L/F$? Thank you!
abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field ramification
abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field ramification
asked Dec 22 '18 at 21:01
DiglettDiglett
9801521
9801521
$begingroup$
$mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 23 '18 at 1:43
$begingroup$
@reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 11:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 23 '18 at 1:43
$begingroup$
@reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 11:52
$begingroup$
$mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 23 '18 at 1:43
$begingroup$
$mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 23 '18 at 1:43
$begingroup$
@reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 11:52
$begingroup$
@reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 11:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $L_{1}=mathbb{Q}_{2}(beta)$ and note that $beta$ is a root of $x^{9}-2$ over $K$, which is an Eisenstein polynomial. Therefore $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified of degree 9 (see e.g. Proposition 3.6 of Local Fields and Their Extensions by Fesenko & Vostokov for a proof if you don't know this result). Now, $K_{1}/K$ is Galois of degree 2, therefore we have by Galois theory
$$[L:L_{1}]=[K_{1}:K],$$
because $L=L_{1}K_{1}$. Therefore we conclude that $[L:L_{1}]=2$. So $[L:K]=18$ by the tower formula, whence $[L:K_{1}]=9$.
Now, note that
$$f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}),$$
because $K_{1}/K$ is unramified (where $f(L/K)$ means the inertia degree of the extension $L/K$). Also
$$e(L/K)=e(L/L_{1})e(L_{1}/K)=9e(L/L_{1}),$$
because $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified (where $e(L/K)$ means the ramification index of the extension $L/K$). Thus we see that $2mid f(L/K)$ and $9mid e(L/K)$. By the fundamental identity we have $$18=[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K),$$
whence $f(L/K)=2$ and $e(L/K)=9$. This implies that $f(L/K_{1})=1$ because
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}).$$
It also implies that $e(L/K_{1})=9$ because
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=e(L/K_{1}).$$
Now for the extension $L/F$ we have
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/F)f(F/K_{1}),$$
whence $f(L/F)=1$. Furthermore
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=3e(L/F),$$
whence $e(L/F)=3$ and we conclude that $[L:F]=e(L/F)f(L/F)=3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049847%2fcomputing-degrees-and-ramification-indices-of-some-extensions-of-mathbbq-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $L_{1}=mathbb{Q}_{2}(beta)$ and note that $beta$ is a root of $x^{9}-2$ over $K$, which is an Eisenstein polynomial. Therefore $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified of degree 9 (see e.g. Proposition 3.6 of Local Fields and Their Extensions by Fesenko & Vostokov for a proof if you don't know this result). Now, $K_{1}/K$ is Galois of degree 2, therefore we have by Galois theory
$$[L:L_{1}]=[K_{1}:K],$$
because $L=L_{1}K_{1}$. Therefore we conclude that $[L:L_{1}]=2$. So $[L:K]=18$ by the tower formula, whence $[L:K_{1}]=9$.
Now, note that
$$f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}),$$
because $K_{1}/K$ is unramified (where $f(L/K)$ means the inertia degree of the extension $L/K$). Also
$$e(L/K)=e(L/L_{1})e(L_{1}/K)=9e(L/L_{1}),$$
because $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified (where $e(L/K)$ means the ramification index of the extension $L/K$). Thus we see that $2mid f(L/K)$ and $9mid e(L/K)$. By the fundamental identity we have $$18=[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K),$$
whence $f(L/K)=2$ and $e(L/K)=9$. This implies that $f(L/K_{1})=1$ because
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}).$$
It also implies that $e(L/K_{1})=9$ because
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=e(L/K_{1}).$$
Now for the extension $L/F$ we have
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/F)f(F/K_{1}),$$
whence $f(L/F)=1$. Furthermore
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=3e(L/F),$$
whence $e(L/F)=3$ and we conclude that $[L:F]=e(L/F)f(L/F)=3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $L_{1}=mathbb{Q}_{2}(beta)$ and note that $beta$ is a root of $x^{9}-2$ over $K$, which is an Eisenstein polynomial. Therefore $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified of degree 9 (see e.g. Proposition 3.6 of Local Fields and Their Extensions by Fesenko & Vostokov for a proof if you don't know this result). Now, $K_{1}/K$ is Galois of degree 2, therefore we have by Galois theory
$$[L:L_{1}]=[K_{1}:K],$$
because $L=L_{1}K_{1}$. Therefore we conclude that $[L:L_{1}]=2$. So $[L:K]=18$ by the tower formula, whence $[L:K_{1}]=9$.
Now, note that
$$f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}),$$
because $K_{1}/K$ is unramified (where $f(L/K)$ means the inertia degree of the extension $L/K$). Also
$$e(L/K)=e(L/L_{1})e(L_{1}/K)=9e(L/L_{1}),$$
because $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified (where $e(L/K)$ means the ramification index of the extension $L/K$). Thus we see that $2mid f(L/K)$ and $9mid e(L/K)$. By the fundamental identity we have $$18=[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K),$$
whence $f(L/K)=2$ and $e(L/K)=9$. This implies that $f(L/K_{1})=1$ because
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}).$$
It also implies that $e(L/K_{1})=9$ because
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=e(L/K_{1}).$$
Now for the extension $L/F$ we have
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/F)f(F/K_{1}),$$
whence $f(L/F)=1$. Furthermore
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=3e(L/F),$$
whence $e(L/F)=3$ and we conclude that $[L:F]=e(L/F)f(L/F)=3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $L_{1}=mathbb{Q}_{2}(beta)$ and note that $beta$ is a root of $x^{9}-2$ over $K$, which is an Eisenstein polynomial. Therefore $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified of degree 9 (see e.g. Proposition 3.6 of Local Fields and Their Extensions by Fesenko & Vostokov for a proof if you don't know this result). Now, $K_{1}/K$ is Galois of degree 2, therefore we have by Galois theory
$$[L:L_{1}]=[K_{1}:K],$$
because $L=L_{1}K_{1}$. Therefore we conclude that $[L:L_{1}]=2$. So $[L:K]=18$ by the tower formula, whence $[L:K_{1}]=9$.
Now, note that
$$f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}),$$
because $K_{1}/K$ is unramified (where $f(L/K)$ means the inertia degree of the extension $L/K$). Also
$$e(L/K)=e(L/L_{1})e(L_{1}/K)=9e(L/L_{1}),$$
because $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified (where $e(L/K)$ means the ramification index of the extension $L/K$). Thus we see that $2mid f(L/K)$ and $9mid e(L/K)$. By the fundamental identity we have $$18=[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K),$$
whence $f(L/K)=2$ and $e(L/K)=9$. This implies that $f(L/K_{1})=1$ because
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}).$$
It also implies that $e(L/K_{1})=9$ because
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=e(L/K_{1}).$$
Now for the extension $L/F$ we have
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/F)f(F/K_{1}),$$
whence $f(L/F)=1$. Furthermore
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=3e(L/F),$$
whence $e(L/F)=3$ and we conclude that $[L:F]=e(L/F)f(L/F)=3$.
$endgroup$
Let $L_{1}=mathbb{Q}_{2}(beta)$ and note that $beta$ is a root of $x^{9}-2$ over $K$, which is an Eisenstein polynomial. Therefore $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified of degree 9 (see e.g. Proposition 3.6 of Local Fields and Their Extensions by Fesenko & Vostokov for a proof if you don't know this result). Now, $K_{1}/K$ is Galois of degree 2, therefore we have by Galois theory
$$[L:L_{1}]=[K_{1}:K],$$
because $L=L_{1}K_{1}$. Therefore we conclude that $[L:L_{1}]=2$. So $[L:K]=18$ by the tower formula, whence $[L:K_{1}]=9$.
Now, note that
$$f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}),$$
because $K_{1}/K$ is unramified (where $f(L/K)$ means the inertia degree of the extension $L/K$). Also
$$e(L/K)=e(L/L_{1})e(L_{1}/K)=9e(L/L_{1}),$$
because $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified (where $e(L/K)$ means the ramification index of the extension $L/K$). Thus we see that $2mid f(L/K)$ and $9mid e(L/K)$. By the fundamental identity we have $$18=[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K),$$
whence $f(L/K)=2$ and $e(L/K)=9$. This implies that $f(L/K_{1})=1$ because
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}).$$
It also implies that $e(L/K_{1})=9$ because
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=e(L/K_{1}).$$
Now for the extension $L/F$ we have
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/F)f(F/K_{1}),$$
whence $f(L/F)=1$. Furthermore
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=3e(L/F),$$
whence $e(L/F)=3$ and we conclude that $[L:F]=e(L/F)f(L/F)=3$.
edited Dec 25 '18 at 18:44
answered Dec 25 '18 at 18:36
YumekuiMathYumekuiMath
34114
34114
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049847%2fcomputing-degrees-and-ramification-indices-of-some-extensions-of-mathbbq-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
$mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 23 '18 at 1:43
$begingroup$
@reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 11:52