How to prove associativity of lattice?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












(a^b)^c = a^(b^c) I can understand intuitively that it is right but i am not able to write the proof.



Also i didn't understood the answer in Associativity of a lattice










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    (a^b)^c = a^(b^c) I can understand intuitively that it is right but i am not able to write the proof.



    Also i didn't understood the answer in Associativity of a lattice










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      (a^b)^c = a^(b^c) I can understand intuitively that it is right but i am not able to write the proof.



      Also i didn't understood the answer in Associativity of a lattice










      share|cite|improve this question













      (a^b)^c = a^(b^c) I can understand intuitively that it is right but i am not able to write the proof.



      Also i didn't understood the answer in Associativity of a lattice







      discrete-mathematics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 26 at 18:32









      Amit

      1398




      1398






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          If you're familiar with school course of informatics, just remember about AND (logic symbol) and act like ^ is AND.



          Or you can draw a simple picture. You need: a circle, b circle, c circle. Draw a picture as a overlaps with b, and another picture as b overlaps with c. Then add to each picture a third circle which overlaps with those two in their intersection. Voila!



          [edit] Note about informatics. Imagine that ^ is multiplication and a,b, and c can be either 1 or 0 (doesn't matter in this problem, though). Then (a*b)c=a(b*c).



          Also, "a", "b", or "c" in my text is more like "rule about a/b/c", not a,b,c themselves. This allows us to use informatics principles: rule can be either suiting (1) or not (0).






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014727%2fhow-to-prove-associativity-of-lattice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            If you're familiar with school course of informatics, just remember about AND (logic symbol) and act like ^ is AND.



            Or you can draw a simple picture. You need: a circle, b circle, c circle. Draw a picture as a overlaps with b, and another picture as b overlaps with c. Then add to each picture a third circle which overlaps with those two in their intersection. Voila!



            [edit] Note about informatics. Imagine that ^ is multiplication and a,b, and c can be either 1 or 0 (doesn't matter in this problem, though). Then (a*b)c=a(b*c).



            Also, "a", "b", or "c" in my text is more like "rule about a/b/c", not a,b,c themselves. This allows us to use informatics principles: rule can be either suiting (1) or not (0).






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              If you're familiar with school course of informatics, just remember about AND (logic symbol) and act like ^ is AND.



              Or you can draw a simple picture. You need: a circle, b circle, c circle. Draw a picture as a overlaps with b, and another picture as b overlaps with c. Then add to each picture a third circle which overlaps with those two in their intersection. Voila!



              [edit] Note about informatics. Imagine that ^ is multiplication and a,b, and c can be either 1 or 0 (doesn't matter in this problem, though). Then (a*b)c=a(b*c).



              Also, "a", "b", or "c" in my text is more like "rule about a/b/c", not a,b,c themselves. This allows us to use informatics principles: rule can be either suiting (1) or not (0).






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                If you're familiar with school course of informatics, just remember about AND (logic symbol) and act like ^ is AND.



                Or you can draw a simple picture. You need: a circle, b circle, c circle. Draw a picture as a overlaps with b, and another picture as b overlaps with c. Then add to each picture a third circle which overlaps with those two in their intersection. Voila!



                [edit] Note about informatics. Imagine that ^ is multiplication and a,b, and c can be either 1 or 0 (doesn't matter in this problem, though). Then (a*b)c=a(b*c).



                Also, "a", "b", or "c" in my text is more like "rule about a/b/c", not a,b,c themselves. This allows us to use informatics principles: rule can be either suiting (1) or not (0).






                share|cite|improve this answer














                If you're familiar with school course of informatics, just remember about AND (logic symbol) and act like ^ is AND.



                Or you can draw a simple picture. You need: a circle, b circle, c circle. Draw a picture as a overlaps with b, and another picture as b overlaps with c. Then add to each picture a third circle which overlaps with those two in their intersection. Voila!



                [edit] Note about informatics. Imagine that ^ is multiplication and a,b, and c can be either 1 or 0 (doesn't matter in this problem, though). Then (a*b)c=a(b*c).



                Also, "a", "b", or "c" in my text is more like "rule about a/b/c", not a,b,c themselves. This allows us to use informatics principles: rule can be either suiting (1) or not (0).







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 26 at 19:53

























                answered Nov 26 at 19:21









                Kelly Shepphard

                2298




                2298






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014727%2fhow-to-prove-associativity-of-lattice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen