$bigcap_{i}mathrm{co}(A_i)=mathrm{co}(bigcap_{i}A_i)$












3












$begingroup$


Let $(A_i: i in I)$ be a family of closed sets contained in $[0,1]$ such that for all $i,j in I$ there exists $k in I$ for which $A_i cap A_j=A_k$. Denote by $mathrm{co}(X)$ the convex hull of $X$. Is it true that
$$
bigcap_{i in I}mathrm{co}(A_i)=mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright),,,?
$$



Ps. Here a related question. Here, under weaker conditions, it is already shown that the right hand side is always contained in the left hand side. I guess a positive answer also on the converse inclusion.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 21 '18 at 14:23








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
    $endgroup$
    – Paolo Leonetti
    Dec 21 '18 at 14:26


















3












$begingroup$


Let $(A_i: i in I)$ be a family of closed sets contained in $[0,1]$ such that for all $i,j in I$ there exists $k in I$ for which $A_i cap A_j=A_k$. Denote by $mathrm{co}(X)$ the convex hull of $X$. Is it true that
$$
bigcap_{i in I}mathrm{co}(A_i)=mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright),,,?
$$



Ps. Here a related question. Here, under weaker conditions, it is already shown that the right hand side is always contained in the left hand side. I guess a positive answer also on the converse inclusion.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 21 '18 at 14:23








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
    $endgroup$
    – Paolo Leonetti
    Dec 21 '18 at 14:26
















3












3








3


0



$begingroup$


Let $(A_i: i in I)$ be a family of closed sets contained in $[0,1]$ such that for all $i,j in I$ there exists $k in I$ for which $A_i cap A_j=A_k$. Denote by $mathrm{co}(X)$ the convex hull of $X$. Is it true that
$$
bigcap_{i in I}mathrm{co}(A_i)=mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright),,,?
$$



Ps. Here a related question. Here, under weaker conditions, it is already shown that the right hand side is always contained in the left hand side. I guess a positive answer also on the converse inclusion.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $(A_i: i in I)$ be a family of closed sets contained in $[0,1]$ such that for all $i,j in I$ there exists $k in I$ for which $A_i cap A_j=A_k$. Denote by $mathrm{co}(X)$ the convex hull of $X$. Is it true that
$$
bigcap_{i in I}mathrm{co}(A_i)=mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright),,,?
$$



Ps. Here a related question. Here, under weaker conditions, it is already shown that the right hand side is always contained in the left hand side. I guess a positive answer also on the converse inclusion.







general-topology compactness convex-hulls






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 22 '18 at 4:09









Alex Ravsky

42.4k32383




42.4k32383










asked Dec 21 '18 at 14:11









Paolo LeonettiPaolo Leonetti

11.5k21550




11.5k21550












  • $begingroup$
    What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 21 '18 at 14:23








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
    $endgroup$
    – Paolo Leonetti
    Dec 21 '18 at 14:26




















  • $begingroup$
    What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 21 '18 at 14:23








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
    $endgroup$
    – Paolo Leonetti
    Dec 21 '18 at 14:26


















$begingroup$
What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 21 '18 at 14:23






$begingroup$
What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 21 '18 at 14:23






1




1




$begingroup$
I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Dec 21 '18 at 14:26






$begingroup$
I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Dec 21 '18 at 14:26












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The converse inclusion holds for any family $(A_i: i in I)$ of compact subsets of a (Hausdorff) locally convex topological vector space $V$ (over $Bbb R$). Indeed, let $ain Vsetminus mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. By Hahn–Banach separation theorem there exists a continuous linear map $lambda : Vto Bbb R$ and $t inBbb R$ such that $lambda(a) < t < lambda (b)$ for all $bin mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. Therefore $U=lambda^{-1}(t,infty)$ is a convex open subset of $V$ containing $bigcap_{i in I}A_i$ but not containing $a$. By so-called generalized Shura-Bura’s lemma, there exists a finite subset $J$ of $I$ such that $bigcap_{i in J}A_isubset U$ (indeed, otherwise $(A_isetminus U: i in I)$ is a centered family of compact sets with empty intersection). Since $bigcap_{i in J}A_i=A_j$ for some $jin I$, we have $mathrm{co} A_jsubset Usubset Vsetminus{a}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048529%2fbigcap-i-mathrmcoa-i-mathrmco-bigcap-ia-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The converse inclusion holds for any family $(A_i: i in I)$ of compact subsets of a (Hausdorff) locally convex topological vector space $V$ (over $Bbb R$). Indeed, let $ain Vsetminus mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. By Hahn–Banach separation theorem there exists a continuous linear map $lambda : Vto Bbb R$ and $t inBbb R$ such that $lambda(a) < t < lambda (b)$ for all $bin mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. Therefore $U=lambda^{-1}(t,infty)$ is a convex open subset of $V$ containing $bigcap_{i in I}A_i$ but not containing $a$. By so-called generalized Shura-Bura’s lemma, there exists a finite subset $J$ of $I$ such that $bigcap_{i in J}A_isubset U$ (indeed, otherwise $(A_isetminus U: i in I)$ is a centered family of compact sets with empty intersection). Since $bigcap_{i in J}A_i=A_j$ for some $jin I$, we have $mathrm{co} A_jsubset Usubset Vsetminus{a}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The converse inclusion holds for any family $(A_i: i in I)$ of compact subsets of a (Hausdorff) locally convex topological vector space $V$ (over $Bbb R$). Indeed, let $ain Vsetminus mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. By Hahn–Banach separation theorem there exists a continuous linear map $lambda : Vto Bbb R$ and $t inBbb R$ such that $lambda(a) < t < lambda (b)$ for all $bin mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. Therefore $U=lambda^{-1}(t,infty)$ is a convex open subset of $V$ containing $bigcap_{i in I}A_i$ but not containing $a$. By so-called generalized Shura-Bura’s lemma, there exists a finite subset $J$ of $I$ such that $bigcap_{i in J}A_isubset U$ (indeed, otherwise $(A_isetminus U: i in I)$ is a centered family of compact sets with empty intersection). Since $bigcap_{i in J}A_i=A_j$ for some $jin I$, we have $mathrm{co} A_jsubset Usubset Vsetminus{a}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The converse inclusion holds for any family $(A_i: i in I)$ of compact subsets of a (Hausdorff) locally convex topological vector space $V$ (over $Bbb R$). Indeed, let $ain Vsetminus mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. By Hahn–Banach separation theorem there exists a continuous linear map $lambda : Vto Bbb R$ and $t inBbb R$ such that $lambda(a) < t < lambda (b)$ for all $bin mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. Therefore $U=lambda^{-1}(t,infty)$ is a convex open subset of $V$ containing $bigcap_{i in I}A_i$ but not containing $a$. By so-called generalized Shura-Bura’s lemma, there exists a finite subset $J$ of $I$ such that $bigcap_{i in J}A_isubset U$ (indeed, otherwise $(A_isetminus U: i in I)$ is a centered family of compact sets with empty intersection). Since $bigcap_{i in J}A_i=A_j$ for some $jin I$, we have $mathrm{co} A_jsubset Usubset Vsetminus{a}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The converse inclusion holds for any family $(A_i: i in I)$ of compact subsets of a (Hausdorff) locally convex topological vector space $V$ (over $Bbb R$). Indeed, let $ain Vsetminus mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. By Hahn–Banach separation theorem there exists a continuous linear map $lambda : Vto Bbb R$ and $t inBbb R$ such that $lambda(a) < t < lambda (b)$ for all $bin mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. Therefore $U=lambda^{-1}(t,infty)$ is a convex open subset of $V$ containing $bigcap_{i in I}A_i$ but not containing $a$. By so-called generalized Shura-Bura’s lemma, there exists a finite subset $J$ of $I$ such that $bigcap_{i in J}A_isubset U$ (indeed, otherwise $(A_isetminus U: i in I)$ is a centered family of compact sets with empty intersection). Since $bigcap_{i in J}A_i=A_j$ for some $jin I$, we have $mathrm{co} A_jsubset Usubset Vsetminus{a}$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 22 '18 at 4:08









        Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky

        42.4k32383




        42.4k32383






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048529%2fbigcap-i-mathrmcoa-i-mathrmco-bigcap-ia-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Tonle Sap (See)

            I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

            Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft