Question regarding localization of polynomial ring
$begingroup$
I made an exercise that went as follows:
Suppose $R = frac{mathbb{R}[x,y]}{(xy)}$. Define the multiplicative set $$ S = left{ 1 + (xy), x + (xy), x^2 + (xy), ldots right}.$$
In the exercise, I showed that $S^{-1}R cong mathbb{R}[x,x^{-1}].$
My question is as follows: Why don't we just define $R = mathbb{R}[x]$ and consider the multiplicative set $S = left{ 1,x,x^2, ldotsright}$? Wouldn't we also then get $S^{-1}R cong mathbb{R}[x,x^{-1}]$? If so, what is the advantage one gets with the definition used in the exercise, if any?
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra localization
asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:41
GregGreg
183112
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I made an exercise that went as follows:
Suppose $R = frac{mathbb{R}[x,y]}{(xy)}$. Define the multiplicative set $$ S = left{ 1 + (xy), x + (xy), x^2 + (xy), ldots right}.$$
In the exercise, I showed that $S^{-1}R cong mathbb{R}[x,x^{-1}].$
My question is as follows: Why don't we just define $R = mathbb{R}[x]$ and consider the multiplicative set $S = left{ 1,x,x^2, ldotsright}$? Wouldn't we also then get $S^{-1}R cong mathbb{R}[x,x^{-1}]$? If so, what is the advantage one gets with the definition used in the exercise, if any?
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra localization
asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:41
GregGreg
183112
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
No advantage. It's an exercise where you have to notice that $x$ becomes invertible in the ring of fractions, and therefore the ideal generated by $xy$ equals the ideal generated by $y$ (which eventually goes to $0$).
$endgroup$
– user26857
Dec 22 '18 at 21:40
$begingroup$
That's what I assumed. Just thought it was strange (and thus perhaps useful) to throw in something that gets annihilated later on. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:42
2
$begingroup$
If the problem is geometric in origin, you might have been originally dealing with functions on two-dimensional real affine space, and then wanted to restrict to only the axis (this corresponds to taking the quotient $Bbb R[x,y]to R$). Then, you might have been interested in functions on these spaces which are invertible on a particular locus (this would correspond to localizing). In the end you have a simpler description of the ring you're working with, but you may want to remember the original perspective when thinking about what the ring "means."
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 22:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I made an exercise that went as follows:
Suppose $R = frac{mathbb{R}[x,y]}{(xy)}$. Define the multiplicative set $$ S = left{ 1 + (xy), x + (xy), x^2 + (xy), ldots right}.$$
In the exercise, I showed that $S^{-1}R cong mathbb{R}[x,x^{-1}].$
My question is as follows: Why don't we just define $R = mathbb{R}[x]$ and consider the multiplicative set $S = left{ 1,x,x^2, ldotsright}$? Wouldn't we also then get $S^{-1}R cong mathbb{R}[x,x^{-1}]$? If so, what is the advantage one gets with the definition used in the exercise, if any?
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra localization
asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:41
GregGreg
183112
$endgroup$
I made an exercise that went as follows:
Suppose $R = frac{mathbb{R}[x,y]}{(xy)}$. Define the multiplicative set $$ S = left{ 1 + (xy), x + (xy), x^2 + (xy), ldots right}.$$
In the exercise, I showed that $S^{-1}R cong mathbb{R}[x,x^{-1}].$
My question is as follows: Why don't we just define $R = mathbb{R}[x]$ and consider the multiplicative set $S = left{ 1,x,x^2, ldotsright}$? Wouldn't we also then get $S^{-1}R cong mathbb{R}[x,x^{-1}]$? If so, what is the advantage one gets with the definition used in the exercise, if any?
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra localization
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra localization
asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:41
GregGreg
183112
asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:41
GregGreg
183112
edited Dec 22 '18 at 20:54
Greg
asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:41
GregGreg
183112
asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:41
GregGreg
183112
asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:41
GregGreg
183112
183112
1
$begingroup$
No advantage. It's an exercise where you have to notice that $x$ becomes invertible in the ring of fractions, and therefore the ideal generated by $xy$ equals the ideal generated by $y$ (which eventually goes to $0$).
$endgroup$
– user26857
Dec 22 '18 at 21:40
$begingroup$
That's what I assumed. Just thought it was strange (and thus perhaps useful) to throw in something that gets annihilated later on. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:42
2
$begingroup$
If the problem is geometric in origin, you might have been originally dealing with functions on two-dimensional real affine space, and then wanted to restrict to only the axis (this corresponds to taking the quotient $Bbb R[x,y]to R$). Then, you might have been interested in functions on these spaces which are invertible on a particular locus (this would correspond to localizing). In the end you have a simpler description of the ring you're working with, but you may want to remember the original perspective when thinking about what the ring "means."
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 22:05
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
No advantage. It's an exercise where you have to notice that $x$ becomes invertible in the ring of fractions, and therefore the ideal generated by $xy$ equals the ideal generated by $y$ (which eventually goes to $0$).
$endgroup$
– user26857
Dec 22 '18 at 21:40
$begingroup$
That's what I assumed. Just thought it was strange (and thus perhaps useful) to throw in something that gets annihilated later on. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:42
2
$begingroup$
If the problem is geometric in origin, you might have been originally dealing with functions on two-dimensional real affine space, and then wanted to restrict to only the axis (this corresponds to taking the quotient $Bbb R[x,y]to R$). Then, you might have been interested in functions on these spaces which are invertible on a particular locus (this would correspond to localizing). In the end you have a simpler description of the ring you're working with, but you may want to remember the original perspective when thinking about what the ring "means."
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 22:05
1
1
$begingroup$
No advantage. It's an exercise where you have to notice that $x$ becomes invertible in the ring of fractions, and therefore the ideal generated by $xy$ equals the ideal generated by $y$ (which eventually goes to $0$).
$endgroup$
– user26857
Dec 22 '18 at 21:40
$begingroup$
No advantage. It's an exercise where you have to notice that $x$ becomes invertible in the ring of fractions, and therefore the ideal generated by $xy$ equals the ideal generated by $y$ (which eventually goes to $0$).
$endgroup$
– user26857
Dec 22 '18 at 21:40
$begingroup$
That's what I assumed. Just thought it was strange (and thus perhaps useful) to throw in something that gets annihilated later on. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:42
$begingroup$
That's what I assumed. Just thought it was strange (and thus perhaps useful) to throw in something that gets annihilated later on. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:42
2
2
$begingroup$
If the problem is geometric in origin, you might have been originally dealing with functions on two-dimensional real affine space, and then wanted to restrict to only the axis (this corresponds to taking the quotient $Bbb R[x,y]to R$). Then, you might have been interested in functions on these spaces which are invertible on a particular locus (this would correspond to localizing). In the end you have a simpler description of the ring you're working with, but you may want to remember the original perspective when thinking about what the ring "means."
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 22:05
$begingroup$
If the problem is geometric in origin, you might have been originally dealing with functions on two-dimensional real affine space, and then wanted to restrict to only the axis (this corresponds to taking the quotient $Bbb R[x,y]to R$). Then, you might have been interested in functions on these spaces which are invertible on a particular locus (this would correspond to localizing). In the end you have a simpler description of the ring you're working with, but you may want to remember the original perspective when thinking about what the ring "means."
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 22:05
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049829%2fquestion-regarding-localization-of-polynomial-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049829%2fquestion-regarding-localization-of-polynomial-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
No advantage. It's an exercise where you have to notice that $x$ becomes invertible in the ring of fractions, and therefore the ideal generated by $xy$ equals the ideal generated by $y$ (which eventually goes to $0$).
$endgroup$
– user26857
Dec 22 '18 at 21:40
$begingroup$
That's what I assumed. Just thought it was strange (and thus perhaps useful) to throw in something that gets annihilated later on. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:42
2
$begingroup$
If the problem is geometric in origin, you might have been originally dealing with functions on two-dimensional real affine space, and then wanted to restrict to only the axis (this corresponds to taking the quotient $Bbb R[x,y]to R$). Then, you might have been interested in functions on these spaces which are invertible on a particular locus (this would correspond to localizing). In the end you have a simpler description of the ring you're working with, but you may want to remember the original perspective when thinking about what the ring "means."
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 22:05