How can a discontinuous function belong to $C_B^1(Omega)$, the space of continuous functions $u$ with bounded...
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $Omega = {(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : 0 < |x| < 1, 0 < y < 1}$ and consider the function $u$ defined on $Omega$ by (Sobolev Spaces by Adams, page 68, Example 3.10)
$$
u(x,y) =
begin{cases}
1, quad x > 0, \
0, quad x < 0.
end{cases}
$$
On page 80 (item (iv)) of this book Adams says that this function belongs to $C_B^1(Omega)$ which consists of function in $C^1(Omega)$ such that $D^alpha u$ is bounded for $0 le alpha le 1$.
But this function is discontinuous at $x=0$ so how can it be an element of any space of continuous functions? Is this a typo?
pde continuity sobolev-spaces regularity-theory-of-pdes discontinuous-functions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $Omega = {(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : 0 < |x| < 1, 0 < y < 1}$ and consider the function $u$ defined on $Omega$ by (Sobolev Spaces by Adams, page 68, Example 3.10)
$$
u(x,y) =
begin{cases}
1, quad x > 0, \
0, quad x < 0.
end{cases}
$$
On page 80 (item (iv)) of this book Adams says that this function belongs to $C_B^1(Omega)$ which consists of function in $C^1(Omega)$ such that $D^alpha u$ is bounded for $0 le alpha le 1$.
But this function is discontinuous at $x=0$ so how can it be an element of any space of continuous functions? Is this a typo?
pde continuity sobolev-spaces regularity-theory-of-pdes discontinuous-functions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $Omega = {(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : 0 < |x| < 1, 0 < y < 1}$ and consider the function $u$ defined on $Omega$ by (Sobolev Spaces by Adams, page 68, Example 3.10)
$$
u(x,y) =
begin{cases}
1, quad x > 0, \
0, quad x < 0.
end{cases}
$$
On page 80 (item (iv)) of this book Adams says that this function belongs to $C_B^1(Omega)$ which consists of function in $C^1(Omega)$ such that $D^alpha u$ is bounded for $0 le alpha le 1$.
But this function is discontinuous at $x=0$ so how can it be an element of any space of continuous functions? Is this a typo?
pde continuity sobolev-spaces regularity-theory-of-pdes discontinuous-functions
Let $Omega = {(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : 0 < |x| < 1, 0 < y < 1}$ and consider the function $u$ defined on $Omega$ by (Sobolev Spaces by Adams, page 68, Example 3.10)
$$
u(x,y) =
begin{cases}
1, quad x > 0, \
0, quad x < 0.
end{cases}
$$
On page 80 (item (iv)) of this book Adams says that this function belongs to $C_B^1(Omega)$ which consists of function in $C^1(Omega)$ such that $D^alpha u$ is bounded for $0 le alpha le 1$.
But this function is discontinuous at $x=0$ so how can it be an element of any space of continuous functions? Is this a typo?
pde continuity sobolev-spaces regularity-theory-of-pdes discontinuous-functions
pde continuity sobolev-spaces regularity-theory-of-pdes discontinuous-functions
asked Nov 21 at 10:58
eurocoder
1,095315
1,095315
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Its not a typo. The function is defined on two separate sets that are not path connected. On each set, it takes a constant value. Its maybe easier to see in 1D, this function is
$$ f: [-1,0)cup (0,1] to mathbb R, quad f(x) = frac{operatorname{sgn(x)+1}}2$$
$f$ is continuous (even $C^infty$) on its domain, but there is no continuous extension to $[-1,1]$ (and certainly no $C^1$ extension).
Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:23
Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:26
If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
– Calvin Khor
Nov 21 at 11:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Its not a typo. The function is defined on two separate sets that are not path connected. On each set, it takes a constant value. Its maybe easier to see in 1D, this function is
$$ f: [-1,0)cup (0,1] to mathbb R, quad f(x) = frac{operatorname{sgn(x)+1}}2$$
$f$ is continuous (even $C^infty$) on its domain, but there is no continuous extension to $[-1,1]$ (and certainly no $C^1$ extension).
Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:23
Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:26
If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
– Calvin Khor
Nov 21 at 11:26
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Its not a typo. The function is defined on two separate sets that are not path connected. On each set, it takes a constant value. Its maybe easier to see in 1D, this function is
$$ f: [-1,0)cup (0,1] to mathbb R, quad f(x) = frac{operatorname{sgn(x)+1}}2$$
$f$ is continuous (even $C^infty$) on its domain, but there is no continuous extension to $[-1,1]$ (and certainly no $C^1$ extension).
Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:23
Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:26
If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
– Calvin Khor
Nov 21 at 11:26
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Its not a typo. The function is defined on two separate sets that are not path connected. On each set, it takes a constant value. Its maybe easier to see in 1D, this function is
$$ f: [-1,0)cup (0,1] to mathbb R, quad f(x) = frac{operatorname{sgn(x)+1}}2$$
$f$ is continuous (even $C^infty$) on its domain, but there is no continuous extension to $[-1,1]$ (and certainly no $C^1$ extension).
Its not a typo. The function is defined on two separate sets that are not path connected. On each set, it takes a constant value. Its maybe easier to see in 1D, this function is
$$ f: [-1,0)cup (0,1] to mathbb R, quad f(x) = frac{operatorname{sgn(x)+1}}2$$
$f$ is continuous (even $C^infty$) on its domain, but there is no continuous extension to $[-1,1]$ (and certainly no $C^1$ extension).
answered Nov 21 at 11:18
Calvin Khor
10.8k21437
10.8k21437
Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:23
Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:26
If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
– Calvin Khor
Nov 21 at 11:26
add a comment |
Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:23
Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:26
If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
– Calvin Khor
Nov 21 at 11:26
Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:23
Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:23
Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:26
Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
– eurocoder
Nov 21 at 11:26
If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
– Calvin Khor
Nov 21 at 11:26
If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
– Calvin Khor
Nov 21 at 11:26
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007565%2fhow-can-a-discontinuous-function-belong-to-c-b1-omega-the-space-of-continu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown