Continuous mapping between $mathbb{S}^2$, $mathbb{R}P^2$ and $mathbb{R}^4$












2












$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{S}^2$ be the unit sphere in $mathbb{R}^3$. Let $f:mathbb{S}^2rightarrowmathbb{R}^4$ be defined by $f(x,y,z)=(x^2-y^2,xy,yz,zx)$



prove that $f$ determines a continuous map $tilde{f} : mathbb{R}P^2 → mathbb{R}^4$ where $mathbb{R}P^2$ is the real projective plane and that $tilde{f}$ defines a homeomorphism onto a subset of $mathbb{R}^4$





$mathbb{R}P^2$ is homeomorphic to the upper hemisphere of the sphere so is the first proof to show that $f$ is continuous on the upper hemisphere and that we can map the sphere continuously onto the upper hemisphere?



[as an aside question if $f = gcdot h$ and $f,g$ are continuous, is $h$ continuous?]



Fir the second part, is the subset it is homeomorphic to just the image of the upper hemisphere?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To answer your aside question, $f,g$ continuous and $f=gcirc h$ doesn't mean $h$ is continuous. As a simple example, let $h$ be any noncontinuous function and let $g$ be the constant map.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Dec 22 '18 at 19:52
















2












$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{S}^2$ be the unit sphere in $mathbb{R}^3$. Let $f:mathbb{S}^2rightarrowmathbb{R}^4$ be defined by $f(x,y,z)=(x^2-y^2,xy,yz,zx)$



prove that $f$ determines a continuous map $tilde{f} : mathbb{R}P^2 → mathbb{R}^4$ where $mathbb{R}P^2$ is the real projective plane and that $tilde{f}$ defines a homeomorphism onto a subset of $mathbb{R}^4$





$mathbb{R}P^2$ is homeomorphic to the upper hemisphere of the sphere so is the first proof to show that $f$ is continuous on the upper hemisphere and that we can map the sphere continuously onto the upper hemisphere?



[as an aside question if $f = gcdot h$ and $f,g$ are continuous, is $h$ continuous?]



Fir the second part, is the subset it is homeomorphic to just the image of the upper hemisphere?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To answer your aside question, $f,g$ continuous and $f=gcirc h$ doesn't mean $h$ is continuous. As a simple example, let $h$ be any noncontinuous function and let $g$ be the constant map.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Dec 22 '18 at 19:52














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{S}^2$ be the unit sphere in $mathbb{R}^3$. Let $f:mathbb{S}^2rightarrowmathbb{R}^4$ be defined by $f(x,y,z)=(x^2-y^2,xy,yz,zx)$



prove that $f$ determines a continuous map $tilde{f} : mathbb{R}P^2 → mathbb{R}^4$ where $mathbb{R}P^2$ is the real projective plane and that $tilde{f}$ defines a homeomorphism onto a subset of $mathbb{R}^4$





$mathbb{R}P^2$ is homeomorphic to the upper hemisphere of the sphere so is the first proof to show that $f$ is continuous on the upper hemisphere and that we can map the sphere continuously onto the upper hemisphere?



[as an aside question if $f = gcdot h$ and $f,g$ are continuous, is $h$ continuous?]



Fir the second part, is the subset it is homeomorphic to just the image of the upper hemisphere?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $mathbb{S}^2$ be the unit sphere in $mathbb{R}^3$. Let $f:mathbb{S}^2rightarrowmathbb{R}^4$ be defined by $f(x,y,z)=(x^2-y^2,xy,yz,zx)$



prove that $f$ determines a continuous map $tilde{f} : mathbb{R}P^2 → mathbb{R}^4$ where $mathbb{R}P^2$ is the real projective plane and that $tilde{f}$ defines a homeomorphism onto a subset of $mathbb{R}^4$





$mathbb{R}P^2$ is homeomorphic to the upper hemisphere of the sphere so is the first proof to show that $f$ is continuous on the upper hemisphere and that we can map the sphere continuously onto the upper hemisphere?



[as an aside question if $f = gcdot h$ and $f,g$ are continuous, is $h$ continuous?]



Fir the second part, is the subset it is homeomorphic to just the image of the upper hemisphere?







general-topology continuity






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 22 '18 at 19:43









Clayton

19.3k33287




19.3k33287










asked Dec 22 '18 at 19:41









Toby PeterkenToby Peterken

1496




1496








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To answer your aside question, $f,g$ continuous and $f=gcirc h$ doesn't mean $h$ is continuous. As a simple example, let $h$ be any noncontinuous function and let $g$ be the constant map.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Dec 22 '18 at 19:52














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To answer your aside question, $f,g$ continuous and $f=gcirc h$ doesn't mean $h$ is continuous. As a simple example, let $h$ be any noncontinuous function and let $g$ be the constant map.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Dec 22 '18 at 19:52








1




1




$begingroup$
To answer your aside question, $f,g$ continuous and $f=gcirc h$ doesn't mean $h$ is continuous. As a simple example, let $h$ be any noncontinuous function and let $g$ be the constant map.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 22 '18 at 19:52




$begingroup$
To answer your aside question, $f,g$ continuous and $f=gcirc h$ doesn't mean $h$ is continuous. As a simple example, let $h$ be any noncontinuous function and let $g$ be the constant map.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 22 '18 at 19:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

$mathbb{R}P^2$ is not homeomorphic to the upper hemisphere. In fact, it is the quotient of $S^2$ obtained by identifying all antipodal points $p,-p$.



Hence to see that $f$ determines $tilde{f}$, it suffices to verify that $f(p) = f(-p)$. But this is obvious from the definition.



To prove that $tilde{f}$ is an embedding, it suffices to show that it is injective (use the compactness of $mathbb{R}P^2$). In other words, we have to show that $f(x,y,z) = f(x',y',z')$ implies $(x',y',z') = pm (x,y,z)$. So let
$$(*) phantom{xx} (x^2-y^2,xy,yz,zx) = ((x')^2-(y')^2,x'y',y'z',z'x') .$$



Write $c = x + iy in mathbb{C}$, $c' = x' + iy' in mathbb{C}$. Then $c^2 = x^2 - y^2 + i(2xy)$, $(c')^2 = (x')^2 - (y')^2 + i(2x'y')$. $(*)$ shows that $c^2 = (c')^2$, i.e. $c'= epsilon c$ with $epsilon = pm 1$. In other words, $(x',y') = epsilon (x,y)$.



Case 1. $(x,y) = (0,0)$. Then $z,z' in { -1, 1}$, hence $(x',y',z') = pm (x,y,z)$.



Case 2. $(x,y) ne (0,0)$. W.lo.g. let $x ne 0$. Then $epsilon x z' = x'z' = xz$, hence $z' = epsilon z$. This shows $(x',y',z') = epsilon (x,y,z)$.



Concerning your final question: The image $R = tilde{f}(mathbb{R}P^2)$ agrees with the image $f(S^2)$. And in fact $f(S^2) = f(S^2_+)$, where $S^2_+$ is the upper hemisphere of $S^2$. But note that $f mid_{S^2_+}$ is no embedding because $f mid_{S^2_+}$ still identifies antipodal points in the equator $E$ of $S^2$ which is contained in $S^2_+$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049783%2fcontinuous-mapping-between-mathbbs2-mathbbrp2-and-mathbbr4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    $mathbb{R}P^2$ is not homeomorphic to the upper hemisphere. In fact, it is the quotient of $S^2$ obtained by identifying all antipodal points $p,-p$.



    Hence to see that $f$ determines $tilde{f}$, it suffices to verify that $f(p) = f(-p)$. But this is obvious from the definition.



    To prove that $tilde{f}$ is an embedding, it suffices to show that it is injective (use the compactness of $mathbb{R}P^2$). In other words, we have to show that $f(x,y,z) = f(x',y',z')$ implies $(x',y',z') = pm (x,y,z)$. So let
    $$(*) phantom{xx} (x^2-y^2,xy,yz,zx) = ((x')^2-(y')^2,x'y',y'z',z'x') .$$



    Write $c = x + iy in mathbb{C}$, $c' = x' + iy' in mathbb{C}$. Then $c^2 = x^2 - y^2 + i(2xy)$, $(c')^2 = (x')^2 - (y')^2 + i(2x'y')$. $(*)$ shows that $c^2 = (c')^2$, i.e. $c'= epsilon c$ with $epsilon = pm 1$. In other words, $(x',y') = epsilon (x,y)$.



    Case 1. $(x,y) = (0,0)$. Then $z,z' in { -1, 1}$, hence $(x',y',z') = pm (x,y,z)$.



    Case 2. $(x,y) ne (0,0)$. W.lo.g. let $x ne 0$. Then $epsilon x z' = x'z' = xz$, hence $z' = epsilon z$. This shows $(x',y',z') = epsilon (x,y,z)$.



    Concerning your final question: The image $R = tilde{f}(mathbb{R}P^2)$ agrees with the image $f(S^2)$. And in fact $f(S^2) = f(S^2_+)$, where $S^2_+$ is the upper hemisphere of $S^2$. But note that $f mid_{S^2_+}$ is no embedding because $f mid_{S^2_+}$ still identifies antipodal points in the equator $E$ of $S^2$ which is contained in $S^2_+$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      $mathbb{R}P^2$ is not homeomorphic to the upper hemisphere. In fact, it is the quotient of $S^2$ obtained by identifying all antipodal points $p,-p$.



      Hence to see that $f$ determines $tilde{f}$, it suffices to verify that $f(p) = f(-p)$. But this is obvious from the definition.



      To prove that $tilde{f}$ is an embedding, it suffices to show that it is injective (use the compactness of $mathbb{R}P^2$). In other words, we have to show that $f(x,y,z) = f(x',y',z')$ implies $(x',y',z') = pm (x,y,z)$. So let
      $$(*) phantom{xx} (x^2-y^2,xy,yz,zx) = ((x')^2-(y')^2,x'y',y'z',z'x') .$$



      Write $c = x + iy in mathbb{C}$, $c' = x' + iy' in mathbb{C}$. Then $c^2 = x^2 - y^2 + i(2xy)$, $(c')^2 = (x')^2 - (y')^2 + i(2x'y')$. $(*)$ shows that $c^2 = (c')^2$, i.e. $c'= epsilon c$ with $epsilon = pm 1$. In other words, $(x',y') = epsilon (x,y)$.



      Case 1. $(x,y) = (0,0)$. Then $z,z' in { -1, 1}$, hence $(x',y',z') = pm (x,y,z)$.



      Case 2. $(x,y) ne (0,0)$. W.lo.g. let $x ne 0$. Then $epsilon x z' = x'z' = xz$, hence $z' = epsilon z$. This shows $(x',y',z') = epsilon (x,y,z)$.



      Concerning your final question: The image $R = tilde{f}(mathbb{R}P^2)$ agrees with the image $f(S^2)$. And in fact $f(S^2) = f(S^2_+)$, where $S^2_+$ is the upper hemisphere of $S^2$. But note that $f mid_{S^2_+}$ is no embedding because $f mid_{S^2_+}$ still identifies antipodal points in the equator $E$ of $S^2$ which is contained in $S^2_+$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        $mathbb{R}P^2$ is not homeomorphic to the upper hemisphere. In fact, it is the quotient of $S^2$ obtained by identifying all antipodal points $p,-p$.



        Hence to see that $f$ determines $tilde{f}$, it suffices to verify that $f(p) = f(-p)$. But this is obvious from the definition.



        To prove that $tilde{f}$ is an embedding, it suffices to show that it is injective (use the compactness of $mathbb{R}P^2$). In other words, we have to show that $f(x,y,z) = f(x',y',z')$ implies $(x',y',z') = pm (x,y,z)$. So let
        $$(*) phantom{xx} (x^2-y^2,xy,yz,zx) = ((x')^2-(y')^2,x'y',y'z',z'x') .$$



        Write $c = x + iy in mathbb{C}$, $c' = x' + iy' in mathbb{C}$. Then $c^2 = x^2 - y^2 + i(2xy)$, $(c')^2 = (x')^2 - (y')^2 + i(2x'y')$. $(*)$ shows that $c^2 = (c')^2$, i.e. $c'= epsilon c$ with $epsilon = pm 1$. In other words, $(x',y') = epsilon (x,y)$.



        Case 1. $(x,y) = (0,0)$. Then $z,z' in { -1, 1}$, hence $(x',y',z') = pm (x,y,z)$.



        Case 2. $(x,y) ne (0,0)$. W.lo.g. let $x ne 0$. Then $epsilon x z' = x'z' = xz$, hence $z' = epsilon z$. This shows $(x',y',z') = epsilon (x,y,z)$.



        Concerning your final question: The image $R = tilde{f}(mathbb{R}P^2)$ agrees with the image $f(S^2)$. And in fact $f(S^2) = f(S^2_+)$, where $S^2_+$ is the upper hemisphere of $S^2$. But note that $f mid_{S^2_+}$ is no embedding because $f mid_{S^2_+}$ still identifies antipodal points in the equator $E$ of $S^2$ which is contained in $S^2_+$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        $mathbb{R}P^2$ is not homeomorphic to the upper hemisphere. In fact, it is the quotient of $S^2$ obtained by identifying all antipodal points $p,-p$.



        Hence to see that $f$ determines $tilde{f}$, it suffices to verify that $f(p) = f(-p)$. But this is obvious from the definition.



        To prove that $tilde{f}$ is an embedding, it suffices to show that it is injective (use the compactness of $mathbb{R}P^2$). In other words, we have to show that $f(x,y,z) = f(x',y',z')$ implies $(x',y',z') = pm (x,y,z)$. So let
        $$(*) phantom{xx} (x^2-y^2,xy,yz,zx) = ((x')^2-(y')^2,x'y',y'z',z'x') .$$



        Write $c = x + iy in mathbb{C}$, $c' = x' + iy' in mathbb{C}$. Then $c^2 = x^2 - y^2 + i(2xy)$, $(c')^2 = (x')^2 - (y')^2 + i(2x'y')$. $(*)$ shows that $c^2 = (c')^2$, i.e. $c'= epsilon c$ with $epsilon = pm 1$. In other words, $(x',y') = epsilon (x,y)$.



        Case 1. $(x,y) = (0,0)$. Then $z,z' in { -1, 1}$, hence $(x',y',z') = pm (x,y,z)$.



        Case 2. $(x,y) ne (0,0)$. W.lo.g. let $x ne 0$. Then $epsilon x z' = x'z' = xz$, hence $z' = epsilon z$. This shows $(x',y',z') = epsilon (x,y,z)$.



        Concerning your final question: The image $R = tilde{f}(mathbb{R}P^2)$ agrees with the image $f(S^2)$. And in fact $f(S^2) = f(S^2_+)$, where $S^2_+$ is the upper hemisphere of $S^2$. But note that $f mid_{S^2_+}$ is no embedding because $f mid_{S^2_+}$ still identifies antipodal points in the equator $E$ of $S^2$ which is contained in $S^2_+$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 23 '18 at 15:25

























        answered Dec 22 '18 at 23:58









        Paul FrostPaul Frost

        11.4k3934




        11.4k3934






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049783%2fcontinuous-mapping-between-mathbbs2-mathbbrp2-and-mathbbr4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen