Polynomial Function given roots and a point
$begingroup$
A 3rd degree polynomial has roots at x=-2i and x=5. The y-intercept is (0,25). Write an equation for this function in factored form with real coefficients.
My first hack is to say that in factored form this is (x-5)(X2+4) as that gets me the roots, but that has y-intercept (0,-20). What am I missing?
Thanks!
polynomials
asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:02
jerHjerH
1104
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A 3rd degree polynomial has roots at x=-2i and x=5. The y-intercept is (0,25). Write an equation for this function in factored form with real coefficients.
My first hack is to say that in factored form this is (x-5)(X2+4) as that gets me the roots, but that has y-intercept (0,-20). What am I missing?
Thanks!
polynomials
asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:02
jerHjerH
1104
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Duh! Thanks. -2i was how the problem was written, but yeah, they come in pairs don't they...if you want to stick that in as an answer I'll gladly accept it
$endgroup$
– jerH
Dec 14 '18 at 2:11
$begingroup$
The way it states that the polynomial has real coefficients is a bit vague, but sure, then $-2i$ gives $+2i$ as well.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 2:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A 3rd degree polynomial has roots at x=-2i and x=5. The y-intercept is (0,25). Write an equation for this function in factored form with real coefficients.
My first hack is to say that in factored form this is (x-5)(X2+4) as that gets me the roots, but that has y-intercept (0,-20). What am I missing?
Thanks!
polynomials
asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:02
jerHjerH
1104
$endgroup$
A 3rd degree polynomial has roots at x=-2i and x=5. The y-intercept is (0,25). Write an equation for this function in factored form with real coefficients.
My first hack is to say that in factored form this is (x-5)(X2+4) as that gets me the roots, but that has y-intercept (0,-20). What am I missing?
Thanks!
polynomials
polynomials
asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:02
jerHjerH
1104
asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:02
jerHjerH
1104
asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:02
jerHjerH
1104
asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:02
jerHjerH
1104
asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:02
jerHjerH
1104
1104
$begingroup$
Duh! Thanks. -2i was how the problem was written, but yeah, they come in pairs don't they...if you want to stick that in as an answer I'll gladly accept it
$endgroup$
– jerH
Dec 14 '18 at 2:11
$begingroup$
The way it states that the polynomial has real coefficients is a bit vague, but sure, then $-2i$ gives $+2i$ as well.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 2:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Duh! Thanks. -2i was how the problem was written, but yeah, they come in pairs don't they...if you want to stick that in as an answer I'll gladly accept it
$endgroup$
– jerH
Dec 14 '18 at 2:11
$begingroup$
The way it states that the polynomial has real coefficients is a bit vague, but sure, then $-2i$ gives $+2i$ as well.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 2:15
$begingroup$
Duh! Thanks. -2i was how the problem was written, but yeah, they come in pairs don't they...if you want to stick that in as an answer I'll gladly accept it
$endgroup$
– jerH
Dec 14 '18 at 2:11
$begingroup$
Duh! Thanks. -2i was how the problem was written, but yeah, they come in pairs don't they...if you want to stick that in as an answer I'll gladly accept it
$endgroup$
– jerH
Dec 14 '18 at 2:11
$begingroup$
The way it states that the polynomial has real coefficients is a bit vague, but sure, then $-2i$ gives $+2i$ as well.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 2:15
$begingroup$
The way it states that the polynomial has real coefficients is a bit vague, but sure, then $-2i$ gives $+2i$ as well.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 2:15
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To elaborate on SmileyCraft's answer (they give the answer but not the underlying reason why, which I feel is more important)...
The Roots:
On first contending with the roots issue, which the comments hint you had trouble with: we know $-2i$ and $5$ are roots. We know that since $-2i$ is a root, $+2i$ is also a root because it's the conjugate of $-2i$. Then, since $5, -2i, +2i$ are all roots, we know that the polynomial can be factored as
$$f(x) = a(x - 5)(x - 2i)(x + 2i)$$
up to a leading coefficient $a$ that I'll talk about later. (You assumed $a=1$, and I'll explain why that's wrong in the next section.) It should be clear that this form is correct otherwise, since plugging in any of our roots gives $f(x) = 0$.
Since you wanted real coefficients and such, we note that $(x-2i)(x+2i)=x^2 + 4$, thus giving us the form you posed in the question (again, up to that constant $a$).
Finding $a$:
So now you know that the polynomial has the form
$$f(x) = a(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$$
The reason we include this $a$ is because the leading coefficient of the polynomial doesn't actually affect the roots: it does affect certain aspects of its behavior, but not that one.
(Note of import: that is only true when the polynomial is factored in this form. For example, in the other standard form of a cubic, $f(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$, the coefficient $a$ does affect the zeroes. It's only if in this factored form that the leading coefficient does not affect the roots. Play around on a graphing calculator, shouldn't be hard to convince yourself of these facts.)
We also know that the $y$-intercept of the graph is $(0,25)$. Thus, plug in $x = 0$ and $f(x) = 25$ in the equation above, and then you'll be able to figure out what $a$ actually is.
Plugging in these values, then, we see
$$25 = a(-5)(4) ;;; Rightarrow ;;; 25 = a(-20) ;;; Rightarrow ;;; a = frac{25}{-20} = -frac{5}{4}$$
Thus, the polynomial in its factored form is
$$f(x) = left( -frac{5}{4} right)(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$$
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:30
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
5,9771936
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In my defense, from the question I thought it was quite clear that jerH has a good idea of what he's doing, so I thought they should be able to understand why my answer is correct.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 3:11
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I suppose I can sort of see that. I don't think he actually did, though, seeing as he described his method as a hack. (I feel like he came up with the $(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$ more by trial and error than a more thorough process.) That was my big hint that a detailed answer would be more appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You solve the problem by simply multiplying the polynomial by $frac{25}{-20}$.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:14
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
3,591517
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038827%2fpolynomial-function-given-roots-and-a-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To elaborate on SmileyCraft's answer (they give the answer but not the underlying reason why, which I feel is more important)...
The Roots:
On first contending with the roots issue, which the comments hint you had trouble with: we know $-2i$ and $5$ are roots. We know that since $-2i$ is a root, $+2i$ is also a root because it's the conjugate of $-2i$. Then, since $5, -2i, +2i$ are all roots, we know that the polynomial can be factored as
$$f(x) = a(x - 5)(x - 2i)(x + 2i)$$
up to a leading coefficient $a$ that I'll talk about later. (You assumed $a=1$, and I'll explain why that's wrong in the next section.) It should be clear that this form is correct otherwise, since plugging in any of our roots gives $f(x) = 0$.
Since you wanted real coefficients and such, we note that $(x-2i)(x+2i)=x^2 + 4$, thus giving us the form you posed in the question (again, up to that constant $a$).
Finding $a$:
So now you know that the polynomial has the form
$$f(x) = a(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$$
The reason we include this $a$ is because the leading coefficient of the polynomial doesn't actually affect the roots: it does affect certain aspects of its behavior, but not that one.
(Note of import: that is only true when the polynomial is factored in this form. For example, in the other standard form of a cubic, $f(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$, the coefficient $a$ does affect the zeroes. It's only if in this factored form that the leading coefficient does not affect the roots. Play around on a graphing calculator, shouldn't be hard to convince yourself of these facts.)
We also know that the $y$-intercept of the graph is $(0,25)$. Thus, plug in $x = 0$ and $f(x) = 25$ in the equation above, and then you'll be able to figure out what $a$ actually is.
Plugging in these values, then, we see
$$25 = a(-5)(4) ;;; Rightarrow ;;; 25 = a(-20) ;;; Rightarrow ;;; a = frac{25}{-20} = -frac{5}{4}$$
Thus, the polynomial in its factored form is
$$f(x) = left( -frac{5}{4} right)(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$$
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:30
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
5,9771936
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In my defense, from the question I thought it was quite clear that jerH has a good idea of what he's doing, so I thought they should be able to understand why my answer is correct.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 3:11
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I suppose I can sort of see that. I don't think he actually did, though, seeing as he described his method as a hack. (I feel like he came up with the $(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$ more by trial and error than a more thorough process.) That was my big hint that a detailed answer would be more appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To elaborate on SmileyCraft's answer (they give the answer but not the underlying reason why, which I feel is more important)...
The Roots:
On first contending with the roots issue, which the comments hint you had trouble with: we know $-2i$ and $5$ are roots. We know that since $-2i$ is a root, $+2i$ is also a root because it's the conjugate of $-2i$. Then, since $5, -2i, +2i$ are all roots, we know that the polynomial can be factored as
$$f(x) = a(x - 5)(x - 2i)(x + 2i)$$
up to a leading coefficient $a$ that I'll talk about later. (You assumed $a=1$, and I'll explain why that's wrong in the next section.) It should be clear that this form is correct otherwise, since plugging in any of our roots gives $f(x) = 0$.
Since you wanted real coefficients and such, we note that $(x-2i)(x+2i)=x^2 + 4$, thus giving us the form you posed in the question (again, up to that constant $a$).
Finding $a$:
So now you know that the polynomial has the form
$$f(x) = a(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$$
The reason we include this $a$ is because the leading coefficient of the polynomial doesn't actually affect the roots: it does affect certain aspects of its behavior, but not that one.
(Note of import: that is only true when the polynomial is factored in this form. For example, in the other standard form of a cubic, $f(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$, the coefficient $a$ does affect the zeroes. It's only if in this factored form that the leading coefficient does not affect the roots. Play around on a graphing calculator, shouldn't be hard to convince yourself of these facts.)
We also know that the $y$-intercept of the graph is $(0,25)$. Thus, plug in $x = 0$ and $f(x) = 25$ in the equation above, and then you'll be able to figure out what $a$ actually is.
Plugging in these values, then, we see
$$25 = a(-5)(4) ;;; Rightarrow ;;; 25 = a(-20) ;;; Rightarrow ;;; a = frac{25}{-20} = -frac{5}{4}$$
Thus, the polynomial in its factored form is
$$f(x) = left( -frac{5}{4} right)(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$$
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:30
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
5,9771936
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In my defense, from the question I thought it was quite clear that jerH has a good idea of what he's doing, so I thought they should be able to understand why my answer is correct.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 3:11
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I suppose I can sort of see that. I don't think he actually did, though, seeing as he described his method as a hack. (I feel like he came up with the $(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$ more by trial and error than a more thorough process.) That was my big hint that a detailed answer would be more appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To elaborate on SmileyCraft's answer (they give the answer but not the underlying reason why, which I feel is more important)...
The Roots:
On first contending with the roots issue, which the comments hint you had trouble with: we know $-2i$ and $5$ are roots. We know that since $-2i$ is a root, $+2i$ is also a root because it's the conjugate of $-2i$. Then, since $5, -2i, +2i$ are all roots, we know that the polynomial can be factored as
$$f(x) = a(x - 5)(x - 2i)(x + 2i)$$
up to a leading coefficient $a$ that I'll talk about later. (You assumed $a=1$, and I'll explain why that's wrong in the next section.) It should be clear that this form is correct otherwise, since plugging in any of our roots gives $f(x) = 0$.
Since you wanted real coefficients and such, we note that $(x-2i)(x+2i)=x^2 + 4$, thus giving us the form you posed in the question (again, up to that constant $a$).
Finding $a$:
So now you know that the polynomial has the form
$$f(x) = a(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$$
The reason we include this $a$ is because the leading coefficient of the polynomial doesn't actually affect the roots: it does affect certain aspects of its behavior, but not that one.
(Note of import: that is only true when the polynomial is factored in this form. For example, in the other standard form of a cubic, $f(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$, the coefficient $a$ does affect the zeroes. It's only if in this factored form that the leading coefficient does not affect the roots. Play around on a graphing calculator, shouldn't be hard to convince yourself of these facts.)
We also know that the $y$-intercept of the graph is $(0,25)$. Thus, plug in $x = 0$ and $f(x) = 25$ in the equation above, and then you'll be able to figure out what $a$ actually is.
Plugging in these values, then, we see
$$25 = a(-5)(4) ;;; Rightarrow ;;; 25 = a(-20) ;;; Rightarrow ;;; a = frac{25}{-20} = -frac{5}{4}$$
Thus, the polynomial in its factored form is
$$f(x) = left( -frac{5}{4} right)(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$$
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:30
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
5,9771936
$endgroup$
To elaborate on SmileyCraft's answer (they give the answer but not the underlying reason why, which I feel is more important)...
The Roots:
On first contending with the roots issue, which the comments hint you had trouble with: we know $-2i$ and $5$ are roots. We know that since $-2i$ is a root, $+2i$ is also a root because it's the conjugate of $-2i$. Then, since $5, -2i, +2i$ are all roots, we know that the polynomial can be factored as
$$f(x) = a(x - 5)(x - 2i)(x + 2i)$$
up to a leading coefficient $a$ that I'll talk about later. (You assumed $a=1$, and I'll explain why that's wrong in the next section.) It should be clear that this form is correct otherwise, since plugging in any of our roots gives $f(x) = 0$.
Since you wanted real coefficients and such, we note that $(x-2i)(x+2i)=x^2 + 4$, thus giving us the form you posed in the question (again, up to that constant $a$).
Finding $a$:
So now you know that the polynomial has the form
$$f(x) = a(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$$
The reason we include this $a$ is because the leading coefficient of the polynomial doesn't actually affect the roots: it does affect certain aspects of its behavior, but not that one.
(Note of import: that is only true when the polynomial is factored in this form. For example, in the other standard form of a cubic, $f(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$, the coefficient $a$ does affect the zeroes. It's only if in this factored form that the leading coefficient does not affect the roots. Play around on a graphing calculator, shouldn't be hard to convince yourself of these facts.)
We also know that the $y$-intercept of the graph is $(0,25)$. Thus, plug in $x = 0$ and $f(x) = 25$ in the equation above, and then you'll be able to figure out what $a$ actually is.
Plugging in these values, then, we see
$$25 = a(-5)(4) ;;; Rightarrow ;;; 25 = a(-20) ;;; Rightarrow ;;; a = frac{25}{-20} = -frac{5}{4}$$
Thus, the polynomial in its factored form is
$$f(x) = left( -frac{5}{4} right)(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$$
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:30
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
5,9771936
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:30
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
5,9771936
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:30
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
5,9771936
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:30
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
5,9771936
5,9771936
$begingroup$
In my defense, from the question I thought it was quite clear that jerH has a good idea of what he's doing, so I thought they should be able to understand why my answer is correct.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 3:11
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I suppose I can sort of see that. I don't think he actually did, though, seeing as he described his method as a hack. (I feel like he came up with the $(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$ more by trial and error than a more thorough process.) That was my big hint that a detailed answer would be more appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my defense, from the question I thought it was quite clear that jerH has a good idea of what he's doing, so I thought they should be able to understand why my answer is correct.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 3:11
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I suppose I can sort of see that. I don't think he actually did, though, seeing as he described his method as a hack. (I feel like he came up with the $(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$ more by trial and error than a more thorough process.) That was my big hint that a detailed answer would be more appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:13
$begingroup$
In my defense, from the question I thought it was quite clear that jerH has a good idea of what he's doing, so I thought they should be able to understand why my answer is correct.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 3:11
$begingroup$
In my defense, from the question I thought it was quite clear that jerH has a good idea of what he's doing, so I thought they should be able to understand why my answer is correct.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 3:11
1
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I suppose I can sort of see that. I don't think he actually did, though, seeing as he described his method as a hack. (I feel like he came up with the $(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$ more by trial and error than a more thorough process.) That was my big hint that a detailed answer would be more appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:13
$begingroup$
Yeah I suppose I can sort of see that. I don't think he actually did, though, seeing as he described his method as a hack. (I feel like he came up with the $(x-5)(x^2 + 4)$ more by trial and error than a more thorough process.) That was my big hint that a detailed answer would be more appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You solve the problem by simply multiplying the polynomial by $frac{25}{-20}$.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:14
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
3,591517
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You solve the problem by simply multiplying the polynomial by $frac{25}{-20}$.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:14
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
3,591517
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You solve the problem by simply multiplying the polynomial by $frac{25}{-20}$.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:14
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
3,591517
$endgroup$
You solve the problem by simply multiplying the polynomial by $frac{25}{-20}$.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:14
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
3,591517
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:14
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
3,591517
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:14
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
3,591517
answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:14
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
3,591517
3,591517
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038827%2fpolynomial-function-given-roots-and-a-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Duh! Thanks. -2i was how the problem was written, but yeah, they come in pairs don't they...if you want to stick that in as an answer I'll gladly accept it
$endgroup$
– jerH
Dec 14 '18 at 2:11
$begingroup$
The way it states that the polynomial has real coefficients is a bit vague, but sure, then $-2i$ gives $+2i$ as well.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 14 '18 at 2:15