Gamma function in Taylor series
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The formula I am having some problems is this one
$$
fleft( x right) =sin left(frac { 2(x-3)!-x+1 }{ 2x } pi right) =sin left(frac { 2,Gamma (x-2)-x+1 }{ 2x } pi right)
$$
Although this might seem too general it is a variation of Wilson's theorem which (in my opinion) has slightly better properties than the general Wilson's theorem formula.
If you look at the graph you'll see that the values for $f(x)$ where $x$ is prime is 0 while for $x$ nonprime tends to be converging toward $-1$ and in almost a perfect fashion and rapidly.
My idea is this: turn this into infinite Taylor series and add $x$ to it, that way we could get a good approximation of prime counting function to infinity.
In other words:
$$
lim _{ xrightarrow infty }{ x+sum _{ nepsilon N }^{ }{ f(n) } } =lim _{ xrightarrow infty }{ Pi (x) }
$$
The problem I am having is actually converting it into Taylor series. I really didn't have any experience with this kind of equations so I was wondering is there any trick to do this, or should I just let this one pass
Edited: Changed the formula, forgot to multiply by $pi$
prime-numbers
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The formula I am having some problems is this one
$$
fleft( x right) =sin left(frac { 2(x-3)!-x+1 }{ 2x } pi right) =sin left(frac { 2,Gamma (x-2)-x+1 }{ 2x } pi right)
$$
Although this might seem too general it is a variation of Wilson's theorem which (in my opinion) has slightly better properties than the general Wilson's theorem formula.
If you look at the graph you'll see that the values for $f(x)$ where $x$ is prime is 0 while for $x$ nonprime tends to be converging toward $-1$ and in almost a perfect fashion and rapidly.
My idea is this: turn this into infinite Taylor series and add $x$ to it, that way we could get a good approximation of prime counting function to infinity.
In other words:
$$
lim _{ xrightarrow infty }{ x+sum _{ nepsilon N }^{ }{ f(n) } } =lim _{ xrightarrow infty }{ Pi (x) }
$$
The problem I am having is actually converting it into Taylor series. I really didn't have any experience with this kind of equations so I was wondering is there any trick to do this, or should I just let this one pass
Edited: Changed the formula, forgot to multiply by $pi$
prime-numbers
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The formula I am having some problems is this one
$$
fleft( x right) =sin left(frac { 2(x-3)!-x+1 }{ 2x } pi right) =sin left(frac { 2,Gamma (x-2)-x+1 }{ 2x } pi right)
$$
Although this might seem too general it is a variation of Wilson's theorem which (in my opinion) has slightly better properties than the general Wilson's theorem formula.
If you look at the graph you'll see that the values for $f(x)$ where $x$ is prime is 0 while for $x$ nonprime tends to be converging toward $-1$ and in almost a perfect fashion and rapidly.
My idea is this: turn this into infinite Taylor series and add $x$ to it, that way we could get a good approximation of prime counting function to infinity.
In other words:
$$
lim _{ xrightarrow infty }{ x+sum _{ nepsilon N }^{ }{ f(n) } } =lim _{ xrightarrow infty }{ Pi (x) }
$$
The problem I am having is actually converting it into Taylor series. I really didn't have any experience with this kind of equations so I was wondering is there any trick to do this, or should I just let this one pass
Edited: Changed the formula, forgot to multiply by $pi$
prime-numbers
The formula I am having some problems is this one
$$
fleft( x right) =sin left(frac { 2(x-3)!-x+1 }{ 2x } pi right) =sin left(frac { 2,Gamma (x-2)-x+1 }{ 2x } pi right)
$$
Although this might seem too general it is a variation of Wilson's theorem which (in my opinion) has slightly better properties than the general Wilson's theorem formula.
If you look at the graph you'll see that the values for $f(x)$ where $x$ is prime is 0 while for $x$ nonprime tends to be converging toward $-1$ and in almost a perfect fashion and rapidly.
My idea is this: turn this into infinite Taylor series and add $x$ to it, that way we could get a good approximation of prime counting function to infinity.
In other words:
$$
lim _{ xrightarrow infty }{ x+sum _{ nepsilon N }^{ }{ f(n) } } =lim _{ xrightarrow infty }{ Pi (x) }
$$
The problem I am having is actually converting it into Taylor series. I really didn't have any experience with this kind of equations so I was wondering is there any trick to do this, or should I just let this one pass
Edited: Changed the formula, forgot to multiply by $pi$
prime-numbers
prime-numbers
edited Apr 7 '13 at 17:42
vonbrand
19.8k63058
19.8k63058
asked Apr 7 '13 at 17:20
user1398593
364
364
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Well it seems I will answer my own question.
There is a similar formula that clearly says the nature of prime numbers and it goes like this:
$$pi (m)=sum _{ j=2 }^{ m }{ frac { sin ^{ 2 }{ (pi frac { { ((j-1)!) }^{ 2 } }{ j } ) } }{ sin ^{ 2 }{ (frac { pi }{ j } ) } } } $$
This function really is a prime counting function but you can see that it is a little tricky to develop it into a working formula since it should be integrated over ${ 1 }_{ N }$ .
However since I'm already answering I'm going to show what I planned on doing with the formula:
$$pi (x)quad approx quad sum _{ n=1 }^{ n=x }{ [quad cos { (frac { 2*(n-3)!+1 }{ 2n } pi ) } -cos { (frac { 2*(n-3)!+1 }{ n } pi ) } quad ] } $$
furthermore it converges toward $π(x)$
– user1398593
Apr 10 '13 at 19:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Well it seems I will answer my own question.
There is a similar formula that clearly says the nature of prime numbers and it goes like this:
$$pi (m)=sum _{ j=2 }^{ m }{ frac { sin ^{ 2 }{ (pi frac { { ((j-1)!) }^{ 2 } }{ j } ) } }{ sin ^{ 2 }{ (frac { pi }{ j } ) } } } $$
This function really is a prime counting function but you can see that it is a little tricky to develop it into a working formula since it should be integrated over ${ 1 }_{ N }$ .
However since I'm already answering I'm going to show what I planned on doing with the formula:
$$pi (x)quad approx quad sum _{ n=1 }^{ n=x }{ [quad cos { (frac { 2*(n-3)!+1 }{ 2n } pi ) } -cos { (frac { 2*(n-3)!+1 }{ n } pi ) } quad ] } $$
furthermore it converges toward $π(x)$
– user1398593
Apr 10 '13 at 19:03
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Well it seems I will answer my own question.
There is a similar formula that clearly says the nature of prime numbers and it goes like this:
$$pi (m)=sum _{ j=2 }^{ m }{ frac { sin ^{ 2 }{ (pi frac { { ((j-1)!) }^{ 2 } }{ j } ) } }{ sin ^{ 2 }{ (frac { pi }{ j } ) } } } $$
This function really is a prime counting function but you can see that it is a little tricky to develop it into a working formula since it should be integrated over ${ 1 }_{ N }$ .
However since I'm already answering I'm going to show what I planned on doing with the formula:
$$pi (x)quad approx quad sum _{ n=1 }^{ n=x }{ [quad cos { (frac { 2*(n-3)!+1 }{ 2n } pi ) } -cos { (frac { 2*(n-3)!+1 }{ n } pi ) } quad ] } $$
furthermore it converges toward $π(x)$
– user1398593
Apr 10 '13 at 19:03
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Well it seems I will answer my own question.
There is a similar formula that clearly says the nature of prime numbers and it goes like this:
$$pi (m)=sum _{ j=2 }^{ m }{ frac { sin ^{ 2 }{ (pi frac { { ((j-1)!) }^{ 2 } }{ j } ) } }{ sin ^{ 2 }{ (frac { pi }{ j } ) } } } $$
This function really is a prime counting function but you can see that it is a little tricky to develop it into a working formula since it should be integrated over ${ 1 }_{ N }$ .
However since I'm already answering I'm going to show what I planned on doing with the formula:
$$pi (x)quad approx quad sum _{ n=1 }^{ n=x }{ [quad cos { (frac { 2*(n-3)!+1 }{ 2n } pi ) } -cos { (frac { 2*(n-3)!+1 }{ n } pi ) } quad ] } $$
Well it seems I will answer my own question.
There is a similar formula that clearly says the nature of prime numbers and it goes like this:
$$pi (m)=sum _{ j=2 }^{ m }{ frac { sin ^{ 2 }{ (pi frac { { ((j-1)!) }^{ 2 } }{ j } ) } }{ sin ^{ 2 }{ (frac { pi }{ j } ) } } } $$
This function really is a prime counting function but you can see that it is a little tricky to develop it into a working formula since it should be integrated over ${ 1 }_{ N }$ .
However since I'm already answering I'm going to show what I planned on doing with the formula:
$$pi (x)quad approx quad sum _{ n=1 }^{ n=x }{ [quad cos { (frac { 2*(n-3)!+1 }{ 2n } pi ) } -cos { (frac { 2*(n-3)!+1 }{ n } pi ) } quad ] } $$
answered Apr 10 '13 at 12:04
user1398593
364
364
furthermore it converges toward $π(x)$
– user1398593
Apr 10 '13 at 19:03
add a comment |
furthermore it converges toward $π(x)$
– user1398593
Apr 10 '13 at 19:03
furthermore it converges toward $π(x)$
– user1398593
Apr 10 '13 at 19:03
furthermore it converges toward $π(x)$
– user1398593
Apr 10 '13 at 19:03
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f354030%2fgamma-function-in-taylor-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown