Different almost-complex structures $Rightarrow$ different complex structures?
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $(M,J)$ be an almost-complex structure. By definition, if $M$ admits local holomorphic coordinates for $J$ around every point and these patch together to form a holomorphic atlas (complex structure) for $M$, then $J$ is said to be integrable.
I was able to verify that a complex manifold $M$ can admit many almost-complex structures.
But I couldn't verify this: given different integrable almost-complex structures $J_1,J_2$, can we say that they integrate to different complex structures?
differential-geometry complex-geometry connections
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $(M,J)$ be an almost-complex structure. By definition, if $M$ admits local holomorphic coordinates for $J$ around every point and these patch together to form a holomorphic atlas (complex structure) for $M$, then $J$ is said to be integrable.
I was able to verify that a complex manifold $M$ can admit many almost-complex structures.
But I couldn't verify this: given different integrable almost-complex structures $J_1,J_2$, can we say that they integrate to different complex structures?
differential-geometry complex-geometry connections
1
certainly, right? If the complex structures were identical then the collection of charts would be identical, and the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$ in a chart is how you define the $J_i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:12
@MikeMiller What I mean by "complex structures ${(U_i,varphi_i)}$ and ${(V_j,psi_j)}$ being the same" is that $varphi_icircpsi_j^{-1}$ is holomorphic for every $i,j$. I don't understand what you said about multiplication by $i$ defining $J_i$, since $J_1,J_2$ are already given.
– rmdmc89
Nov 26 at 20:28
2
You may as well pass to a maximal atlas, which means that both atlases contain exactly the same charts. For your charts to integrate your given almost complex structure means that, on each chart, the map $J$ is the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:38
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $(M,J)$ be an almost-complex structure. By definition, if $M$ admits local holomorphic coordinates for $J$ around every point and these patch together to form a holomorphic atlas (complex structure) for $M$, then $J$ is said to be integrable.
I was able to verify that a complex manifold $M$ can admit many almost-complex structures.
But I couldn't verify this: given different integrable almost-complex structures $J_1,J_2$, can we say that they integrate to different complex structures?
differential-geometry complex-geometry connections
Let $(M,J)$ be an almost-complex structure. By definition, if $M$ admits local holomorphic coordinates for $J$ around every point and these patch together to form a holomorphic atlas (complex structure) for $M$, then $J$ is said to be integrable.
I was able to verify that a complex manifold $M$ can admit many almost-complex structures.
But I couldn't verify this: given different integrable almost-complex structures $J_1,J_2$, can we say that they integrate to different complex structures?
differential-geometry complex-geometry connections
differential-geometry complex-geometry connections
asked Nov 26 at 18:03
rmdmc89
2,0511921
2,0511921
1
certainly, right? If the complex structures were identical then the collection of charts would be identical, and the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$ in a chart is how you define the $J_i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:12
@MikeMiller What I mean by "complex structures ${(U_i,varphi_i)}$ and ${(V_j,psi_j)}$ being the same" is that $varphi_icircpsi_j^{-1}$ is holomorphic for every $i,j$. I don't understand what you said about multiplication by $i$ defining $J_i$, since $J_1,J_2$ are already given.
– rmdmc89
Nov 26 at 20:28
2
You may as well pass to a maximal atlas, which means that both atlases contain exactly the same charts. For your charts to integrate your given almost complex structure means that, on each chart, the map $J$ is the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:38
add a comment |
1
certainly, right? If the complex structures were identical then the collection of charts would be identical, and the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$ in a chart is how you define the $J_i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:12
@MikeMiller What I mean by "complex structures ${(U_i,varphi_i)}$ and ${(V_j,psi_j)}$ being the same" is that $varphi_icircpsi_j^{-1}$ is holomorphic for every $i,j$. I don't understand what you said about multiplication by $i$ defining $J_i$, since $J_1,J_2$ are already given.
– rmdmc89
Nov 26 at 20:28
2
You may as well pass to a maximal atlas, which means that both atlases contain exactly the same charts. For your charts to integrate your given almost complex structure means that, on each chart, the map $J$ is the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:38
1
1
certainly, right? If the complex structures were identical then the collection of charts would be identical, and the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$ in a chart is how you define the $J_i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:12
certainly, right? If the complex structures were identical then the collection of charts would be identical, and the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$ in a chart is how you define the $J_i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:12
@MikeMiller What I mean by "complex structures ${(U_i,varphi_i)}$ and ${(V_j,psi_j)}$ being the same" is that $varphi_icircpsi_j^{-1}$ is holomorphic for every $i,j$. I don't understand what you said about multiplication by $i$ defining $J_i$, since $J_1,J_2$ are already given.
– rmdmc89
Nov 26 at 20:28
@MikeMiller What I mean by "complex structures ${(U_i,varphi_i)}$ and ${(V_j,psi_j)}$ being the same" is that $varphi_icircpsi_j^{-1}$ is holomorphic for every $i,j$. I don't understand what you said about multiplication by $i$ defining $J_i$, since $J_1,J_2$ are already given.
– rmdmc89
Nov 26 at 20:28
2
2
You may as well pass to a maximal atlas, which means that both atlases contain exactly the same charts. For your charts to integrate your given almost complex structure means that, on each chart, the map $J$ is the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:38
You may as well pass to a maximal atlas, which means that both atlases contain exactly the same charts. For your charts to integrate your given almost complex structure means that, on each chart, the map $J$ is the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:38
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014682%2fdifferent-almost-complex-structures-rightarrow-different-complex-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014682%2fdifferent-almost-complex-structures-rightarrow-different-complex-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
certainly, right? If the complex structures were identical then the collection of charts would be identical, and the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$ in a chart is how you define the $J_i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:12
@MikeMiller What I mean by "complex structures ${(U_i,varphi_i)}$ and ${(V_j,psi_j)}$ being the same" is that $varphi_icircpsi_j^{-1}$ is holomorphic for every $i,j$. I don't understand what you said about multiplication by $i$ defining $J_i$, since $J_1,J_2$ are already given.
– rmdmc89
Nov 26 at 20:28
2
You may as well pass to a maximal atlas, which means that both atlases contain exactly the same charts. For your charts to integrate your given almost complex structure means that, on each chart, the map $J$ is the derivative of multiplication-by-$i$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 26 at 20:38