Find the equation of the plane containing these lines
$begingroup$
So I was given these lines:
$$frac{x-1}{2} = frac{y-2}{-2} = frac{z}{-1}$$
$$ frac{x}{-2} = y+frac{5}{3} = z-frac{4}{0} $$
And I was asked to find out if they are parallel or perpendicular. Now I found that they are not perpendicular since the determinant of the system is not equal to zero. But I was also asked to find the equation of plane containing these line but honestly don't know even where to start. Any Hints?
geometry plane-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I was given these lines:
$$frac{x-1}{2} = frac{y-2}{-2} = frac{z}{-1}$$
$$ frac{x}{-2} = y+frac{5}{3} = z-frac{4}{0} $$
And I was asked to find out if they are parallel or perpendicular. Now I found that they are not perpendicular since the determinant of the system is not equal to zero. But I was also asked to find the equation of plane containing these line but honestly don't know even where to start. Any Hints?
geometry plane-geometry
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
$endgroup$
– dantopa
Dec 22 '18 at 20:28
3
$begingroup$
there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
$endgroup$
– Mustang
Dec 22 '18 at 20:29
1
$begingroup$
$x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:02
$begingroup$
Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 21:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I was given these lines:
$$frac{x-1}{2} = frac{y-2}{-2} = frac{z}{-1}$$
$$ frac{x}{-2} = y+frac{5}{3} = z-frac{4}{0} $$
And I was asked to find out if they are parallel or perpendicular. Now I found that they are not perpendicular since the determinant of the system is not equal to zero. But I was also asked to find the equation of plane containing these line but honestly don't know even where to start. Any Hints?
geometry plane-geometry
$endgroup$
So I was given these lines:
$$frac{x-1}{2} = frac{y-2}{-2} = frac{z}{-1}$$
$$ frac{x}{-2} = y+frac{5}{3} = z-frac{4}{0} $$
And I was asked to find out if they are parallel or perpendicular. Now I found that they are not perpendicular since the determinant of the system is not equal to zero. But I was also asked to find the equation of plane containing these line but honestly don't know even where to start. Any Hints?
geometry plane-geometry
geometry plane-geometry
edited Dec 22 '18 at 20:26
dantopa
6,58942244
6,58942244
asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:00
YolaYola
63
63
$begingroup$
Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
$endgroup$
– dantopa
Dec 22 '18 at 20:28
3
$begingroup$
there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
$endgroup$
– Mustang
Dec 22 '18 at 20:29
1
$begingroup$
$x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:02
$begingroup$
Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 21:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
$endgroup$
– dantopa
Dec 22 '18 at 20:28
3
$begingroup$
there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
$endgroup$
– Mustang
Dec 22 '18 at 20:29
1
$begingroup$
$x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:02
$begingroup$
Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 21:05
$begingroup$
Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
$endgroup$
– dantopa
Dec 22 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
$endgroup$
– dantopa
Dec 22 '18 at 20:28
3
3
$begingroup$
there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
$endgroup$
– Mustang
Dec 22 '18 at 20:29
$begingroup$
there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
$endgroup$
– Mustang
Dec 22 '18 at 20:29
1
1
$begingroup$
$x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
$x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:02
$begingroup$
@user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:02
$begingroup$
Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 21:05
$begingroup$
Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 21:05
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation I'll only comment on the general procedure of finding out the solution but not the actual computation.
1)To check if the lines are perpendicular, do a dot product of vectors parallel to it(hint:its 0 if they were perpendicular and the 2 vectors would be scalar multiples if they were parallel). The equation of a line passing through a point $x_1,x_2,x_3$ and parallel to (a,b,c) in coordinate form is- $frac{x-x_1}{a}=frac{y-x_2}{b}=frac{z-x_3}{c}=constant=lambda (say)$ where x,y,z are any points on the line.
2) Finding out the point of intersection- Write the equation of the line in the parametric form, from above it'll give $(x,y,z)=(alambda+x_1,blambda +x_2,clambda+ x_3)$ and put this into the equation of the second line to find out the point of intersection.
3) Now having a point in the plane and 2 lines passing through it you would be able to write the equation of the plane containing the lines with the following procedure- given 2 lines are $frac{x-x_1}{a_1}=frac{y-x_2}{b_1}=frac{z-x_3}{c_1}$ and $frac{x-y_1}{a_2}=frac{y-y_2}{b_2}=frac{z-y_3}{c_2}$ and they pass through the point ($alpha_1,alpha_2,alpha_3$), then the equation of all the points (x,y,z) in the plane would satisfy $(x-alpha_1,y-alpha_2,z-alpha_3).{(a_1,b_1,c_1)times(a_2,b_2,c_2)}=0$, i.e., this is the equaiton of the plane in coordinate form.(it can be interpreted as saying that the dot product of any vector inside the plane with the normal to the plane is always 0 since the vector is parallel to the plane and hence perpendicular to the normal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Personally, I prefer to write lines in parametric form. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{y- 2}{-2}$ is the same as $1- x= y- 2$ or $y= 3- x$. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{z}{-1}$ is the same as $1- x= 2z$ or $x= 1- 2z$. Taking z as parameter, t, we have $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 3- x= 3- 1+ 2t= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$. For the second line, assuming you mean $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}= frac{z- 4}{0}$, from $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}$ we get $3x= -2y+ 10$ or $2y= 10- 3x$. Taking parameter s such that $x= 2s$, $2y= 10- 6s$ so $y= 5- 3s$. The "$frac{z- 4}{0}$" means that z is the constant, $z= 4$.
So the two lines are given by $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$, and $x= 2s$, $y= 5- 3s$, $z= 4$. They are not parallel because the "direction vectors", -2i+ 2k+ z and 2i- 3s are not parallel- one is not a multiple of the other. The only other possibilities are that they intersect pr are skew. If they intersect then there exist two numbers, s and t, such that $x= 1- 2t= 2s$, $y= 2+ 2t= 5- 3s$ and $z= t= 4$. Setting t= 4 in the x-equation, $x= 1- 8= -7= 2s$ so $s= -7/2$. Setting t= 4 and s= -7/2 in the y-equation, $y= 2+ 8= 5+ 21/2$ which is false. There are no values of s and t that make all three equations true so the lines do not intersect.
The lines are neither parallel nor do they intersect. They are skew. There is no plane that contains both lines.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:04
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049797%2ffind-the-equation-of-the-plane-containing-these-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation I'll only comment on the general procedure of finding out the solution but not the actual computation.
1)To check if the lines are perpendicular, do a dot product of vectors parallel to it(hint:its 0 if they were perpendicular and the 2 vectors would be scalar multiples if they were parallel). The equation of a line passing through a point $x_1,x_2,x_3$ and parallel to (a,b,c) in coordinate form is- $frac{x-x_1}{a}=frac{y-x_2}{b}=frac{z-x_3}{c}=constant=lambda (say)$ where x,y,z are any points on the line.
2) Finding out the point of intersection- Write the equation of the line in the parametric form, from above it'll give $(x,y,z)=(alambda+x_1,blambda +x_2,clambda+ x_3)$ and put this into the equation of the second line to find out the point of intersection.
3) Now having a point in the plane and 2 lines passing through it you would be able to write the equation of the plane containing the lines with the following procedure- given 2 lines are $frac{x-x_1}{a_1}=frac{y-x_2}{b_1}=frac{z-x_3}{c_1}$ and $frac{x-y_1}{a_2}=frac{y-y_2}{b_2}=frac{z-y_3}{c_2}$ and they pass through the point ($alpha_1,alpha_2,alpha_3$), then the equation of all the points (x,y,z) in the plane would satisfy $(x-alpha_1,y-alpha_2,z-alpha_3).{(a_1,b_1,c_1)times(a_2,b_2,c_2)}=0$, i.e., this is the equaiton of the plane in coordinate form.(it can be interpreted as saying that the dot product of any vector inside the plane with the normal to the plane is always 0 since the vector is parallel to the plane and hence perpendicular to the normal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation I'll only comment on the general procedure of finding out the solution but not the actual computation.
1)To check if the lines are perpendicular, do a dot product of vectors parallel to it(hint:its 0 if they were perpendicular and the 2 vectors would be scalar multiples if they were parallel). The equation of a line passing through a point $x_1,x_2,x_3$ and parallel to (a,b,c) in coordinate form is- $frac{x-x_1}{a}=frac{y-x_2}{b}=frac{z-x_3}{c}=constant=lambda (say)$ where x,y,z are any points on the line.
2) Finding out the point of intersection- Write the equation of the line in the parametric form, from above it'll give $(x,y,z)=(alambda+x_1,blambda +x_2,clambda+ x_3)$ and put this into the equation of the second line to find out the point of intersection.
3) Now having a point in the plane and 2 lines passing through it you would be able to write the equation of the plane containing the lines with the following procedure- given 2 lines are $frac{x-x_1}{a_1}=frac{y-x_2}{b_1}=frac{z-x_3}{c_1}$ and $frac{x-y_1}{a_2}=frac{y-y_2}{b_2}=frac{z-y_3}{c_2}$ and they pass through the point ($alpha_1,alpha_2,alpha_3$), then the equation of all the points (x,y,z) in the plane would satisfy $(x-alpha_1,y-alpha_2,z-alpha_3).{(a_1,b_1,c_1)times(a_2,b_2,c_2)}=0$, i.e., this is the equaiton of the plane in coordinate form.(it can be interpreted as saying that the dot product of any vector inside the plane with the normal to the plane is always 0 since the vector is parallel to the plane and hence perpendicular to the normal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation I'll only comment on the general procedure of finding out the solution but not the actual computation.
1)To check if the lines are perpendicular, do a dot product of vectors parallel to it(hint:its 0 if they were perpendicular and the 2 vectors would be scalar multiples if they were parallel). The equation of a line passing through a point $x_1,x_2,x_3$ and parallel to (a,b,c) in coordinate form is- $frac{x-x_1}{a}=frac{y-x_2}{b}=frac{z-x_3}{c}=constant=lambda (say)$ where x,y,z are any points on the line.
2) Finding out the point of intersection- Write the equation of the line in the parametric form, from above it'll give $(x,y,z)=(alambda+x_1,blambda +x_2,clambda+ x_3)$ and put this into the equation of the second line to find out the point of intersection.
3) Now having a point in the plane and 2 lines passing through it you would be able to write the equation of the plane containing the lines with the following procedure- given 2 lines are $frac{x-x_1}{a_1}=frac{y-x_2}{b_1}=frac{z-x_3}{c_1}$ and $frac{x-y_1}{a_2}=frac{y-y_2}{b_2}=frac{z-y_3}{c_2}$ and they pass through the point ($alpha_1,alpha_2,alpha_3$), then the equation of all the points (x,y,z) in the plane would satisfy $(x-alpha_1,y-alpha_2,z-alpha_3).{(a_1,b_1,c_1)times(a_2,b_2,c_2)}=0$, i.e., this is the equaiton of the plane in coordinate form.(it can be interpreted as saying that the dot product of any vector inside the plane with the normal to the plane is always 0 since the vector is parallel to the plane and hence perpendicular to the normal.
$endgroup$
Since there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation I'll only comment on the general procedure of finding out the solution but not the actual computation.
1)To check if the lines are perpendicular, do a dot product of vectors parallel to it(hint:its 0 if they were perpendicular and the 2 vectors would be scalar multiples if they were parallel). The equation of a line passing through a point $x_1,x_2,x_3$ and parallel to (a,b,c) in coordinate form is- $frac{x-x_1}{a}=frac{y-x_2}{b}=frac{z-x_3}{c}=constant=lambda (say)$ where x,y,z are any points on the line.
2) Finding out the point of intersection- Write the equation of the line in the parametric form, from above it'll give $(x,y,z)=(alambda+x_1,blambda +x_2,clambda+ x_3)$ and put this into the equation of the second line to find out the point of intersection.
3) Now having a point in the plane and 2 lines passing through it you would be able to write the equation of the plane containing the lines with the following procedure- given 2 lines are $frac{x-x_1}{a_1}=frac{y-x_2}{b_1}=frac{z-x_3}{c_1}$ and $frac{x-y_1}{a_2}=frac{y-y_2}{b_2}=frac{z-y_3}{c_2}$ and they pass through the point ($alpha_1,alpha_2,alpha_3$), then the equation of all the points (x,y,z) in the plane would satisfy $(x-alpha_1,y-alpha_2,z-alpha_3).{(a_1,b_1,c_1)times(a_2,b_2,c_2)}=0$, i.e., this is the equaiton of the plane in coordinate form.(it can be interpreted as saying that the dot product of any vector inside the plane with the normal to the plane is always 0 since the vector is parallel to the plane and hence perpendicular to the normal.
answered Dec 22 '18 at 20:48
MustangMustang
3367
3367
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Personally, I prefer to write lines in parametric form. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{y- 2}{-2}$ is the same as $1- x= y- 2$ or $y= 3- x$. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{z}{-1}$ is the same as $1- x= 2z$ or $x= 1- 2z$. Taking z as parameter, t, we have $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 3- x= 3- 1+ 2t= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$. For the second line, assuming you mean $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}= frac{z- 4}{0}$, from $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}$ we get $3x= -2y+ 10$ or $2y= 10- 3x$. Taking parameter s such that $x= 2s$, $2y= 10- 6s$ so $y= 5- 3s$. The "$frac{z- 4}{0}$" means that z is the constant, $z= 4$.
So the two lines are given by $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$, and $x= 2s$, $y= 5- 3s$, $z= 4$. They are not parallel because the "direction vectors", -2i+ 2k+ z and 2i- 3s are not parallel- one is not a multiple of the other. The only other possibilities are that they intersect pr are skew. If they intersect then there exist two numbers, s and t, such that $x= 1- 2t= 2s$, $y= 2+ 2t= 5- 3s$ and $z= t= 4$. Setting t= 4 in the x-equation, $x= 1- 8= -7= 2s$ so $s= -7/2$. Setting t= 4 and s= -7/2 in the y-equation, $y= 2+ 8= 5+ 21/2$ which is false. There are no values of s and t that make all three equations true so the lines do not intersect.
The lines are neither parallel nor do they intersect. They are skew. There is no plane that contains both lines.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Personally, I prefer to write lines in parametric form. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{y- 2}{-2}$ is the same as $1- x= y- 2$ or $y= 3- x$. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{z}{-1}$ is the same as $1- x= 2z$ or $x= 1- 2z$. Taking z as parameter, t, we have $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 3- x= 3- 1+ 2t= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$. For the second line, assuming you mean $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}= frac{z- 4}{0}$, from $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}$ we get $3x= -2y+ 10$ or $2y= 10- 3x$. Taking parameter s such that $x= 2s$, $2y= 10- 6s$ so $y= 5- 3s$. The "$frac{z- 4}{0}$" means that z is the constant, $z= 4$.
So the two lines are given by $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$, and $x= 2s$, $y= 5- 3s$, $z= 4$. They are not parallel because the "direction vectors", -2i+ 2k+ z and 2i- 3s are not parallel- one is not a multiple of the other. The only other possibilities are that they intersect pr are skew. If they intersect then there exist two numbers, s and t, such that $x= 1- 2t= 2s$, $y= 2+ 2t= 5- 3s$ and $z= t= 4$. Setting t= 4 in the x-equation, $x= 1- 8= -7= 2s$ so $s= -7/2$. Setting t= 4 and s= -7/2 in the y-equation, $y= 2+ 8= 5+ 21/2$ which is false. There are no values of s and t that make all three equations true so the lines do not intersect.
The lines are neither parallel nor do they intersect. They are skew. There is no plane that contains both lines.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Personally, I prefer to write lines in parametric form. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{y- 2}{-2}$ is the same as $1- x= y- 2$ or $y= 3- x$. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{z}{-1}$ is the same as $1- x= 2z$ or $x= 1- 2z$. Taking z as parameter, t, we have $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 3- x= 3- 1+ 2t= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$. For the second line, assuming you mean $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}= frac{z- 4}{0}$, from $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}$ we get $3x= -2y+ 10$ or $2y= 10- 3x$. Taking parameter s such that $x= 2s$, $2y= 10- 6s$ so $y= 5- 3s$. The "$frac{z- 4}{0}$" means that z is the constant, $z= 4$.
So the two lines are given by $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$, and $x= 2s$, $y= 5- 3s$, $z= 4$. They are not parallel because the "direction vectors", -2i+ 2k+ z and 2i- 3s are not parallel- one is not a multiple of the other. The only other possibilities are that they intersect pr are skew. If they intersect then there exist two numbers, s and t, such that $x= 1- 2t= 2s$, $y= 2+ 2t= 5- 3s$ and $z= t= 4$. Setting t= 4 in the x-equation, $x= 1- 8= -7= 2s$ so $s= -7/2$. Setting t= 4 and s= -7/2 in the y-equation, $y= 2+ 8= 5+ 21/2$ which is false. There are no values of s and t that make all three equations true so the lines do not intersect.
The lines are neither parallel nor do they intersect. They are skew. There is no plane that contains both lines.
$endgroup$
Personally, I prefer to write lines in parametric form. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{y- 2}{-2}$ is the same as $1- x= y- 2$ or $y= 3- x$. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{z}{-1}$ is the same as $1- x= 2z$ or $x= 1- 2z$. Taking z as parameter, t, we have $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 3- x= 3- 1+ 2t= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$. For the second line, assuming you mean $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}= frac{z- 4}{0}$, from $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}$ we get $3x= -2y+ 10$ or $2y= 10- 3x$. Taking parameter s such that $x= 2s$, $2y= 10- 6s$ so $y= 5- 3s$. The "$frac{z- 4}{0}$" means that z is the constant, $z= 4$.
So the two lines are given by $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$, and $x= 2s$, $y= 5- 3s$, $z= 4$. They are not parallel because the "direction vectors", -2i+ 2k+ z and 2i- 3s are not parallel- one is not a multiple of the other. The only other possibilities are that they intersect pr are skew. If they intersect then there exist two numbers, s and t, such that $x= 1- 2t= 2s$, $y= 2+ 2t= 5- 3s$ and $z= t= 4$. Setting t= 4 in the x-equation, $x= 1- 8= -7= 2s$ so $s= -7/2$. Setting t= 4 and s= -7/2 in the y-equation, $y= 2+ 8= 5+ 21/2$ which is false. There are no values of s and t that make all three equations true so the lines do not intersect.
The lines are neither parallel nor do they intersect. They are skew. There is no plane that contains both lines.
answered Dec 22 '18 at 20:59
user247327user247327
11.2k1515
11.2k1515
$begingroup$
From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:04
$begingroup$
From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:04
$begingroup$
From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:04
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049797%2ffind-the-equation-of-the-plane-containing-these-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
$endgroup$
– dantopa
Dec 22 '18 at 20:28
3
$begingroup$
there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
$endgroup$
– Mustang
Dec 22 '18 at 20:29
1
$begingroup$
$x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:02
$begingroup$
Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 21:05