Find a factorisation in a cubic field.
Take $alpha$ a root of $x^3-7$ and consider $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$. This is a pure cubic field. I am interested in the ideals which ramify. Since the discriminant here is $27cdot7^2$, I have to look at the ideals generated by 3 and 7 in $mathbb{Z}[alpha]$, which is the ring of integers. Surely $(7)=(alpha)^3$.
Now we consider $(3)$. I think I have to find $a,b,cin mathbb{Z}$ such that $$(3)=(3,alpha+a)(3,alpha+b)(3,alpha+c).$$ Computing, I get a system of modular equation which solution is $a,b,c=2$. Thus $$(3)supset(3,alpha+2)(3,alpha+2)(3,alpha+2).$$ For the other inclusion, is there a better way or have I to find 3 in this product by hand? I think that not always is simple. And more, I am always sure that the ideals in the factorisation are of the form $(3,alpha+a)$? Why not, for example, $(3,alpha^2+a)$?
algebraic-number-theory extension-field
add a comment |
Take $alpha$ a root of $x^3-7$ and consider $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$. This is a pure cubic field. I am interested in the ideals which ramify. Since the discriminant here is $27cdot7^2$, I have to look at the ideals generated by 3 and 7 in $mathbb{Z}[alpha]$, which is the ring of integers. Surely $(7)=(alpha)^3$.
Now we consider $(3)$. I think I have to find $a,b,cin mathbb{Z}$ such that $$(3)=(3,alpha+a)(3,alpha+b)(3,alpha+c).$$ Computing, I get a system of modular equation which solution is $a,b,c=2$. Thus $$(3)supset(3,alpha+2)(3,alpha+2)(3,alpha+2).$$ For the other inclusion, is there a better way or have I to find 3 in this product by hand? I think that not always is simple. And more, I am always sure that the ideals in the factorisation are of the form $(3,alpha+a)$? Why not, for example, $(3,alpha^2+a)$?
algebraic-number-theory extension-field
add a comment |
Take $alpha$ a root of $x^3-7$ and consider $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$. This is a pure cubic field. I am interested in the ideals which ramify. Since the discriminant here is $27cdot7^2$, I have to look at the ideals generated by 3 and 7 in $mathbb{Z}[alpha]$, which is the ring of integers. Surely $(7)=(alpha)^3$.
Now we consider $(3)$. I think I have to find $a,b,cin mathbb{Z}$ such that $$(3)=(3,alpha+a)(3,alpha+b)(3,alpha+c).$$ Computing, I get a system of modular equation which solution is $a,b,c=2$. Thus $$(3)supset(3,alpha+2)(3,alpha+2)(3,alpha+2).$$ For the other inclusion, is there a better way or have I to find 3 in this product by hand? I think that not always is simple. And more, I am always sure that the ideals in the factorisation are of the form $(3,alpha+a)$? Why not, for example, $(3,alpha^2+a)$?
algebraic-number-theory extension-field
Take $alpha$ a root of $x^3-7$ and consider $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$. This is a pure cubic field. I am interested in the ideals which ramify. Since the discriminant here is $27cdot7^2$, I have to look at the ideals generated by 3 and 7 in $mathbb{Z}[alpha]$, which is the ring of integers. Surely $(7)=(alpha)^3$.
Now we consider $(3)$. I think I have to find $a,b,cin mathbb{Z}$ such that $$(3)=(3,alpha+a)(3,alpha+b)(3,alpha+c).$$ Computing, I get a system of modular equation which solution is $a,b,c=2$. Thus $$(3)supset(3,alpha+2)(3,alpha+2)(3,alpha+2).$$ For the other inclusion, is there a better way or have I to find 3 in this product by hand? I think that not always is simple. And more, I am always sure that the ideals in the factorisation are of the form $(3,alpha+a)$? Why not, for example, $(3,alpha^2+a)$?
algebraic-number-theory extension-field
algebraic-number-theory extension-field
asked Nov 29 at 19:57
Yecabel
1547
1547
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Are you aware of Kummer's factorization theorem? This gives you the answer instantly. Since $x^2-7$ is the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $Bbb Q$, we can take its reduction mod $3$ and reduce it into a product of irreducibles to get the prime factorization of $(3)$ in $Bbb Q(alpha)$: as polynomials in $Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ we have
$$x^3-7=x^3+2=(x+2)^3$$
and therefore $(3)=mathfrak p^3$ where $mathfrak p=(3,alpha+2)$.
Edit: You could also look at the "norm" function, it sends an ideal $IsubsetBbb Z[alpha]$ to the cardinality of $Bbb Z[alpha]/I$ (this is always finite if $I$ is nonzero since $Bbb Z[alpha]$ is the ring of integers of a number field). This norm is multilpicative with respect to products of ideals, and as a result, in general we have that if
$$Isubseteq Jtext{ and } N(I)=N(J)implies I=J.$$
Applied to our case, if you could show that
$$N((3))=N((3,alpha+2)^3)=(N(3,alpha+2))^3$$
(which is the same as showing that $N(3,alpha+2)=3$), then it follows that the two ideals are equal.
No, I was not aware of this theorem, thank you! Are there other techniques to show it?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:17
1
@Yecabel See my edit
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:24
We get $N(3,alpha+2)=|mathbb{Z}[alpha]/(3,alpha+2)|=|mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^3-7,3,x+2)|=|mathbb{Z}_3[x]/(x+2)|=3$. Is this correct?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:38
1
@Yecabel Looks good, nice!
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:40
You need to be a bit more careful. Modular factorization of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ works as prescribed if one the conditions A) the factors are all simple, B) the powers of $alpha$ form an integral basis.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 1 at 20:27
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019120%2ffind-a-factorisation-in-a-cubic-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Are you aware of Kummer's factorization theorem? This gives you the answer instantly. Since $x^2-7$ is the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $Bbb Q$, we can take its reduction mod $3$ and reduce it into a product of irreducibles to get the prime factorization of $(3)$ in $Bbb Q(alpha)$: as polynomials in $Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ we have
$$x^3-7=x^3+2=(x+2)^3$$
and therefore $(3)=mathfrak p^3$ where $mathfrak p=(3,alpha+2)$.
Edit: You could also look at the "norm" function, it sends an ideal $IsubsetBbb Z[alpha]$ to the cardinality of $Bbb Z[alpha]/I$ (this is always finite if $I$ is nonzero since $Bbb Z[alpha]$ is the ring of integers of a number field). This norm is multilpicative with respect to products of ideals, and as a result, in general we have that if
$$Isubseteq Jtext{ and } N(I)=N(J)implies I=J.$$
Applied to our case, if you could show that
$$N((3))=N((3,alpha+2)^3)=(N(3,alpha+2))^3$$
(which is the same as showing that $N(3,alpha+2)=3$), then it follows that the two ideals are equal.
No, I was not aware of this theorem, thank you! Are there other techniques to show it?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:17
1
@Yecabel See my edit
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:24
We get $N(3,alpha+2)=|mathbb{Z}[alpha]/(3,alpha+2)|=|mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^3-7,3,x+2)|=|mathbb{Z}_3[x]/(x+2)|=3$. Is this correct?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:38
1
@Yecabel Looks good, nice!
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:40
You need to be a bit more careful. Modular factorization of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ works as prescribed if one the conditions A) the factors are all simple, B) the powers of $alpha$ form an integral basis.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 1 at 20:27
|
show 1 more comment
Are you aware of Kummer's factorization theorem? This gives you the answer instantly. Since $x^2-7$ is the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $Bbb Q$, we can take its reduction mod $3$ and reduce it into a product of irreducibles to get the prime factorization of $(3)$ in $Bbb Q(alpha)$: as polynomials in $Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ we have
$$x^3-7=x^3+2=(x+2)^3$$
and therefore $(3)=mathfrak p^3$ where $mathfrak p=(3,alpha+2)$.
Edit: You could also look at the "norm" function, it sends an ideal $IsubsetBbb Z[alpha]$ to the cardinality of $Bbb Z[alpha]/I$ (this is always finite if $I$ is nonzero since $Bbb Z[alpha]$ is the ring of integers of a number field). This norm is multilpicative with respect to products of ideals, and as a result, in general we have that if
$$Isubseteq Jtext{ and } N(I)=N(J)implies I=J.$$
Applied to our case, if you could show that
$$N((3))=N((3,alpha+2)^3)=(N(3,alpha+2))^3$$
(which is the same as showing that $N(3,alpha+2)=3$), then it follows that the two ideals are equal.
No, I was not aware of this theorem, thank you! Are there other techniques to show it?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:17
1
@Yecabel See my edit
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:24
We get $N(3,alpha+2)=|mathbb{Z}[alpha]/(3,alpha+2)|=|mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^3-7,3,x+2)|=|mathbb{Z}_3[x]/(x+2)|=3$. Is this correct?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:38
1
@Yecabel Looks good, nice!
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:40
You need to be a bit more careful. Modular factorization of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ works as prescribed if one the conditions A) the factors are all simple, B) the powers of $alpha$ form an integral basis.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 1 at 20:27
|
show 1 more comment
Are you aware of Kummer's factorization theorem? This gives you the answer instantly. Since $x^2-7$ is the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $Bbb Q$, we can take its reduction mod $3$ and reduce it into a product of irreducibles to get the prime factorization of $(3)$ in $Bbb Q(alpha)$: as polynomials in $Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ we have
$$x^3-7=x^3+2=(x+2)^3$$
and therefore $(3)=mathfrak p^3$ where $mathfrak p=(3,alpha+2)$.
Edit: You could also look at the "norm" function, it sends an ideal $IsubsetBbb Z[alpha]$ to the cardinality of $Bbb Z[alpha]/I$ (this is always finite if $I$ is nonzero since $Bbb Z[alpha]$ is the ring of integers of a number field). This norm is multilpicative with respect to products of ideals, and as a result, in general we have that if
$$Isubseteq Jtext{ and } N(I)=N(J)implies I=J.$$
Applied to our case, if you could show that
$$N((3))=N((3,alpha+2)^3)=(N(3,alpha+2))^3$$
(which is the same as showing that $N(3,alpha+2)=3$), then it follows that the two ideals are equal.
Are you aware of Kummer's factorization theorem? This gives you the answer instantly. Since $x^2-7$ is the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $Bbb Q$, we can take its reduction mod $3$ and reduce it into a product of irreducibles to get the prime factorization of $(3)$ in $Bbb Q(alpha)$: as polynomials in $Bbb Z/3Bbb Z$ we have
$$x^3-7=x^3+2=(x+2)^3$$
and therefore $(3)=mathfrak p^3$ where $mathfrak p=(3,alpha+2)$.
Edit: You could also look at the "norm" function, it sends an ideal $IsubsetBbb Z[alpha]$ to the cardinality of $Bbb Z[alpha]/I$ (this is always finite if $I$ is nonzero since $Bbb Z[alpha]$ is the ring of integers of a number field). This norm is multilpicative with respect to products of ideals, and as a result, in general we have that if
$$Isubseteq Jtext{ and } N(I)=N(J)implies I=J.$$
Applied to our case, if you could show that
$$N((3))=N((3,alpha+2)^3)=(N(3,alpha+2))^3$$
(which is the same as showing that $N(3,alpha+2)=3$), then it follows that the two ideals are equal.
edited Nov 29 at 20:24
answered Nov 29 at 20:09
Alex Mathers
10.7k21344
10.7k21344
No, I was not aware of this theorem, thank you! Are there other techniques to show it?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:17
1
@Yecabel See my edit
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:24
We get $N(3,alpha+2)=|mathbb{Z}[alpha]/(3,alpha+2)|=|mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^3-7,3,x+2)|=|mathbb{Z}_3[x]/(x+2)|=3$. Is this correct?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:38
1
@Yecabel Looks good, nice!
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:40
You need to be a bit more careful. Modular factorization of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ works as prescribed if one the conditions A) the factors are all simple, B) the powers of $alpha$ form an integral basis.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 1 at 20:27
|
show 1 more comment
No, I was not aware of this theorem, thank you! Are there other techniques to show it?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:17
1
@Yecabel See my edit
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:24
We get $N(3,alpha+2)=|mathbb{Z}[alpha]/(3,alpha+2)|=|mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^3-7,3,x+2)|=|mathbb{Z}_3[x]/(x+2)|=3$. Is this correct?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:38
1
@Yecabel Looks good, nice!
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:40
You need to be a bit more careful. Modular factorization of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ works as prescribed if one the conditions A) the factors are all simple, B) the powers of $alpha$ form an integral basis.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 1 at 20:27
No, I was not aware of this theorem, thank you! Are there other techniques to show it?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:17
No, I was not aware of this theorem, thank you! Are there other techniques to show it?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:17
1
1
@Yecabel See my edit
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:24
@Yecabel See my edit
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:24
We get $N(3,alpha+2)=|mathbb{Z}[alpha]/(3,alpha+2)|=|mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^3-7,3,x+2)|=|mathbb{Z}_3[x]/(x+2)|=3$. Is this correct?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:38
We get $N(3,alpha+2)=|mathbb{Z}[alpha]/(3,alpha+2)|=|mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^3-7,3,x+2)|=|mathbb{Z}_3[x]/(x+2)|=3$. Is this correct?
– Yecabel
Nov 29 at 20:38
1
1
@Yecabel Looks good, nice!
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:40
@Yecabel Looks good, nice!
– Alex Mathers
Nov 29 at 20:40
You need to be a bit more careful. Modular factorization of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ works as prescribed if one the conditions A) the factors are all simple, B) the powers of $alpha$ form an integral basis.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 1 at 20:27
You need to be a bit more careful. Modular factorization of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ works as prescribed if one the conditions A) the factors are all simple, B) the powers of $alpha$ form an integral basis.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 1 at 20:27
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019120%2ffind-a-factorisation-in-a-cubic-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown