dividing by variance to avoid trivial solutions in multidimensional Newton's method












0












$begingroup$


I'm using Newton's method as implemented by GSL (GNU Scientific Library) to try to find a cycle of a multi-variate function $F$ (reaction-diffusion simulation over two-channel 2D images collapsed to 1D vectors):



$$begin{aligned}F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) &= F^Q(mathbf{v})&mathbf{v} &in [0,1]^{S times S times 2}end{aligned}$$



Values are of the order $Q=1, P=1000,S=50$. The purpose of $Q$ is to mitigate the problem of $v_{ijk}$ being pushed outside the range $[0,1]$ by Newton iterations ($F$ will bring them into the range). To prevent convergence to a trivial solution (a featureless image), I am solving the system:



$$H(mathbf{v}) = frac{F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) - F^Q(mathbf{v})}{sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}))} = mathbf{0}$$



where $sigma(mathbf{v})$ is the sum of the variances of each channel of the image:



$$sigma(mathbf{v}) = sum_{k=1}^2left(frac{S^2 left(sum_{i=1}^S sum_{j=1}^Sv_{ijk}^2right) - left(sum_{i=1}^Ssum_{j=1}^S v_{ijk}right)^2}{S^4}right)$$



For efficiency, I would like to use an FDF solver from GSL, which means I need to calculate the Jacobian derivative matrix for $H$. I get to:



$$J_H = frac{sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v})) times left(J_{F^{Q+P}}(mathbf{v}) - J_{F^Q}(mathbf{v})right) - left(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) - F^Q(mathbf{v})right)times J_sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}))} {sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v})^2)}$$



$J_F$ is not too hard to calculate. By a shape argument, I think $J_sigma(mathbf{v})$ must be a row vector that is combined with the $F$ column vectors using outer product, and concretely I get:



$$frac{partial g(mathbf{v})}{partial v_{ijk}} = frac{2 v_{ijk}}{S^2} - frac{2 sum_{l=1}^Ssum_{m=1}^S v_{lmk}}{S^4}$$



Questions:




  1. Is there a better way to solve my problem than Newton's method?

  2. Is my general approach of dividing by variance a good way to avoid trivial solutions?

  3. Is my expression for $J_H$ correct?

  4. Is my expression for $frac{partial g(mathbf{v})}{partial v_{ijk}}$ correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I'm using Newton's method as implemented by GSL (GNU Scientific Library) to try to find a cycle of a multi-variate function $F$ (reaction-diffusion simulation over two-channel 2D images collapsed to 1D vectors):



    $$begin{aligned}F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) &= F^Q(mathbf{v})&mathbf{v} &in [0,1]^{S times S times 2}end{aligned}$$



    Values are of the order $Q=1, P=1000,S=50$. The purpose of $Q$ is to mitigate the problem of $v_{ijk}$ being pushed outside the range $[0,1]$ by Newton iterations ($F$ will bring them into the range). To prevent convergence to a trivial solution (a featureless image), I am solving the system:



    $$H(mathbf{v}) = frac{F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) - F^Q(mathbf{v})}{sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}))} = mathbf{0}$$



    where $sigma(mathbf{v})$ is the sum of the variances of each channel of the image:



    $$sigma(mathbf{v}) = sum_{k=1}^2left(frac{S^2 left(sum_{i=1}^S sum_{j=1}^Sv_{ijk}^2right) - left(sum_{i=1}^Ssum_{j=1}^S v_{ijk}right)^2}{S^4}right)$$



    For efficiency, I would like to use an FDF solver from GSL, which means I need to calculate the Jacobian derivative matrix for $H$. I get to:



    $$J_H = frac{sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v})) times left(J_{F^{Q+P}}(mathbf{v}) - J_{F^Q}(mathbf{v})right) - left(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) - F^Q(mathbf{v})right)times J_sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}))} {sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v})^2)}$$



    $J_F$ is not too hard to calculate. By a shape argument, I think $J_sigma(mathbf{v})$ must be a row vector that is combined with the $F$ column vectors using outer product, and concretely I get:



    $$frac{partial g(mathbf{v})}{partial v_{ijk}} = frac{2 v_{ijk}}{S^2} - frac{2 sum_{l=1}^Ssum_{m=1}^S v_{lmk}}{S^4}$$



    Questions:




    1. Is there a better way to solve my problem than Newton's method?

    2. Is my general approach of dividing by variance a good way to avoid trivial solutions?

    3. Is my expression for $J_H$ correct?

    4. Is my expression for $frac{partial g(mathbf{v})}{partial v_{ijk}}$ correct?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I'm using Newton's method as implemented by GSL (GNU Scientific Library) to try to find a cycle of a multi-variate function $F$ (reaction-diffusion simulation over two-channel 2D images collapsed to 1D vectors):



      $$begin{aligned}F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) &= F^Q(mathbf{v})&mathbf{v} &in [0,1]^{S times S times 2}end{aligned}$$



      Values are of the order $Q=1, P=1000,S=50$. The purpose of $Q$ is to mitigate the problem of $v_{ijk}$ being pushed outside the range $[0,1]$ by Newton iterations ($F$ will bring them into the range). To prevent convergence to a trivial solution (a featureless image), I am solving the system:



      $$H(mathbf{v}) = frac{F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) - F^Q(mathbf{v})}{sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}))} = mathbf{0}$$



      where $sigma(mathbf{v})$ is the sum of the variances of each channel of the image:



      $$sigma(mathbf{v}) = sum_{k=1}^2left(frac{S^2 left(sum_{i=1}^S sum_{j=1}^Sv_{ijk}^2right) - left(sum_{i=1}^Ssum_{j=1}^S v_{ijk}right)^2}{S^4}right)$$



      For efficiency, I would like to use an FDF solver from GSL, which means I need to calculate the Jacobian derivative matrix for $H$. I get to:



      $$J_H = frac{sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v})) times left(J_{F^{Q+P}}(mathbf{v}) - J_{F^Q}(mathbf{v})right) - left(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) - F^Q(mathbf{v})right)times J_sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}))} {sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v})^2)}$$



      $J_F$ is not too hard to calculate. By a shape argument, I think $J_sigma(mathbf{v})$ must be a row vector that is combined with the $F$ column vectors using outer product, and concretely I get:



      $$frac{partial g(mathbf{v})}{partial v_{ijk}} = frac{2 v_{ijk}}{S^2} - frac{2 sum_{l=1}^Ssum_{m=1}^S v_{lmk}}{S^4}$$



      Questions:




      1. Is there a better way to solve my problem than Newton's method?

      2. Is my general approach of dividing by variance a good way to avoid trivial solutions?

      3. Is my expression for $J_H$ correct?

      4. Is my expression for $frac{partial g(mathbf{v})}{partial v_{ijk}}$ correct?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm using Newton's method as implemented by GSL (GNU Scientific Library) to try to find a cycle of a multi-variate function $F$ (reaction-diffusion simulation over two-channel 2D images collapsed to 1D vectors):



      $$begin{aligned}F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) &= F^Q(mathbf{v})&mathbf{v} &in [0,1]^{S times S times 2}end{aligned}$$



      Values are of the order $Q=1, P=1000,S=50$. The purpose of $Q$ is to mitigate the problem of $v_{ijk}$ being pushed outside the range $[0,1]$ by Newton iterations ($F$ will bring them into the range). To prevent convergence to a trivial solution (a featureless image), I am solving the system:



      $$H(mathbf{v}) = frac{F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) - F^Q(mathbf{v})}{sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}))} = mathbf{0}$$



      where $sigma(mathbf{v})$ is the sum of the variances of each channel of the image:



      $$sigma(mathbf{v}) = sum_{k=1}^2left(frac{S^2 left(sum_{i=1}^S sum_{j=1}^Sv_{ijk}^2right) - left(sum_{i=1}^Ssum_{j=1}^S v_{ijk}right)^2}{S^4}right)$$



      For efficiency, I would like to use an FDF solver from GSL, which means I need to calculate the Jacobian derivative matrix for $H$. I get to:



      $$J_H = frac{sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v})) times left(J_{F^{Q+P}}(mathbf{v}) - J_{F^Q}(mathbf{v})right) - left(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}) - F^Q(mathbf{v})right)times J_sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v}))} {sigma(F^{Q+P}(mathbf{v})^2)}$$



      $J_F$ is not too hard to calculate. By a shape argument, I think $J_sigma(mathbf{v})$ must be a row vector that is combined with the $F$ column vectors using outer product, and concretely I get:



      $$frac{partial g(mathbf{v})}{partial v_{ijk}} = frac{2 v_{ijk}}{S^2} - frac{2 sum_{l=1}^Ssum_{m=1}^S v_{lmk}}{S^4}$$



      Questions:




      1. Is there a better way to solve my problem than Newton's method?

      2. Is my general approach of dividing by variance a good way to avoid trivial solutions?

      3. Is my expression for $J_H$ correct?

      4. Is my expression for $frac{partial g(mathbf{v})}{partial v_{ijk}}$ correct?







      proof-verification numerical-methods variance newton-raphson






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:50









      ClaudeClaude

      2,553523




      2,553523






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049838%2fdividing-by-variance-to-avoid-trivial-solutions-in-multidimensional-newtons-met%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049838%2fdividing-by-variance-to-avoid-trivial-solutions-in-multidimensional-newtons-met%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen