Equality of the sums $sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$ and $sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{v^v...
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
How can one proof the equality
$$sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}=sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v!(k-v)!}$$
for $kinmathbb{N}_0$?
Induction and generating functions don't seem to be useful.
The generation function of the right sum is simply $f^2(x)$ with $displaystyle f(x):=sumlimits_{k=0}^infty frac{(xk)^k}{k!}$
but for the left sum I still don't know.
It is $displaystyle f(x)=frac{1}{1-ln g(x)}$ with $ln g(x)=xg(x)$ for $displaystyle |x|<frac{1}{e}$.
summation
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
How can one proof the equality
$$sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}=sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v!(k-v)!}$$
for $kinmathbb{N}_0$?
Induction and generating functions don't seem to be useful.
The generation function of the right sum is simply $f^2(x)$ with $displaystyle f(x):=sumlimits_{k=0}^infty frac{(xk)^k}{k!}$
but for the left sum I still don't know.
It is $displaystyle f(x)=frac{1}{1-ln g(x)}$ with $ln g(x)=xg(x)$ for $displaystyle |x|<frac{1}{e}$.
summation
Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:08
Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:10
How do I correct the headline ?
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:14
You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:23
Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:28
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
How can one proof the equality
$$sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}=sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v!(k-v)!}$$
for $kinmathbb{N}_0$?
Induction and generating functions don't seem to be useful.
The generation function of the right sum is simply $f^2(x)$ with $displaystyle f(x):=sumlimits_{k=0}^infty frac{(xk)^k}{k!}$
but for the left sum I still don't know.
It is $displaystyle f(x)=frac{1}{1-ln g(x)}$ with $ln g(x)=xg(x)$ for $displaystyle |x|<frac{1}{e}$.
summation
How can one proof the equality
$$sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}=sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v!(k-v)!}$$
for $kinmathbb{N}_0$?
Induction and generating functions don't seem to be useful.
The generation function of the right sum is simply $f^2(x)$ with $displaystyle f(x):=sumlimits_{k=0}^infty frac{(xk)^k}{k!}$
but for the left sum I still don't know.
It is $displaystyle f(x)=frac{1}{1-ln g(x)}$ with $ln g(x)=xg(x)$ for $displaystyle |x|<frac{1}{e}$.
summation
summation
edited Jul 28 '16 at 22:37
asked Jul 28 '16 at 20:06
user90369
8,173925
8,173925
Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:08
Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:10
How do I correct the headline ?
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:14
You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:23
Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:28
add a comment |
Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:08
Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:10
How do I correct the headline ?
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:14
You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:23
Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:28
Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:08
Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:08
Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:10
Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:10
How do I correct the headline ?
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:14
How do I correct the headline ?
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:14
You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:23
You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:23
Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:28
Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:28
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Recall the combinatorial class of labeled trees which is
$$deftextsc#1{dosc#1csod}
defdosc#1#2csod{{rm #1{small #2}}}mathcal{T} = mathcal{Z}times textsc{SET}(mathcal{T})$$
which immediately produces the functional equation
$$T(z) = z exp T(z)
quadtext{or}quad
z = T(z) exp(-T(z)).$$
By Cayley's theorem we have
$$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!}.$$
This yields
$$T'(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q-1}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}.$$
The functional equation yields
$$T'(z) = exp T(z) + z exp T(z) T'(z)
= frac{1}{z} T(z) + T(z) T'(z)$$
which in turn yields
$$T'(z) = frac{1}{z} frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}$$
so that
$$sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}
= frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}.$$
Now we are trying to show that
$$sum_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v! (k-v)!}
= sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$
Multiply by $k!$ to get
$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$
Start by evaluating the LHS.
Observe that when we multiply two
exponential generating functions of the sequences ${a_n}$ and
${b_n}$ we get that
$$ A(z) B(z) = sum_{nge 0} a_n frac{z^n}{n!}
sum_{nge 0} b_n frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{k!}frac{1}{(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} z^n\
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
left(sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}right)frac{z^n}{n!}$$
i.e. the product of the two generating functions is the generating
function of $$sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}.$$
In the present case we have
$$A(z) = B(z) = 1 + frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}
= frac{1}{1-T(z)} $$ by inspection.
We added the constant term to account for the fact that $v^v=1$ when
$v=0$ in the convolution. We thus have
$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! [z^k] frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2}.$$
To compute this introduce
$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2} ; dz$$
Using the functional equation we put $z=wexp(-w)$ so that $dz =
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw$ and obtain
$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp((k+1)w)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-w)^2}
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw
\ = frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp(kw)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{1-w} ; dw$$
Extracting the coefficient we get
$$k! sum_{v=0}^k [w^v] exp(kw) [w^{k-v}] frac{1}{1-w}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$$
as claimed.
Remark. This all looks very familiar but I am unable to locate the
duplicate among my papers at this time.
Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 22:42
This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
– Marko Riedel
Jul 28 '16 at 22:47
It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
– Diger
Nov 24 at 19:45
I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
– Marko Riedel
Nov 25 at 13:31
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Recall the combinatorial class of labeled trees which is
$$deftextsc#1{dosc#1csod}
defdosc#1#2csod{{rm #1{small #2}}}mathcal{T} = mathcal{Z}times textsc{SET}(mathcal{T})$$
which immediately produces the functional equation
$$T(z) = z exp T(z)
quadtext{or}quad
z = T(z) exp(-T(z)).$$
By Cayley's theorem we have
$$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!}.$$
This yields
$$T'(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q-1}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}.$$
The functional equation yields
$$T'(z) = exp T(z) + z exp T(z) T'(z)
= frac{1}{z} T(z) + T(z) T'(z)$$
which in turn yields
$$T'(z) = frac{1}{z} frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}$$
so that
$$sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}
= frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}.$$
Now we are trying to show that
$$sum_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v! (k-v)!}
= sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$
Multiply by $k!$ to get
$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$
Start by evaluating the LHS.
Observe that when we multiply two
exponential generating functions of the sequences ${a_n}$ and
${b_n}$ we get that
$$ A(z) B(z) = sum_{nge 0} a_n frac{z^n}{n!}
sum_{nge 0} b_n frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{k!}frac{1}{(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} z^n\
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
left(sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}right)frac{z^n}{n!}$$
i.e. the product of the two generating functions is the generating
function of $$sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}.$$
In the present case we have
$$A(z) = B(z) = 1 + frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}
= frac{1}{1-T(z)} $$ by inspection.
We added the constant term to account for the fact that $v^v=1$ when
$v=0$ in the convolution. We thus have
$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! [z^k] frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2}.$$
To compute this introduce
$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2} ; dz$$
Using the functional equation we put $z=wexp(-w)$ so that $dz =
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw$ and obtain
$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp((k+1)w)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-w)^2}
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw
\ = frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp(kw)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{1-w} ; dw$$
Extracting the coefficient we get
$$k! sum_{v=0}^k [w^v] exp(kw) [w^{k-v}] frac{1}{1-w}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$$
as claimed.
Remark. This all looks very familiar but I am unable to locate the
duplicate among my papers at this time.
Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 22:42
This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
– Marko Riedel
Jul 28 '16 at 22:47
It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
– Diger
Nov 24 at 19:45
I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
– Marko Riedel
Nov 25 at 13:31
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Recall the combinatorial class of labeled trees which is
$$deftextsc#1{dosc#1csod}
defdosc#1#2csod{{rm #1{small #2}}}mathcal{T} = mathcal{Z}times textsc{SET}(mathcal{T})$$
which immediately produces the functional equation
$$T(z) = z exp T(z)
quadtext{or}quad
z = T(z) exp(-T(z)).$$
By Cayley's theorem we have
$$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!}.$$
This yields
$$T'(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q-1}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}.$$
The functional equation yields
$$T'(z) = exp T(z) + z exp T(z) T'(z)
= frac{1}{z} T(z) + T(z) T'(z)$$
which in turn yields
$$T'(z) = frac{1}{z} frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}$$
so that
$$sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}
= frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}.$$
Now we are trying to show that
$$sum_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v! (k-v)!}
= sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$
Multiply by $k!$ to get
$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$
Start by evaluating the LHS.
Observe that when we multiply two
exponential generating functions of the sequences ${a_n}$ and
${b_n}$ we get that
$$ A(z) B(z) = sum_{nge 0} a_n frac{z^n}{n!}
sum_{nge 0} b_n frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{k!}frac{1}{(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} z^n\
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
left(sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}right)frac{z^n}{n!}$$
i.e. the product of the two generating functions is the generating
function of $$sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}.$$
In the present case we have
$$A(z) = B(z) = 1 + frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}
= frac{1}{1-T(z)} $$ by inspection.
We added the constant term to account for the fact that $v^v=1$ when
$v=0$ in the convolution. We thus have
$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! [z^k] frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2}.$$
To compute this introduce
$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2} ; dz$$
Using the functional equation we put $z=wexp(-w)$ so that $dz =
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw$ and obtain
$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp((k+1)w)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-w)^2}
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw
\ = frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp(kw)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{1-w} ; dw$$
Extracting the coefficient we get
$$k! sum_{v=0}^k [w^v] exp(kw) [w^{k-v}] frac{1}{1-w}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$$
as claimed.
Remark. This all looks very familiar but I am unable to locate the
duplicate among my papers at this time.
Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 22:42
This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
– Marko Riedel
Jul 28 '16 at 22:47
It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
– Diger
Nov 24 at 19:45
I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
– Marko Riedel
Nov 25 at 13:31
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Recall the combinatorial class of labeled trees which is
$$deftextsc#1{dosc#1csod}
defdosc#1#2csod{{rm #1{small #2}}}mathcal{T} = mathcal{Z}times textsc{SET}(mathcal{T})$$
which immediately produces the functional equation
$$T(z) = z exp T(z)
quadtext{or}quad
z = T(z) exp(-T(z)).$$
By Cayley's theorem we have
$$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!}.$$
This yields
$$T'(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q-1}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}.$$
The functional equation yields
$$T'(z) = exp T(z) + z exp T(z) T'(z)
= frac{1}{z} T(z) + T(z) T'(z)$$
which in turn yields
$$T'(z) = frac{1}{z} frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}$$
so that
$$sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}
= frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}.$$
Now we are trying to show that
$$sum_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v! (k-v)!}
= sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$
Multiply by $k!$ to get
$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$
Start by evaluating the LHS.
Observe that when we multiply two
exponential generating functions of the sequences ${a_n}$ and
${b_n}$ we get that
$$ A(z) B(z) = sum_{nge 0} a_n frac{z^n}{n!}
sum_{nge 0} b_n frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{k!}frac{1}{(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} z^n\
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
left(sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}right)frac{z^n}{n!}$$
i.e. the product of the two generating functions is the generating
function of $$sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}.$$
In the present case we have
$$A(z) = B(z) = 1 + frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}
= frac{1}{1-T(z)} $$ by inspection.
We added the constant term to account for the fact that $v^v=1$ when
$v=0$ in the convolution. We thus have
$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! [z^k] frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2}.$$
To compute this introduce
$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2} ; dz$$
Using the functional equation we put $z=wexp(-w)$ so that $dz =
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw$ and obtain
$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp((k+1)w)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-w)^2}
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw
\ = frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp(kw)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{1-w} ; dw$$
Extracting the coefficient we get
$$k! sum_{v=0}^k [w^v] exp(kw) [w^{k-v}] frac{1}{1-w}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$$
as claimed.
Remark. This all looks very familiar but I am unable to locate the
duplicate among my papers at this time.
Recall the combinatorial class of labeled trees which is
$$deftextsc#1{dosc#1csod}
defdosc#1#2csod{{rm #1{small #2}}}mathcal{T} = mathcal{Z}times textsc{SET}(mathcal{T})$$
which immediately produces the functional equation
$$T(z) = z exp T(z)
quadtext{or}quad
z = T(z) exp(-T(z)).$$
By Cayley's theorem we have
$$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!}.$$
This yields
$$T'(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q-1}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}.$$
The functional equation yields
$$T'(z) = exp T(z) + z exp T(z) T'(z)
= frac{1}{z} T(z) + T(z) T'(z)$$
which in turn yields
$$T'(z) = frac{1}{z} frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}$$
so that
$$sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}
= frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}.$$
Now we are trying to show that
$$sum_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v! (k-v)!}
= sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$
Multiply by $k!$ to get
$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$
Start by evaluating the LHS.
Observe that when we multiply two
exponential generating functions of the sequences ${a_n}$ and
${b_n}$ we get that
$$ A(z) B(z) = sum_{nge 0} a_n frac{z^n}{n!}
sum_{nge 0} b_n frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{k!}frac{1}{(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} z^n\
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
left(sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}right)frac{z^n}{n!}$$
i.e. the product of the two generating functions is the generating
function of $$sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}.$$
In the present case we have
$$A(z) = B(z) = 1 + frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}
= frac{1}{1-T(z)} $$ by inspection.
We added the constant term to account for the fact that $v^v=1$ when
$v=0$ in the convolution. We thus have
$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! [z^k] frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2}.$$
To compute this introduce
$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2} ; dz$$
Using the functional equation we put $z=wexp(-w)$ so that $dz =
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw$ and obtain
$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp((k+1)w)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-w)^2}
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw
\ = frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp(kw)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{1-w} ; dw$$
Extracting the coefficient we get
$$k! sum_{v=0}^k [w^v] exp(kw) [w^{k-v}] frac{1}{1-w}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$$
as claimed.
Remark. This all looks very familiar but I am unable to locate the
duplicate among my papers at this time.
edited Nov 25 at 15:01
answered Jul 28 '16 at 22:28
Marko Riedel
38.6k339106
38.6k339106
Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 22:42
This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
– Marko Riedel
Jul 28 '16 at 22:47
It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
– Diger
Nov 24 at 19:45
I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
– Marko Riedel
Nov 25 at 13:31
add a comment |
Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 22:42
This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
– Marko Riedel
Jul 28 '16 at 22:47
It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
– Diger
Nov 24 at 19:45
I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
– Marko Riedel
Nov 25 at 13:31
Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 22:42
Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 22:42
This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
– Marko Riedel
Jul 28 '16 at 22:47
This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
– Marko Riedel
Jul 28 '16 at 22:47
It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
– Diger
Nov 24 at 19:45
It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
– Diger
Nov 24 at 19:45
I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
– Marko Riedel
Nov 25 at 13:31
I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
– Marko Riedel
Nov 25 at 13:31
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1874271%2fequality-of-the-sums-sum-limits-v-0k-frackvv-and-sum-limits-v-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:08
Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:10
How do I correct the headline ?
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:14
You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:23
Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:28