Find the convergence radius of series
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I need to find the convergence radius of the following series:
$$sum_{n=0}^infty cos in times z^n$$
Since
$$cos in = cosh n = {frac{e^{in} + e^{-in}}{2}}$$
therefore, using D'Alembert's property I find the limit as
$$lim {frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}} = {frac{e^{i(n+1)} + e^{-i(n+1)}}{2}} times z^n times z times {frac{2}{(e^{in} + e^{-in})z^n}} = lim z times {frac{e^{i(n+1)} + e^{-i(n+1)}}{e^{in} + e^{-in}}} = z$$
Therefore the radius should be 1. But the answer on the book is ${frac{1}{e}}$.
What's wrong with my solution?
limits convergence complex-numbers
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I need to find the convergence radius of the following series:
$$sum_{n=0}^infty cos in times z^n$$
Since
$$cos in = cosh n = {frac{e^{in} + e^{-in}}{2}}$$
therefore, using D'Alembert's property I find the limit as
$$lim {frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}} = {frac{e^{i(n+1)} + e^{-i(n+1)}}{2}} times z^n times z times {frac{2}{(e^{in} + e^{-in})z^n}} = lim z times {frac{e^{i(n+1)} + e^{-i(n+1)}}{e^{in} + e^{-in}}} = z$$
Therefore the radius should be 1. But the answer on the book is ${frac{1}{e}}$.
What's wrong with my solution?
limits convergence complex-numbers
Are you sure this is the definition of $cosh n$ you wrote? Looks like $cos n$...
– Clement C.
2 days ago
isn't it the same as $cos n$, only with $i$s added to the exponentiation of $e$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
(also, even assuming it's correct, not clear how you compute your last limit. The ratio does not tend to $1$, whether you look at what you wrote or the correct one.)
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@OP: $$cos x = frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2}$$ and $$cosh x = frac{e^{x}+e^{-x}}{2}$$ you picked the wrong one.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
1
So it should be $${frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}}$$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I need to find the convergence radius of the following series:
$$sum_{n=0}^infty cos in times z^n$$
Since
$$cos in = cosh n = {frac{e^{in} + e^{-in}}{2}}$$
therefore, using D'Alembert's property I find the limit as
$$lim {frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}} = {frac{e^{i(n+1)} + e^{-i(n+1)}}{2}} times z^n times z times {frac{2}{(e^{in} + e^{-in})z^n}} = lim z times {frac{e^{i(n+1)} + e^{-i(n+1)}}{e^{in} + e^{-in}}} = z$$
Therefore the radius should be 1. But the answer on the book is ${frac{1}{e}}$.
What's wrong with my solution?
limits convergence complex-numbers
I need to find the convergence radius of the following series:
$$sum_{n=0}^infty cos in times z^n$$
Since
$$cos in = cosh n = {frac{e^{in} + e^{-in}}{2}}$$
therefore, using D'Alembert's property I find the limit as
$$lim {frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}} = {frac{e^{i(n+1)} + e^{-i(n+1)}}{2}} times z^n times z times {frac{2}{(e^{in} + e^{-in})z^n}} = lim z times {frac{e^{i(n+1)} + e^{-i(n+1)}}{e^{in} + e^{-in}}} = z$$
Therefore the radius should be 1. But the answer on the book is ${frac{1}{e}}$.
What's wrong with my solution?
limits convergence complex-numbers
limits convergence complex-numbers
edited 2 days ago
Bernard
115k637108
115k637108
asked 2 days ago
user3132457
656
656
Are you sure this is the definition of $cosh n$ you wrote? Looks like $cos n$...
– Clement C.
2 days ago
isn't it the same as $cos n$, only with $i$s added to the exponentiation of $e$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
(also, even assuming it's correct, not clear how you compute your last limit. The ratio does not tend to $1$, whether you look at what you wrote or the correct one.)
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@OP: $$cos x = frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2}$$ and $$cosh x = frac{e^{x}+e^{-x}}{2}$$ you picked the wrong one.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
1
So it should be $${frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}}$$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
|
show 5 more comments
Are you sure this is the definition of $cosh n$ you wrote? Looks like $cos n$...
– Clement C.
2 days ago
isn't it the same as $cos n$, only with $i$s added to the exponentiation of $e$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
(also, even assuming it's correct, not clear how you compute your last limit. The ratio does not tend to $1$, whether you look at what you wrote or the correct one.)
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@OP: $$cos x = frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2}$$ and $$cosh x = frac{e^{x}+e^{-x}}{2}$$ you picked the wrong one.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
1
So it should be $${frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}}$$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
Are you sure this is the definition of $cosh n$ you wrote? Looks like $cos n$...
– Clement C.
2 days ago
Are you sure this is the definition of $cosh n$ you wrote? Looks like $cos n$...
– Clement C.
2 days ago
isn't it the same as $cos n$, only with $i$s added to the exponentiation of $e$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
isn't it the same as $cos n$, only with $i$s added to the exponentiation of $e$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
(also, even assuming it's correct, not clear how you compute your last limit. The ratio does not tend to $1$, whether you look at what you wrote or the correct one.)
– Clement C.
2 days ago
(also, even assuming it's correct, not clear how you compute your last limit. The ratio does not tend to $1$, whether you look at what you wrote or the correct one.)
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@OP: $$cos x = frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2}$$ and $$cosh x = frac{e^{x}+e^{-x}}{2}$$ you picked the wrong one.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@OP: $$cos x = frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2}$$ and $$cosh x = frac{e^{x}+e^{-x}}{2}$$ you picked the wrong one.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
1
1
So it should be $${frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}}$$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
So it should be $${frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}}$$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
|
show 5 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You have two errors here. The first is that
$$
cosh n = frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}
$$
not what you wrote (which is $cos n$. To remember: $cosh$ is unbounded on $mathbb{R}$, so you have "true" exponentials, while $cos$ is bounded, so you have $e^{i x}$ which is bounded). So you need to compute
$$lim_{ntoinfty} frac{e^{n+1}+e^{-(n+1)}}{e^{n}+e^{-n}} tag{1}$$ and not $lim_{ntoinfty} frac{e^{i(n+1)}+e^{-i(n+1)}}{e^{in}+e^{-in}}$ (where you also made a mistake, the second: this limit does not exist, anyway!).
So let's compute (1):
$$
frac{e^{n+1}+e^{-(n+1)}}{e^{n}+e^{-n}}
= frac{e^n(e+e^{-(2n+1)})}{e^n(1+e^{-2n})} =
= frac{e+e^{-(2n+1)}}{1+e^{-2n}} xrightarrow[ntoinfty]{} frac{e+0}{1+0} = e,.
$$
Therefore,
$$
lim_{ntoinfty} frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} = zcdot e tag{2}
$$
which explains why the radius is $frac{1}{e}$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Hint:
We can use https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series#Proof_of_convergence
far more easily,so that we need $$|ez|<1$$ and $$left|dfrac zeright|<1$$
The OP is using the ratio test.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@ClementC, Please find updated answer
– lab bhattacharjee
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You have two errors here. The first is that
$$
cosh n = frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}
$$
not what you wrote (which is $cos n$. To remember: $cosh$ is unbounded on $mathbb{R}$, so you have "true" exponentials, while $cos$ is bounded, so you have $e^{i x}$ which is bounded). So you need to compute
$$lim_{ntoinfty} frac{e^{n+1}+e^{-(n+1)}}{e^{n}+e^{-n}} tag{1}$$ and not $lim_{ntoinfty} frac{e^{i(n+1)}+e^{-i(n+1)}}{e^{in}+e^{-in}}$ (where you also made a mistake, the second: this limit does not exist, anyway!).
So let's compute (1):
$$
frac{e^{n+1}+e^{-(n+1)}}{e^{n}+e^{-n}}
= frac{e^n(e+e^{-(2n+1)})}{e^n(1+e^{-2n})} =
= frac{e+e^{-(2n+1)}}{1+e^{-2n}} xrightarrow[ntoinfty]{} frac{e+0}{1+0} = e,.
$$
Therefore,
$$
lim_{ntoinfty} frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} = zcdot e tag{2}
$$
which explains why the radius is $frac{1}{e}$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You have two errors here. The first is that
$$
cosh n = frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}
$$
not what you wrote (which is $cos n$. To remember: $cosh$ is unbounded on $mathbb{R}$, so you have "true" exponentials, while $cos$ is bounded, so you have $e^{i x}$ which is bounded). So you need to compute
$$lim_{ntoinfty} frac{e^{n+1}+e^{-(n+1)}}{e^{n}+e^{-n}} tag{1}$$ and not $lim_{ntoinfty} frac{e^{i(n+1)}+e^{-i(n+1)}}{e^{in}+e^{-in}}$ (where you also made a mistake, the second: this limit does not exist, anyway!).
So let's compute (1):
$$
frac{e^{n+1}+e^{-(n+1)}}{e^{n}+e^{-n}}
= frac{e^n(e+e^{-(2n+1)})}{e^n(1+e^{-2n})} =
= frac{e+e^{-(2n+1)}}{1+e^{-2n}} xrightarrow[ntoinfty]{} frac{e+0}{1+0} = e,.
$$
Therefore,
$$
lim_{ntoinfty} frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} = zcdot e tag{2}
$$
which explains why the radius is $frac{1}{e}$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You have two errors here. The first is that
$$
cosh n = frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}
$$
not what you wrote (which is $cos n$. To remember: $cosh$ is unbounded on $mathbb{R}$, so you have "true" exponentials, while $cos$ is bounded, so you have $e^{i x}$ which is bounded). So you need to compute
$$lim_{ntoinfty} frac{e^{n+1}+e^{-(n+1)}}{e^{n}+e^{-n}} tag{1}$$ and not $lim_{ntoinfty} frac{e^{i(n+1)}+e^{-i(n+1)}}{e^{in}+e^{-in}}$ (where you also made a mistake, the second: this limit does not exist, anyway!).
So let's compute (1):
$$
frac{e^{n+1}+e^{-(n+1)}}{e^{n}+e^{-n}}
= frac{e^n(e+e^{-(2n+1)})}{e^n(1+e^{-2n})} =
= frac{e+e^{-(2n+1)}}{1+e^{-2n}} xrightarrow[ntoinfty]{} frac{e+0}{1+0} = e,.
$$
Therefore,
$$
lim_{ntoinfty} frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} = zcdot e tag{2}
$$
which explains why the radius is $frac{1}{e}$.
You have two errors here. The first is that
$$
cosh n = frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}
$$
not what you wrote (which is $cos n$. To remember: $cosh$ is unbounded on $mathbb{R}$, so you have "true" exponentials, while $cos$ is bounded, so you have $e^{i x}$ which is bounded). So you need to compute
$$lim_{ntoinfty} frac{e^{n+1}+e^{-(n+1)}}{e^{n}+e^{-n}} tag{1}$$ and not $lim_{ntoinfty} frac{e^{i(n+1)}+e^{-i(n+1)}}{e^{in}+e^{-in}}$ (where you also made a mistake, the second: this limit does not exist, anyway!).
So let's compute (1):
$$
frac{e^{n+1}+e^{-(n+1)}}{e^{n}+e^{-n}}
= frac{e^n(e+e^{-(2n+1)})}{e^n(1+e^{-2n})} =
= frac{e+e^{-(2n+1)}}{1+e^{-2n}} xrightarrow[ntoinfty]{} frac{e+0}{1+0} = e,.
$$
Therefore,
$$
lim_{ntoinfty} frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} = zcdot e tag{2}
$$
which explains why the radius is $frac{1}{e}$.
answered 2 days ago
Clement C.
48.7k33784
48.7k33784
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Hint:
We can use https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series#Proof_of_convergence
far more easily,so that we need $$|ez|<1$$ and $$left|dfrac zeright|<1$$
The OP is using the ratio test.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@ClementC, Please find updated answer
– lab bhattacharjee
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Hint:
We can use https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series#Proof_of_convergence
far more easily,so that we need $$|ez|<1$$ and $$left|dfrac zeright|<1$$
The OP is using the ratio test.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@ClementC, Please find updated answer
– lab bhattacharjee
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Hint:
We can use https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series#Proof_of_convergence
far more easily,so that we need $$|ez|<1$$ and $$left|dfrac zeright|<1$$
Hint:
We can use https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series#Proof_of_convergence
far more easily,so that we need $$|ez|<1$$ and $$left|dfrac zeright|<1$$
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
lab bhattacharjee
220k15154271
220k15154271
The OP is using the ratio test.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@ClementC, Please find updated answer
– lab bhattacharjee
2 days ago
add a comment |
The OP is using the ratio test.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@ClementC, Please find updated answer
– lab bhattacharjee
2 days ago
The OP is using the ratio test.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
The OP is using the ratio test.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@ClementC, Please find updated answer
– lab bhattacharjee
2 days ago
@ClementC, Please find updated answer
– lab bhattacharjee
2 days ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005304%2ffind-the-convergence-radius-of-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are you sure this is the definition of $cosh n$ you wrote? Looks like $cos n$...
– Clement C.
2 days ago
isn't it the same as $cos n$, only with $i$s added to the exponentiation of $e$?
– user3132457
2 days ago
(also, even assuming it's correct, not clear how you compute your last limit. The ratio does not tend to $1$, whether you look at what you wrote or the correct one.)
– Clement C.
2 days ago
@OP: $$cos x = frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2}$$ and $$cosh x = frac{e^{x}+e^{-x}}{2}$$ you picked the wrong one.
– Clement C.
2 days ago
1
So it should be $${frac{e^n + e^{-n}}{2}}$$?
– user3132457
2 days ago