Is it possible to intercept a timeout method without AroundTimeout annotation?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












My company is currently using an old javaee jar (5.2.0) which doesn't contain the AroundTimeOut class. The jar cannot be changed because it will occur some major impacts. My manager asks me to intercept a timeout method.. Do you know if there is a way to workaround this issue?



This is the method that I use:



@Timeout
@TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRES_NEW)
@Interceptors(CorrelationIdInterceptor.class)
public void handleTimeout(Timer timer) {


And the interceptor:



public class CorrelationIdInterceptor {


private static final String CORRELATION_ID = "CORRELATION_ID";
private static final String GET_CORRELATION_ID = "getCorrelationId";

private static final Logger LOGGER =
Logger.getLogger(CorrelationIdInterceptor.class);


@AroundInvoke
public Object log(final InvocationContext ic) throws Exception {

String webServiceMethodName = ic.getMethod().getName();


if(webServiceMethodName.equalsIgnoreCase("handleTimeout")){
webServiceMethodName="SIBOI"+":"+ webServiceMethodName;
}









share|improve this question
























  • We couldn't help you without a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example including proper example input/output data.
    – Bsquare
    2 days ago










  • What does "is using an old javaee jar" mean? As compile dependency? But at runtime EE6 is supported?
    – Frito
    2 days ago










  • Yes for the compilation it is not supported. In fact, a work on a release branch and the jar which is used on it is the 5.2.0 without the AroundTimeout class.
    – S_George
    2 days ago















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












My company is currently using an old javaee jar (5.2.0) which doesn't contain the AroundTimeOut class. The jar cannot be changed because it will occur some major impacts. My manager asks me to intercept a timeout method.. Do you know if there is a way to workaround this issue?



This is the method that I use:



@Timeout
@TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRES_NEW)
@Interceptors(CorrelationIdInterceptor.class)
public void handleTimeout(Timer timer) {


And the interceptor:



public class CorrelationIdInterceptor {


private static final String CORRELATION_ID = "CORRELATION_ID";
private static final String GET_CORRELATION_ID = "getCorrelationId";

private static final Logger LOGGER =
Logger.getLogger(CorrelationIdInterceptor.class);


@AroundInvoke
public Object log(final InvocationContext ic) throws Exception {

String webServiceMethodName = ic.getMethod().getName();


if(webServiceMethodName.equalsIgnoreCase("handleTimeout")){
webServiceMethodName="SIBOI"+":"+ webServiceMethodName;
}









share|improve this question
























  • We couldn't help you without a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example including proper example input/output data.
    – Bsquare
    2 days ago










  • What does "is using an old javaee jar" mean? As compile dependency? But at runtime EE6 is supported?
    – Frito
    2 days ago










  • Yes for the compilation it is not supported. In fact, a work on a release branch and the jar which is used on it is the 5.2.0 without the AroundTimeout class.
    – S_George
    2 days ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











My company is currently using an old javaee jar (5.2.0) which doesn't contain the AroundTimeOut class. The jar cannot be changed because it will occur some major impacts. My manager asks me to intercept a timeout method.. Do you know if there is a way to workaround this issue?



This is the method that I use:



@Timeout
@TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRES_NEW)
@Interceptors(CorrelationIdInterceptor.class)
public void handleTimeout(Timer timer) {


And the interceptor:



public class CorrelationIdInterceptor {


private static final String CORRELATION_ID = "CORRELATION_ID";
private static final String GET_CORRELATION_ID = "getCorrelationId";

private static final Logger LOGGER =
Logger.getLogger(CorrelationIdInterceptor.class);


@AroundInvoke
public Object log(final InvocationContext ic) throws Exception {

String webServiceMethodName = ic.getMethod().getName();


if(webServiceMethodName.equalsIgnoreCase("handleTimeout")){
webServiceMethodName="SIBOI"+":"+ webServiceMethodName;
}









share|improve this question















My company is currently using an old javaee jar (5.2.0) which doesn't contain the AroundTimeOut class. The jar cannot be changed because it will occur some major impacts. My manager asks me to intercept a timeout method.. Do you know if there is a way to workaround this issue?



This is the method that I use:



@Timeout
@TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRES_NEW)
@Interceptors(CorrelationIdInterceptor.class)
public void handleTimeout(Timer timer) {


And the interceptor:



public class CorrelationIdInterceptor {


private static final String CORRELATION_ID = "CORRELATION_ID";
private static final String GET_CORRELATION_ID = "getCorrelationId";

private static final Logger LOGGER =
Logger.getLogger(CorrelationIdInterceptor.class);


@AroundInvoke
public Object log(final InvocationContext ic) throws Exception {

String webServiceMethodName = ic.getMethod().getName();


if(webServiceMethodName.equalsIgnoreCase("handleTimeout")){
webServiceMethodName="SIBOI"+":"+ webServiceMethodName;
}






java java-ee jar interceptor






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago

























asked 2 days ago









S_George

144




144












  • We couldn't help you without a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example including proper example input/output data.
    – Bsquare
    2 days ago










  • What does "is using an old javaee jar" mean? As compile dependency? But at runtime EE6 is supported?
    – Frito
    2 days ago










  • Yes for the compilation it is not supported. In fact, a work on a release branch and the jar which is used on it is the 5.2.0 without the AroundTimeout class.
    – S_George
    2 days ago


















  • We couldn't help you without a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example including proper example input/output data.
    – Bsquare
    2 days ago










  • What does "is using an old javaee jar" mean? As compile dependency? But at runtime EE6 is supported?
    – Frito
    2 days ago










  • Yes for the compilation it is not supported. In fact, a work on a release branch and the jar which is used on it is the 5.2.0 without the AroundTimeout class.
    – S_George
    2 days ago
















We couldn't help you without a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example including proper example input/output data.
– Bsquare
2 days ago




We couldn't help you without a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example including proper example input/output data.
– Bsquare
2 days ago












What does "is using an old javaee jar" mean? As compile dependency? But at runtime EE6 is supported?
– Frito
2 days ago




What does "is using an old javaee jar" mean? As compile dependency? But at runtime EE6 is supported?
– Frito
2 days ago












Yes for the compilation it is not supported. In fact, a work on a release branch and the jar which is used on it is the 5.2.0 without the AroundTimeout class.
– S_George
2 days ago




Yes for the compilation it is not supported. In fact, a work on a release branch and the jar which is used on it is the 5.2.0 without the AroundTimeout class.
– S_George
2 days ago

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53372949%2fis-it-possible-to-intercept-a-timeout-method-without-aroundtimeout-annotation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53372949%2fis-it-possible-to-intercept-a-timeout-method-without-aroundtimeout-annotation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen