Implications of multiple ways to order eight numbers












1












$begingroup$


Consider two sets $A,B$ composed of four real numbers each.



These eight real numbers are in $[0,1]$.



Consider other four real numbers $c,d,e,f$ each in $[0,1]$, all different between each other.



Assume there exists a way of ordering the four numbers in each set $A,B$ such that
$$
begin{cases}
w^A_1+w^B_1=c\
w^A_2+w^B_2=d\
w^A_3+w^B_3=e\
w^A_4+w^B_4=f\
end{cases}
$$

where




  • $w^A_h$ denotes the $h$th element of set $A$ once we have ordered its 4 elements


  • $w^B_h$ denotes the $h$th element of set $B$ once we have ordered its 4 elements



Claim: if such an ordering is not unique, then it should be that two numbers in $A$ are equal and/or that two numbers in $B$ are equal.



Is this claim correct? If yes, how can I prove it? If not, can you provide a counterexample?



(similar question here but with 2 elements per set)





Maybe the claim is wrong? Let ${a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4}$ be the elements of $A$ and ${b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4}$ be the elements of $B$. We could have:



order I
$$
begin{cases}
a_2+b_3=c\
a_4+b_4=d\
a_1+b_1=e\
a_3+b_2=f
end{cases}
$$



and



order II
$$
begin{cases}
a_1+b_2=c\
a_2+b_1=d\
a_3+b_4=e\
a_4+b_3=f
end{cases}
$$



which implies
$$
begin{cases}
a_2+b_3=a_1+b_2\
a_4+b_4=a_2+b_1\
a_1+b_1=a_3+b_4\
a_3+b_2=a_4+b_3
end{cases}
$$

Does this imply that two numbers in $A$ are equal and/or that two numbers in $B$ are equal?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Consider two sets $A,B$ composed of four real numbers each.



    These eight real numbers are in $[0,1]$.



    Consider other four real numbers $c,d,e,f$ each in $[0,1]$, all different between each other.



    Assume there exists a way of ordering the four numbers in each set $A,B$ such that
    $$
    begin{cases}
    w^A_1+w^B_1=c\
    w^A_2+w^B_2=d\
    w^A_3+w^B_3=e\
    w^A_4+w^B_4=f\
    end{cases}
    $$

    where




    • $w^A_h$ denotes the $h$th element of set $A$ once we have ordered its 4 elements


    • $w^B_h$ denotes the $h$th element of set $B$ once we have ordered its 4 elements



    Claim: if such an ordering is not unique, then it should be that two numbers in $A$ are equal and/or that two numbers in $B$ are equal.



    Is this claim correct? If yes, how can I prove it? If not, can you provide a counterexample?



    (similar question here but with 2 elements per set)





    Maybe the claim is wrong? Let ${a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4}$ be the elements of $A$ and ${b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4}$ be the elements of $B$. We could have:



    order I
    $$
    begin{cases}
    a_2+b_3=c\
    a_4+b_4=d\
    a_1+b_1=e\
    a_3+b_2=f
    end{cases}
    $$



    and



    order II
    $$
    begin{cases}
    a_1+b_2=c\
    a_2+b_1=d\
    a_3+b_4=e\
    a_4+b_3=f
    end{cases}
    $$



    which implies
    $$
    begin{cases}
    a_2+b_3=a_1+b_2\
    a_4+b_4=a_2+b_1\
    a_1+b_1=a_3+b_4\
    a_3+b_2=a_4+b_3
    end{cases}
    $$

    Does this imply that two numbers in $A$ are equal and/or that two numbers in $B$ are equal?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      Consider two sets $A,B$ composed of four real numbers each.



      These eight real numbers are in $[0,1]$.



      Consider other four real numbers $c,d,e,f$ each in $[0,1]$, all different between each other.



      Assume there exists a way of ordering the four numbers in each set $A,B$ such that
      $$
      begin{cases}
      w^A_1+w^B_1=c\
      w^A_2+w^B_2=d\
      w^A_3+w^B_3=e\
      w^A_4+w^B_4=f\
      end{cases}
      $$

      where




      • $w^A_h$ denotes the $h$th element of set $A$ once we have ordered its 4 elements


      • $w^B_h$ denotes the $h$th element of set $B$ once we have ordered its 4 elements



      Claim: if such an ordering is not unique, then it should be that two numbers in $A$ are equal and/or that two numbers in $B$ are equal.



      Is this claim correct? If yes, how can I prove it? If not, can you provide a counterexample?



      (similar question here but with 2 elements per set)





      Maybe the claim is wrong? Let ${a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4}$ be the elements of $A$ and ${b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4}$ be the elements of $B$. We could have:



      order I
      $$
      begin{cases}
      a_2+b_3=c\
      a_4+b_4=d\
      a_1+b_1=e\
      a_3+b_2=f
      end{cases}
      $$



      and



      order II
      $$
      begin{cases}
      a_1+b_2=c\
      a_2+b_1=d\
      a_3+b_4=e\
      a_4+b_3=f
      end{cases}
      $$



      which implies
      $$
      begin{cases}
      a_2+b_3=a_1+b_2\
      a_4+b_4=a_2+b_1\
      a_1+b_1=a_3+b_4\
      a_3+b_2=a_4+b_3
      end{cases}
      $$

      Does this imply that two numbers in $A$ are equal and/or that two numbers in $B$ are equal?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Consider two sets $A,B$ composed of four real numbers each.



      These eight real numbers are in $[0,1]$.



      Consider other four real numbers $c,d,e,f$ each in $[0,1]$, all different between each other.



      Assume there exists a way of ordering the four numbers in each set $A,B$ such that
      $$
      begin{cases}
      w^A_1+w^B_1=c\
      w^A_2+w^B_2=d\
      w^A_3+w^B_3=e\
      w^A_4+w^B_4=f\
      end{cases}
      $$

      where




      • $w^A_h$ denotes the $h$th element of set $A$ once we have ordered its 4 elements


      • $w^B_h$ denotes the $h$th element of set $B$ once we have ordered its 4 elements



      Claim: if such an ordering is not unique, then it should be that two numbers in $A$ are equal and/or that two numbers in $B$ are equal.



      Is this claim correct? If yes, how can I prove it? If not, can you provide a counterexample?



      (similar question here but with 2 elements per set)





      Maybe the claim is wrong? Let ${a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4}$ be the elements of $A$ and ${b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4}$ be the elements of $B$. We could have:



      order I
      $$
      begin{cases}
      a_2+b_3=c\
      a_4+b_4=d\
      a_1+b_1=e\
      a_3+b_2=f
      end{cases}
      $$



      and



      order II
      $$
      begin{cases}
      a_1+b_2=c\
      a_2+b_1=d\
      a_3+b_4=e\
      a_4+b_3=f
      end{cases}
      $$



      which implies
      $$
      begin{cases}
      a_2+b_3=a_1+b_2\
      a_4+b_4=a_2+b_1\
      a_1+b_1=a_3+b_4\
      a_3+b_2=a_4+b_3
      end{cases}
      $$

      Does this imply that two numbers in $A$ are equal and/or that two numbers in $B$ are equal?







      linear-algebra combinatorics permutations combinations linear-programming






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 23 '18 at 19:29







      STF

















      asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:47









      STFSTF

      431422




      431422






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The claim is wrong. Pick the following partial solution of the last system: $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)=(0,a,a’,a+a’)$ and $(b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4)=(a’,a+b,b,0)$. Then $(c,d,e,f)=(a+b,a+a’,a’,a+a’+b)$. For instance, we can put $a=0.1$, $a’=0.15$ and $b=0.2$. Then $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)=(0,0.1,0.15,0.25)$, $(b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4)=(0.15,0.3,0.2,0)$, and $(c,d,e,f)=(0.3,0.25,0.15,0.45)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049836%2fimplications-of-multiple-ways-to-order-eight-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            The claim is wrong. Pick the following partial solution of the last system: $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)=(0,a,a’,a+a’)$ and $(b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4)=(a’,a+b,b,0)$. Then $(c,d,e,f)=(a+b,a+a’,a’,a+a’+b)$. For instance, we can put $a=0.1$, $a’=0.15$ and $b=0.2$. Then $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)=(0,0.1,0.15,0.25)$, $(b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4)=(0.15,0.3,0.2,0)$, and $(c,d,e,f)=(0.3,0.25,0.15,0.45)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              The claim is wrong. Pick the following partial solution of the last system: $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)=(0,a,a’,a+a’)$ and $(b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4)=(a’,a+b,b,0)$. Then $(c,d,e,f)=(a+b,a+a’,a’,a+a’+b)$. For instance, we can put $a=0.1$, $a’=0.15$ and $b=0.2$. Then $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)=(0,0.1,0.15,0.25)$, $(b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4)=(0.15,0.3,0.2,0)$, and $(c,d,e,f)=(0.3,0.25,0.15,0.45)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                The claim is wrong. Pick the following partial solution of the last system: $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)=(0,a,a’,a+a’)$ and $(b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4)=(a’,a+b,b,0)$. Then $(c,d,e,f)=(a+b,a+a’,a’,a+a’+b)$. For instance, we can put $a=0.1$, $a’=0.15$ and $b=0.2$. Then $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)=(0,0.1,0.15,0.25)$, $(b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4)=(0.15,0.3,0.2,0)$, and $(c,d,e,f)=(0.3,0.25,0.15,0.45)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The claim is wrong. Pick the following partial solution of the last system: $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)=(0,a,a’,a+a’)$ and $(b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4)=(a’,a+b,b,0)$. Then $(c,d,e,f)=(a+b,a+a’,a’,a+a’+b)$. For instance, we can put $a=0.1$, $a’=0.15$ and $b=0.2$. Then $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)=(0,0.1,0.15,0.25)$, $(b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4)=(0.15,0.3,0.2,0)$, and $(c,d,e,f)=(0.3,0.25,0.15,0.45)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 26 '18 at 21:48









                Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky

                42.4k32383




                42.4k32383






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049836%2fimplications-of-multiple-ways-to-order-eight-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen