Prove by induction $2^n > 2n+1$ for all $n geq 3$ [duplicate]












0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$. [duplicate]

    12 answers




Base case



$n=3$ - true



Inductive Step



Assume that for every $k geq 3$, $2^k>2k+1$ show that $P(k+1)$ holds, that is show that $2^{k+1} > 2k+3$



$2^{k+1} = 2^k*2 > (I.H) (2k+1)*2 > (k+2)*2 = 2k+4 > 2k+3$



Did I do this right? I am asking because I am not sure about $(2k+1)*2 > (k+2)*2$ step










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by apnorton, Community Dec 14 '18 at 2:55


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • $begingroup$
    This is very similar in form to the following question, of which the answer may be helpful: Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – apnorton
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:35


















0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$. [duplicate]

    12 answers




Base case



$n=3$ - true



Inductive Step



Assume that for every $k geq 3$, $2^k>2k+1$ show that $P(k+1)$ holds, that is show that $2^{k+1} > 2k+3$



$2^{k+1} = 2^k*2 > (I.H) (2k+1)*2 > (k+2)*2 = 2k+4 > 2k+3$



Did I do this right? I am asking because I am not sure about $(2k+1)*2 > (k+2)*2$ step










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by apnorton, Community Dec 14 '18 at 2:55


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • $begingroup$
    This is very similar in form to the following question, of which the answer may be helpful: Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – apnorton
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:35
















0












0








0





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$. [duplicate]

    12 answers




Base case



$n=3$ - true



Inductive Step



Assume that for every $k geq 3$, $2^k>2k+1$ show that $P(k+1)$ holds, that is show that $2^{k+1} > 2k+3$



$2^{k+1} = 2^k*2 > (I.H) (2k+1)*2 > (k+2)*2 = 2k+4 > 2k+3$



Did I do this right? I am asking because I am not sure about $(2k+1)*2 > (k+2)*2$ step










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$. [duplicate]

    12 answers




Base case



$n=3$ - true



Inductive Step



Assume that for every $k geq 3$, $2^k>2k+1$ show that $P(k+1)$ holds, that is show that $2^{k+1} > 2k+3$



$2^{k+1} = 2^k*2 > (I.H) (2k+1)*2 > (k+2)*2 = 2k+4 > 2k+3$



Did I do this right? I am asking because I am not sure about $(2k+1)*2 > (k+2)*2$ step





This question already has an answer here:




  • Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$. [duplicate]

    12 answers








proof-verification induction






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:29









RufyiRufyi

6618




6618




marked as duplicate by apnorton, Community Dec 14 '18 at 2:55


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by apnorton, Community Dec 14 '18 at 2:55


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • $begingroup$
    This is very similar in form to the following question, of which the answer may be helpful: Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – apnorton
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:35




















  • $begingroup$
    This is very similar in form to the following question, of which the answer may be helpful: Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – apnorton
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:35


















$begingroup$
This is very similar in form to the following question, of which the answer may be helpful: Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$.
$endgroup$
– apnorton
Dec 14 '18 at 2:35






$begingroup$
This is very similar in form to the following question, of which the answer may be helpful: Prove that $ n < 2^{n}$ for all natural numbers $n$.
$endgroup$
– apnorton
Dec 14 '18 at 2:35












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

$4k + 2 = 2k + 2 + 2k$. $k geq 3 implies 2k geq 6 > 2$ so you're right.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    This is valid, you should just clean up and clarify some details a little.





    Let $P(n)$ denote the proposition, $2^n > 2n + 1$, which we seek to prove for $n geq 3$.



    Base Case: Here, we check $n=3$. $2^3 = 8 > 7 = 2(3) + 1$, so this holds.



    Inductive Hypothesis: Suppose $P(k)$ for some $k > 3$. That is, we suppose that $2^k > 2k + 1$.



    Induction: We seek to show $P(k+1)$ holds under the inductive hypothesis, that meaning we seek to show



    $$2^{k+1} > 2(k+1) + 1 = 2k + 3$$



    Then we note: by multiplying by $2$ on both sides of the assumption in the inductive hypothesis,



    $$2 cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1} > 2 cdot (2k+1) = 4k + 2 $$



    We want to show $4k+2 > 2k+4$: this is a detail crucial to your proof that is not immediately obvious (you yourself aren't sure). So note: like solving any other inequality,



    $$4k+2 > 2k+4 Rightarrow 2k > 2 Rightarrow k > 1$$



    Since our induction only cares about $n$ (and thus $k$) greater than or equal to $3$, then $4k+2 > 2k+4$ is perfectly valid for all the $k$ we care about. Thus, since trivially $2k+4 > 2k+3$, we have



    $$2^{k+1} > 2 cdot (2k+1) = 4k + 2 > 2k+4 > 2k+3 = 2(k+1)+1$$



    Having shown that $$2^{k+1} > 2(k+1)+1$$ we have shown that, for all $n geq 3$, $P(n)$ holds, i.e. for all $n geq 3, 2^n > 2n+1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      Certain things are not transparent when expressed in symbols. In the formula ('sequence') $2^n$, every term is obtained by doubling the previous one: $2^{n+1} = 2times 2^n$. In the other formula we add 2 to the previous term: $2(n+1)+1 = 2n+1 + 2$.



      Between a job which doubles your pay every month and one that adds 2 more dollars to your pay every month which one is preferable? (I assume you are not Perelman!)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        0












        $begingroup$

        $4k + 2 = 2k + 2 + 2k$. $k geq 3 implies 2k geq 6 > 2$ so you're right.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          0












          $begingroup$

          $4k + 2 = 2k + 2 + 2k$. $k geq 3 implies 2k geq 6 > 2$ so you're right.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            $4k + 2 = 2k + 2 + 2k$. $k geq 3 implies 2k geq 6 > 2$ so you're right.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            $4k + 2 = 2k + 2 + 2k$. $k geq 3 implies 2k geq 6 > 2$ so you're right.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:34









            Lucas HenriqueLucas Henrique

            1,059414




            1,059414























                0












                $begingroup$

                This is valid, you should just clean up and clarify some details a little.





                Let $P(n)$ denote the proposition, $2^n > 2n + 1$, which we seek to prove for $n geq 3$.



                Base Case: Here, we check $n=3$. $2^3 = 8 > 7 = 2(3) + 1$, so this holds.



                Inductive Hypothesis: Suppose $P(k)$ for some $k > 3$. That is, we suppose that $2^k > 2k + 1$.



                Induction: We seek to show $P(k+1)$ holds under the inductive hypothesis, that meaning we seek to show



                $$2^{k+1} > 2(k+1) + 1 = 2k + 3$$



                Then we note: by multiplying by $2$ on both sides of the assumption in the inductive hypothesis,



                $$2 cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1} > 2 cdot (2k+1) = 4k + 2 $$



                We want to show $4k+2 > 2k+4$: this is a detail crucial to your proof that is not immediately obvious (you yourself aren't sure). So note: like solving any other inequality,



                $$4k+2 > 2k+4 Rightarrow 2k > 2 Rightarrow k > 1$$



                Since our induction only cares about $n$ (and thus $k$) greater than or equal to $3$, then $4k+2 > 2k+4$ is perfectly valid for all the $k$ we care about. Thus, since trivially $2k+4 > 2k+3$, we have



                $$2^{k+1} > 2 cdot (2k+1) = 4k + 2 > 2k+4 > 2k+3 = 2(k+1)+1$$



                Having shown that $$2^{k+1} > 2(k+1)+1$$ we have shown that, for all $n geq 3$, $P(n)$ holds, i.e. for all $n geq 3, 2^n > 2n+1$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  This is valid, you should just clean up and clarify some details a little.





                  Let $P(n)$ denote the proposition, $2^n > 2n + 1$, which we seek to prove for $n geq 3$.



                  Base Case: Here, we check $n=3$. $2^3 = 8 > 7 = 2(3) + 1$, so this holds.



                  Inductive Hypothesis: Suppose $P(k)$ for some $k > 3$. That is, we suppose that $2^k > 2k + 1$.



                  Induction: We seek to show $P(k+1)$ holds under the inductive hypothesis, that meaning we seek to show



                  $$2^{k+1} > 2(k+1) + 1 = 2k + 3$$



                  Then we note: by multiplying by $2$ on both sides of the assumption in the inductive hypothesis,



                  $$2 cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1} > 2 cdot (2k+1) = 4k + 2 $$



                  We want to show $4k+2 > 2k+4$: this is a detail crucial to your proof that is not immediately obvious (you yourself aren't sure). So note: like solving any other inequality,



                  $$4k+2 > 2k+4 Rightarrow 2k > 2 Rightarrow k > 1$$



                  Since our induction only cares about $n$ (and thus $k$) greater than or equal to $3$, then $4k+2 > 2k+4$ is perfectly valid for all the $k$ we care about. Thus, since trivially $2k+4 > 2k+3$, we have



                  $$2^{k+1} > 2 cdot (2k+1) = 4k + 2 > 2k+4 > 2k+3 = 2(k+1)+1$$



                  Having shown that $$2^{k+1} > 2(k+1)+1$$ we have shown that, for all $n geq 3$, $P(n)$ holds, i.e. for all $n geq 3, 2^n > 2n+1$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    This is valid, you should just clean up and clarify some details a little.





                    Let $P(n)$ denote the proposition, $2^n > 2n + 1$, which we seek to prove for $n geq 3$.



                    Base Case: Here, we check $n=3$. $2^3 = 8 > 7 = 2(3) + 1$, so this holds.



                    Inductive Hypothesis: Suppose $P(k)$ for some $k > 3$. That is, we suppose that $2^k > 2k + 1$.



                    Induction: We seek to show $P(k+1)$ holds under the inductive hypothesis, that meaning we seek to show



                    $$2^{k+1} > 2(k+1) + 1 = 2k + 3$$



                    Then we note: by multiplying by $2$ on both sides of the assumption in the inductive hypothesis,



                    $$2 cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1} > 2 cdot (2k+1) = 4k + 2 $$



                    We want to show $4k+2 > 2k+4$: this is a detail crucial to your proof that is not immediately obvious (you yourself aren't sure). So note: like solving any other inequality,



                    $$4k+2 > 2k+4 Rightarrow 2k > 2 Rightarrow k > 1$$



                    Since our induction only cares about $n$ (and thus $k$) greater than or equal to $3$, then $4k+2 > 2k+4$ is perfectly valid for all the $k$ we care about. Thus, since trivially $2k+4 > 2k+3$, we have



                    $$2^{k+1} > 2 cdot (2k+1) = 4k + 2 > 2k+4 > 2k+3 = 2(k+1)+1$$



                    Having shown that $$2^{k+1} > 2(k+1)+1$$ we have shown that, for all $n geq 3$, $P(n)$ holds, i.e. for all $n geq 3, 2^n > 2n+1$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    This is valid, you should just clean up and clarify some details a little.





                    Let $P(n)$ denote the proposition, $2^n > 2n + 1$, which we seek to prove for $n geq 3$.



                    Base Case: Here, we check $n=3$. $2^3 = 8 > 7 = 2(3) + 1$, so this holds.



                    Inductive Hypothesis: Suppose $P(k)$ for some $k > 3$. That is, we suppose that $2^k > 2k + 1$.



                    Induction: We seek to show $P(k+1)$ holds under the inductive hypothesis, that meaning we seek to show



                    $$2^{k+1} > 2(k+1) + 1 = 2k + 3$$



                    Then we note: by multiplying by $2$ on both sides of the assumption in the inductive hypothesis,



                    $$2 cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1} > 2 cdot (2k+1) = 4k + 2 $$



                    We want to show $4k+2 > 2k+4$: this is a detail crucial to your proof that is not immediately obvious (you yourself aren't sure). So note: like solving any other inequality,



                    $$4k+2 > 2k+4 Rightarrow 2k > 2 Rightarrow k > 1$$



                    Since our induction only cares about $n$ (and thus $k$) greater than or equal to $3$, then $4k+2 > 2k+4$ is perfectly valid for all the $k$ we care about. Thus, since trivially $2k+4 > 2k+3$, we have



                    $$2^{k+1} > 2 cdot (2k+1) = 4k + 2 > 2k+4 > 2k+3 = 2(k+1)+1$$



                    Having shown that $$2^{k+1} > 2(k+1)+1$$ we have shown that, for all $n geq 3$, $P(n)$ holds, i.e. for all $n geq 3, 2^n > 2n+1$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:45









                    Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

                    5,9771936




                    5,9771936























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Certain things are not transparent when expressed in symbols. In the formula ('sequence') $2^n$, every term is obtained by doubling the previous one: $2^{n+1} = 2times 2^n$. In the other formula we add 2 to the previous term: $2(n+1)+1 = 2n+1 + 2$.



                        Between a job which doubles your pay every month and one that adds 2 more dollars to your pay every month which one is preferable? (I assume you are not Perelman!)






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Certain things are not transparent when expressed in symbols. In the formula ('sequence') $2^n$, every term is obtained by doubling the previous one: $2^{n+1} = 2times 2^n$. In the other formula we add 2 to the previous term: $2(n+1)+1 = 2n+1 + 2$.



                          Between a job which doubles your pay every month and one that adds 2 more dollars to your pay every month which one is preferable? (I assume you are not Perelman!)






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            Certain things are not transparent when expressed in symbols. In the formula ('sequence') $2^n$, every term is obtained by doubling the previous one: $2^{n+1} = 2times 2^n$. In the other formula we add 2 to the previous term: $2(n+1)+1 = 2n+1 + 2$.



                            Between a job which doubles your pay every month and one that adds 2 more dollars to your pay every month which one is preferable? (I assume you are not Perelman!)






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Certain things are not transparent when expressed in symbols. In the formula ('sequence') $2^n$, every term is obtained by doubling the previous one: $2^{n+1} = 2times 2^n$. In the other formula we add 2 to the previous term: $2(n+1)+1 = 2n+1 + 2$.



                            Between a job which doubles your pay every month and one that adds 2 more dollars to your pay every month which one is preferable? (I assume you are not Perelman!)







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 14 '18 at 2:46









                            P VanchinathanP Vanchinathan

                            15.1k12136




                            15.1k12136















                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Wiesbaden

                                Marschland

                                Dieringhausen