Is the cardinality of the set of points on the circumference of a circle equal to the cardinality of the set...












0












$begingroup$


Is the cardinality of the set of points on the circumference of a circle equal to the cardinality of the set of points on the interior of a circle? They're both infinite, but are they the same aleph?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why is the answer yes, I would like to have knowledge of this. Carnal or otherwise.
    $endgroup$
    – David
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:06










  • $begingroup$
    Is this a general-topology problem?
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:55
















0












$begingroup$


Is the cardinality of the set of points on the circumference of a circle equal to the cardinality of the set of points on the interior of a circle? They're both infinite, but are they the same aleph?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why is the answer yes, I would like to have knowledge of this. Carnal or otherwise.
    $endgroup$
    – David
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:06










  • $begingroup$
    Is this a general-topology problem?
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:55














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Is the cardinality of the set of points on the circumference of a circle equal to the cardinality of the set of points on the interior of a circle? They're both infinite, but are they the same aleph?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is the cardinality of the set of points on the circumference of a circle equal to the cardinality of the set of points on the interior of a circle? They're both infinite, but are they the same aleph?







general-topology geometry elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 14 '18 at 3:09









spaceisdarkgreen

32.8k21753




32.8k21753










asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:55









DavidDavid

1506




1506












  • $begingroup$
    Why is the answer yes, I would like to have knowledge of this. Carnal or otherwise.
    $endgroup$
    – David
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:06










  • $begingroup$
    Is this a general-topology problem?
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:55


















  • $begingroup$
    Why is the answer yes, I would like to have knowledge of this. Carnal or otherwise.
    $endgroup$
    – David
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:06










  • $begingroup$
    Is this a general-topology problem?
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:55
















$begingroup$
Why is the answer yes, I would like to have knowledge of this. Carnal or otherwise.
$endgroup$
– David
Dec 14 '18 at 3:06




$begingroup$
Why is the answer yes, I would like to have knowledge of this. Carnal or otherwise.
$endgroup$
– David
Dec 14 '18 at 3:06












$begingroup$
Is this a general-topology problem?
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
Dec 14 '18 at 16:55




$begingroup$
Is this a general-topology problem?
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
Dec 14 '18 at 16:55










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Look at it this way: you're comparing the cardinality of the points on a line, with those in an area of the plane.



Obviously both are finite (finite length and area I mean, not cardinality), but you know that the interval $(0,1)$ has the same cardinality as that of the entire number line $mathbb{R}$ - both having cardinality of the continuum, $c$. It should then come to no surprise - someone could probably flesh out the details - that the cardinality of points enclosed by a circle in the plane with nonzero area would have the same cardinality as the plane itself.



In this sense, then, the circle's circumference is analogous to a finite interval of $mathbb{R}$, and similarly the circle encloses a finite area of $mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}$. The cardinalities we're concerned with then, in the end, are the cardinalities of $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}$, right?



For a Cartesian product, we note that $|A times B | = |A| cdot |B|$. Thus,



$$|mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}| = |mathbb{R}| cdot |mathbb{R}| = c cdot c = c = |mathbb{R}|$$



(Counterintuitive as $c cdot c = c$ would be, it's true. In fact, in general, $| mathbb{R}^n | = c$ for all $n in mathbb{N}$. That's another detail someone else more qualified might want to hash out if you're confused though.)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038873%2fis-the-cardinality-of-the-set-of-points-on-the-circumference-of-a-circle-equal-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Look at it this way: you're comparing the cardinality of the points on a line, with those in an area of the plane.



    Obviously both are finite (finite length and area I mean, not cardinality), but you know that the interval $(0,1)$ has the same cardinality as that of the entire number line $mathbb{R}$ - both having cardinality of the continuum, $c$. It should then come to no surprise - someone could probably flesh out the details - that the cardinality of points enclosed by a circle in the plane with nonzero area would have the same cardinality as the plane itself.



    In this sense, then, the circle's circumference is analogous to a finite interval of $mathbb{R}$, and similarly the circle encloses a finite area of $mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}$. The cardinalities we're concerned with then, in the end, are the cardinalities of $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}$, right?



    For a Cartesian product, we note that $|A times B | = |A| cdot |B|$. Thus,



    $$|mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}| = |mathbb{R}| cdot |mathbb{R}| = c cdot c = c = |mathbb{R}|$$



    (Counterintuitive as $c cdot c = c$ would be, it's true. In fact, in general, $| mathbb{R}^n | = c$ for all $n in mathbb{N}$. That's another detail someone else more qualified might want to hash out if you're confused though.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Look at it this way: you're comparing the cardinality of the points on a line, with those in an area of the plane.



      Obviously both are finite (finite length and area I mean, not cardinality), but you know that the interval $(0,1)$ has the same cardinality as that of the entire number line $mathbb{R}$ - both having cardinality of the continuum, $c$. It should then come to no surprise - someone could probably flesh out the details - that the cardinality of points enclosed by a circle in the plane with nonzero area would have the same cardinality as the plane itself.



      In this sense, then, the circle's circumference is analogous to a finite interval of $mathbb{R}$, and similarly the circle encloses a finite area of $mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}$. The cardinalities we're concerned with then, in the end, are the cardinalities of $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}$, right?



      For a Cartesian product, we note that $|A times B | = |A| cdot |B|$. Thus,



      $$|mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}| = |mathbb{R}| cdot |mathbb{R}| = c cdot c = c = |mathbb{R}|$$



      (Counterintuitive as $c cdot c = c$ would be, it's true. In fact, in general, $| mathbb{R}^n | = c$ for all $n in mathbb{N}$. That's another detail someone else more qualified might want to hash out if you're confused though.)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Look at it this way: you're comparing the cardinality of the points on a line, with those in an area of the plane.



        Obviously both are finite (finite length and area I mean, not cardinality), but you know that the interval $(0,1)$ has the same cardinality as that of the entire number line $mathbb{R}$ - both having cardinality of the continuum, $c$. It should then come to no surprise - someone could probably flesh out the details - that the cardinality of points enclosed by a circle in the plane with nonzero area would have the same cardinality as the plane itself.



        In this sense, then, the circle's circumference is analogous to a finite interval of $mathbb{R}$, and similarly the circle encloses a finite area of $mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}$. The cardinalities we're concerned with then, in the end, are the cardinalities of $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}$, right?



        For a Cartesian product, we note that $|A times B | = |A| cdot |B|$. Thus,



        $$|mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}| = |mathbb{R}| cdot |mathbb{R}| = c cdot c = c = |mathbb{R}|$$



        (Counterintuitive as $c cdot c = c$ would be, it's true. In fact, in general, $| mathbb{R}^n | = c$ for all $n in mathbb{N}$. That's another detail someone else more qualified might want to hash out if you're confused though.)






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Look at it this way: you're comparing the cardinality of the points on a line, with those in an area of the plane.



        Obviously both are finite (finite length and area I mean, not cardinality), but you know that the interval $(0,1)$ has the same cardinality as that of the entire number line $mathbb{R}$ - both having cardinality of the continuum, $c$. It should then come to no surprise - someone could probably flesh out the details - that the cardinality of points enclosed by a circle in the plane with nonzero area would have the same cardinality as the plane itself.



        In this sense, then, the circle's circumference is analogous to a finite interval of $mathbb{R}$, and similarly the circle encloses a finite area of $mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}$. The cardinalities we're concerned with then, in the end, are the cardinalities of $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}$, right?



        For a Cartesian product, we note that $|A times B | = |A| cdot |B|$. Thus,



        $$|mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}| = |mathbb{R}| cdot |mathbb{R}| = c cdot c = c = |mathbb{R}|$$



        (Counterintuitive as $c cdot c = c$ would be, it's true. In fact, in general, $| mathbb{R}^n | = c$ for all $n in mathbb{N}$. That's another detail someone else more qualified might want to hash out if you're confused though.)







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 14 '18 at 3:09









        Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

        5,9771936




        5,9771936






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038873%2fis-the-cardinality-of-the-set-of-points-on-the-circumference-of-a-circle-equal-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen