Infinite sequence of integers has infinitely many prime divisors











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Problem: For a sequence ${a_i}_{ige 1}$ consisting of only positive integers, prove that if for all different positive integers $i$ and $j$, we have $a_i nmid a_j$ , then
$${pcolon p text{ is a prime and } pmid a_i text{ for some } i}$$
is an infinite set.



I have a solution to this problem, but if you read my solution (which I have posted below) then you can see that it is kind of vague, not the type you can write in some contest. It is because I am not particularly trained in linear algebra. So I was hoping for someone to make my solution more rigorous. Also rather than posting a new solution, please tell me how I can improve my solution.



Thanks in advance.



My approach:



(1)Some motivation (Must read, because I have introduced some definitions here which I have used in the solution): Hmmm... the method of contradiction is the best way with this kind of problems. So let's assume that there are only finitely many primes in the set. OK let us consider the simplest case: there are only $2$ primes in the set. Then we can associate a two dimensional vector (with non-negative integer components) to all the elements of the sequence. Now observe that if $(a,b)$ is an element of the sequence then $(x,y)$ can't be an element of the sequence iff both $xge a$ and $yge b$ or $xle a$ and $yle b$. Now let us look at its geometrical interpretation by tossing the vectors onto the Cartesian plane. Planes where we can place points will be called safe region and the rest is danger region. Notice that there are two kinds of safe region: i)solid safe region, safe regions which has one of the axis as its border line and stretches infinitely, ii) lofty region, which is not in touch with any of the axis. Observe that if you keep placing more and more points in the solid region, it gradually gets thinner and thinner and ultimately it collapses to the axis. And since the lofty regions are finite, we can cover them with finitely many points (It is not hard to see that there are only finitely many lofty regions). Hmm..so the 2-D case seems doable. But we are still far from a complete solution. Indeed, what about 3-D and higher dimensional cases? The 3-D case initially looks like the corner of a box with some kind of layer glued to the 3 planes and as you keep placing points within those layers=safe regions, the layers keep getting thinner and thinner. But this time the lofty regions aren't well-behaved bounded anymore, but they can still be covered with finitely many points; after all they are partially bounded 3-D space. Time to take on the 4-D case? Yes, but not with imagination anymore. Time to generalize it to higher dimension with $vectors$!



SOLUTION: Throughout the solution by vector I mean vectors with non-negative integer components.
For the sake of contrary assume that the set of primes, $P$ is finite, i.e. $P={p_1,p_2.ldots,p_n}$. Then each element of the sequence ${a_i}_{ige 1}$ is of the form $p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}ldots p_n^{a_n}$, where $a_iin mathbb{Z^+}cup{0}$. Notice that all the $a_i$'s can't be equal to $0$, otherwise $1$ is an element of the sequence and $1$ divides every other number. We can assign a unique vector $v_i=(a_1,a_2,ldots,a_n)$ to each element $a_i=p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}ldots p_n^{a_n}$ of the sequence . Suppose $v_1=(alpha_1,alpha_2,ldots, alpha _n)$. We will now define some sets,
$$D(v_1)={(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)mid x_ilealpha _i~for~all~i}$$
$$S_1(v_1)={(x_1,y_2,ldots,y_n)mid x_1<alpha_1}$$
$$S_2(v_1)={(y_1,x_2,ldots,y_n)mid x_2<alpha_2}$$
$$vdots$$
$$S_n(v_1)={(y_1,y_2,ldots,x_n)mid x_nlealpha_n}$$
Then $v_2in S_1(v_1)cup S_2(v_2)cupldotscup S_n(v_n) -D(v_1)=S(v_1)-D(v_1)$. Notice that $v_2$ has at-least one component which is smaller than that component of $v_1$. So $S(v_1)cap S(v_2)-D(v_1)cup D(v_2)$ has at least one vector component which is less than that of $S(v_1)-D(v_1)$ and thus the solid danger region will get thinner and thinner if we keep placing more points in it and gradually just collapse to the axis. But still there are finitely many lofty danger region. But we can always cover them with finitely many vectors.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Problem: For a sequence ${a_i}_{ige 1}$ consisting of only positive integers, prove that if for all different positive integers $i$ and $j$, we have $a_i nmid a_j$ , then
    $${pcolon p text{ is a prime and } pmid a_i text{ for some } i}$$
    is an infinite set.



    I have a solution to this problem, but if you read my solution (which I have posted below) then you can see that it is kind of vague, not the type you can write in some contest. It is because I am not particularly trained in linear algebra. So I was hoping for someone to make my solution more rigorous. Also rather than posting a new solution, please tell me how I can improve my solution.



    Thanks in advance.



    My approach:



    (1)Some motivation (Must read, because I have introduced some definitions here which I have used in the solution): Hmmm... the method of contradiction is the best way with this kind of problems. So let's assume that there are only finitely many primes in the set. OK let us consider the simplest case: there are only $2$ primes in the set. Then we can associate a two dimensional vector (with non-negative integer components) to all the elements of the sequence. Now observe that if $(a,b)$ is an element of the sequence then $(x,y)$ can't be an element of the sequence iff both $xge a$ and $yge b$ or $xle a$ and $yle b$. Now let us look at its geometrical interpretation by tossing the vectors onto the Cartesian plane. Planes where we can place points will be called safe region and the rest is danger region. Notice that there are two kinds of safe region: i)solid safe region, safe regions which has one of the axis as its border line and stretches infinitely, ii) lofty region, which is not in touch with any of the axis. Observe that if you keep placing more and more points in the solid region, it gradually gets thinner and thinner and ultimately it collapses to the axis. And since the lofty regions are finite, we can cover them with finitely many points (It is not hard to see that there are only finitely many lofty regions). Hmm..so the 2-D case seems doable. But we are still far from a complete solution. Indeed, what about 3-D and higher dimensional cases? The 3-D case initially looks like the corner of a box with some kind of layer glued to the 3 planes and as you keep placing points within those layers=safe regions, the layers keep getting thinner and thinner. But this time the lofty regions aren't well-behaved bounded anymore, but they can still be covered with finitely many points; after all they are partially bounded 3-D space. Time to take on the 4-D case? Yes, but not with imagination anymore. Time to generalize it to higher dimension with $vectors$!



    SOLUTION: Throughout the solution by vector I mean vectors with non-negative integer components.
    For the sake of contrary assume that the set of primes, $P$ is finite, i.e. $P={p_1,p_2.ldots,p_n}$. Then each element of the sequence ${a_i}_{ige 1}$ is of the form $p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}ldots p_n^{a_n}$, where $a_iin mathbb{Z^+}cup{0}$. Notice that all the $a_i$'s can't be equal to $0$, otherwise $1$ is an element of the sequence and $1$ divides every other number. We can assign a unique vector $v_i=(a_1,a_2,ldots,a_n)$ to each element $a_i=p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}ldots p_n^{a_n}$ of the sequence . Suppose $v_1=(alpha_1,alpha_2,ldots, alpha _n)$. We will now define some sets,
    $$D(v_1)={(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)mid x_ilealpha _i~for~all~i}$$
    $$S_1(v_1)={(x_1,y_2,ldots,y_n)mid x_1<alpha_1}$$
    $$S_2(v_1)={(y_1,x_2,ldots,y_n)mid x_2<alpha_2}$$
    $$vdots$$
    $$S_n(v_1)={(y_1,y_2,ldots,x_n)mid x_nlealpha_n}$$
    Then $v_2in S_1(v_1)cup S_2(v_2)cupldotscup S_n(v_n) -D(v_1)=S(v_1)-D(v_1)$. Notice that $v_2$ has at-least one component which is smaller than that component of $v_1$. So $S(v_1)cap S(v_2)-D(v_1)cup D(v_2)$ has at least one vector component which is less than that of $S(v_1)-D(v_1)$ and thus the solid danger region will get thinner and thinner if we keep placing more points in it and gradually just collapse to the axis. But still there are finitely many lofty danger region. But we can always cover them with finitely many vectors.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Problem: For a sequence ${a_i}_{ige 1}$ consisting of only positive integers, prove that if for all different positive integers $i$ and $j$, we have $a_i nmid a_j$ , then
      $${pcolon p text{ is a prime and } pmid a_i text{ for some } i}$$
      is an infinite set.



      I have a solution to this problem, but if you read my solution (which I have posted below) then you can see that it is kind of vague, not the type you can write in some contest. It is because I am not particularly trained in linear algebra. So I was hoping for someone to make my solution more rigorous. Also rather than posting a new solution, please tell me how I can improve my solution.



      Thanks in advance.



      My approach:



      (1)Some motivation (Must read, because I have introduced some definitions here which I have used in the solution): Hmmm... the method of contradiction is the best way with this kind of problems. So let's assume that there are only finitely many primes in the set. OK let us consider the simplest case: there are only $2$ primes in the set. Then we can associate a two dimensional vector (with non-negative integer components) to all the elements of the sequence. Now observe that if $(a,b)$ is an element of the sequence then $(x,y)$ can't be an element of the sequence iff both $xge a$ and $yge b$ or $xle a$ and $yle b$. Now let us look at its geometrical interpretation by tossing the vectors onto the Cartesian plane. Planes where we can place points will be called safe region and the rest is danger region. Notice that there are two kinds of safe region: i)solid safe region, safe regions which has one of the axis as its border line and stretches infinitely, ii) lofty region, which is not in touch with any of the axis. Observe that if you keep placing more and more points in the solid region, it gradually gets thinner and thinner and ultimately it collapses to the axis. And since the lofty regions are finite, we can cover them with finitely many points (It is not hard to see that there are only finitely many lofty regions). Hmm..so the 2-D case seems doable. But we are still far from a complete solution. Indeed, what about 3-D and higher dimensional cases? The 3-D case initially looks like the corner of a box with some kind of layer glued to the 3 planes and as you keep placing points within those layers=safe regions, the layers keep getting thinner and thinner. But this time the lofty regions aren't well-behaved bounded anymore, but they can still be covered with finitely many points; after all they are partially bounded 3-D space. Time to take on the 4-D case? Yes, but not with imagination anymore. Time to generalize it to higher dimension with $vectors$!



      SOLUTION: Throughout the solution by vector I mean vectors with non-negative integer components.
      For the sake of contrary assume that the set of primes, $P$ is finite, i.e. $P={p_1,p_2.ldots,p_n}$. Then each element of the sequence ${a_i}_{ige 1}$ is of the form $p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}ldots p_n^{a_n}$, where $a_iin mathbb{Z^+}cup{0}$. Notice that all the $a_i$'s can't be equal to $0$, otherwise $1$ is an element of the sequence and $1$ divides every other number. We can assign a unique vector $v_i=(a_1,a_2,ldots,a_n)$ to each element $a_i=p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}ldots p_n^{a_n}$ of the sequence . Suppose $v_1=(alpha_1,alpha_2,ldots, alpha _n)$. We will now define some sets,
      $$D(v_1)={(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)mid x_ilealpha _i~for~all~i}$$
      $$S_1(v_1)={(x_1,y_2,ldots,y_n)mid x_1<alpha_1}$$
      $$S_2(v_1)={(y_1,x_2,ldots,y_n)mid x_2<alpha_2}$$
      $$vdots$$
      $$S_n(v_1)={(y_1,y_2,ldots,x_n)mid x_nlealpha_n}$$
      Then $v_2in S_1(v_1)cup S_2(v_2)cupldotscup S_n(v_n) -D(v_1)=S(v_1)-D(v_1)$. Notice that $v_2$ has at-least one component which is smaller than that component of $v_1$. So $S(v_1)cap S(v_2)-D(v_1)cup D(v_2)$ has at least one vector component which is less than that of $S(v_1)-D(v_1)$ and thus the solid danger region will get thinner and thinner if we keep placing more points in it and gradually just collapse to the axis. But still there are finitely many lofty danger region. But we can always cover them with finitely many vectors.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Problem: For a sequence ${a_i}_{ige 1}$ consisting of only positive integers, prove that if for all different positive integers $i$ and $j$, we have $a_i nmid a_j$ , then
      $${pcolon p text{ is a prime and } pmid a_i text{ for some } i}$$
      is an infinite set.



      I have a solution to this problem, but if you read my solution (which I have posted below) then you can see that it is kind of vague, not the type you can write in some contest. It is because I am not particularly trained in linear algebra. So I was hoping for someone to make my solution more rigorous. Also rather than posting a new solution, please tell me how I can improve my solution.



      Thanks in advance.



      My approach:



      (1)Some motivation (Must read, because I have introduced some definitions here which I have used in the solution): Hmmm... the method of contradiction is the best way with this kind of problems. So let's assume that there are only finitely many primes in the set. OK let us consider the simplest case: there are only $2$ primes in the set. Then we can associate a two dimensional vector (with non-negative integer components) to all the elements of the sequence. Now observe that if $(a,b)$ is an element of the sequence then $(x,y)$ can't be an element of the sequence iff both $xge a$ and $yge b$ or $xle a$ and $yle b$. Now let us look at its geometrical interpretation by tossing the vectors onto the Cartesian plane. Planes where we can place points will be called safe region and the rest is danger region. Notice that there are two kinds of safe region: i)solid safe region, safe regions which has one of the axis as its border line and stretches infinitely, ii) lofty region, which is not in touch with any of the axis. Observe that if you keep placing more and more points in the solid region, it gradually gets thinner and thinner and ultimately it collapses to the axis. And since the lofty regions are finite, we can cover them with finitely many points (It is not hard to see that there are only finitely many lofty regions). Hmm..so the 2-D case seems doable. But we are still far from a complete solution. Indeed, what about 3-D and higher dimensional cases? The 3-D case initially looks like the corner of a box with some kind of layer glued to the 3 planes and as you keep placing points within those layers=safe regions, the layers keep getting thinner and thinner. But this time the lofty regions aren't well-behaved bounded anymore, but they can still be covered with finitely many points; after all they are partially bounded 3-D space. Time to take on the 4-D case? Yes, but not with imagination anymore. Time to generalize it to higher dimension with $vectors$!



      SOLUTION: Throughout the solution by vector I mean vectors with non-negative integer components.
      For the sake of contrary assume that the set of primes, $P$ is finite, i.e. $P={p_1,p_2.ldots,p_n}$. Then each element of the sequence ${a_i}_{ige 1}$ is of the form $p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}ldots p_n^{a_n}$, where $a_iin mathbb{Z^+}cup{0}$. Notice that all the $a_i$'s can't be equal to $0$, otherwise $1$ is an element of the sequence and $1$ divides every other number. We can assign a unique vector $v_i=(a_1,a_2,ldots,a_n)$ to each element $a_i=p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}ldots p_n^{a_n}$ of the sequence . Suppose $v_1=(alpha_1,alpha_2,ldots, alpha _n)$. We will now define some sets,
      $$D(v_1)={(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)mid x_ilealpha _i~for~all~i}$$
      $$S_1(v_1)={(x_1,y_2,ldots,y_n)mid x_1<alpha_1}$$
      $$S_2(v_1)={(y_1,x_2,ldots,y_n)mid x_2<alpha_2}$$
      $$vdots$$
      $$S_n(v_1)={(y_1,y_2,ldots,x_n)mid x_nlealpha_n}$$
      Then $v_2in S_1(v_1)cup S_2(v_2)cupldotscup S_n(v_n) -D(v_1)=S(v_1)-D(v_1)$. Notice that $v_2$ has at-least one component which is smaller than that component of $v_1$. So $S(v_1)cap S(v_2)-D(v_1)cup D(v_2)$ has at least one vector component which is less than that of $S(v_1)-D(v_1)$ and thus the solid danger region will get thinner and thinner if we keep placing more points in it and gradually just collapse to the axis. But still there are finitely many lofty danger region. But we can always cover them with finitely many vectors.







      sequences-and-series combinatorics number-theory prime-numbers vectors






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 25 at 17:34









      the_fox

      2,2941430




      2,2941430










      asked Nov 25 at 16:24









      Basudeb Bhowmick

      336




      336






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Claim. Let $P$ be a finite set of primes and let $A$ be a subset of $Bbb N$ such that each $ain A$ has all its prime divisors in $P$ and for $a,bin A$ with $ane b$, we always have $anmid b$. Then $A$ is finite.



          Proof. By induction on $|P|$, the case $|P|=0$ being trivial.



          Assume $|P|=m$ and the claim is true whenever $|P|<m$.
          Assume that $A$ has the properties of the claim, but is infinite.
          Pick $a_0in A$ and write $a_0=prod_{pin P}p^{c_p}$ with $c_pinBbb N_0$.
          For $pin P$ and $0le c<c_p$ let
          $$N_{p,c}={,ain A:p^c| a,}.$$
          Then each $ain Asetminus{a}$ is in some $N_{p,c}$ as otherwise we have $amid a_0$. As there are only finitely many $(p,c)$, we conclude that some $N_{p_0,c_0}$ is infinite. For this, let $$A'=left{,frac a{p_0^{c_0}}: ain N_{p_0,c_0},right}.$$
          Then $A'$ fulfils the condition of the claim with $P$ replaced by $P'=Psetminus{p}$. As $|P'|=m-1$, the induction hypothesis says that $A'$ is finite, contradiction. $square$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • An interesting thing is that our solutions are actually equivalent. Like $N_{p,c}$ in your solution is just the mathematical form of my safe region and thinning out in my solution $equiv$ $A'$ in your solution. But my solution missed induction. Your solution is still much better. Thanks.
            – Basudeb Bhowmick
            Nov 26 at 13:56













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013047%2finfinite-sequence-of-integers-has-infinitely-many-prime-divisors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Claim. Let $P$ be a finite set of primes and let $A$ be a subset of $Bbb N$ such that each $ain A$ has all its prime divisors in $P$ and for $a,bin A$ with $ane b$, we always have $anmid b$. Then $A$ is finite.



          Proof. By induction on $|P|$, the case $|P|=0$ being trivial.



          Assume $|P|=m$ and the claim is true whenever $|P|<m$.
          Assume that $A$ has the properties of the claim, but is infinite.
          Pick $a_0in A$ and write $a_0=prod_{pin P}p^{c_p}$ with $c_pinBbb N_0$.
          For $pin P$ and $0le c<c_p$ let
          $$N_{p,c}={,ain A:p^c| a,}.$$
          Then each $ain Asetminus{a}$ is in some $N_{p,c}$ as otherwise we have $amid a_0$. As there are only finitely many $(p,c)$, we conclude that some $N_{p_0,c_0}$ is infinite. For this, let $$A'=left{,frac a{p_0^{c_0}}: ain N_{p_0,c_0},right}.$$
          Then $A'$ fulfils the condition of the claim with $P$ replaced by $P'=Psetminus{p}$. As $|P'|=m-1$, the induction hypothesis says that $A'$ is finite, contradiction. $square$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • An interesting thing is that our solutions are actually equivalent. Like $N_{p,c}$ in your solution is just the mathematical form of my safe region and thinning out in my solution $equiv$ $A'$ in your solution. But my solution missed induction. Your solution is still much better. Thanks.
            – Basudeb Bhowmick
            Nov 26 at 13:56

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Claim. Let $P$ be a finite set of primes and let $A$ be a subset of $Bbb N$ such that each $ain A$ has all its prime divisors in $P$ and for $a,bin A$ with $ane b$, we always have $anmid b$. Then $A$ is finite.



          Proof. By induction on $|P|$, the case $|P|=0$ being trivial.



          Assume $|P|=m$ and the claim is true whenever $|P|<m$.
          Assume that $A$ has the properties of the claim, but is infinite.
          Pick $a_0in A$ and write $a_0=prod_{pin P}p^{c_p}$ with $c_pinBbb N_0$.
          For $pin P$ and $0le c<c_p$ let
          $$N_{p,c}={,ain A:p^c| a,}.$$
          Then each $ain Asetminus{a}$ is in some $N_{p,c}$ as otherwise we have $amid a_0$. As there are only finitely many $(p,c)$, we conclude that some $N_{p_0,c_0}$ is infinite. For this, let $$A'=left{,frac a{p_0^{c_0}}: ain N_{p_0,c_0},right}.$$
          Then $A'$ fulfils the condition of the claim with $P$ replaced by $P'=Psetminus{p}$. As $|P'|=m-1$, the induction hypothesis says that $A'$ is finite, contradiction. $square$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • An interesting thing is that our solutions are actually equivalent. Like $N_{p,c}$ in your solution is just the mathematical form of my safe region and thinning out in my solution $equiv$ $A'$ in your solution. But my solution missed induction. Your solution is still much better. Thanks.
            – Basudeb Bhowmick
            Nov 26 at 13:56















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Claim. Let $P$ be a finite set of primes and let $A$ be a subset of $Bbb N$ such that each $ain A$ has all its prime divisors in $P$ and for $a,bin A$ with $ane b$, we always have $anmid b$. Then $A$ is finite.



          Proof. By induction on $|P|$, the case $|P|=0$ being trivial.



          Assume $|P|=m$ and the claim is true whenever $|P|<m$.
          Assume that $A$ has the properties of the claim, but is infinite.
          Pick $a_0in A$ and write $a_0=prod_{pin P}p^{c_p}$ with $c_pinBbb N_0$.
          For $pin P$ and $0le c<c_p$ let
          $$N_{p,c}={,ain A:p^c| a,}.$$
          Then each $ain Asetminus{a}$ is in some $N_{p,c}$ as otherwise we have $amid a_0$. As there are only finitely many $(p,c)$, we conclude that some $N_{p_0,c_0}$ is infinite. For this, let $$A'=left{,frac a{p_0^{c_0}}: ain N_{p_0,c_0},right}.$$
          Then $A'$ fulfils the condition of the claim with $P$ replaced by $P'=Psetminus{p}$. As $|P'|=m-1$, the induction hypothesis says that $A'$ is finite, contradiction. $square$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Claim. Let $P$ be a finite set of primes and let $A$ be a subset of $Bbb N$ such that each $ain A$ has all its prime divisors in $P$ and for $a,bin A$ with $ane b$, we always have $anmid b$. Then $A$ is finite.



          Proof. By induction on $|P|$, the case $|P|=0$ being trivial.



          Assume $|P|=m$ and the claim is true whenever $|P|<m$.
          Assume that $A$ has the properties of the claim, but is infinite.
          Pick $a_0in A$ and write $a_0=prod_{pin P}p^{c_p}$ with $c_pinBbb N_0$.
          For $pin P$ and $0le c<c_p$ let
          $$N_{p,c}={,ain A:p^c| a,}.$$
          Then each $ain Asetminus{a}$ is in some $N_{p,c}$ as otherwise we have $amid a_0$. As there are only finitely many $(p,c)$, we conclude that some $N_{p_0,c_0}$ is infinite. For this, let $$A'=left{,frac a{p_0^{c_0}}: ain N_{p_0,c_0},right}.$$
          Then $A'$ fulfils the condition of the claim with $P$ replaced by $P'=Psetminus{p}$. As $|P'|=m-1$, the induction hypothesis says that $A'$ is finite, contradiction. $square$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 25 at 16:58









          Hagen von Eitzen

          275k21268495




          275k21268495












          • An interesting thing is that our solutions are actually equivalent. Like $N_{p,c}$ in your solution is just the mathematical form of my safe region and thinning out in my solution $equiv$ $A'$ in your solution. But my solution missed induction. Your solution is still much better. Thanks.
            – Basudeb Bhowmick
            Nov 26 at 13:56




















          • An interesting thing is that our solutions are actually equivalent. Like $N_{p,c}$ in your solution is just the mathematical form of my safe region and thinning out in my solution $equiv$ $A'$ in your solution. But my solution missed induction. Your solution is still much better. Thanks.
            – Basudeb Bhowmick
            Nov 26 at 13:56


















          An interesting thing is that our solutions are actually equivalent. Like $N_{p,c}$ in your solution is just the mathematical form of my safe region and thinning out in my solution $equiv$ $A'$ in your solution. But my solution missed induction. Your solution is still much better. Thanks.
          – Basudeb Bhowmick
          Nov 26 at 13:56






          An interesting thing is that our solutions are actually equivalent. Like $N_{p,c}$ in your solution is just the mathematical form of my safe region and thinning out in my solution $equiv$ $A'$ in your solution. But my solution missed induction. Your solution is still much better. Thanks.
          – Basudeb Bhowmick
          Nov 26 at 13:56




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013047%2finfinite-sequence-of-integers-has-infinitely-many-prime-divisors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen