Help with Autonne-Takagi factorization of a complex symmetric matrix.











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Let $A=A_1i+A_2$ with $A$ non singular. Now let



$$B =begin{bmatrix}
A_1 & A_2\
A_2 & -A_1
end{bmatrix}$$



With $A_1$, $A_2$ and $B$ symmetric. Is it true that:



1) $B$ is non singular



2) $B begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}=lambda begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}$
if and only if $B begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}=-lambda begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}$
so the
eigenvalues of $B$ appear in $+-$ pairs.



3) Let $begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \
-y_1
end{bmatrix},dots, begin{bmatrix}
x_n \
-y_n
end{bmatrix}$
be the orthonormal eigenvectors of $B$ associated
with its positive eigenvalues $lambda_1,dots,lambda_n$. Let $X=begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & dots & x_n
end{bmatrix}$
, $Y=begin{bmatrix}
y_1 & dots & y_n
end{bmatrix}$
, $Sigma=diag(lambda_1,dots,lambda_n)$, $V =begin{bmatrix}
X & Y\
-Y & X
end{bmatrix}$
and $Lambda = Sigma oplus (-Sigma)$. Then $V$ is real orthogonal and $B = VLambda V^T$. Let $U = X - iY$.
Explain why $U$ is unitary and show that $USigma U ^T=A$.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Can you show your ideas about the problem?
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '14 at 9:05










  • 1)I think that DET(B)=DET($-A_1^2$-$A_2^2$) since A is non singular $-A_1^2-A_2^2 neq 0$ then B is non sigular. 2) can be seen by doing the plain calculation but I don't know if there is another way 3) Since A can be written as $U Sigma U$ and $Sigma$ has the eigenvalues of A, according to the takagi factorization U is unitary. But it sounds still vague...
    – Paula
    Apr 19 '14 at 9:32

















up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Let $A=A_1i+A_2$ with $A$ non singular. Now let



$$B =begin{bmatrix}
A_1 & A_2\
A_2 & -A_1
end{bmatrix}$$



With $A_1$, $A_2$ and $B$ symmetric. Is it true that:



1) $B$ is non singular



2) $B begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}=lambda begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}$
if and only if $B begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}=-lambda begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}$
so the
eigenvalues of $B$ appear in $+-$ pairs.



3) Let $begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \
-y_1
end{bmatrix},dots, begin{bmatrix}
x_n \
-y_n
end{bmatrix}$
be the orthonormal eigenvectors of $B$ associated
with its positive eigenvalues $lambda_1,dots,lambda_n$. Let $X=begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & dots & x_n
end{bmatrix}$
, $Y=begin{bmatrix}
y_1 & dots & y_n
end{bmatrix}$
, $Sigma=diag(lambda_1,dots,lambda_n)$, $V =begin{bmatrix}
X & Y\
-Y & X
end{bmatrix}$
and $Lambda = Sigma oplus (-Sigma)$. Then $V$ is real orthogonal and $B = VLambda V^T$. Let $U = X - iY$.
Explain why $U$ is unitary and show that $USigma U ^T=A$.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Can you show your ideas about the problem?
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '14 at 9:05










  • 1)I think that DET(B)=DET($-A_1^2$-$A_2^2$) since A is non singular $-A_1^2-A_2^2 neq 0$ then B is non sigular. 2) can be seen by doing the plain calculation but I don't know if there is another way 3) Since A can be written as $U Sigma U$ and $Sigma$ has the eigenvalues of A, according to the takagi factorization U is unitary. But it sounds still vague...
    – Paula
    Apr 19 '14 at 9:32















up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite











Let $A=A_1i+A_2$ with $A$ non singular. Now let



$$B =begin{bmatrix}
A_1 & A_2\
A_2 & -A_1
end{bmatrix}$$



With $A_1$, $A_2$ and $B$ symmetric. Is it true that:



1) $B$ is non singular



2) $B begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}=lambda begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}$
if and only if $B begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}=-lambda begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}$
so the
eigenvalues of $B$ appear in $+-$ pairs.



3) Let $begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \
-y_1
end{bmatrix},dots, begin{bmatrix}
x_n \
-y_n
end{bmatrix}$
be the orthonormal eigenvectors of $B$ associated
with its positive eigenvalues $lambda_1,dots,lambda_n$. Let $X=begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & dots & x_n
end{bmatrix}$
, $Y=begin{bmatrix}
y_1 & dots & y_n
end{bmatrix}$
, $Sigma=diag(lambda_1,dots,lambda_n)$, $V =begin{bmatrix}
X & Y\
-Y & X
end{bmatrix}$
and $Lambda = Sigma oplus (-Sigma)$. Then $V$ is real orthogonal and $B = VLambda V^T$. Let $U = X - iY$.
Explain why $U$ is unitary and show that $USigma U ^T=A$.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $A=A_1i+A_2$ with $A$ non singular. Now let



$$B =begin{bmatrix}
A_1 & A_2\
A_2 & -A_1
end{bmatrix}$$



With $A_1$, $A_2$ and $B$ symmetric. Is it true that:



1) $B$ is non singular



2) $B begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}=lambda begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}$
if and only if $B begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}=-lambda begin{bmatrix}
x \
-y
end{bmatrix}$
so the
eigenvalues of $B$ appear in $+-$ pairs.



3) Let $begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \
-y_1
end{bmatrix},dots, begin{bmatrix}
x_n \
-y_n
end{bmatrix}$
be the orthonormal eigenvectors of $B$ associated
with its positive eigenvalues $lambda_1,dots,lambda_n$. Let $X=begin{bmatrix}
x_1 & dots & x_n
end{bmatrix}$
, $Y=begin{bmatrix}
y_1 & dots & y_n
end{bmatrix}$
, $Sigma=diag(lambda_1,dots,lambda_n)$, $V =begin{bmatrix}
X & Y\
-Y & X
end{bmatrix}$
and $Lambda = Sigma oplus (-Sigma)$. Then $V$ is real orthogonal and $B = VLambda V^T$. Let $U = X - iY$.
Explain why $U$ is unitary and show that $USigma U ^T=A$.







matrices factoring symmetry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 25 at 17:19









A.Γ.

21.5k22455




21.5k22455










asked Apr 19 '14 at 8:39









Paula

312




312












  • Can you show your ideas about the problem?
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '14 at 9:05










  • 1)I think that DET(B)=DET($-A_1^2$-$A_2^2$) since A is non singular $-A_1^2-A_2^2 neq 0$ then B is non sigular. 2) can be seen by doing the plain calculation but I don't know if there is another way 3) Since A can be written as $U Sigma U$ and $Sigma$ has the eigenvalues of A, according to the takagi factorization U is unitary. But it sounds still vague...
    – Paula
    Apr 19 '14 at 9:32




















  • Can you show your ideas about the problem?
    – egreg
    Apr 19 '14 at 9:05










  • 1)I think that DET(B)=DET($-A_1^2$-$A_2^2$) since A is non singular $-A_1^2-A_2^2 neq 0$ then B is non sigular. 2) can be seen by doing the plain calculation but I don't know if there is another way 3) Since A can be written as $U Sigma U$ and $Sigma$ has the eigenvalues of A, according to the takagi factorization U is unitary. But it sounds still vague...
    – Paula
    Apr 19 '14 at 9:32


















Can you show your ideas about the problem?
– egreg
Apr 19 '14 at 9:05




Can you show your ideas about the problem?
– egreg
Apr 19 '14 at 9:05












1)I think that DET(B)=DET($-A_1^2$-$A_2^2$) since A is non singular $-A_1^2-A_2^2 neq 0$ then B is non sigular. 2) can be seen by doing the plain calculation but I don't know if there is another way 3) Since A can be written as $U Sigma U$ and $Sigma$ has the eigenvalues of A, according to the takagi factorization U is unitary. But it sounds still vague...
– Paula
Apr 19 '14 at 9:32






1)I think that DET(B)=DET($-A_1^2$-$A_2^2$) since A is non singular $-A_1^2-A_2^2 neq 0$ then B is non sigular. 2) can be seen by doing the plain calculation but I don't know if there is another way 3) Since A can be written as $U Sigma U$ and $Sigma$ has the eigenvalues of A, according to the takagi factorization U is unitary. But it sounds still vague...
– Paula
Apr 19 '14 at 9:32












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













I am not going to do the homework for you. I have two remarks, though.




  1. Part (1) is actually true for any real matrices $A_1$ and $A_2$. It has nothing to do with matrix symmetry. Note that
    $$
    pmatrix{I&-iI\ 0&I} pmatrix{A_1&A_2\ A_2&-A_1} pmatrix{I&0\ iI&I}
    = pmatrix{0&A_2+iA_1\ A_2-iA_1&-A_1}
    $$
    and
    $$
    det(A_2+iA_1),det(A_2-iA_1)=det(A_2+iA_1),overline{det(A_2+iA_1)}=
    |det(A_2+iA_1)|^2.
    $$

  2. Part (2) as it stands is false. Since $B$ is nonsingular, $lambdane0$. Therefore $lambda$ and $-lambda$ are different eigenvalues and they cannot share the same eigenvector $pmatrix{x\ -y}$. The correct statement should be this: if $lambda$ and $pmatrix{x\ -y}$ form an eigenpair of $B$, then $-lambda$ and $pmatrix{y\ x}$ is also an eigenpair of $B$. Therefore, eigenvalues of $B$ occur in pairs of the form $pmlambda$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f760197%2fhelp-with-autonne-takagi-factorization-of-a-complex-symmetric-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I am not going to do the homework for you. I have two remarks, though.




    1. Part (1) is actually true for any real matrices $A_1$ and $A_2$. It has nothing to do with matrix symmetry. Note that
      $$
      pmatrix{I&-iI\ 0&I} pmatrix{A_1&A_2\ A_2&-A_1} pmatrix{I&0\ iI&I}
      = pmatrix{0&A_2+iA_1\ A_2-iA_1&-A_1}
      $$
      and
      $$
      det(A_2+iA_1),det(A_2-iA_1)=det(A_2+iA_1),overline{det(A_2+iA_1)}=
      |det(A_2+iA_1)|^2.
      $$

    2. Part (2) as it stands is false. Since $B$ is nonsingular, $lambdane0$. Therefore $lambda$ and $-lambda$ are different eigenvalues and they cannot share the same eigenvector $pmatrix{x\ -y}$. The correct statement should be this: if $lambda$ and $pmatrix{x\ -y}$ form an eigenpair of $B$, then $-lambda$ and $pmatrix{y\ x}$ is also an eigenpair of $B$. Therefore, eigenvalues of $B$ occur in pairs of the form $pmlambda$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      I am not going to do the homework for you. I have two remarks, though.




      1. Part (1) is actually true for any real matrices $A_1$ and $A_2$. It has nothing to do with matrix symmetry. Note that
        $$
        pmatrix{I&-iI\ 0&I} pmatrix{A_1&A_2\ A_2&-A_1} pmatrix{I&0\ iI&I}
        = pmatrix{0&A_2+iA_1\ A_2-iA_1&-A_1}
        $$
        and
        $$
        det(A_2+iA_1),det(A_2-iA_1)=det(A_2+iA_1),overline{det(A_2+iA_1)}=
        |det(A_2+iA_1)|^2.
        $$

      2. Part (2) as it stands is false. Since $B$ is nonsingular, $lambdane0$. Therefore $lambda$ and $-lambda$ are different eigenvalues and they cannot share the same eigenvector $pmatrix{x\ -y}$. The correct statement should be this: if $lambda$ and $pmatrix{x\ -y}$ form an eigenpair of $B$, then $-lambda$ and $pmatrix{y\ x}$ is also an eigenpair of $B$. Therefore, eigenvalues of $B$ occur in pairs of the form $pmlambda$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        I am not going to do the homework for you. I have two remarks, though.




        1. Part (1) is actually true for any real matrices $A_1$ and $A_2$. It has nothing to do with matrix symmetry. Note that
          $$
          pmatrix{I&-iI\ 0&I} pmatrix{A_1&A_2\ A_2&-A_1} pmatrix{I&0\ iI&I}
          = pmatrix{0&A_2+iA_1\ A_2-iA_1&-A_1}
          $$
          and
          $$
          det(A_2+iA_1),det(A_2-iA_1)=det(A_2+iA_1),overline{det(A_2+iA_1)}=
          |det(A_2+iA_1)|^2.
          $$

        2. Part (2) as it stands is false. Since $B$ is nonsingular, $lambdane0$. Therefore $lambda$ and $-lambda$ are different eigenvalues and they cannot share the same eigenvector $pmatrix{x\ -y}$. The correct statement should be this: if $lambda$ and $pmatrix{x\ -y}$ form an eigenpair of $B$, then $-lambda$ and $pmatrix{y\ x}$ is also an eigenpair of $B$. Therefore, eigenvalues of $B$ occur in pairs of the form $pmlambda$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        I am not going to do the homework for you. I have two remarks, though.




        1. Part (1) is actually true for any real matrices $A_1$ and $A_2$. It has nothing to do with matrix symmetry. Note that
          $$
          pmatrix{I&-iI\ 0&I} pmatrix{A_1&A_2\ A_2&-A_1} pmatrix{I&0\ iI&I}
          = pmatrix{0&A_2+iA_1\ A_2-iA_1&-A_1}
          $$
          and
          $$
          det(A_2+iA_1),det(A_2-iA_1)=det(A_2+iA_1),overline{det(A_2+iA_1)}=
          |det(A_2+iA_1)|^2.
          $$

        2. Part (2) as it stands is false. Since $B$ is nonsingular, $lambdane0$. Therefore $lambda$ and $-lambda$ are different eigenvalues and they cannot share the same eigenvector $pmatrix{x\ -y}$. The correct statement should be this: if $lambda$ and $pmatrix{x\ -y}$ form an eigenpair of $B$, then $-lambda$ and $pmatrix{y\ x}$ is also an eigenpair of $B$. Therefore, eigenvalues of $B$ occur in pairs of the form $pmlambda$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 19 '14 at 12:14









        user1551

        71k566125




        71k566125






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f760197%2fhelp-with-autonne-takagi-factorization-of-a-complex-symmetric-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen