Show that the space $S$ of real sequences that are $0$ after a certain rank is not complete with the uniform...
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Show that the space $S$ of all real sequences that are $0$ after a certain rank is not complete with the uniform norm. Find a metric space $X$ such that $bar{S} = X.$
I took the sequence $x_{k}^{n}=(1,1/2,1/3,cdots ,1/n,0,0,cdots)$ then for $ngeq m$
$$||x_{k}^{n}-x_{k}^{m}||_{infty}leq frac{1}{m+1}to 0$$ and so the sequence ${x^{n}_{k}}$ is Cauchy. However it is not convergent since the limit $x=(1,1/2,1/3,cdots)$ does not belong to $S.$ So $S$ is not complete. Next, I am guessing that $X= l^{infty},$ but I am not sure how to prove this. Any hints will be much appreicated.
real-analysis functional-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Show that the space $S$ of all real sequences that are $0$ after a certain rank is not complete with the uniform norm. Find a metric space $X$ such that $bar{S} = X.$
I took the sequence $x_{k}^{n}=(1,1/2,1/3,cdots ,1/n,0,0,cdots)$ then for $ngeq m$
$$||x_{k}^{n}-x_{k}^{m}||_{infty}leq frac{1}{m+1}to 0$$ and so the sequence ${x^{n}_{k}}$ is Cauchy. However it is not convergent since the limit $x=(1,1/2,1/3,cdots)$ does not belong to $S.$ So $S$ is not complete. Next, I am guessing that $X= l^{infty},$ but I am not sure how to prove this. Any hints will be much appreicated.
real-analysis functional-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Show that the space $S$ of all real sequences that are $0$ after a certain rank is not complete with the uniform norm. Find a metric space $X$ such that $bar{S} = X.$
I took the sequence $x_{k}^{n}=(1,1/2,1/3,cdots ,1/n,0,0,cdots)$ then for $ngeq m$
$$||x_{k}^{n}-x_{k}^{m}||_{infty}leq frac{1}{m+1}to 0$$ and so the sequence ${x^{n}_{k}}$ is Cauchy. However it is not convergent since the limit $x=(1,1/2,1/3,cdots)$ does not belong to $S.$ So $S$ is not complete. Next, I am guessing that $X= l^{infty},$ but I am not sure how to prove this. Any hints will be much appreicated.
real-analysis functional-analysis
Show that the space $S$ of all real sequences that are $0$ after a certain rank is not complete with the uniform norm. Find a metric space $X$ such that $bar{S} = X.$
I took the sequence $x_{k}^{n}=(1,1/2,1/3,cdots ,1/n,0,0,cdots)$ then for $ngeq m$
$$||x_{k}^{n}-x_{k}^{m}||_{infty}leq frac{1}{m+1}to 0$$ and so the sequence ${x^{n}_{k}}$ is Cauchy. However it is not convergent since the limit $x=(1,1/2,1/3,cdots)$ does not belong to $S.$ So $S$ is not complete. Next, I am guessing that $X= l^{infty},$ but I am not sure how to prove this. Any hints will be much appreicated.
real-analysis functional-analysis
real-analysis functional-analysis
asked Nov 25 at 16:47
Hello_World
3,82521630
3,82521630
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If $X=ell^{infty}$, then you would be able to approximate the element
$$bar{x}=(1,1,1,dots) $$
with eventually vanishing sequences. This is clearly not true. So $X$ is a smaller space.
More generally the problem is represent by elements containing infinitely many elements larger than $varepsilon$ for some $varepsilon>0$. Indeed, in this case, if $left{x^kright}_{kin mathbb{N}}subset S$, we have
$$|x^k-bar{x}|_{infty}geq varepsilon $$
and so $x^knot to bar{x}$. But these are precisely the elements $bar{x}=(bar{x}_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}$ such that $lim_{nto +infty}bar{x}_nneq 0$. So we might guess that
$$X=left{x=(x_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}in ell^{infty}:lim_{nto +infty}x_n=0right} $$
it remains to verify that indeed, each element $xin X$ can be approximated by a sequence $left{x^kright}_{kin mathbb{N}}$ elements in $S$, and this is easily done by truncating the sequence $(x_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}$ at the $k$-th index.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If $X=ell^{infty}$, then you would be able to approximate the element
$$bar{x}=(1,1,1,dots) $$
with eventually vanishing sequences. This is clearly not true. So $X$ is a smaller space.
More generally the problem is represent by elements containing infinitely many elements larger than $varepsilon$ for some $varepsilon>0$. Indeed, in this case, if $left{x^kright}_{kin mathbb{N}}subset S$, we have
$$|x^k-bar{x}|_{infty}geq varepsilon $$
and so $x^knot to bar{x}$. But these are precisely the elements $bar{x}=(bar{x}_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}$ such that $lim_{nto +infty}bar{x}_nneq 0$. So we might guess that
$$X=left{x=(x_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}in ell^{infty}:lim_{nto +infty}x_n=0right} $$
it remains to verify that indeed, each element $xin X$ can be approximated by a sequence $left{x^kright}_{kin mathbb{N}}$ elements in $S$, and this is easily done by truncating the sequence $(x_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}$ at the $k$-th index.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If $X=ell^{infty}$, then you would be able to approximate the element
$$bar{x}=(1,1,1,dots) $$
with eventually vanishing sequences. This is clearly not true. So $X$ is a smaller space.
More generally the problem is represent by elements containing infinitely many elements larger than $varepsilon$ for some $varepsilon>0$. Indeed, in this case, if $left{x^kright}_{kin mathbb{N}}subset S$, we have
$$|x^k-bar{x}|_{infty}geq varepsilon $$
and so $x^knot to bar{x}$. But these are precisely the elements $bar{x}=(bar{x}_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}$ such that $lim_{nto +infty}bar{x}_nneq 0$. So we might guess that
$$X=left{x=(x_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}in ell^{infty}:lim_{nto +infty}x_n=0right} $$
it remains to verify that indeed, each element $xin X$ can be approximated by a sequence $left{x^kright}_{kin mathbb{N}}$ elements in $S$, and this is easily done by truncating the sequence $(x_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}$ at the $k$-th index.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If $X=ell^{infty}$, then you would be able to approximate the element
$$bar{x}=(1,1,1,dots) $$
with eventually vanishing sequences. This is clearly not true. So $X$ is a smaller space.
More generally the problem is represent by elements containing infinitely many elements larger than $varepsilon$ for some $varepsilon>0$. Indeed, in this case, if $left{x^kright}_{kin mathbb{N}}subset S$, we have
$$|x^k-bar{x}|_{infty}geq varepsilon $$
and so $x^knot to bar{x}$. But these are precisely the elements $bar{x}=(bar{x}_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}$ such that $lim_{nto +infty}bar{x}_nneq 0$. So we might guess that
$$X=left{x=(x_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}in ell^{infty}:lim_{nto +infty}x_n=0right} $$
it remains to verify that indeed, each element $xin X$ can be approximated by a sequence $left{x^kright}_{kin mathbb{N}}$ elements in $S$, and this is easily done by truncating the sequence $(x_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}$ at the $k$-th index.
If $X=ell^{infty}$, then you would be able to approximate the element
$$bar{x}=(1,1,1,dots) $$
with eventually vanishing sequences. This is clearly not true. So $X$ is a smaller space.
More generally the problem is represent by elements containing infinitely many elements larger than $varepsilon$ for some $varepsilon>0$. Indeed, in this case, if $left{x^kright}_{kin mathbb{N}}subset S$, we have
$$|x^k-bar{x}|_{infty}geq varepsilon $$
and so $x^knot to bar{x}$. But these are precisely the elements $bar{x}=(bar{x}_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}$ such that $lim_{nto +infty}bar{x}_nneq 0$. So we might guess that
$$X=left{x=(x_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}in ell^{infty}:lim_{nto +infty}x_n=0right} $$
it remains to verify that indeed, each element $xin X$ can be approximated by a sequence $left{x^kright}_{kin mathbb{N}}$ elements in $S$, and this is easily done by truncating the sequence $(x_n)_{nin mathbb{N}}$ at the $k$-th index.
answered Nov 25 at 17:08
Lorenzo Quarisa
3,146316
3,146316
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013067%2fshow-that-the-space-s-of-real-sequences-that-are-0-after-a-certain-rank-is-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown