Equality of the sums $sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$ and $sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{v^v...











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
3












How can one proof the equality
$$sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}=sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v!(k-v)!}$$
for $kinmathbb{N}_0$?



Induction and generating functions don't seem to be useful.



The generation function of the right sum is simply $f^2(x)$ with $displaystyle f(x):=sumlimits_{k=0}^infty frac{(xk)^k}{k!}$



but for the left sum I still don't know.



It is $displaystyle f(x)=frac{1}{1-ln g(x)}$ with $ln g(x)=xg(x)$ for $displaystyle |x|<frac{1}{e}$.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:08










  • Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:10










  • How do I correct the headline ?
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:14










  • You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:23










  • Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:28















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
3












How can one proof the equality
$$sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}=sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v!(k-v)!}$$
for $kinmathbb{N}_0$?



Induction and generating functions don't seem to be useful.



The generation function of the right sum is simply $f^2(x)$ with $displaystyle f(x):=sumlimits_{k=0}^infty frac{(xk)^k}{k!}$



but for the left sum I still don't know.



It is $displaystyle f(x)=frac{1}{1-ln g(x)}$ with $ln g(x)=xg(x)$ for $displaystyle |x|<frac{1}{e}$.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:08










  • Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:10










  • How do I correct the headline ?
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:14










  • You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:23










  • Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:28













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
3






3





How can one proof the equality
$$sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}=sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v!(k-v)!}$$
for $kinmathbb{N}_0$?



Induction and generating functions don't seem to be useful.



The generation function of the right sum is simply $f^2(x)$ with $displaystyle f(x):=sumlimits_{k=0}^infty frac{(xk)^k}{k!}$



but for the left sum I still don't know.



It is $displaystyle f(x)=frac{1}{1-ln g(x)}$ with $ln g(x)=xg(x)$ for $displaystyle |x|<frac{1}{e}$.










share|cite|improve this question















How can one proof the equality
$$sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}=sumlimits_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v!(k-v)!}$$
for $kinmathbb{N}_0$?



Induction and generating functions don't seem to be useful.



The generation function of the right sum is simply $f^2(x)$ with $displaystyle f(x):=sumlimits_{k=0}^infty frac{(xk)^k}{k!}$



but for the left sum I still don't know.



It is $displaystyle f(x)=frac{1}{1-ln g(x)}$ with $ln g(x)=xg(x)$ for $displaystyle |x|<frac{1}{e}$.







summation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 28 '16 at 22:37

























asked Jul 28 '16 at 20:06









user90369

8,173925




8,173925












  • Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:08










  • Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:10










  • How do I correct the headline ?
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:14










  • You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:23










  • Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:28


















  • Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:08










  • Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:10










  • How do I correct the headline ?
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:14










  • You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:23










  • Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 20:28
















Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:08




Try multiplying both sides by $k!$ are rewriting all of the factorials on the right as a binomial coefficient. (Not sure where that'll take you)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:08












Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:10




Sorry, I wrote a mistake. Now it's correct.
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:10












How do I correct the headline ?
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:14




How do I correct the headline ?
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:14












You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:23




You just edit it when you hit "edit"...
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 28 '16 at 20:23












Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:28




Thank you - sometimes I cannot see the wood for the trees. :-)
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 20:28










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Recall the combinatorial class of labeled trees which is



$$deftextsc#1{dosc#1csod}
defdosc#1#2csod{{rm #1{small #2}}}mathcal{T} = mathcal{Z}times textsc{SET}(mathcal{T})$$



which immediately produces the functional equation



$$T(z) = z exp T(z)
quadtext{or}quad
z = T(z) exp(-T(z)).$$



By Cayley's theorem we have



$$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!}.$$



This yields



$$T'(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q-1}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}.$$



The functional equation yields



$$T'(z) = exp T(z) + z exp T(z) T'(z)
= frac{1}{z} T(z) + T(z) T'(z)$$



which in turn yields



$$T'(z) = frac{1}{z} frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}$$



so that



$$sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}
= frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}.$$



Now we are trying to show that



$$sum_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v! (k-v)!}
= sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$



Multiply by $k!$ to get



$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$



Start by evaluating the LHS.


Observe that when we multiply two
exponential generating functions of the sequences ${a_n}$ and
${b_n}$ we get that



$$ A(z) B(z) = sum_{nge 0} a_n frac{z^n}{n!}
sum_{nge 0} b_n frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{k!}frac{1}{(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} z^n\
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
left(sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}right)frac{z^n}{n!}$$



i.e. the product of the two generating functions is the generating
function of $$sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}.$$



In the present case we have
$$A(z) = B(z) = 1 + frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}
= frac{1}{1-T(z)} $$
by inspection.





We added the constant term to account for the fact that $v^v=1$ when
$v=0$ in the convolution. We thus have



$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! [z^k] frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2}.$$



To compute this introduce



$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2} ; dz$$



Using the functional equation we put $z=wexp(-w)$ so that $dz =
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw$
and obtain



$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp((k+1)w)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-w)^2}
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw
\ = frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp(kw)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{1-w} ; dw$$



Extracting the coefficient we get



$$k! sum_{v=0}^k [w^v] exp(kw) [w^{k-v}] frac{1}{1-w}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$$



as claimed.



Remark. This all looks very familiar but I am unable to locate the
duplicate among my papers at this time.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 22:42












  • This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
    – Marko Riedel
    Jul 28 '16 at 22:47










  • It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
    – Diger
    Nov 24 at 19:45












  • I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
    – Marko Riedel
    Nov 25 at 13:31











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1874271%2fequality-of-the-sums-sum-limits-v-0k-frackvv-and-sum-limits-v-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Recall the combinatorial class of labeled trees which is



$$deftextsc#1{dosc#1csod}
defdosc#1#2csod{{rm #1{small #2}}}mathcal{T} = mathcal{Z}times textsc{SET}(mathcal{T})$$



which immediately produces the functional equation



$$T(z) = z exp T(z)
quadtext{or}quad
z = T(z) exp(-T(z)).$$



By Cayley's theorem we have



$$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!}.$$



This yields



$$T'(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q-1}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}.$$



The functional equation yields



$$T'(z) = exp T(z) + z exp T(z) T'(z)
= frac{1}{z} T(z) + T(z) T'(z)$$



which in turn yields



$$T'(z) = frac{1}{z} frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}$$



so that



$$sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}
= frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}.$$



Now we are trying to show that



$$sum_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v! (k-v)!}
= sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$



Multiply by $k!$ to get



$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$



Start by evaluating the LHS.


Observe that when we multiply two
exponential generating functions of the sequences ${a_n}$ and
${b_n}$ we get that



$$ A(z) B(z) = sum_{nge 0} a_n frac{z^n}{n!}
sum_{nge 0} b_n frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{k!}frac{1}{(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} z^n\
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
left(sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}right)frac{z^n}{n!}$$



i.e. the product of the two generating functions is the generating
function of $$sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}.$$



In the present case we have
$$A(z) = B(z) = 1 + frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}
= frac{1}{1-T(z)} $$
by inspection.





We added the constant term to account for the fact that $v^v=1$ when
$v=0$ in the convolution. We thus have



$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! [z^k] frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2}.$$



To compute this introduce



$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2} ; dz$$



Using the functional equation we put $z=wexp(-w)$ so that $dz =
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw$
and obtain



$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp((k+1)w)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-w)^2}
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw
\ = frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp(kw)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{1-w} ; dw$$



Extracting the coefficient we get



$$k! sum_{v=0}^k [w^v] exp(kw) [w^{k-v}] frac{1}{1-w}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$$



as claimed.



Remark. This all looks very familiar but I am unable to locate the
duplicate among my papers at this time.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 22:42












  • This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
    – Marko Riedel
    Jul 28 '16 at 22:47










  • It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
    – Diger
    Nov 24 at 19:45












  • I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
    – Marko Riedel
    Nov 25 at 13:31















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Recall the combinatorial class of labeled trees which is



$$deftextsc#1{dosc#1csod}
defdosc#1#2csod{{rm #1{small #2}}}mathcal{T} = mathcal{Z}times textsc{SET}(mathcal{T})$$



which immediately produces the functional equation



$$T(z) = z exp T(z)
quadtext{or}quad
z = T(z) exp(-T(z)).$$



By Cayley's theorem we have



$$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!}.$$



This yields



$$T'(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q-1}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}.$$



The functional equation yields



$$T'(z) = exp T(z) + z exp T(z) T'(z)
= frac{1}{z} T(z) + T(z) T'(z)$$



which in turn yields



$$T'(z) = frac{1}{z} frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}$$



so that



$$sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}
= frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}.$$



Now we are trying to show that



$$sum_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v! (k-v)!}
= sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$



Multiply by $k!$ to get



$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$



Start by evaluating the LHS.


Observe that when we multiply two
exponential generating functions of the sequences ${a_n}$ and
${b_n}$ we get that



$$ A(z) B(z) = sum_{nge 0} a_n frac{z^n}{n!}
sum_{nge 0} b_n frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{k!}frac{1}{(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} z^n\
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
left(sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}right)frac{z^n}{n!}$$



i.e. the product of the two generating functions is the generating
function of $$sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}.$$



In the present case we have
$$A(z) = B(z) = 1 + frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}
= frac{1}{1-T(z)} $$
by inspection.





We added the constant term to account for the fact that $v^v=1$ when
$v=0$ in the convolution. We thus have



$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! [z^k] frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2}.$$



To compute this introduce



$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2} ; dz$$



Using the functional equation we put $z=wexp(-w)$ so that $dz =
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw$
and obtain



$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp((k+1)w)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-w)^2}
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw
\ = frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp(kw)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{1-w} ; dw$$



Extracting the coefficient we get



$$k! sum_{v=0}^k [w^v] exp(kw) [w^{k-v}] frac{1}{1-w}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$$



as claimed.



Remark. This all looks very familiar but I am unable to locate the
duplicate among my papers at this time.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 22:42












  • This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
    – Marko Riedel
    Jul 28 '16 at 22:47










  • It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
    – Diger
    Nov 24 at 19:45












  • I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
    – Marko Riedel
    Nov 25 at 13:31













up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






Recall the combinatorial class of labeled trees which is



$$deftextsc#1{dosc#1csod}
defdosc#1#2csod{{rm #1{small #2}}}mathcal{T} = mathcal{Z}times textsc{SET}(mathcal{T})$$



which immediately produces the functional equation



$$T(z) = z exp T(z)
quadtext{or}quad
z = T(z) exp(-T(z)).$$



By Cayley's theorem we have



$$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!}.$$



This yields



$$T'(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q-1}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}.$$



The functional equation yields



$$T'(z) = exp T(z) + z exp T(z) T'(z)
= frac{1}{z} T(z) + T(z) T'(z)$$



which in turn yields



$$T'(z) = frac{1}{z} frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}$$



so that



$$sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}
= frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}.$$



Now we are trying to show that



$$sum_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v! (k-v)!}
= sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$



Multiply by $k!$ to get



$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$



Start by evaluating the LHS.


Observe that when we multiply two
exponential generating functions of the sequences ${a_n}$ and
${b_n}$ we get that



$$ A(z) B(z) = sum_{nge 0} a_n frac{z^n}{n!}
sum_{nge 0} b_n frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{k!}frac{1}{(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} z^n\
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
left(sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}right)frac{z^n}{n!}$$



i.e. the product of the two generating functions is the generating
function of $$sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}.$$



In the present case we have
$$A(z) = B(z) = 1 + frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}
= frac{1}{1-T(z)} $$
by inspection.





We added the constant term to account for the fact that $v^v=1$ when
$v=0$ in the convolution. We thus have



$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! [z^k] frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2}.$$



To compute this introduce



$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2} ; dz$$



Using the functional equation we put $z=wexp(-w)$ so that $dz =
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw$
and obtain



$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp((k+1)w)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-w)^2}
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw
\ = frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp(kw)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{1-w} ; dw$$



Extracting the coefficient we get



$$k! sum_{v=0}^k [w^v] exp(kw) [w^{k-v}] frac{1}{1-w}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$$



as claimed.



Remark. This all looks very familiar but I am unable to locate the
duplicate among my papers at this time.






share|cite|improve this answer














Recall the combinatorial class of labeled trees which is



$$deftextsc#1{dosc#1csod}
defdosc#1#2csod{{rm #1{small #2}}}mathcal{T} = mathcal{Z}times textsc{SET}(mathcal{T})$$



which immediately produces the functional equation



$$T(z) = z exp T(z)
quadtext{or}quad
z = T(z) exp(-T(z)).$$



By Cayley's theorem we have



$$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!}.$$



This yields



$$T'(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q-1}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^{q}}{(q-1)!}
= frac{1}{z} sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}.$$



The functional equation yields



$$T'(z) = exp T(z) + z exp T(z) T'(z)
= frac{1}{z} T(z) + T(z) T'(z)$$



which in turn yields



$$T'(z) = frac{1}{z} frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}$$



so that



$$sum_{qge 1} q^{q} frac{z^{q}}{q!}
= frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}.$$



Now we are trying to show that



$$sum_{v=0}^k frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v! (k-v)!}
= sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$



Multiply by $k!$ to get



$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}.$$



Start by evaluating the LHS.


Observe that when we multiply two
exponential generating functions of the sequences ${a_n}$ and
${b_n}$ we get that



$$ A(z) B(z) = sum_{nge 0} a_n frac{z^n}{n!}
sum_{nge 0} b_n frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{k!}frac{1}{(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} z^n\
= sum_{nge 0}
sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} a_k b_{n-k} frac{z^n}{n!}
= sum_{nge 0}
left(sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}right)frac{z^n}{n!}$$



i.e. the product of the two generating functions is the generating
function of $$sum_{k=0}^n {nchoose k} a_k b_{n-k}.$$



In the present case we have
$$A(z) = B(z) = 1 + frac{T(z)}{1-T(z)}
= frac{1}{1-T(z)} $$
by inspection.





We added the constant term to account for the fact that $v^v=1$ when
$v=0$ in the convolution. We thus have



$$sum_{v=0}^k {kchoose v} v^v (k-v)^{k-v}
= k! [z^k] frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2}.$$



To compute this introduce



$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-T(z))^2} ; dz$$



Using the functional equation we put $z=wexp(-w)$ so that $dz =
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw$
and obtain



$$frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp((k+1)w)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{(1-w)^2}
(exp(-w)-wexp(-w)) ; dw
\ = frac{k!}{2pi i}
int_{|w|=gamma}
frac{exp(kw)}{w^{k+1}} frac{1}{1-w} ; dw$$



Extracting the coefficient we get



$$k! sum_{v=0}^k [w^v] exp(kw) [w^{k-v}] frac{1}{1-w}
= k! sum_{v=0}^k frac{k^v}{v!}$$



as claimed.



Remark. This all looks very familiar but I am unable to locate the
duplicate among my papers at this time.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 25 at 15:01

























answered Jul 28 '16 at 22:28









Marko Riedel

38.6k339106




38.6k339106












  • Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 22:42












  • This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
    – Marko Riedel
    Jul 28 '16 at 22:47










  • It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
    – Diger
    Nov 24 at 19:45












  • I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
    – Marko Riedel
    Nov 25 at 13:31


















  • Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
    – user90369
    Jul 28 '16 at 22:42












  • This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
    – Marko Riedel
    Jul 28 '16 at 22:47










  • It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
    – Diger
    Nov 24 at 19:45












  • I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
    – Marko Riedel
    Nov 25 at 13:31
















Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 22:42






Very nice but hard to understand. Thank you very much for your efforts!
– user90369
Jul 28 '16 at 22:42














This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
– Marko Riedel
Jul 28 '16 at 22:47




This is very kind. Here is a MSE link to a similar computation. Maybe it helps. These types of problems (convolutions of terms in the labeled tree function) actually appear quite frequently.
– Marko Riedel
Jul 28 '16 at 22:47












It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
– Diger
Nov 24 at 19:45






It's not necessary to understand for what follows, but I'd still like to know how precisely you apply Cayleys Theorem to obtain $$T(z) = sum_{qge 1} q^{q-1} frac{z^q}{q!} , .$$
– Diger
Nov 24 at 19:45














I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
– Marko Riedel
Nov 25 at 13:31




I guess it should have been Cayley's formula as opposed to "theorem". Also consult Lambert W function.
– Marko Riedel
Nov 25 at 13:31


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1874271%2fequality-of-the-sums-sum-limits-v-0k-frackvv-and-sum-limits-v-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen