Proof clarification: Catalan numbers and lattice paths












2












$begingroup$


I'm reading a proof of the fact that the number of monotonic lattice paths from (0,0) to (n,n) not crossing over the diagonal y=x is given by the Catalan numbers. The proof uses the reflection technique (about y = x+1) that a number of other proofs seem to employ as well. That is, you find a bijection between the "bad" paths (ones crossing y = x) and the lattice paths from (0,0) to (n-1,n+1). However, I don't understand this part in the attached image about showing it is indeed a bijection. How does this establish that the reflection transformation described is one-to-one and onto? (In the text below, $mathcal{B}$ denotes the set of paths crossing the diagonal, and the lattice paths are described as binary strings in V and H, H denoting horizontal movements and V denoting vertical. The position $i$ refers to the $i$-th character in such a string.)
enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I'm reading a proof of the fact that the number of monotonic lattice paths from (0,0) to (n,n) not crossing over the diagonal y=x is given by the Catalan numbers. The proof uses the reflection technique (about y = x+1) that a number of other proofs seem to employ as well. That is, you find a bijection between the "bad" paths (ones crossing y = x) and the lattice paths from (0,0) to (n-1,n+1). However, I don't understand this part in the attached image about showing it is indeed a bijection. How does this establish that the reflection transformation described is one-to-one and onto? (In the text below, $mathcal{B}$ denotes the set of paths crossing the diagonal, and the lattice paths are described as binary strings in V and H, H denoting horizontal movements and V denoting vertical. The position $i$ refers to the $i$-th character in such a string.)
    enter image description here










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      I'm reading a proof of the fact that the number of monotonic lattice paths from (0,0) to (n,n) not crossing over the diagonal y=x is given by the Catalan numbers. The proof uses the reflection technique (about y = x+1) that a number of other proofs seem to employ as well. That is, you find a bijection between the "bad" paths (ones crossing y = x) and the lattice paths from (0,0) to (n-1,n+1). However, I don't understand this part in the attached image about showing it is indeed a bijection. How does this establish that the reflection transformation described is one-to-one and onto? (In the text below, $mathcal{B}$ denotes the set of paths crossing the diagonal, and the lattice paths are described as binary strings in V and H, H denoting horizontal movements and V denoting vertical. The position $i$ refers to the $i$-th character in such a string.)
      enter image description here










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm reading a proof of the fact that the number of monotonic lattice paths from (0,0) to (n,n) not crossing over the diagonal y=x is given by the Catalan numbers. The proof uses the reflection technique (about y = x+1) that a number of other proofs seem to employ as well. That is, you find a bijection between the "bad" paths (ones crossing y = x) and the lattice paths from (0,0) to (n-1,n+1). However, I don't understand this part in the attached image about showing it is indeed a bijection. How does this establish that the reflection transformation described is one-to-one and onto? (In the text below, $mathcal{B}$ denotes the set of paths crossing the diagonal, and the lattice paths are described as binary strings in V and H, H denoting horizontal movements and V denoting vertical. The position $i$ refers to the $i$-th character in such a string.)
      enter image description here







      combinatorics proof-explanation integer-lattices catalan-numbers






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 30 '18 at 7:28









      Alex Ravsky

      42.5k32383




      42.5k32383










      asked Dec 24 '18 at 22:57









      Zain SiddiquiZain Siddiqui

      645




      645






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051701%2fproof-clarification-catalan-numbers-and-lattice-paths%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051701%2fproof-clarification-catalan-numbers-and-lattice-paths%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen