$bigcap_{i}mathrm{co}(A_i)=mathrm{co}(bigcap_{i}A_i)$
$begingroup$
Let $(A_i: i in I)$ be a family of closed sets contained in $[0,1]$ such that for all $i,j in I$ there exists $k in I$ for which $A_i cap A_j=A_k$. Denote by $mathrm{co}(X)$ the convex hull of $X$. Is it true that
$$
bigcap_{i in I}mathrm{co}(A_i)=mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright),,,?
$$
Ps. Here a related question. Here, under weaker conditions, it is already shown that the right hand side is always contained in the left hand side. I guess a positive answer also on the converse inclusion.
general-topology compactness convex-hulls
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(A_i: i in I)$ be a family of closed sets contained in $[0,1]$ such that for all $i,j in I$ there exists $k in I$ for which $A_i cap A_j=A_k$. Denote by $mathrm{co}(X)$ the convex hull of $X$. Is it true that
$$
bigcap_{i in I}mathrm{co}(A_i)=mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright),,,?
$$
Ps. Here a related question. Here, under weaker conditions, it is already shown that the right hand side is always contained in the left hand side. I guess a positive answer also on the converse inclusion.
general-topology compactness convex-hulls
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 21 '18 at 14:23
1
$begingroup$
I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Dec 21 '18 at 14:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(A_i: i in I)$ be a family of closed sets contained in $[0,1]$ such that for all $i,j in I$ there exists $k in I$ for which $A_i cap A_j=A_k$. Denote by $mathrm{co}(X)$ the convex hull of $X$. Is it true that
$$
bigcap_{i in I}mathrm{co}(A_i)=mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright),,,?
$$
Ps. Here a related question. Here, under weaker conditions, it is already shown that the right hand side is always contained in the left hand side. I guess a positive answer also on the converse inclusion.
general-topology compactness convex-hulls
$endgroup$
Let $(A_i: i in I)$ be a family of closed sets contained in $[0,1]$ such that for all $i,j in I$ there exists $k in I$ for which $A_i cap A_j=A_k$. Denote by $mathrm{co}(X)$ the convex hull of $X$. Is it true that
$$
bigcap_{i in I}mathrm{co}(A_i)=mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright),,,?
$$
Ps. Here a related question. Here, under weaker conditions, it is already shown that the right hand side is always contained in the left hand side. I guess a positive answer also on the converse inclusion.
general-topology compactness convex-hulls
general-topology compactness convex-hulls
edited Dec 22 '18 at 4:09
Alex Ravsky
42.4k32383
42.4k32383
asked Dec 21 '18 at 14:11
Paolo LeonettiPaolo Leonetti
11.5k21550
11.5k21550
$begingroup$
What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 21 '18 at 14:23
1
$begingroup$
I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Dec 21 '18 at 14:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 21 '18 at 14:23
1
$begingroup$
I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Dec 21 '18 at 14:26
$begingroup$
What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 21 '18 at 14:23
$begingroup$
What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 21 '18 at 14:23
1
1
$begingroup$
I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Dec 21 '18 at 14:26
$begingroup$
I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Dec 21 '18 at 14:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The converse inclusion holds for any family $(A_i: i in I)$ of compact subsets of a (Hausdorff) locally convex topological vector space $V$ (over $Bbb R$). Indeed, let $ain Vsetminus mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. By Hahn–Banach separation theorem there exists a continuous linear map $lambda : Vto Bbb R$ and $t inBbb R$ such that $lambda(a) < t < lambda (b)$ for all $bin mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. Therefore $U=lambda^{-1}(t,infty)$ is a convex open subset of $V$ containing $bigcap_{i in I}A_i$ but not containing $a$. By so-called generalized Shura-Bura’s lemma, there exists a finite subset $J$ of $I$ such that $bigcap_{i in J}A_isubset U$ (indeed, otherwise $(A_isetminus U: i in I)$ is a centered family of compact sets with empty intersection). Since $bigcap_{i in J}A_i=A_j$ for some $jin I$, we have $mathrm{co} A_jsubset Usubset Vsetminus{a}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048529%2fbigcap-i-mathrmcoa-i-mathrmco-bigcap-ia-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The converse inclusion holds for any family $(A_i: i in I)$ of compact subsets of a (Hausdorff) locally convex topological vector space $V$ (over $Bbb R$). Indeed, let $ain Vsetminus mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. By Hahn–Banach separation theorem there exists a continuous linear map $lambda : Vto Bbb R$ and $t inBbb R$ such that $lambda(a) < t < lambda (b)$ for all $bin mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. Therefore $U=lambda^{-1}(t,infty)$ is a convex open subset of $V$ containing $bigcap_{i in I}A_i$ but not containing $a$. By so-called generalized Shura-Bura’s lemma, there exists a finite subset $J$ of $I$ such that $bigcap_{i in J}A_isubset U$ (indeed, otherwise $(A_isetminus U: i in I)$ is a centered family of compact sets with empty intersection). Since $bigcap_{i in J}A_i=A_j$ for some $jin I$, we have $mathrm{co} A_jsubset Usubset Vsetminus{a}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The converse inclusion holds for any family $(A_i: i in I)$ of compact subsets of a (Hausdorff) locally convex topological vector space $V$ (over $Bbb R$). Indeed, let $ain Vsetminus mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. By Hahn–Banach separation theorem there exists a continuous linear map $lambda : Vto Bbb R$ and $t inBbb R$ such that $lambda(a) < t < lambda (b)$ for all $bin mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. Therefore $U=lambda^{-1}(t,infty)$ is a convex open subset of $V$ containing $bigcap_{i in I}A_i$ but not containing $a$. By so-called generalized Shura-Bura’s lemma, there exists a finite subset $J$ of $I$ such that $bigcap_{i in J}A_isubset U$ (indeed, otherwise $(A_isetminus U: i in I)$ is a centered family of compact sets with empty intersection). Since $bigcap_{i in J}A_i=A_j$ for some $jin I$, we have $mathrm{co} A_jsubset Usubset Vsetminus{a}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The converse inclusion holds for any family $(A_i: i in I)$ of compact subsets of a (Hausdorff) locally convex topological vector space $V$ (over $Bbb R$). Indeed, let $ain Vsetminus mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. By Hahn–Banach separation theorem there exists a continuous linear map $lambda : Vto Bbb R$ and $t inBbb R$ such that $lambda(a) < t < lambda (b)$ for all $bin mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. Therefore $U=lambda^{-1}(t,infty)$ is a convex open subset of $V$ containing $bigcap_{i in I}A_i$ but not containing $a$. By so-called generalized Shura-Bura’s lemma, there exists a finite subset $J$ of $I$ such that $bigcap_{i in J}A_isubset U$ (indeed, otherwise $(A_isetminus U: i in I)$ is a centered family of compact sets with empty intersection). Since $bigcap_{i in J}A_i=A_j$ for some $jin I$, we have $mathrm{co} A_jsubset Usubset Vsetminus{a}$.
$endgroup$
The converse inclusion holds for any family $(A_i: i in I)$ of compact subsets of a (Hausdorff) locally convex topological vector space $V$ (over $Bbb R$). Indeed, let $ain Vsetminus mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. By Hahn–Banach separation theorem there exists a continuous linear map $lambda : Vto Bbb R$ and $t inBbb R$ such that $lambda(a) < t < lambda (b)$ for all $bin mathrm{co}left(bigcap_{i in I}A_iright)$. Therefore $U=lambda^{-1}(t,infty)$ is a convex open subset of $V$ containing $bigcap_{i in I}A_i$ but not containing $a$. By so-called generalized Shura-Bura’s lemma, there exists a finite subset $J$ of $I$ such that $bigcap_{i in J}A_isubset U$ (indeed, otherwise $(A_isetminus U: i in I)$ is a centered family of compact sets with empty intersection). Since $bigcap_{i in J}A_i=A_j$ for some $jin I$, we have $mathrm{co} A_jsubset Usubset Vsetminus{a}$.
answered Dec 22 '18 at 4:08
Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky
42.4k32383
42.4k32383
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048529%2fbigcap-i-mathrmcoa-i-mathrmco-bigcap-ia-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What happens when you try to prove it? Can you show the left is a subset of the right? Can you show the right is a subset of the left? --> In this forum, you should show your work when you pose a question. If you do not, the question may be "put on hold" until you do.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 21 '18 at 14:23
1
$begingroup$
I already proved in the related link that RHS is a subset of LHS, under weaker conditions. However, the related question is false. A counterexample will be posted soon; on the other hand, the sets were not bounded. Here, assuming that each $A_i$ is compact you can use, by the Caratheodory theorem, that operators closure and conv commute. Hence the identity simplifies to the above one.
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Dec 21 '18 at 14:26