Why of this bound $||u_{m0}|| leq ||u_0||$, where $u_{m0}$ is a projection of $u_0$?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm dealing with Navier-Stokes equations, using the book of Teman. Theres a bound of a projection of a function that i didn't understood, so i will introduce the main concepts with i am dealing with.



Consider $u_m=sum_{i=1}^m g_{im}(t)w_i$ an approximation of $u$ via galerkin method, where $w_i$ are the basis and $g_{im}(t)$ the coeficients, $u_m(0)=u_{m0}$ and $u(0)=u_0$.



The space $V$ is basecally the closure, in $H^1_0(Omega)$, of the set of all function $C^infty$ with support on a open set $Omega subset mathbb{R}^2$, with it's divergent being null.



Let ${w_j}$ be a base of $V$ which we can take $u_{m0}$ as a projection in $V$ of $u_0$ spanned by $w_1,w_2, cdots,w_m $.



So, why this bound is valid,
$||u_{m0}|| leq ||u_0||$?



$||cdot|| $ is the norm in $H^1_0$.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I'm dealing with Navier-Stokes equations, using the book of Teman. Theres a bound of a projection of a function that i didn't understood, so i will introduce the main concepts with i am dealing with.



    Consider $u_m=sum_{i=1}^m g_{im}(t)w_i$ an approximation of $u$ via galerkin method, where $w_i$ are the basis and $g_{im}(t)$ the coeficients, $u_m(0)=u_{m0}$ and $u(0)=u_0$.



    The space $V$ is basecally the closure, in $H^1_0(Omega)$, of the set of all function $C^infty$ with support on a open set $Omega subset mathbb{R}^2$, with it's divergent being null.



    Let ${w_j}$ be a base of $V$ which we can take $u_{m0}$ as a projection in $V$ of $u_0$ spanned by $w_1,w_2, cdots,w_m $.



    So, why this bound is valid,
    $||u_{m0}|| leq ||u_0||$?



    $||cdot|| $ is the norm in $H^1_0$.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I'm dealing with Navier-Stokes equations, using the book of Teman. Theres a bound of a projection of a function that i didn't understood, so i will introduce the main concepts with i am dealing with.



      Consider $u_m=sum_{i=1}^m g_{im}(t)w_i$ an approximation of $u$ via galerkin method, where $w_i$ are the basis and $g_{im}(t)$ the coeficients, $u_m(0)=u_{m0}$ and $u(0)=u_0$.



      The space $V$ is basecally the closure, in $H^1_0(Omega)$, of the set of all function $C^infty$ with support on a open set $Omega subset mathbb{R}^2$, with it's divergent being null.



      Let ${w_j}$ be a base of $V$ which we can take $u_{m0}$ as a projection in $V$ of $u_0$ spanned by $w_1,w_2, cdots,w_m $.



      So, why this bound is valid,
      $||u_{m0}|| leq ||u_0||$?



      $||cdot|| $ is the norm in $H^1_0$.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I'm dealing with Navier-Stokes equations, using the book of Teman. Theres a bound of a projection of a function that i didn't understood, so i will introduce the main concepts with i am dealing with.



      Consider $u_m=sum_{i=1}^m g_{im}(t)w_i$ an approximation of $u$ via galerkin method, where $w_i$ are the basis and $g_{im}(t)$ the coeficients, $u_m(0)=u_{m0}$ and $u(0)=u_0$.



      The space $V$ is basecally the closure, in $H^1_0(Omega)$, of the set of all function $C^infty$ with support on a open set $Omega subset mathbb{R}^2$, with it's divergent being null.



      Let ${w_j}$ be a base of $V$ which we can take $u_{m0}$ as a projection in $V$ of $u_0$ spanned by $w_1,w_2, cdots,w_m $.



      So, why this bound is valid,
      $||u_{m0}|| leq ||u_0||$?



      $||cdot|| $ is the norm in $H^1_0$.







      functional-analysis analysis pde galerkin-methods






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago

























      asked Nov 19 at 0:56









      João Paulo Andrade

      264




      264






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Usually, in the context of Galerkin method, "base" of a separable normed space $X$ means a linearly indpendent countable set whose span is dense in $X$ (the existence of this family follows from the separability - see Lemma 4.1, p. 83, in Le Dret). On the other hand, in the context of Hilber spaces, "base" usually means a maximal orthonormal set which is characterized as follows:




          Theorem. Let ${e_j}_{jin J}$ be an orthonormal family in a Hilbert space $H$. The following assertions are equivalent:





          • ${e_j}_{jin J}$ is maximal.


          • $ x=sum_{jin J}(x,e_j)e_j$ for all $xin mathcal{H}$.


          • $ |x|^2=sum_{jin J}|(x,e_j)|^2$ for all $xin mathcal{H}$.


          • $overline{operatorname{span}{e_jmid jin J}}=mathcal{H}$.




          Proof: See Corollary 12.8, p. 532, in Knapp and Proposition 2.3, p. 479, in Taylor.



          From this theorem, if $X$ is Hilbert separable, then a base in the "Hilbert space sense" is also a base in the "Galerking sense".



          Therefore, assuming that $(w_j)_{jinmathbb N}$ is base of $V$ (which is Hilbert separable) in the "Hilbert space sense", using the above theorem we conclude that



          $$begin{aligned}
          |u_{m0}|^2&=(u_{m0},u_{m0})\
          &=left(sum_{i=1}^m(u_0,w_i)w_i,sum_{j=1}^m(u_0,w_j)w_jright)\
          &=sum_{i=1}^m(u_0,w_i)sum_{j=1}^moverline{(u_0,w_j)}left(w_i,w_jright)\
          &=sum_{i=1}^m|(u_0,w_i)|^2left(w_i,w_iright)\
          &=sum_{i=1}^m|(u_0,w_i)|^2\
          &leq sum_{i=1}^infty|(u_0,w_i)|^2\
          &=|u_0|^2
          end{aligned}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004367%2fwhy-of-this-bound-u-m0-leq-u-0-where-u-m0-is-a-projection-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote



            accepted










            Usually, in the context of Galerkin method, "base" of a separable normed space $X$ means a linearly indpendent countable set whose span is dense in $X$ (the existence of this family follows from the separability - see Lemma 4.1, p. 83, in Le Dret). On the other hand, in the context of Hilber spaces, "base" usually means a maximal orthonormal set which is characterized as follows:




            Theorem. Let ${e_j}_{jin J}$ be an orthonormal family in a Hilbert space $H$. The following assertions are equivalent:





            • ${e_j}_{jin J}$ is maximal.


            • $ x=sum_{jin J}(x,e_j)e_j$ for all $xin mathcal{H}$.


            • $ |x|^2=sum_{jin J}|(x,e_j)|^2$ for all $xin mathcal{H}$.


            • $overline{operatorname{span}{e_jmid jin J}}=mathcal{H}$.




            Proof: See Corollary 12.8, p. 532, in Knapp and Proposition 2.3, p. 479, in Taylor.



            From this theorem, if $X$ is Hilbert separable, then a base in the "Hilbert space sense" is also a base in the "Galerking sense".



            Therefore, assuming that $(w_j)_{jinmathbb N}$ is base of $V$ (which is Hilbert separable) in the "Hilbert space sense", using the above theorem we conclude that



            $$begin{aligned}
            |u_{m0}|^2&=(u_{m0},u_{m0})\
            &=left(sum_{i=1}^m(u_0,w_i)w_i,sum_{j=1}^m(u_0,w_j)w_jright)\
            &=sum_{i=1}^m(u_0,w_i)sum_{j=1}^moverline{(u_0,w_j)}left(w_i,w_jright)\
            &=sum_{i=1}^m|(u_0,w_i)|^2left(w_i,w_iright)\
            &=sum_{i=1}^m|(u_0,w_i)|^2\
            &leq sum_{i=1}^infty|(u_0,w_i)|^2\
            &=|u_0|^2
            end{aligned}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              0
              down vote



              accepted










              Usually, in the context of Galerkin method, "base" of a separable normed space $X$ means a linearly indpendent countable set whose span is dense in $X$ (the existence of this family follows from the separability - see Lemma 4.1, p. 83, in Le Dret). On the other hand, in the context of Hilber spaces, "base" usually means a maximal orthonormal set which is characterized as follows:




              Theorem. Let ${e_j}_{jin J}$ be an orthonormal family in a Hilbert space $H$. The following assertions are equivalent:





              • ${e_j}_{jin J}$ is maximal.


              • $ x=sum_{jin J}(x,e_j)e_j$ for all $xin mathcal{H}$.


              • $ |x|^2=sum_{jin J}|(x,e_j)|^2$ for all $xin mathcal{H}$.


              • $overline{operatorname{span}{e_jmid jin J}}=mathcal{H}$.




              Proof: See Corollary 12.8, p. 532, in Knapp and Proposition 2.3, p. 479, in Taylor.



              From this theorem, if $X$ is Hilbert separable, then a base in the "Hilbert space sense" is also a base in the "Galerking sense".



              Therefore, assuming that $(w_j)_{jinmathbb N}$ is base of $V$ (which is Hilbert separable) in the "Hilbert space sense", using the above theorem we conclude that



              $$begin{aligned}
              |u_{m0}|^2&=(u_{m0},u_{m0})\
              &=left(sum_{i=1}^m(u_0,w_i)w_i,sum_{j=1}^m(u_0,w_j)w_jright)\
              &=sum_{i=1}^m(u_0,w_i)sum_{j=1}^moverline{(u_0,w_j)}left(w_i,w_jright)\
              &=sum_{i=1}^m|(u_0,w_i)|^2left(w_i,w_iright)\
              &=sum_{i=1}^m|(u_0,w_i)|^2\
              &leq sum_{i=1}^infty|(u_0,w_i)|^2\
              &=|u_0|^2
              end{aligned}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                0
                down vote



                accepted






                Usually, in the context of Galerkin method, "base" of a separable normed space $X$ means a linearly indpendent countable set whose span is dense in $X$ (the existence of this family follows from the separability - see Lemma 4.1, p. 83, in Le Dret). On the other hand, in the context of Hilber spaces, "base" usually means a maximal orthonormal set which is characterized as follows:




                Theorem. Let ${e_j}_{jin J}$ be an orthonormal family in a Hilbert space $H$. The following assertions are equivalent:





                • ${e_j}_{jin J}$ is maximal.


                • $ x=sum_{jin J}(x,e_j)e_j$ for all $xin mathcal{H}$.


                • $ |x|^2=sum_{jin J}|(x,e_j)|^2$ for all $xin mathcal{H}$.


                • $overline{operatorname{span}{e_jmid jin J}}=mathcal{H}$.




                Proof: See Corollary 12.8, p. 532, in Knapp and Proposition 2.3, p. 479, in Taylor.



                From this theorem, if $X$ is Hilbert separable, then a base in the "Hilbert space sense" is also a base in the "Galerking sense".



                Therefore, assuming that $(w_j)_{jinmathbb N}$ is base of $V$ (which is Hilbert separable) in the "Hilbert space sense", using the above theorem we conclude that



                $$begin{aligned}
                |u_{m0}|^2&=(u_{m0},u_{m0})\
                &=left(sum_{i=1}^m(u_0,w_i)w_i,sum_{j=1}^m(u_0,w_j)w_jright)\
                &=sum_{i=1}^m(u_0,w_i)sum_{j=1}^moverline{(u_0,w_j)}left(w_i,w_jright)\
                &=sum_{i=1}^m|(u_0,w_i)|^2left(w_i,w_iright)\
                &=sum_{i=1}^m|(u_0,w_i)|^2\
                &leq sum_{i=1}^infty|(u_0,w_i)|^2\
                &=|u_0|^2
                end{aligned}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer














                Usually, in the context of Galerkin method, "base" of a separable normed space $X$ means a linearly indpendent countable set whose span is dense in $X$ (the existence of this family follows from the separability - see Lemma 4.1, p. 83, in Le Dret). On the other hand, in the context of Hilber spaces, "base" usually means a maximal orthonormal set which is characterized as follows:




                Theorem. Let ${e_j}_{jin J}$ be an orthonormal family in a Hilbert space $H$. The following assertions are equivalent:





                • ${e_j}_{jin J}$ is maximal.


                • $ x=sum_{jin J}(x,e_j)e_j$ for all $xin mathcal{H}$.


                • $ |x|^2=sum_{jin J}|(x,e_j)|^2$ for all $xin mathcal{H}$.


                • $overline{operatorname{span}{e_jmid jin J}}=mathcal{H}$.




                Proof: See Corollary 12.8, p. 532, in Knapp and Proposition 2.3, p. 479, in Taylor.



                From this theorem, if $X$ is Hilbert separable, then a base in the "Hilbert space sense" is also a base in the "Galerking sense".



                Therefore, assuming that $(w_j)_{jinmathbb N}$ is base of $V$ (which is Hilbert separable) in the "Hilbert space sense", using the above theorem we conclude that



                $$begin{aligned}
                |u_{m0}|^2&=(u_{m0},u_{m0})\
                &=left(sum_{i=1}^m(u_0,w_i)w_i,sum_{j=1}^m(u_0,w_j)w_jright)\
                &=sum_{i=1}^m(u_0,w_i)sum_{j=1}^moverline{(u_0,w_j)}left(w_i,w_jright)\
                &=sum_{i=1}^m|(u_0,w_i)|^2left(w_i,w_iright)\
                &=sum_{i=1}^m|(u_0,w_i)|^2\
                &leq sum_{i=1}^infty|(u_0,w_i)|^2\
                &=|u_0|^2
                end{aligned}$$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited yesterday

























                answered yesterday









                Pedro

                10k23066




                10k23066






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004367%2fwhy-of-this-bound-u-m0-leq-u-0-where-u-m0-is-a-projection-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen