Matrix differentiation by a vector in Least Squares method
$begingroup$
In a book The Elements of
Statistical Learning published by Springer we can find following statement:
We can write
$RSS(beta) = (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$
where $mathbf{X}$ is an $Ntimes p$ matrix with each row an input vector, and $mathbf{y}$ is an $N$-vector of the outputs in the training set. Differentiating w.r.t. $beta$ we get the normal equations
$mathbf{X}^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta) = 0$
Questions
How do I formally derive the normal equations operating on matrix level calculations without diving into operating on scalar elements?
Is my Second attemp valid?
First attemp
Note: $beta$ is an $p$-vector. Let us assume that vectors are vertical matrixes.
As in The Matrix Cookbook (http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~hwolkowi//matrixcookbook.pdf) let us assume that
$partialmathbf{X}^T = (partialmathbf{X})^T$
and
$partial(mathbf{XY})=partial(mathbf{X})mathbf{Y}+mathbf{X}partial(mathbf{Y})$.
Let us differentiate with respect to $beta$ and observe that $partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)=-mathbf{X}$.
Now $partial RSS(beta)=(partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)+(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)^T partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$
Which gives us $partial RSS(beta)=-mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)-(mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T$
At this point we find contradiction because dimensions are incompatible to perform summation. $mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$ is vertical $p$-vector, while $(mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T$ is horizontal $p$-vector.
Second attemp
If I assumed $partial(mathbf{X}^Tmathbf{Y})=partial(mathbf{X})^Tmathbf{Y}+(mathbf{X}^Tpartial(mathbf{Y}))^T$
I would get that
$partial RSS(beta)=-2mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$, which matches with the normal equations from the book.
calculus matrix-equations matrix-calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In a book The Elements of
Statistical Learning published by Springer we can find following statement:
We can write
$RSS(beta) = (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$
where $mathbf{X}$ is an $Ntimes p$ matrix with each row an input vector, and $mathbf{y}$ is an $N$-vector of the outputs in the training set. Differentiating w.r.t. $beta$ we get the normal equations
$mathbf{X}^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta) = 0$
Questions
How do I formally derive the normal equations operating on matrix level calculations without diving into operating on scalar elements?
Is my Second attemp valid?
First attemp
Note: $beta$ is an $p$-vector. Let us assume that vectors are vertical matrixes.
As in The Matrix Cookbook (http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~hwolkowi//matrixcookbook.pdf) let us assume that
$partialmathbf{X}^T = (partialmathbf{X})^T$
and
$partial(mathbf{XY})=partial(mathbf{X})mathbf{Y}+mathbf{X}partial(mathbf{Y})$.
Let us differentiate with respect to $beta$ and observe that $partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)=-mathbf{X}$.
Now $partial RSS(beta)=(partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)+(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)^T partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$
Which gives us $partial RSS(beta)=-mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)-(mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T$
At this point we find contradiction because dimensions are incompatible to perform summation. $mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$ is vertical $p$-vector, while $(mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T$ is horizontal $p$-vector.
Second attemp
If I assumed $partial(mathbf{X}^Tmathbf{Y})=partial(mathbf{X})^Tmathbf{Y}+(mathbf{X}^Tpartial(mathbf{Y}))^T$
I would get that
$partial RSS(beta)=-2mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$, which matches with the normal equations from the book.
calculus matrix-equations matrix-calculus
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
there must be a lot of examples to show the derivative of $|Y - Xbeta|^2$ with respect to $beta$... not index notation
$endgroup$
– user550103
Dec 22 '18 at 21:39
$begingroup$
The problem with your first attempt is that the product rule $$d(XY)=dX,Y+X,dY$$ applies, not to gradients, but to differentials (and to time derivatives). In your second attempt, the presumed rule only holds when $(X,Y)$ are vectors -- which, fortunately, they are. So there are problems with both approaches, but the 2nd is less problematic.
$endgroup$
– greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In a book The Elements of
Statistical Learning published by Springer we can find following statement:
We can write
$RSS(beta) = (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$
where $mathbf{X}$ is an $Ntimes p$ matrix with each row an input vector, and $mathbf{y}$ is an $N$-vector of the outputs in the training set. Differentiating w.r.t. $beta$ we get the normal equations
$mathbf{X}^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta) = 0$
Questions
How do I formally derive the normal equations operating on matrix level calculations without diving into operating on scalar elements?
Is my Second attemp valid?
First attemp
Note: $beta$ is an $p$-vector. Let us assume that vectors are vertical matrixes.
As in The Matrix Cookbook (http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~hwolkowi//matrixcookbook.pdf) let us assume that
$partialmathbf{X}^T = (partialmathbf{X})^T$
and
$partial(mathbf{XY})=partial(mathbf{X})mathbf{Y}+mathbf{X}partial(mathbf{Y})$.
Let us differentiate with respect to $beta$ and observe that $partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)=-mathbf{X}$.
Now $partial RSS(beta)=(partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)+(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)^T partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$
Which gives us $partial RSS(beta)=-mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)-(mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T$
At this point we find contradiction because dimensions are incompatible to perform summation. $mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$ is vertical $p$-vector, while $(mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T$ is horizontal $p$-vector.
Second attemp
If I assumed $partial(mathbf{X}^Tmathbf{Y})=partial(mathbf{X})^Tmathbf{Y}+(mathbf{X}^Tpartial(mathbf{Y}))^T$
I would get that
$partial RSS(beta)=-2mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$, which matches with the normal equations from the book.
calculus matrix-equations matrix-calculus
$endgroup$
In a book The Elements of
Statistical Learning published by Springer we can find following statement:
We can write
$RSS(beta) = (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$
where $mathbf{X}$ is an $Ntimes p$ matrix with each row an input vector, and $mathbf{y}$ is an $N$-vector of the outputs in the training set. Differentiating w.r.t. $beta$ we get the normal equations
$mathbf{X}^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta) = 0$
Questions
How do I formally derive the normal equations operating on matrix level calculations without diving into operating on scalar elements?
Is my Second attemp valid?
First attemp
Note: $beta$ is an $p$-vector. Let us assume that vectors are vertical matrixes.
As in The Matrix Cookbook (http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~hwolkowi//matrixcookbook.pdf) let us assume that
$partialmathbf{X}^T = (partialmathbf{X})^T$
and
$partial(mathbf{XY})=partial(mathbf{X})mathbf{Y}+mathbf{X}partial(mathbf{Y})$.
Let us differentiate with respect to $beta$ and observe that $partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)=-mathbf{X}$.
Now $partial RSS(beta)=(partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)+(mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)^T partial (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$
Which gives us $partial RSS(beta)=-mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)-(mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T$
At this point we find contradiction because dimensions are incompatible to perform summation. $mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$ is vertical $p$-vector, while $(mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta))^T$ is horizontal $p$-vector.
Second attemp
If I assumed $partial(mathbf{X}^Tmathbf{Y})=partial(mathbf{X})^Tmathbf{Y}+(mathbf{X}^Tpartial(mathbf{Y}))^T$
I would get that
$partial RSS(beta)=-2mathbf{X}^T (mathbf{y}-mathbf{X}beta)$, which matches with the normal equations from the book.
calculus matrix-equations matrix-calculus
calculus matrix-equations matrix-calculus
asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:08
Andrzej GolonkaAndrzej Golonka
488
488
1
$begingroup$
there must be a lot of examples to show the derivative of $|Y - Xbeta|^2$ with respect to $beta$... not index notation
$endgroup$
– user550103
Dec 22 '18 at 21:39
$begingroup$
The problem with your first attempt is that the product rule $$d(XY)=dX,Y+X,dY$$ applies, not to gradients, but to differentials (and to time derivatives). In your second attempt, the presumed rule only holds when $(X,Y)$ are vectors -- which, fortunately, they are. So there are problems with both approaches, but the 2nd is less problematic.
$endgroup$
– greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:54
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
there must be a lot of examples to show the derivative of $|Y - Xbeta|^2$ with respect to $beta$... not index notation
$endgroup$
– user550103
Dec 22 '18 at 21:39
$begingroup$
The problem with your first attempt is that the product rule $$d(XY)=dX,Y+X,dY$$ applies, not to gradients, but to differentials (and to time derivatives). In your second attempt, the presumed rule only holds when $(X,Y)$ are vectors -- which, fortunately, they are. So there are problems with both approaches, but the 2nd is less problematic.
$endgroup$
– greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:54
1
1
$begingroup$
there must be a lot of examples to show the derivative of $|Y - Xbeta|^2$ with respect to $beta$... not index notation
$endgroup$
– user550103
Dec 22 '18 at 21:39
$begingroup$
there must be a lot of examples to show the derivative of $|Y - Xbeta|^2$ with respect to $beta$... not index notation
$endgroup$
– user550103
Dec 22 '18 at 21:39
$begingroup$
The problem with your first attempt is that the product rule $$d(XY)=dX,Y+X,dY$$ applies, not to gradients, but to differentials (and to time derivatives). In your second attempt, the presumed rule only holds when $(X,Y)$ are vectors -- which, fortunately, they are. So there are problems with both approaches, but the 2nd is less problematic.
$endgroup$
– greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:54
$begingroup$
The problem with your first attempt is that the product rule $$d(XY)=dX,Y+X,dY$$ applies, not to gradients, but to differentials (and to time derivatives). In your second attempt, the presumed rule only holds when $(X,Y)$ are vectors -- which, fortunately, they are. So there are problems with both approaches, but the 2nd is less problematic.
$endgroup$
– greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you have not found an example, then here it goes.
Before we start deriving the gradient, some facts and notations for brevity:
- Trace and Frobenius product relation $$leftlangle A, B Crightrangle={rm tr}(A^TBC) := A : B C$$
- Cyclic properties of Trace/Frobenius product
begin{align}
A : B C
&= BC : A \
&= B^T A : C \
&= {text{etc.}} cr
end{align}
Let $f := left|y- Xbeta right|^2 = left(y- Xbeta right)^T left(y- Xbeta right) = y- Xbeta:y- Xbeta$.
Now, we can obtain the differential first, and then the gradient.
begin{align}
df
&= dleft( y- Xbeta:y- Xbeta right) \
&= 2left(y- Xbeta right) : -X dbeta \
&= -2X^Tleft(y- Xbetaright) : dbeta\
end{align}
Thus, the gradient is
begin{align}
frac{partial}{partial beta} left( left|y - X beta right|^2 right)= -2X^Tleft(y- Xbetaright).
end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049806%2fmatrix-differentiation-by-a-vector-in-least-squares-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you have not found an example, then here it goes.
Before we start deriving the gradient, some facts and notations for brevity:
- Trace and Frobenius product relation $$leftlangle A, B Crightrangle={rm tr}(A^TBC) := A : B C$$
- Cyclic properties of Trace/Frobenius product
begin{align}
A : B C
&= BC : A \
&= B^T A : C \
&= {text{etc.}} cr
end{align}
Let $f := left|y- Xbeta right|^2 = left(y- Xbeta right)^T left(y- Xbeta right) = y- Xbeta:y- Xbeta$.
Now, we can obtain the differential first, and then the gradient.
begin{align}
df
&= dleft( y- Xbeta:y- Xbeta right) \
&= 2left(y- Xbeta right) : -X dbeta \
&= -2X^Tleft(y- Xbetaright) : dbeta\
end{align}
Thus, the gradient is
begin{align}
frac{partial}{partial beta} left( left|y - X beta right|^2 right)= -2X^Tleft(y- Xbetaright).
end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you have not found an example, then here it goes.
Before we start deriving the gradient, some facts and notations for brevity:
- Trace and Frobenius product relation $$leftlangle A, B Crightrangle={rm tr}(A^TBC) := A : B C$$
- Cyclic properties of Trace/Frobenius product
begin{align}
A : B C
&= BC : A \
&= B^T A : C \
&= {text{etc.}} cr
end{align}
Let $f := left|y- Xbeta right|^2 = left(y- Xbeta right)^T left(y- Xbeta right) = y- Xbeta:y- Xbeta$.
Now, we can obtain the differential first, and then the gradient.
begin{align}
df
&= dleft( y- Xbeta:y- Xbeta right) \
&= 2left(y- Xbeta right) : -X dbeta \
&= -2X^Tleft(y- Xbetaright) : dbeta\
end{align}
Thus, the gradient is
begin{align}
frac{partial}{partial beta} left( left|y - X beta right|^2 right)= -2X^Tleft(y- Xbetaright).
end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you have not found an example, then here it goes.
Before we start deriving the gradient, some facts and notations for brevity:
- Trace and Frobenius product relation $$leftlangle A, B Crightrangle={rm tr}(A^TBC) := A : B C$$
- Cyclic properties of Trace/Frobenius product
begin{align}
A : B C
&= BC : A \
&= B^T A : C \
&= {text{etc.}} cr
end{align}
Let $f := left|y- Xbeta right|^2 = left(y- Xbeta right)^T left(y- Xbeta right) = y- Xbeta:y- Xbeta$.
Now, we can obtain the differential first, and then the gradient.
begin{align}
df
&= dleft( y- Xbeta:y- Xbeta right) \
&= 2left(y- Xbeta right) : -X dbeta \
&= -2X^Tleft(y- Xbetaright) : dbeta\
end{align}
Thus, the gradient is
begin{align}
frac{partial}{partial beta} left( left|y - X beta right|^2 right)= -2X^Tleft(y- Xbetaright).
end{align}
$endgroup$
If you have not found an example, then here it goes.
Before we start deriving the gradient, some facts and notations for brevity:
- Trace and Frobenius product relation $$leftlangle A, B Crightrangle={rm tr}(A^TBC) := A : B C$$
- Cyclic properties of Trace/Frobenius product
begin{align}
A : B C
&= BC : A \
&= B^T A : C \
&= {text{etc.}} cr
end{align}
Let $f := left|y- Xbeta right|^2 = left(y- Xbeta right)^T left(y- Xbeta right) = y- Xbeta:y- Xbeta$.
Now, we can obtain the differential first, and then the gradient.
begin{align}
df
&= dleft( y- Xbeta:y- Xbeta right) \
&= 2left(y- Xbeta right) : -X dbeta \
&= -2X^Tleft(y- Xbetaright) : dbeta\
end{align}
Thus, the gradient is
begin{align}
frac{partial}{partial beta} left( left|y - X beta right|^2 right)= -2X^Tleft(y- Xbetaright).
end{align}
answered Dec 23 '18 at 8:01
community wiki
user550103
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049806%2fmatrix-differentiation-by-a-vector-in-least-squares-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
there must be a lot of examples to show the derivative of $|Y - Xbeta|^2$ with respect to $beta$... not index notation
$endgroup$
– user550103
Dec 22 '18 at 21:39
$begingroup$
The problem with your first attempt is that the product rule $$d(XY)=dX,Y+X,dY$$ applies, not to gradients, but to differentials (and to time derivatives). In your second attempt, the presumed rule only holds when $(X,Y)$ are vectors -- which, fortunately, they are. So there are problems with both approaches, but the 2nd is less problematic.
$endgroup$
– greg
Dec 22 '18 at 21:54