Given $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0, 1]$ and $0 < f(x) < 1$, prove that $int_{0}^{1} (f(x))^{n}...
$begingroup$
Given $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0, 1]$ and $0 < f(x) < 1$, prove that
$int_{0}^{1} (f(x))^{n} mathop{dx}$ converges to $0$.
I understand why the statement is true intuitively because as $n to infty$, since $f$ lies between $0$ and $1$, it will be like a fractional value, which converges to $0$ since the fractions get smaller and smaller.
However, I am not sure about how to prove this rigorously.
real-analysis integration limits convergence riemann-integration
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Given $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0, 1]$ and $0 < f(x) < 1$, prove that
$int_{0}^{1} (f(x))^{n} mathop{dx}$ converges to $0$.
I understand why the statement is true intuitively because as $n to infty$, since $f$ lies between $0$ and $1$, it will be like a fractional value, which converges to $0$ since the fractions get smaller and smaller.
However, I am not sure about how to prove this rigorously.
real-analysis integration limits convergence riemann-integration
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:33
$begingroup$
Riemann integrability
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:34
1
$begingroup$
So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:35
$begingroup$
I don't know it
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:38
$begingroup$
Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 3:06
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Given $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0, 1]$ and $0 < f(x) < 1$, prove that
$int_{0}^{1} (f(x))^{n} mathop{dx}$ converges to $0$.
I understand why the statement is true intuitively because as $n to infty$, since $f$ lies between $0$ and $1$, it will be like a fractional value, which converges to $0$ since the fractions get smaller and smaller.
However, I am not sure about how to prove this rigorously.
real-analysis integration limits convergence riemann-integration
$endgroup$
Given $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0, 1]$ and $0 < f(x) < 1$, prove that
$int_{0}^{1} (f(x))^{n} mathop{dx}$ converges to $0$.
I understand why the statement is true intuitively because as $n to infty$, since $f$ lies between $0$ and $1$, it will be like a fractional value, which converges to $0$ since the fractions get smaller and smaller.
However, I am not sure about how to prove this rigorously.
real-analysis integration limits convergence riemann-integration
real-analysis integration limits convergence riemann-integration
edited Dec 14 '18 at 4:06
David G. Stork
11k41432
11k41432
asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:26
josephjoseph
500111
500111
$begingroup$
What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:33
$begingroup$
Riemann integrability
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:34
1
$begingroup$
So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:35
$begingroup$
I don't know it
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:38
$begingroup$
Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 3:06
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:33
$begingroup$
Riemann integrability
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:34
1
$begingroup$
So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:35
$begingroup$
I don't know it
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:38
$begingroup$
Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 3:06
$begingroup$
What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:33
$begingroup$
What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:33
$begingroup$
Riemann integrability
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:34
$begingroup$
Riemann integrability
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:34
1
1
$begingroup$
So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:35
$begingroup$
So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:35
$begingroup$
I don't know it
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:38
$begingroup$
I don't know it
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:38
$begingroup$
Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 3:06
$begingroup$
Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 3:06
|
show 4 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a proof which assumes some amount of measure theory (and I think this is unavoidable, but I may be wrong in thinking so).
Let $f_n(x) =(f(x)) ^n $ then each $f_n(x) $ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and hence the set $D_n$ of its discontinuities is of measure $0$ and thus the set $D=bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty}D_n$ is of measure $0$. Let $epsilon>0$ be given. Then there is a sequence of open intervals ${J_n}$ such that $Dsubseteq bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty} J_n$ and the length of these intervals $J_n$ combined is less than $epsilon$.
Next $f_n(x) to 0$ as $ntoinfty $ for all $xin[0,1]$. Let $xin[0,1]setminus D$. Then we have a positive integer $n_x$ depending on $x$ such that $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq n_x$. By continuity of $f_{n_x}$ at $x$ it follows that there is a neighborhood $I_x$ such that $f_{n_x} (x) <epsilon $ for all $xin I_x$. Since $f_n$ is decreasing it follows that we have $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $xin I_x$ and all $ngeq n_x$.
Now the set of all neighborhoods $I_x$ as $x$ varies in $[0,1]setminus D$ together with the intervals $J_n$ forms an open cover for $[0,1]$ and thus by Heine Borel theorem a finite number of these intervals covers $[0,1]$. Thus we have $$[0,1]subseteq bigcuplimits_{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} cupbigcuplimits_{i=1}^{q}J_i$$ Let $N$ be the maximum of integers $n_{x_1},n_{x_2},dots,n_{x_p}$ then we have $$f_n(x) <epsilon, forall xinbigcuplimits _{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} , forall ngeq N$$ The end points of $J_1,J_2,dots,J_q$ which lie in $[0,1]$ partition it into a finite number of subintervals. Denote the union of all those subintervals which contain points of $J_1,dots, J_q$ as $A$ and let the union of remaining subintervals be denoted by $B$. Then length of $A$ is less than $epsilon$ and $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq N$ and all $xin B$. Thus we have $$int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dx=int_{A}f_n(x),dx+int_{B}f_n(x),dx<epsilon +epsilon =2epsilon $$ for all $ngeq N$. Therefore $int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dxto 0$ as $nto infty $.
Note that the above argument actually proves the following result:
Theorem: Let ${f_n} $ be a sequence of functions $f_n:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ such that each $f_n$ is non-negative and Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) geq f_{n+1}(x),forall xin[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) to 0$ point wise almost everywhere in $[a, b] $ then $int_{a} ^{b} f_n(x) , dxto 0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice answer.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 14 '18 at 7:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You may use the following theorem due to Arzelà :---
Let ${f_n}$ be a sequence of Riemann integrable Functions on $[a,b]$ and converges point-wise to $f$, also there is a positive number $M$ such that $|f_n(x)|≤M,forall xin [a,b],forall nin Bbb N$. Now if $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[a,b]$ then , $$lim_{nrightarrow infty}int_a^bf_n(x)dx=int_a^blim_{nrightarrow infty} f_n(x)dx=int_a^b f(x) dx.$$
Here $f_n(x)=(f(x))^nrightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrow infty$ $,forall
xin [0,1]$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 5:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $f$ is integrable, it is measurable. By Lusin's theorem, for any $varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset [0,1]$ such that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and $|K|>1-varepsilon$. Uniform continuity implies that $sup_{xin K} f(x) = lambda<1$. Thus
$$begin{align}
int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx &= int_{K} f(x)^n, dx + int_{[0,1]backslash K} f(x)^n, dx \
&le |K|lambda^n + varepsiloncdot1.
end{align}$$
Take limit as $ntoinfty$ yields
$$
limsup_{nto infty} int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx le varepsilon.
$$
Since the above hold for any $varepsilon>0$, we have $int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dxto 0$ as wanted.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038847%2fgiven-fx-is-integrable-on-0-1-and-0-fx-1-prove-that-int-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a proof which assumes some amount of measure theory (and I think this is unavoidable, but I may be wrong in thinking so).
Let $f_n(x) =(f(x)) ^n $ then each $f_n(x) $ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and hence the set $D_n$ of its discontinuities is of measure $0$ and thus the set $D=bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty}D_n$ is of measure $0$. Let $epsilon>0$ be given. Then there is a sequence of open intervals ${J_n}$ such that $Dsubseteq bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty} J_n$ and the length of these intervals $J_n$ combined is less than $epsilon$.
Next $f_n(x) to 0$ as $ntoinfty $ for all $xin[0,1]$. Let $xin[0,1]setminus D$. Then we have a positive integer $n_x$ depending on $x$ such that $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq n_x$. By continuity of $f_{n_x}$ at $x$ it follows that there is a neighborhood $I_x$ such that $f_{n_x} (x) <epsilon $ for all $xin I_x$. Since $f_n$ is decreasing it follows that we have $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $xin I_x$ and all $ngeq n_x$.
Now the set of all neighborhoods $I_x$ as $x$ varies in $[0,1]setminus D$ together with the intervals $J_n$ forms an open cover for $[0,1]$ and thus by Heine Borel theorem a finite number of these intervals covers $[0,1]$. Thus we have $$[0,1]subseteq bigcuplimits_{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} cupbigcuplimits_{i=1}^{q}J_i$$ Let $N$ be the maximum of integers $n_{x_1},n_{x_2},dots,n_{x_p}$ then we have $$f_n(x) <epsilon, forall xinbigcuplimits _{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} , forall ngeq N$$ The end points of $J_1,J_2,dots,J_q$ which lie in $[0,1]$ partition it into a finite number of subintervals. Denote the union of all those subintervals which contain points of $J_1,dots, J_q$ as $A$ and let the union of remaining subintervals be denoted by $B$. Then length of $A$ is less than $epsilon$ and $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq N$ and all $xin B$. Thus we have $$int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dx=int_{A}f_n(x),dx+int_{B}f_n(x),dx<epsilon +epsilon =2epsilon $$ for all $ngeq N$. Therefore $int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dxto 0$ as $nto infty $.
Note that the above argument actually proves the following result:
Theorem: Let ${f_n} $ be a sequence of functions $f_n:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ such that each $f_n$ is non-negative and Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) geq f_{n+1}(x),forall xin[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) to 0$ point wise almost everywhere in $[a, b] $ then $int_{a} ^{b} f_n(x) , dxto 0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice answer.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 14 '18 at 7:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a proof which assumes some amount of measure theory (and I think this is unavoidable, but I may be wrong in thinking so).
Let $f_n(x) =(f(x)) ^n $ then each $f_n(x) $ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and hence the set $D_n$ of its discontinuities is of measure $0$ and thus the set $D=bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty}D_n$ is of measure $0$. Let $epsilon>0$ be given. Then there is a sequence of open intervals ${J_n}$ such that $Dsubseteq bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty} J_n$ and the length of these intervals $J_n$ combined is less than $epsilon$.
Next $f_n(x) to 0$ as $ntoinfty $ for all $xin[0,1]$. Let $xin[0,1]setminus D$. Then we have a positive integer $n_x$ depending on $x$ such that $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq n_x$. By continuity of $f_{n_x}$ at $x$ it follows that there is a neighborhood $I_x$ such that $f_{n_x} (x) <epsilon $ for all $xin I_x$. Since $f_n$ is decreasing it follows that we have $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $xin I_x$ and all $ngeq n_x$.
Now the set of all neighborhoods $I_x$ as $x$ varies in $[0,1]setminus D$ together with the intervals $J_n$ forms an open cover for $[0,1]$ and thus by Heine Borel theorem a finite number of these intervals covers $[0,1]$. Thus we have $$[0,1]subseteq bigcuplimits_{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} cupbigcuplimits_{i=1}^{q}J_i$$ Let $N$ be the maximum of integers $n_{x_1},n_{x_2},dots,n_{x_p}$ then we have $$f_n(x) <epsilon, forall xinbigcuplimits _{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} , forall ngeq N$$ The end points of $J_1,J_2,dots,J_q$ which lie in $[0,1]$ partition it into a finite number of subintervals. Denote the union of all those subintervals which contain points of $J_1,dots, J_q$ as $A$ and let the union of remaining subintervals be denoted by $B$. Then length of $A$ is less than $epsilon$ and $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq N$ and all $xin B$. Thus we have $$int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dx=int_{A}f_n(x),dx+int_{B}f_n(x),dx<epsilon +epsilon =2epsilon $$ for all $ngeq N$. Therefore $int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dxto 0$ as $nto infty $.
Note that the above argument actually proves the following result:
Theorem: Let ${f_n} $ be a sequence of functions $f_n:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ such that each $f_n$ is non-negative and Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) geq f_{n+1}(x),forall xin[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) to 0$ point wise almost everywhere in $[a, b] $ then $int_{a} ^{b} f_n(x) , dxto 0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice answer.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 14 '18 at 7:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a proof which assumes some amount of measure theory (and I think this is unavoidable, but I may be wrong in thinking so).
Let $f_n(x) =(f(x)) ^n $ then each $f_n(x) $ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and hence the set $D_n$ of its discontinuities is of measure $0$ and thus the set $D=bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty}D_n$ is of measure $0$. Let $epsilon>0$ be given. Then there is a sequence of open intervals ${J_n}$ such that $Dsubseteq bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty} J_n$ and the length of these intervals $J_n$ combined is less than $epsilon$.
Next $f_n(x) to 0$ as $ntoinfty $ for all $xin[0,1]$. Let $xin[0,1]setminus D$. Then we have a positive integer $n_x$ depending on $x$ such that $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq n_x$. By continuity of $f_{n_x}$ at $x$ it follows that there is a neighborhood $I_x$ such that $f_{n_x} (x) <epsilon $ for all $xin I_x$. Since $f_n$ is decreasing it follows that we have $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $xin I_x$ and all $ngeq n_x$.
Now the set of all neighborhoods $I_x$ as $x$ varies in $[0,1]setminus D$ together with the intervals $J_n$ forms an open cover for $[0,1]$ and thus by Heine Borel theorem a finite number of these intervals covers $[0,1]$. Thus we have $$[0,1]subseteq bigcuplimits_{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} cupbigcuplimits_{i=1}^{q}J_i$$ Let $N$ be the maximum of integers $n_{x_1},n_{x_2},dots,n_{x_p}$ then we have $$f_n(x) <epsilon, forall xinbigcuplimits _{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} , forall ngeq N$$ The end points of $J_1,J_2,dots,J_q$ which lie in $[0,1]$ partition it into a finite number of subintervals. Denote the union of all those subintervals which contain points of $J_1,dots, J_q$ as $A$ and let the union of remaining subintervals be denoted by $B$. Then length of $A$ is less than $epsilon$ and $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq N$ and all $xin B$. Thus we have $$int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dx=int_{A}f_n(x),dx+int_{B}f_n(x),dx<epsilon +epsilon =2epsilon $$ for all $ngeq N$. Therefore $int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dxto 0$ as $nto infty $.
Note that the above argument actually proves the following result:
Theorem: Let ${f_n} $ be a sequence of functions $f_n:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ such that each $f_n$ is non-negative and Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) geq f_{n+1}(x),forall xin[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) to 0$ point wise almost everywhere in $[a, b] $ then $int_{a} ^{b} f_n(x) , dxto 0$.
$endgroup$
Here is a proof which assumes some amount of measure theory (and I think this is unavoidable, but I may be wrong in thinking so).
Let $f_n(x) =(f(x)) ^n $ then each $f_n(x) $ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and hence the set $D_n$ of its discontinuities is of measure $0$ and thus the set $D=bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty}D_n$ is of measure $0$. Let $epsilon>0$ be given. Then there is a sequence of open intervals ${J_n}$ such that $Dsubseteq bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty} J_n$ and the length of these intervals $J_n$ combined is less than $epsilon$.
Next $f_n(x) to 0$ as $ntoinfty $ for all $xin[0,1]$. Let $xin[0,1]setminus D$. Then we have a positive integer $n_x$ depending on $x$ such that $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq n_x$. By continuity of $f_{n_x}$ at $x$ it follows that there is a neighborhood $I_x$ such that $f_{n_x} (x) <epsilon $ for all $xin I_x$. Since $f_n$ is decreasing it follows that we have $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $xin I_x$ and all $ngeq n_x$.
Now the set of all neighborhoods $I_x$ as $x$ varies in $[0,1]setminus D$ together with the intervals $J_n$ forms an open cover for $[0,1]$ and thus by Heine Borel theorem a finite number of these intervals covers $[0,1]$. Thus we have $$[0,1]subseteq bigcuplimits_{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} cupbigcuplimits_{i=1}^{q}J_i$$ Let $N$ be the maximum of integers $n_{x_1},n_{x_2},dots,n_{x_p}$ then we have $$f_n(x) <epsilon, forall xinbigcuplimits _{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} , forall ngeq N$$ The end points of $J_1,J_2,dots,J_q$ which lie in $[0,1]$ partition it into a finite number of subintervals. Denote the union of all those subintervals which contain points of $J_1,dots, J_q$ as $A$ and let the union of remaining subintervals be denoted by $B$. Then length of $A$ is less than $epsilon$ and $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq N$ and all $xin B$. Thus we have $$int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dx=int_{A}f_n(x),dx+int_{B}f_n(x),dx<epsilon +epsilon =2epsilon $$ for all $ngeq N$. Therefore $int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dxto 0$ as $nto infty $.
Note that the above argument actually proves the following result:
Theorem: Let ${f_n} $ be a sequence of functions $f_n:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ such that each $f_n$ is non-negative and Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) geq f_{n+1}(x),forall xin[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) to 0$ point wise almost everywhere in $[a, b] $ then $int_{a} ^{b} f_n(x) , dxto 0$.
edited Dec 18 '18 at 17:20
answered Dec 14 '18 at 4:02
Paramanand SinghParamanand Singh
50.1k556163
50.1k556163
$begingroup$
Very nice answer.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 14 '18 at 7:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Very nice answer.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 14 '18 at 7:36
$begingroup$
Very nice answer.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 14 '18 at 7:36
$begingroup$
Very nice answer.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Dec 14 '18 at 7:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You may use the following theorem due to Arzelà :---
Let ${f_n}$ be a sequence of Riemann integrable Functions on $[a,b]$ and converges point-wise to $f$, also there is a positive number $M$ such that $|f_n(x)|≤M,forall xin [a,b],forall nin Bbb N$. Now if $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[a,b]$ then , $$lim_{nrightarrow infty}int_a^bf_n(x)dx=int_a^blim_{nrightarrow infty} f_n(x)dx=int_a^b f(x) dx.$$
Here $f_n(x)=(f(x))^nrightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrow infty$ $,forall
xin [0,1]$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 5:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You may use the following theorem due to Arzelà :---
Let ${f_n}$ be a sequence of Riemann integrable Functions on $[a,b]$ and converges point-wise to $f$, also there is a positive number $M$ such that $|f_n(x)|≤M,forall xin [a,b],forall nin Bbb N$. Now if $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[a,b]$ then , $$lim_{nrightarrow infty}int_a^bf_n(x)dx=int_a^blim_{nrightarrow infty} f_n(x)dx=int_a^b f(x) dx.$$
Here $f_n(x)=(f(x))^nrightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrow infty$ $,forall
xin [0,1]$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 5:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You may use the following theorem due to Arzelà :---
Let ${f_n}$ be a sequence of Riemann integrable Functions on $[a,b]$ and converges point-wise to $f$, also there is a positive number $M$ such that $|f_n(x)|≤M,forall xin [a,b],forall nin Bbb N$. Now if $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[a,b]$ then , $$lim_{nrightarrow infty}int_a^bf_n(x)dx=int_a^blim_{nrightarrow infty} f_n(x)dx=int_a^b f(x) dx.$$
Here $f_n(x)=(f(x))^nrightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrow infty$ $,forall
xin [0,1]$.
$endgroup$
You may use the following theorem due to Arzelà :---
Let ${f_n}$ be a sequence of Riemann integrable Functions on $[a,b]$ and converges point-wise to $f$, also there is a positive number $M$ such that $|f_n(x)|≤M,forall xin [a,b],forall nin Bbb N$. Now if $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[a,b]$ then , $$lim_{nrightarrow infty}int_a^bf_n(x)dx=int_a^blim_{nrightarrow infty} f_n(x)dx=int_a^b f(x) dx.$$
Here $f_n(x)=(f(x))^nrightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrow infty$ $,forall
xin [0,1]$.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 4:59
UserSUserS
1,5391112
1,5391112
$begingroup$
+1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 5:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
+1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 5:23
$begingroup$
+1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 5:23
$begingroup$
+1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 5:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $f$ is integrable, it is measurable. By Lusin's theorem, for any $varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset [0,1]$ such that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and $|K|>1-varepsilon$. Uniform continuity implies that $sup_{xin K} f(x) = lambda<1$. Thus
$$begin{align}
int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx &= int_{K} f(x)^n, dx + int_{[0,1]backslash K} f(x)^n, dx \
&le |K|lambda^n + varepsiloncdot1.
end{align}$$
Take limit as $ntoinfty$ yields
$$
limsup_{nto infty} int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx le varepsilon.
$$
Since the above hold for any $varepsilon>0$, we have $int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dxto 0$ as wanted.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $f$ is integrable, it is measurable. By Lusin's theorem, for any $varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset [0,1]$ such that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and $|K|>1-varepsilon$. Uniform continuity implies that $sup_{xin K} f(x) = lambda<1$. Thus
$$begin{align}
int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx &= int_{K} f(x)^n, dx + int_{[0,1]backslash K} f(x)^n, dx \
&le |K|lambda^n + varepsiloncdot1.
end{align}$$
Take limit as $ntoinfty$ yields
$$
limsup_{nto infty} int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx le varepsilon.
$$
Since the above hold for any $varepsilon>0$, we have $int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dxto 0$ as wanted.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $f$ is integrable, it is measurable. By Lusin's theorem, for any $varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset [0,1]$ such that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and $|K|>1-varepsilon$. Uniform continuity implies that $sup_{xin K} f(x) = lambda<1$. Thus
$$begin{align}
int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx &= int_{K} f(x)^n, dx + int_{[0,1]backslash K} f(x)^n, dx \
&le |K|lambda^n + varepsiloncdot1.
end{align}$$
Take limit as $ntoinfty$ yields
$$
limsup_{nto infty} int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx le varepsilon.
$$
Since the above hold for any $varepsilon>0$, we have $int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dxto 0$ as wanted.
$endgroup$
Since $f$ is integrable, it is measurable. By Lusin's theorem, for any $varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset [0,1]$ such that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and $|K|>1-varepsilon$. Uniform continuity implies that $sup_{xin K} f(x) = lambda<1$. Thus
$$begin{align}
int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx &= int_{K} f(x)^n, dx + int_{[0,1]backslash K} f(x)^n, dx \
&le |K|lambda^n + varepsiloncdot1.
end{align}$$
Take limit as $ntoinfty$ yields
$$
limsup_{nto infty} int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx le varepsilon.
$$
Since the above hold for any $varepsilon>0$, we have $int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dxto 0$ as wanted.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 5:22
BigbearZzzBigbearZzz
8,69121652
8,69121652
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038847%2fgiven-fx-is-integrable-on-0-1-and-0-fx-1-prove-that-int-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:33
$begingroup$
Riemann integrability
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:34
1
$begingroup$
So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:35
$begingroup$
I don't know it
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:38
$begingroup$
Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 3:06