Evolution equation of radial function of a star-shaped hypersurface











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $F_t:Sigma^ntomathbb{R}^{n+1}$ be a smooth family of immersion of a hypersurface that satisfies the inverse curvature flow:
begin{align}
tag1
frac{partial F_t}{partial t}=frac{1}{f}nu.
end{align}

Now, suppose each $Sigma_t:=F_t(Sigma)$ is a star-shaped hypersurface in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$; that is, there exists a smooth positive function $r$ such that
begin{align}
Sigma_t=left{(r(theta,t),theta):thetainmathbb{S}^nright}
end{align}

Let $(theta^i)$ be a local coordinate system of $mathbb{S}^n$, and denote $sigma_{ij}$ the components of the round metric on $mathbb{S}^n$ with respect to $(theta^i)$. Let $nabla$ be the Levi-Civita connection on $mathbb{S}^n$ with respect to the round metric, and let $|cdot|$ be the norm induced by the round metric. Denote
begin{align}
rho:=sqrt{1+|nablalog r|^2}
end{align}

If we write the flat metric on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ by $delta=drotimes dr+r^2g_{mathbb{S}^n}$, then the unit normal vector on $Sigma_t$ can be given by
begin{align}
nu=frac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright)
end{align}



Now, the inverse curvature flow can be reduced to the following equation:
begin{equation}
tag2
frac{partial r}{partial t}=frac{rho}{f}
end{equation}

Indeed, we have the following computation:
begin{align}
frac{1}{f}&=leftlanglefrac{partial F_t}{partial t},nurightrangle \
&=leftlanglefrac{partial r}{partial t}partial_r,frac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright)rightrangle \
&=frac{1}{rho}frac{partial r}{partial t}left[underbrace{langlepartial_r,partial_rrangle}_{=1}-nabla^ilog runderbrace{langlepartial_r,partial_irangle}_{=0}right] \
&=frac{1}{rho}frac{partial r}{partial t}
end{align}




Here comes my question: What is the error in the following
computation: begin{align} frac{partial r}{partial t}&=leftlanglefrac{partial r}{partial t}partial_r,partial_rrightrangle \
&=leftlanglefrac{partial F_t}{partial t},partial_rrightrangle \
&=leftlanglefrac{1}{f}nu,partial_rrightrangle \
&=frac{1}{f}leftlanglefrac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright),partial_rrightrangle \
&=frac{1}{rho f}
end{align}

which obviously does not get the same answer as the computation above?




For reference, I was reading "Flow of Nonconvex Hypersurfaces Into Spheres" by Claus Gerhardt. The equation (2) that I wish to obtain is the equation (1.8) in his paper. In this post, I have reformulated the whole problem in my own language and notations, while also omitted some detail which I think is not relevant to my problem here. I hope my writing is correct and I apologise if this brings any inconvenience to you all.



Thanks in advance for any comment and answer.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $F_t:Sigma^ntomathbb{R}^{n+1}$ be a smooth family of immersion of a hypersurface that satisfies the inverse curvature flow:
    begin{align}
    tag1
    frac{partial F_t}{partial t}=frac{1}{f}nu.
    end{align}

    Now, suppose each $Sigma_t:=F_t(Sigma)$ is a star-shaped hypersurface in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$; that is, there exists a smooth positive function $r$ such that
    begin{align}
    Sigma_t=left{(r(theta,t),theta):thetainmathbb{S}^nright}
    end{align}

    Let $(theta^i)$ be a local coordinate system of $mathbb{S}^n$, and denote $sigma_{ij}$ the components of the round metric on $mathbb{S}^n$ with respect to $(theta^i)$. Let $nabla$ be the Levi-Civita connection on $mathbb{S}^n$ with respect to the round metric, and let $|cdot|$ be the norm induced by the round metric. Denote
    begin{align}
    rho:=sqrt{1+|nablalog r|^2}
    end{align}

    If we write the flat metric on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ by $delta=drotimes dr+r^2g_{mathbb{S}^n}$, then the unit normal vector on $Sigma_t$ can be given by
    begin{align}
    nu=frac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright)
    end{align}



    Now, the inverse curvature flow can be reduced to the following equation:
    begin{equation}
    tag2
    frac{partial r}{partial t}=frac{rho}{f}
    end{equation}

    Indeed, we have the following computation:
    begin{align}
    frac{1}{f}&=leftlanglefrac{partial F_t}{partial t},nurightrangle \
    &=leftlanglefrac{partial r}{partial t}partial_r,frac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright)rightrangle \
    &=frac{1}{rho}frac{partial r}{partial t}left[underbrace{langlepartial_r,partial_rrangle}_{=1}-nabla^ilog runderbrace{langlepartial_r,partial_irangle}_{=0}right] \
    &=frac{1}{rho}frac{partial r}{partial t}
    end{align}




    Here comes my question: What is the error in the following
    computation: begin{align} frac{partial r}{partial t}&=leftlanglefrac{partial r}{partial t}partial_r,partial_rrightrangle \
    &=leftlanglefrac{partial F_t}{partial t},partial_rrightrangle \
    &=leftlanglefrac{1}{f}nu,partial_rrightrangle \
    &=frac{1}{f}leftlanglefrac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright),partial_rrightrangle \
    &=frac{1}{rho f}
    end{align}

    which obviously does not get the same answer as the computation above?




    For reference, I was reading "Flow of Nonconvex Hypersurfaces Into Spheres" by Claus Gerhardt. The equation (2) that I wish to obtain is the equation (1.8) in his paper. In this post, I have reformulated the whole problem in my own language and notations, while also omitted some detail which I think is not relevant to my problem here. I hope my writing is correct and I apologise if this brings any inconvenience to you all.



    Thanks in advance for any comment and answer.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $F_t:Sigma^ntomathbb{R}^{n+1}$ be a smooth family of immersion of a hypersurface that satisfies the inverse curvature flow:
      begin{align}
      tag1
      frac{partial F_t}{partial t}=frac{1}{f}nu.
      end{align}

      Now, suppose each $Sigma_t:=F_t(Sigma)$ is a star-shaped hypersurface in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$; that is, there exists a smooth positive function $r$ such that
      begin{align}
      Sigma_t=left{(r(theta,t),theta):thetainmathbb{S}^nright}
      end{align}

      Let $(theta^i)$ be a local coordinate system of $mathbb{S}^n$, and denote $sigma_{ij}$ the components of the round metric on $mathbb{S}^n$ with respect to $(theta^i)$. Let $nabla$ be the Levi-Civita connection on $mathbb{S}^n$ with respect to the round metric, and let $|cdot|$ be the norm induced by the round metric. Denote
      begin{align}
      rho:=sqrt{1+|nablalog r|^2}
      end{align}

      If we write the flat metric on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ by $delta=drotimes dr+r^2g_{mathbb{S}^n}$, then the unit normal vector on $Sigma_t$ can be given by
      begin{align}
      nu=frac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright)
      end{align}



      Now, the inverse curvature flow can be reduced to the following equation:
      begin{equation}
      tag2
      frac{partial r}{partial t}=frac{rho}{f}
      end{equation}

      Indeed, we have the following computation:
      begin{align}
      frac{1}{f}&=leftlanglefrac{partial F_t}{partial t},nurightrangle \
      &=leftlanglefrac{partial r}{partial t}partial_r,frac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright)rightrangle \
      &=frac{1}{rho}frac{partial r}{partial t}left[underbrace{langlepartial_r,partial_rrangle}_{=1}-nabla^ilog runderbrace{langlepartial_r,partial_irangle}_{=0}right] \
      &=frac{1}{rho}frac{partial r}{partial t}
      end{align}




      Here comes my question: What is the error in the following
      computation: begin{align} frac{partial r}{partial t}&=leftlanglefrac{partial r}{partial t}partial_r,partial_rrightrangle \
      &=leftlanglefrac{partial F_t}{partial t},partial_rrightrangle \
      &=leftlanglefrac{1}{f}nu,partial_rrightrangle \
      &=frac{1}{f}leftlanglefrac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright),partial_rrightrangle \
      &=frac{1}{rho f}
      end{align}

      which obviously does not get the same answer as the computation above?




      For reference, I was reading "Flow of Nonconvex Hypersurfaces Into Spheres" by Claus Gerhardt. The equation (2) that I wish to obtain is the equation (1.8) in his paper. In this post, I have reformulated the whole problem in my own language and notations, while also omitted some detail which I think is not relevant to my problem here. I hope my writing is correct and I apologise if this brings any inconvenience to you all.



      Thanks in advance for any comment and answer.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $F_t:Sigma^ntomathbb{R}^{n+1}$ be a smooth family of immersion of a hypersurface that satisfies the inverse curvature flow:
      begin{align}
      tag1
      frac{partial F_t}{partial t}=frac{1}{f}nu.
      end{align}

      Now, suppose each $Sigma_t:=F_t(Sigma)$ is a star-shaped hypersurface in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$; that is, there exists a smooth positive function $r$ such that
      begin{align}
      Sigma_t=left{(r(theta,t),theta):thetainmathbb{S}^nright}
      end{align}

      Let $(theta^i)$ be a local coordinate system of $mathbb{S}^n$, and denote $sigma_{ij}$ the components of the round metric on $mathbb{S}^n$ with respect to $(theta^i)$. Let $nabla$ be the Levi-Civita connection on $mathbb{S}^n$ with respect to the round metric, and let $|cdot|$ be the norm induced by the round metric. Denote
      begin{align}
      rho:=sqrt{1+|nablalog r|^2}
      end{align}

      If we write the flat metric on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ by $delta=drotimes dr+r^2g_{mathbb{S}^n}$, then the unit normal vector on $Sigma_t$ can be given by
      begin{align}
      nu=frac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright)
      end{align}



      Now, the inverse curvature flow can be reduced to the following equation:
      begin{equation}
      tag2
      frac{partial r}{partial t}=frac{rho}{f}
      end{equation}

      Indeed, we have the following computation:
      begin{align}
      frac{1}{f}&=leftlanglefrac{partial F_t}{partial t},nurightrangle \
      &=leftlanglefrac{partial r}{partial t}partial_r,frac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright)rightrangle \
      &=frac{1}{rho}frac{partial r}{partial t}left[underbrace{langlepartial_r,partial_rrangle}_{=1}-nabla^ilog runderbrace{langlepartial_r,partial_irangle}_{=0}right] \
      &=frac{1}{rho}frac{partial r}{partial t}
      end{align}




      Here comes my question: What is the error in the following
      computation: begin{align} frac{partial r}{partial t}&=leftlanglefrac{partial r}{partial t}partial_r,partial_rrightrangle \
      &=leftlanglefrac{partial F_t}{partial t},partial_rrightrangle \
      &=leftlanglefrac{1}{f}nu,partial_rrightrangle \
      &=frac{1}{f}leftlanglefrac{1}{rho}left(partial_r-(nabla^ilog r)partial_iright),partial_rrightrangle \
      &=frac{1}{rho f}
      end{align}

      which obviously does not get the same answer as the computation above?




      For reference, I was reading "Flow of Nonconvex Hypersurfaces Into Spheres" by Claus Gerhardt. The equation (2) that I wish to obtain is the equation (1.8) in his paper. In this post, I have reformulated the whole problem in my own language and notations, while also omitted some detail which I think is not relevant to my problem here. I hope my writing is correct and I apologise if this brings any inconvenience to you all.



      Thanks in advance for any comment and answer.







      differential-geometry riemannian-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 26 at 17:21









      Hopf eccentric

      14910




      14910



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014621%2fevolution-equation-of-radial-function-of-a-star-shaped-hypersurface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014621%2fevolution-equation-of-radial-function-of-a-star-shaped-hypersurface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen