Prove that $sum_{k=0}^{2n} binom {2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k} frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} frac{1}{k+1} = 0. $
$begingroup$
Let $n$ be a positive integer. Prove that
$$
sum_{k=0}^{2n} binom {2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k} frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} frac{1}{k+1} = 0.
$$
I am trying to solve this by using induction on $n$. I have proven the sum to be zero in the case $n=1$. Assuming that the sum is zero for $n=m$ ($m$ is a positive integer), how do I prove that it implies that the sum is zero for $n=m+1$?
Can I get some hints?
summation permutations binomial-coefficients
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n$ be a positive integer. Prove that
$$
sum_{k=0}^{2n} binom {2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k} frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} frac{1}{k+1} = 0.
$$
I am trying to solve this by using induction on $n$. I have proven the sum to be zero in the case $n=1$. Assuming that the sum is zero for $n=m$ ($m$ is a positive integer), how do I prove that it implies that the sum is zero for $n=m+1$?
Can I get some hints?
summation permutations binomial-coefficients
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n$ be a positive integer. Prove that
$$
sum_{k=0}^{2n} binom {2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k} frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} frac{1}{k+1} = 0.
$$
I am trying to solve this by using induction on $n$. I have proven the sum to be zero in the case $n=1$. Assuming that the sum is zero for $n=m$ ($m$ is a positive integer), how do I prove that it implies that the sum is zero for $n=m+1$?
Can I get some hints?
summation permutations binomial-coefficients
$endgroup$
Let $n$ be a positive integer. Prove that
$$
sum_{k=0}^{2n} binom {2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k} frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} frac{1}{k+1} = 0.
$$
I am trying to solve this by using induction on $n$. I have proven the sum to be zero in the case $n=1$. Assuming that the sum is zero for $n=m$ ($m$ is a positive integer), how do I prove that it implies that the sum is zero for $n=m+1$?
Can I get some hints?
summation permutations binomial-coefficients
summation permutations binomial-coefficients
edited Dec 21 '18 at 13:59
Brahadeesh
6,42442363
6,42442363
asked Dec 19 '18 at 19:05
tonytony
317110
317110
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Starting from
$$sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose k} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} frac{1}{k+1}$$
we get
$$frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose k+1} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}
= frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose 2n-1} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n+k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n}
sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} (1+z)^{k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n}
left(1-frac{1}{2} (1+z)right)^{2n}
\ = frac{1}{2^{2n+1}n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n} (1-z)^{2n}
= frac{1}{2^{2n+1}n} [z^{2n-1}] (1-z^2)^{2n} = 0.$$
The last step is zero by inspection since we are extracting a
coefficient on an odd power from a polynomial where all the powers are
even, and we have the claim.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's approach the sum through the Hypergeometric Function.
To this purpose let's rewrite it as
$$
eqalign{
& S(n) = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{{left( { - 1} right)^{,k} } over {2^{,k} left( {k + 1} right)}}} = cr
& = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{1 over {left( {k + 1} right)}}left( { - {1 over 2}} right)^{,k} } = cr
& = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {t_{,k} left( { - {1 over 2}} right)^{,k} } cr}
$$
The $t_k$ are in the following ratio
$$
eqalign{
& t_{,0} = 1 cr
& {{t_{,k + 1} } over {t_{,k} }} = cr
& = {{left( {2n + k + 1} right)!} over {left( {k + 1} right)!left( {k + 1} right)!left( {2n - k - 1} right)!left( {k + 2} right)}}
{{k!k!left( {2n - k} right)!left( {k + 1} right)} over {left( {2n + k} right)!}} = cr
& = - {{left( {k + 2n + 1} right)left( {k - 2n} right)} over {left( {k + 2} right)}}{1 over {left( {k + 1} right)}} cr}
$$
so the sum can be expressed as
$$
eqalign{
& S(n) = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{{left( { - 1} right)^{,k} } over {2^{,k} left( {k + 1} right)}}} = cr
& = {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {2n + 1,; - 2n} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right) cr}
$$
For $n=0$ this gives
$$
S(0) = {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {1,;0} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right) = 1
$$
while for $0<n$ we have
$$
eqalign{
& {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {2n + 1,; - 2n} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right)quad left| {;0 < n} right.quad = cr
& = {{Gamma left( 2 right)} over {Gamma left( {2n + 1} right)Gamma left( { - 2n} right)}}sumlimits_{0, le ,k,}
{{{Gamma left( {2n + 1 + k} right)Gamma left( { - 2n + k} right)} over {Gamma left( {2 + k} right)}}} {1 over {2^{,k} k!}} cr}
$$
Note that we can arrive to the same result by expressing the binomials through the Gamma function and
performing some algebraic simplifications.
To the fraction outside the sum we can apply the Reflection formula for the Gamma function,
which in the inverted form is valid all over the complex field
$$
{1 over {Gamma left( {z + 1} right),Gamma left( { - z} right)}} = - {{sin left( {pi ,z} right)} over pi }quad left| {;forall z in mathbb C} right.
$$
then clearly
$$
S(n)quad left| {;0 < n in Z} right. = sin left( {2pi ,n} right) cdot left( cdots right) = 0
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you use the binomial theorem for closed Form it's not quite clear to me how to proceed. Can you give a hint?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 19:17
$begingroup$
@Diger: I found an alternative approach that looks easier (to my opinion)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Dec 21 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
I prefered your other approach, which seemed easier as you made it look as if there is not much left to do.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
In fact the zero outside the sum is canceled by the pole inside the sum up to $k=2n$.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 21:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Residue Approach
$$
begin{align}
sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{-2n-1}{k}binom{2n+1}{k+1}frac1{2^k}\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{-2n-1}{k}binom{2n+1}{2n-k}frac1{2^k}\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left(1+frac x2right)^{-2n-1}(1+x)^{2n+1}\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{-1}right]left(frac1{x+2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag1
end{align}
$$
So, we are interested in the residue at $x=0$ of
$$
f(x)=left(frac1{x+2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag2
$$
which is the same as the residue at $x=0$ of
$$
-f(-x)=left(frac1{x-2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag3
$$
Since $-f(-x)=f(x-2)$, this is the residue of $f(x)$ at $x=-2$.
Thus, the residues of $f(x)$ at $x=0$ and $x=-2$ are equal.
For $|x|gt2$, $|f(x)|leleft(frac2{|x|-2}right)^{2n+1}$, and for $nge1$, $$
left|int_{|x|=R}f(x),mathrm{d}xright|le2pi Rleft(frac2{R-2}right)^{2n+1}stackrel{Rtoinfty}{longrightarrow}0tag4
$$
Thus, Cauchy's Residue Theorem says the sum of the residues is $0$. Therefore, for $nge1$, we get that both residues are $0$.
This means that for $nge1$,
$$
sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}=0tag5
$$
A More Elementary Approach
$$
begin{align}
&sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac12right)^ktag6\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n+k}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac12right)^ktag7\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac{1+x}2right)^ktag8\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n-1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac{1+x}2right)^{k+1}tag9\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n-1}left[left(frac{1-x}2right)^{2n+1}-1right]tag{10}\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left[left(frac{1-x^2}2right)^{2n-1}left(frac{1-x}2right)^2-(1+x)^{2n-1}right]tag{11}\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left[left(frac{1-x^2}2right)^{2n-1}frac{1+x^2}4right]tag{12}\
&=-frac{2^{-2n}}{2n+1}left(left[x^{2n}right]left(1-x^2right)^{2n-1}+left[x^{2n-2}right]left(1-x^2right)^{2n-1}right)tag{13}\[6pt]
&=-frac{2^{-2n}}{2n+1}left((-1)^nbinom{2n-1}{n}+(-1)^{n-1}binom{2n-1}{n-1}right)tag{14}\[12pt]
&=0tag{15}
end{align}
$$
Explanation:
$phantom{1}(6)$: $binom{2n+k}{k}=binom{2n+k}{2n}$ and $frac1{k+1}binom{2n}{k}=frac1{2n+1}binom{2n+1}{k+1}$
$phantom{1}(7)$: $binom{2n+k}{2n}=left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n+k}$
$phantom{1}(8)$: move $(1+x)^k$ inside the sum
$phantom{1}(9)$: move $-frac2{1+x}$ outside the sum
$(10)$: Binomial Theorem
$(11)$: distribute $(1+x)^{2n-1}$
$(12)$: toss out odd powers and powers too small (if $nge1$)
$(13)$: $left[x^{2n}right]x^2f(x)=left[x^{2n-2}right]f(x)$
$(14)$: Binomial Theorem
$(15)$: evaluate
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why does follow from $|f(x)|simleft(frac2{|x|}right)^{2n+1}$ that the sum of residues is zero?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 23:00
$begingroup$
Cauchy's Residue Theorem
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 3:23
$begingroup$
Is that a joke? So are you saying about $x=0$ you can neglect all the terms from $1/(x+2)$ in the expansion to calculate the residues?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 10:59
$begingroup$
@Diger: There are two singularities of $f(x)$: one at $x=0$ and one at $x=-2$. The integral of $f(x)$ around a circle $|x|=R$, for $Rgt2$, is $2pi i$ times the sum of the residues of $f(x)$ at those singularities. Since a simple bound of that integral vanishes as $Rto0$, that integral must be $0$ (for all $Rgt2$). Thus, the sum of the residues is $0$. Since the residue at $x=0$ is equal to the residue at $x=-2$, both must be $0$.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 11:25
$begingroup$
You mean as $Rrightarrowinfty$, or? I guess that was what confused me in the first place. Thx
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 11:38
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I prefer Marko Riedels result, since it doesn‘t require prerequisites, but for the record:
$$
sumlimits_{ {0 le } k { le 2n} } {binom{2n+k}{2n} binom{2n}{k} {{left( frac{ - t}{2} right)^{k} }}} = P_{2n}(1-t)
$$
with the Legendre Polynomial $P_{2n}$. It is not too difficult to show, by using the recurrence for the Legendre polynomials $P_n(x)$ i.e.
$$
0 = (n+1) P_{n+1}(x) - (2n+1)xP_n(x) + nP_{n-1}(x) , .
$$
Plugging in the above expression for $n$ instead of $2n$ yields
begin{align}
sum_{k=0}^{n+1} left(frac{-t}{2}right)^k Bigg{ &(n+1) binom{n+1+k}{n+1} binom{n+1}{k} - 2(2n+1) binom{n+k-1}{n} binom{n}{k-1} \
&-(2n+1) binom{n+k}{n} binom{n}{k} + n binom{n-1+k}{n-1} binom{n-1}{k} Bigg} = 0
end{align}
which vanishes termwise after some lengthy but not difficult algebra after converting to factorials; here $binom{n}{k}=0$ if $k>n$.
Then
$$
int_0^1 P_{2n}(1-t) , {rm d}t = int_0^1 P_{2n}(t) , {rm d}t = frac{1}{2^{2n}(2n)!} frac{{rm d}^{2n-1}}{{rm d}t^{2n-1}} left( t^2 -1right)^{2n} Bigg|_{t=0}^{t=1} = 0
$$
by Rodrigues formula and the fact that an odd number of derivatives always leaves at least a single $t$ in each term and since $2n-1 < 2n$ each term will also contain a factor $(t^2-1)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046755%2fprove-that-sum-k-02n-binom-2nkk-binom2nk-frac-1k2k-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Starting from
$$sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose k} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} frac{1}{k+1}$$
we get
$$frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose k+1} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}
= frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose 2n-1} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n+k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n}
sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} (1+z)^{k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n}
left(1-frac{1}{2} (1+z)right)^{2n}
\ = frac{1}{2^{2n+1}n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n} (1-z)^{2n}
= frac{1}{2^{2n+1}n} [z^{2n-1}] (1-z^2)^{2n} = 0.$$
The last step is zero by inspection since we are extracting a
coefficient on an odd power from a polynomial where all the powers are
even, and we have the claim.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Starting from
$$sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose k} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} frac{1}{k+1}$$
we get
$$frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose k+1} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}
= frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose 2n-1} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n+k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n}
sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} (1+z)^{k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n}
left(1-frac{1}{2} (1+z)right)^{2n}
\ = frac{1}{2^{2n+1}n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n} (1-z)^{2n}
= frac{1}{2^{2n+1}n} [z^{2n-1}] (1-z^2)^{2n} = 0.$$
The last step is zero by inspection since we are extracting a
coefficient on an odd power from a polynomial where all the powers are
even, and we have the claim.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Starting from
$$sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose k} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} frac{1}{k+1}$$
we get
$$frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose k+1} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}
= frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose 2n-1} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n+k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n}
sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} (1+z)^{k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n}
left(1-frac{1}{2} (1+z)right)^{2n}
\ = frac{1}{2^{2n+1}n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n} (1-z)^{2n}
= frac{1}{2^{2n+1}n} [z^{2n-1}] (1-z^2)^{2n} = 0.$$
The last step is zero by inspection since we are extracting a
coefficient on an odd power from a polynomial where all the powers are
even, and we have the claim.
$endgroup$
Starting from
$$sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose k} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} frac{1}{k+1}$$
we get
$$frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose k+1} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}
= frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2n+kchoose 2n-1} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n+k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n}
sum_{k=0}^{2n} {2nchoose k}
frac{(-1)^k}{2^k} (1+z)^{k}
\ = frac{1}{2n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n}
left(1-frac{1}{2} (1+z)right)^{2n}
\ = frac{1}{2^{2n+1}n} [z^{2n-1}] (1+z)^{2n} (1-z)^{2n}
= frac{1}{2^{2n+1}n} [z^{2n-1}] (1-z^2)^{2n} = 0.$$
The last step is zero by inspection since we are extracting a
coefficient on an odd power from a polynomial where all the powers are
even, and we have the claim.
answered Dec 21 '18 at 15:01
Marko RiedelMarko Riedel
40.5k339109
40.5k339109
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's approach the sum through the Hypergeometric Function.
To this purpose let's rewrite it as
$$
eqalign{
& S(n) = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{{left( { - 1} right)^{,k} } over {2^{,k} left( {k + 1} right)}}} = cr
& = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{1 over {left( {k + 1} right)}}left( { - {1 over 2}} right)^{,k} } = cr
& = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {t_{,k} left( { - {1 over 2}} right)^{,k} } cr}
$$
The $t_k$ are in the following ratio
$$
eqalign{
& t_{,0} = 1 cr
& {{t_{,k + 1} } over {t_{,k} }} = cr
& = {{left( {2n + k + 1} right)!} over {left( {k + 1} right)!left( {k + 1} right)!left( {2n - k - 1} right)!left( {k + 2} right)}}
{{k!k!left( {2n - k} right)!left( {k + 1} right)} over {left( {2n + k} right)!}} = cr
& = - {{left( {k + 2n + 1} right)left( {k - 2n} right)} over {left( {k + 2} right)}}{1 over {left( {k + 1} right)}} cr}
$$
so the sum can be expressed as
$$
eqalign{
& S(n) = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{{left( { - 1} right)^{,k} } over {2^{,k} left( {k + 1} right)}}} = cr
& = {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {2n + 1,; - 2n} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right) cr}
$$
For $n=0$ this gives
$$
S(0) = {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {1,;0} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right) = 1
$$
while for $0<n$ we have
$$
eqalign{
& {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {2n + 1,; - 2n} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right)quad left| {;0 < n} right.quad = cr
& = {{Gamma left( 2 right)} over {Gamma left( {2n + 1} right)Gamma left( { - 2n} right)}}sumlimits_{0, le ,k,}
{{{Gamma left( {2n + 1 + k} right)Gamma left( { - 2n + k} right)} over {Gamma left( {2 + k} right)}}} {1 over {2^{,k} k!}} cr}
$$
Note that we can arrive to the same result by expressing the binomials through the Gamma function and
performing some algebraic simplifications.
To the fraction outside the sum we can apply the Reflection formula for the Gamma function,
which in the inverted form is valid all over the complex field
$$
{1 over {Gamma left( {z + 1} right),Gamma left( { - z} right)}} = - {{sin left( {pi ,z} right)} over pi }quad left| {;forall z in mathbb C} right.
$$
then clearly
$$
S(n)quad left| {;0 < n in Z} right. = sin left( {2pi ,n} right) cdot left( cdots right) = 0
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you use the binomial theorem for closed Form it's not quite clear to me how to proceed. Can you give a hint?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 19:17
$begingroup$
@Diger: I found an alternative approach that looks easier (to my opinion)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Dec 21 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
I prefered your other approach, which seemed easier as you made it look as if there is not much left to do.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
In fact the zero outside the sum is canceled by the pole inside the sum up to $k=2n$.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 21:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's approach the sum through the Hypergeometric Function.
To this purpose let's rewrite it as
$$
eqalign{
& S(n) = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{{left( { - 1} right)^{,k} } over {2^{,k} left( {k + 1} right)}}} = cr
& = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{1 over {left( {k + 1} right)}}left( { - {1 over 2}} right)^{,k} } = cr
& = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {t_{,k} left( { - {1 over 2}} right)^{,k} } cr}
$$
The $t_k$ are in the following ratio
$$
eqalign{
& t_{,0} = 1 cr
& {{t_{,k + 1} } over {t_{,k} }} = cr
& = {{left( {2n + k + 1} right)!} over {left( {k + 1} right)!left( {k + 1} right)!left( {2n - k - 1} right)!left( {k + 2} right)}}
{{k!k!left( {2n - k} right)!left( {k + 1} right)} over {left( {2n + k} right)!}} = cr
& = - {{left( {k + 2n + 1} right)left( {k - 2n} right)} over {left( {k + 2} right)}}{1 over {left( {k + 1} right)}} cr}
$$
so the sum can be expressed as
$$
eqalign{
& S(n) = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{{left( { - 1} right)^{,k} } over {2^{,k} left( {k + 1} right)}}} = cr
& = {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {2n + 1,; - 2n} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right) cr}
$$
For $n=0$ this gives
$$
S(0) = {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {1,;0} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right) = 1
$$
while for $0<n$ we have
$$
eqalign{
& {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {2n + 1,; - 2n} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right)quad left| {;0 < n} right.quad = cr
& = {{Gamma left( 2 right)} over {Gamma left( {2n + 1} right)Gamma left( { - 2n} right)}}sumlimits_{0, le ,k,}
{{{Gamma left( {2n + 1 + k} right)Gamma left( { - 2n + k} right)} over {Gamma left( {2 + k} right)}}} {1 over {2^{,k} k!}} cr}
$$
Note that we can arrive to the same result by expressing the binomials through the Gamma function and
performing some algebraic simplifications.
To the fraction outside the sum we can apply the Reflection formula for the Gamma function,
which in the inverted form is valid all over the complex field
$$
{1 over {Gamma left( {z + 1} right),Gamma left( { - z} right)}} = - {{sin left( {pi ,z} right)} over pi }quad left| {;forall z in mathbb C} right.
$$
then clearly
$$
S(n)quad left| {;0 < n in Z} right. = sin left( {2pi ,n} right) cdot left( cdots right) = 0
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you use the binomial theorem for closed Form it's not quite clear to me how to proceed. Can you give a hint?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 19:17
$begingroup$
@Diger: I found an alternative approach that looks easier (to my opinion)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Dec 21 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
I prefered your other approach, which seemed easier as you made it look as if there is not much left to do.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
In fact the zero outside the sum is canceled by the pole inside the sum up to $k=2n$.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 21:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's approach the sum through the Hypergeometric Function.
To this purpose let's rewrite it as
$$
eqalign{
& S(n) = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{{left( { - 1} right)^{,k} } over {2^{,k} left( {k + 1} right)}}} = cr
& = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{1 over {left( {k + 1} right)}}left( { - {1 over 2}} right)^{,k} } = cr
& = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {t_{,k} left( { - {1 over 2}} right)^{,k} } cr}
$$
The $t_k$ are in the following ratio
$$
eqalign{
& t_{,0} = 1 cr
& {{t_{,k + 1} } over {t_{,k} }} = cr
& = {{left( {2n + k + 1} right)!} over {left( {k + 1} right)!left( {k + 1} right)!left( {2n - k - 1} right)!left( {k + 2} right)}}
{{k!k!left( {2n - k} right)!left( {k + 1} right)} over {left( {2n + k} right)!}} = cr
& = - {{left( {k + 2n + 1} right)left( {k - 2n} right)} over {left( {k + 2} right)}}{1 over {left( {k + 1} right)}} cr}
$$
so the sum can be expressed as
$$
eqalign{
& S(n) = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{{left( { - 1} right)^{,k} } over {2^{,k} left( {k + 1} right)}}} = cr
& = {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {2n + 1,; - 2n} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right) cr}
$$
For $n=0$ this gives
$$
S(0) = {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {1,;0} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right) = 1
$$
while for $0<n$ we have
$$
eqalign{
& {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {2n + 1,; - 2n} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right)quad left| {;0 < n} right.quad = cr
& = {{Gamma left( 2 right)} over {Gamma left( {2n + 1} right)Gamma left( { - 2n} right)}}sumlimits_{0, le ,k,}
{{{Gamma left( {2n + 1 + k} right)Gamma left( { - 2n + k} right)} over {Gamma left( {2 + k} right)}}} {1 over {2^{,k} k!}} cr}
$$
Note that we can arrive to the same result by expressing the binomials through the Gamma function and
performing some algebraic simplifications.
To the fraction outside the sum we can apply the Reflection formula for the Gamma function,
which in the inverted form is valid all over the complex field
$$
{1 over {Gamma left( {z + 1} right),Gamma left( { - z} right)}} = - {{sin left( {pi ,z} right)} over pi }quad left| {;forall z in mathbb C} right.
$$
then clearly
$$
S(n)quad left| {;0 < n in Z} right. = sin left( {2pi ,n} right) cdot left( cdots right) = 0
$$
$endgroup$
Let's approach the sum through the Hypergeometric Function.
To this purpose let's rewrite it as
$$
eqalign{
& S(n) = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{{left( { - 1} right)^{,k} } over {2^{,k} left( {k + 1} right)}}} = cr
& = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{1 over {left( {k + 1} right)}}left( { - {1 over 2}} right)^{,k} } = cr
& = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {t_{,k} left( { - {1 over 2}} right)^{,k} } cr}
$$
The $t_k$ are in the following ratio
$$
eqalign{
& t_{,0} = 1 cr
& {{t_{,k + 1} } over {t_{,k} }} = cr
& = {{left( {2n + k + 1} right)!} over {left( {k + 1} right)!left( {k + 1} right)!left( {2n - k - 1} right)!left( {k + 2} right)}}
{{k!k!left( {2n - k} right)!left( {k + 1} right)} over {left( {2n + k} right)!}} = cr
& = - {{left( {k + 2n + 1} right)left( {k - 2n} right)} over {left( {k + 2} right)}}{1 over {left( {k + 1} right)}} cr}
$$
so the sum can be expressed as
$$
eqalign{
& S(n) = sumlimits_{left( {0, le } right),k,left( { le ,2n} right)} {binom{2n+k}{k} binom{2n}{k}
{{left( { - 1} right)^{,k} } over {2^{,k} left( {k + 1} right)}}} = cr
& = {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {2n + 1,; - 2n} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right) cr}
$$
For $n=0$ this gives
$$
S(0) = {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {1,;0} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right) = 1
$$
while for $0<n$ we have
$$
eqalign{
& {}_2F_{,1} left( {left. {matrix{ {2n + 1,; - 2n} cr 2 cr } ,} right|1/2} right)quad left| {;0 < n} right.quad = cr
& = {{Gamma left( 2 right)} over {Gamma left( {2n + 1} right)Gamma left( { - 2n} right)}}sumlimits_{0, le ,k,}
{{{Gamma left( {2n + 1 + k} right)Gamma left( { - 2n + k} right)} over {Gamma left( {2 + k} right)}}} {1 over {2^{,k} k!}} cr}
$$
Note that we can arrive to the same result by expressing the binomials through the Gamma function and
performing some algebraic simplifications.
To the fraction outside the sum we can apply the Reflection formula for the Gamma function,
which in the inverted form is valid all over the complex field
$$
{1 over {Gamma left( {z + 1} right),Gamma left( { - z} right)}} = - {{sin left( {pi ,z} right)} over pi }quad left| {;forall z in mathbb C} right.
$$
then clearly
$$
S(n)quad left| {;0 < n in Z} right. = sin left( {2pi ,n} right) cdot left( cdots right) = 0
$$
edited Dec 21 '18 at 19:33
answered Dec 21 '18 at 12:04
G CabG Cab
19.8k31339
19.8k31339
$begingroup$
If you use the binomial theorem for closed Form it's not quite clear to me how to proceed. Can you give a hint?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 19:17
$begingroup$
@Diger: I found an alternative approach that looks easier (to my opinion)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Dec 21 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
I prefered your other approach, which seemed easier as you made it look as if there is not much left to do.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
In fact the zero outside the sum is canceled by the pole inside the sum up to $k=2n$.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 21:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you use the binomial theorem for closed Form it's not quite clear to me how to proceed. Can you give a hint?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 19:17
$begingroup$
@Diger: I found an alternative approach that looks easier (to my opinion)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Dec 21 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
I prefered your other approach, which seemed easier as you made it look as if there is not much left to do.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
In fact the zero outside the sum is canceled by the pole inside the sum up to $k=2n$.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 21:12
$begingroup$
If you use the binomial theorem for closed Form it's not quite clear to me how to proceed. Can you give a hint?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 19:17
$begingroup$
If you use the binomial theorem for closed Form it's not quite clear to me how to proceed. Can you give a hint?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 19:17
$begingroup$
@Diger: I found an alternative approach that looks easier (to my opinion)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Dec 21 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
@Diger: I found an alternative approach that looks easier (to my opinion)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Dec 21 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
I prefered your other approach, which seemed easier as you made it look as if there is not much left to do.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I prefered your other approach, which seemed easier as you made it look as if there is not much left to do.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
In fact the zero outside the sum is canceled by the pole inside the sum up to $k=2n$.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 21:12
$begingroup$
In fact the zero outside the sum is canceled by the pole inside the sum up to $k=2n$.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 21:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Residue Approach
$$
begin{align}
sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{-2n-1}{k}binom{2n+1}{k+1}frac1{2^k}\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{-2n-1}{k}binom{2n+1}{2n-k}frac1{2^k}\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left(1+frac x2right)^{-2n-1}(1+x)^{2n+1}\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{-1}right]left(frac1{x+2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag1
end{align}
$$
So, we are interested in the residue at $x=0$ of
$$
f(x)=left(frac1{x+2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag2
$$
which is the same as the residue at $x=0$ of
$$
-f(-x)=left(frac1{x-2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag3
$$
Since $-f(-x)=f(x-2)$, this is the residue of $f(x)$ at $x=-2$.
Thus, the residues of $f(x)$ at $x=0$ and $x=-2$ are equal.
For $|x|gt2$, $|f(x)|leleft(frac2{|x|-2}right)^{2n+1}$, and for $nge1$, $$
left|int_{|x|=R}f(x),mathrm{d}xright|le2pi Rleft(frac2{R-2}right)^{2n+1}stackrel{Rtoinfty}{longrightarrow}0tag4
$$
Thus, Cauchy's Residue Theorem says the sum of the residues is $0$. Therefore, for $nge1$, we get that both residues are $0$.
This means that for $nge1$,
$$
sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}=0tag5
$$
A More Elementary Approach
$$
begin{align}
&sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac12right)^ktag6\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n+k}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac12right)^ktag7\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac{1+x}2right)^ktag8\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n-1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac{1+x}2right)^{k+1}tag9\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n-1}left[left(frac{1-x}2right)^{2n+1}-1right]tag{10}\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left[left(frac{1-x^2}2right)^{2n-1}left(frac{1-x}2right)^2-(1+x)^{2n-1}right]tag{11}\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left[left(frac{1-x^2}2right)^{2n-1}frac{1+x^2}4right]tag{12}\
&=-frac{2^{-2n}}{2n+1}left(left[x^{2n}right]left(1-x^2right)^{2n-1}+left[x^{2n-2}right]left(1-x^2right)^{2n-1}right)tag{13}\[6pt]
&=-frac{2^{-2n}}{2n+1}left((-1)^nbinom{2n-1}{n}+(-1)^{n-1}binom{2n-1}{n-1}right)tag{14}\[12pt]
&=0tag{15}
end{align}
$$
Explanation:
$phantom{1}(6)$: $binom{2n+k}{k}=binom{2n+k}{2n}$ and $frac1{k+1}binom{2n}{k}=frac1{2n+1}binom{2n+1}{k+1}$
$phantom{1}(7)$: $binom{2n+k}{2n}=left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n+k}$
$phantom{1}(8)$: move $(1+x)^k$ inside the sum
$phantom{1}(9)$: move $-frac2{1+x}$ outside the sum
$(10)$: Binomial Theorem
$(11)$: distribute $(1+x)^{2n-1}$
$(12)$: toss out odd powers and powers too small (if $nge1$)
$(13)$: $left[x^{2n}right]x^2f(x)=left[x^{2n-2}right]f(x)$
$(14)$: Binomial Theorem
$(15)$: evaluate
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why does follow from $|f(x)|simleft(frac2{|x|}right)^{2n+1}$ that the sum of residues is zero?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 23:00
$begingroup$
Cauchy's Residue Theorem
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 3:23
$begingroup$
Is that a joke? So are you saying about $x=0$ you can neglect all the terms from $1/(x+2)$ in the expansion to calculate the residues?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 10:59
$begingroup$
@Diger: There are two singularities of $f(x)$: one at $x=0$ and one at $x=-2$. The integral of $f(x)$ around a circle $|x|=R$, for $Rgt2$, is $2pi i$ times the sum of the residues of $f(x)$ at those singularities. Since a simple bound of that integral vanishes as $Rto0$, that integral must be $0$ (for all $Rgt2$). Thus, the sum of the residues is $0$. Since the residue at $x=0$ is equal to the residue at $x=-2$, both must be $0$.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 11:25
$begingroup$
You mean as $Rrightarrowinfty$, or? I guess that was what confused me in the first place. Thx
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 11:38
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Residue Approach
$$
begin{align}
sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{-2n-1}{k}binom{2n+1}{k+1}frac1{2^k}\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{-2n-1}{k}binom{2n+1}{2n-k}frac1{2^k}\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left(1+frac x2right)^{-2n-1}(1+x)^{2n+1}\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{-1}right]left(frac1{x+2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag1
end{align}
$$
So, we are interested in the residue at $x=0$ of
$$
f(x)=left(frac1{x+2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag2
$$
which is the same as the residue at $x=0$ of
$$
-f(-x)=left(frac1{x-2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag3
$$
Since $-f(-x)=f(x-2)$, this is the residue of $f(x)$ at $x=-2$.
Thus, the residues of $f(x)$ at $x=0$ and $x=-2$ are equal.
For $|x|gt2$, $|f(x)|leleft(frac2{|x|-2}right)^{2n+1}$, and for $nge1$, $$
left|int_{|x|=R}f(x),mathrm{d}xright|le2pi Rleft(frac2{R-2}right)^{2n+1}stackrel{Rtoinfty}{longrightarrow}0tag4
$$
Thus, Cauchy's Residue Theorem says the sum of the residues is $0$. Therefore, for $nge1$, we get that both residues are $0$.
This means that for $nge1$,
$$
sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}=0tag5
$$
A More Elementary Approach
$$
begin{align}
&sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac12right)^ktag6\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n+k}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac12right)^ktag7\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac{1+x}2right)^ktag8\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n-1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac{1+x}2right)^{k+1}tag9\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n-1}left[left(frac{1-x}2right)^{2n+1}-1right]tag{10}\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left[left(frac{1-x^2}2right)^{2n-1}left(frac{1-x}2right)^2-(1+x)^{2n-1}right]tag{11}\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left[left(frac{1-x^2}2right)^{2n-1}frac{1+x^2}4right]tag{12}\
&=-frac{2^{-2n}}{2n+1}left(left[x^{2n}right]left(1-x^2right)^{2n-1}+left[x^{2n-2}right]left(1-x^2right)^{2n-1}right)tag{13}\[6pt]
&=-frac{2^{-2n}}{2n+1}left((-1)^nbinom{2n-1}{n}+(-1)^{n-1}binom{2n-1}{n-1}right)tag{14}\[12pt]
&=0tag{15}
end{align}
$$
Explanation:
$phantom{1}(6)$: $binom{2n+k}{k}=binom{2n+k}{2n}$ and $frac1{k+1}binom{2n}{k}=frac1{2n+1}binom{2n+1}{k+1}$
$phantom{1}(7)$: $binom{2n+k}{2n}=left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n+k}$
$phantom{1}(8)$: move $(1+x)^k$ inside the sum
$phantom{1}(9)$: move $-frac2{1+x}$ outside the sum
$(10)$: Binomial Theorem
$(11)$: distribute $(1+x)^{2n-1}$
$(12)$: toss out odd powers and powers too small (if $nge1$)
$(13)$: $left[x^{2n}right]x^2f(x)=left[x^{2n-2}right]f(x)$
$(14)$: Binomial Theorem
$(15)$: evaluate
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why does follow from $|f(x)|simleft(frac2{|x|}right)^{2n+1}$ that the sum of residues is zero?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 23:00
$begingroup$
Cauchy's Residue Theorem
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 3:23
$begingroup$
Is that a joke? So are you saying about $x=0$ you can neglect all the terms from $1/(x+2)$ in the expansion to calculate the residues?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 10:59
$begingroup$
@Diger: There are two singularities of $f(x)$: one at $x=0$ and one at $x=-2$. The integral of $f(x)$ around a circle $|x|=R$, for $Rgt2$, is $2pi i$ times the sum of the residues of $f(x)$ at those singularities. Since a simple bound of that integral vanishes as $Rto0$, that integral must be $0$ (for all $Rgt2$). Thus, the sum of the residues is $0$. Since the residue at $x=0$ is equal to the residue at $x=-2$, both must be $0$.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 11:25
$begingroup$
You mean as $Rrightarrowinfty$, or? I guess that was what confused me in the first place. Thx
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 11:38
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Residue Approach
$$
begin{align}
sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{-2n-1}{k}binom{2n+1}{k+1}frac1{2^k}\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{-2n-1}{k}binom{2n+1}{2n-k}frac1{2^k}\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left(1+frac x2right)^{-2n-1}(1+x)^{2n+1}\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{-1}right]left(frac1{x+2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag1
end{align}
$$
So, we are interested in the residue at $x=0$ of
$$
f(x)=left(frac1{x+2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag2
$$
which is the same as the residue at $x=0$ of
$$
-f(-x)=left(frac1{x-2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag3
$$
Since $-f(-x)=f(x-2)$, this is the residue of $f(x)$ at $x=-2$.
Thus, the residues of $f(x)$ at $x=0$ and $x=-2$ are equal.
For $|x|gt2$, $|f(x)|leleft(frac2{|x|-2}right)^{2n+1}$, and for $nge1$, $$
left|int_{|x|=R}f(x),mathrm{d}xright|le2pi Rleft(frac2{R-2}right)^{2n+1}stackrel{Rtoinfty}{longrightarrow}0tag4
$$
Thus, Cauchy's Residue Theorem says the sum of the residues is $0$. Therefore, for $nge1$, we get that both residues are $0$.
This means that for $nge1$,
$$
sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}=0tag5
$$
A More Elementary Approach
$$
begin{align}
&sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac12right)^ktag6\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n+k}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac12right)^ktag7\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac{1+x}2right)^ktag8\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n-1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac{1+x}2right)^{k+1}tag9\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n-1}left[left(frac{1-x}2right)^{2n+1}-1right]tag{10}\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left[left(frac{1-x^2}2right)^{2n-1}left(frac{1-x}2right)^2-(1+x)^{2n-1}right]tag{11}\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left[left(frac{1-x^2}2right)^{2n-1}frac{1+x^2}4right]tag{12}\
&=-frac{2^{-2n}}{2n+1}left(left[x^{2n}right]left(1-x^2right)^{2n-1}+left[x^{2n-2}right]left(1-x^2right)^{2n-1}right)tag{13}\[6pt]
&=-frac{2^{-2n}}{2n+1}left((-1)^nbinom{2n-1}{n}+(-1)^{n-1}binom{2n-1}{n-1}right)tag{14}\[12pt]
&=0tag{15}
end{align}
$$
Explanation:
$phantom{1}(6)$: $binom{2n+k}{k}=binom{2n+k}{2n}$ and $frac1{k+1}binom{2n}{k}=frac1{2n+1}binom{2n+1}{k+1}$
$phantom{1}(7)$: $binom{2n+k}{2n}=left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n+k}$
$phantom{1}(8)$: move $(1+x)^k$ inside the sum
$phantom{1}(9)$: move $-frac2{1+x}$ outside the sum
$(10)$: Binomial Theorem
$(11)$: distribute $(1+x)^{2n-1}$
$(12)$: toss out odd powers and powers too small (if $nge1$)
$(13)$: $left[x^{2n}right]x^2f(x)=left[x^{2n-2}right]f(x)$
$(14)$: Binomial Theorem
$(15)$: evaluate
$endgroup$
Residue Approach
$$
begin{align}
sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{-2n-1}{k}binom{2n+1}{k+1}frac1{2^k}\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{-2n-1}{k}binom{2n+1}{2n-k}frac1{2^k}\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left(1+frac x2right)^{-2n-1}(1+x)^{2n+1}\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{-1}right]left(frac1{x+2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag1
end{align}
$$
So, we are interested in the residue at $x=0$ of
$$
f(x)=left(frac1{x+2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag2
$$
which is the same as the residue at $x=0$ of
$$
-f(-x)=left(frac1{x-2}+frac1xright)^{2n+1}tag3
$$
Since $-f(-x)=f(x-2)$, this is the residue of $f(x)$ at $x=-2$.
Thus, the residues of $f(x)$ at $x=0$ and $x=-2$ are equal.
For $|x|gt2$, $|f(x)|leleft(frac2{|x|-2}right)^{2n+1}$, and for $nge1$, $$
left|int_{|x|=R}f(x),mathrm{d}xright|le2pi Rleft(frac2{R-2}right)^{2n+1}stackrel{Rtoinfty}{longrightarrow}0tag4
$$
Thus, Cauchy's Residue Theorem says the sum of the residues is $0$. Therefore, for $nge1$, we get that both residues are $0$.
This means that for $nge1$,
$$
sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}=0tag5
$$
A More Elementary Approach
$$
begin{align}
&sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{k}binom{2n}{k}frac{(-1)^k}{2^k}frac1{k+1}\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+k}{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac12right)^ktag6\
&=frac1{2n+1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n+k}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac12right)^ktag7\
&=frac1{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac{1+x}2right)^ktag8\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n-1}sum_{k=0}^{2n}binom{2n+1}{k+1}left(-frac{1+x}2right)^{k+1}tag9\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n-1}left[left(frac{1-x}2right)^{2n+1}-1right]tag{10}\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left[left(frac{1-x^2}2right)^{2n-1}left(frac{1-x}2right)^2-(1+x)^{2n-1}right]tag{11}\
&=-frac2{2n+1}left[x^{2n}right]left[left(frac{1-x^2}2right)^{2n-1}frac{1+x^2}4right]tag{12}\
&=-frac{2^{-2n}}{2n+1}left(left[x^{2n}right]left(1-x^2right)^{2n-1}+left[x^{2n-2}right]left(1-x^2right)^{2n-1}right)tag{13}\[6pt]
&=-frac{2^{-2n}}{2n+1}left((-1)^nbinom{2n-1}{n}+(-1)^{n-1}binom{2n-1}{n-1}right)tag{14}\[12pt]
&=0tag{15}
end{align}
$$
Explanation:
$phantom{1}(6)$: $binom{2n+k}{k}=binom{2n+k}{2n}$ and $frac1{k+1}binom{2n}{k}=frac1{2n+1}binom{2n+1}{k+1}$
$phantom{1}(7)$: $binom{2n+k}{2n}=left[x^{2n}right](1+x)^{2n+k}$
$phantom{1}(8)$: move $(1+x)^k$ inside the sum
$phantom{1}(9)$: move $-frac2{1+x}$ outside the sum
$(10)$: Binomial Theorem
$(11)$: distribute $(1+x)^{2n-1}$
$(12)$: toss out odd powers and powers too small (if $nge1$)
$(13)$: $left[x^{2n}right]x^2f(x)=left[x^{2n-2}right]f(x)$
$(14)$: Binomial Theorem
$(15)$: evaluate
edited Dec 22 '18 at 12:16
answered Dec 21 '18 at 22:23
robjohn♦robjohn
268k27308634
268k27308634
$begingroup$
Why does follow from $|f(x)|simleft(frac2{|x|}right)^{2n+1}$ that the sum of residues is zero?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 23:00
$begingroup$
Cauchy's Residue Theorem
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 3:23
$begingroup$
Is that a joke? So are you saying about $x=0$ you can neglect all the terms from $1/(x+2)$ in the expansion to calculate the residues?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 10:59
$begingroup$
@Diger: There are two singularities of $f(x)$: one at $x=0$ and one at $x=-2$. The integral of $f(x)$ around a circle $|x|=R$, for $Rgt2$, is $2pi i$ times the sum of the residues of $f(x)$ at those singularities. Since a simple bound of that integral vanishes as $Rto0$, that integral must be $0$ (for all $Rgt2$). Thus, the sum of the residues is $0$. Since the residue at $x=0$ is equal to the residue at $x=-2$, both must be $0$.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 11:25
$begingroup$
You mean as $Rrightarrowinfty$, or? I guess that was what confused me in the first place. Thx
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 11:38
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Why does follow from $|f(x)|simleft(frac2{|x|}right)^{2n+1}$ that the sum of residues is zero?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 23:00
$begingroup$
Cauchy's Residue Theorem
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 3:23
$begingroup$
Is that a joke? So are you saying about $x=0$ you can neglect all the terms from $1/(x+2)$ in the expansion to calculate the residues?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 10:59
$begingroup$
@Diger: There are two singularities of $f(x)$: one at $x=0$ and one at $x=-2$. The integral of $f(x)$ around a circle $|x|=R$, for $Rgt2$, is $2pi i$ times the sum of the residues of $f(x)$ at those singularities. Since a simple bound of that integral vanishes as $Rto0$, that integral must be $0$ (for all $Rgt2$). Thus, the sum of the residues is $0$. Since the residue at $x=0$ is equal to the residue at $x=-2$, both must be $0$.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 11:25
$begingroup$
You mean as $Rrightarrowinfty$, or? I guess that was what confused me in the first place. Thx
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 11:38
$begingroup$
Why does follow from $|f(x)|simleft(frac2{|x|}right)^{2n+1}$ that the sum of residues is zero?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 23:00
$begingroup$
Why does follow from $|f(x)|simleft(frac2{|x|}right)^{2n+1}$ that the sum of residues is zero?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 21 '18 at 23:00
$begingroup$
Cauchy's Residue Theorem
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 3:23
$begingroup$
Cauchy's Residue Theorem
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 3:23
$begingroup$
Is that a joke? So are you saying about $x=0$ you can neglect all the terms from $1/(x+2)$ in the expansion to calculate the residues?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 10:59
$begingroup$
Is that a joke? So are you saying about $x=0$ you can neglect all the terms from $1/(x+2)$ in the expansion to calculate the residues?
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 10:59
$begingroup$
@Diger: There are two singularities of $f(x)$: one at $x=0$ and one at $x=-2$. The integral of $f(x)$ around a circle $|x|=R$, for $Rgt2$, is $2pi i$ times the sum of the residues of $f(x)$ at those singularities. Since a simple bound of that integral vanishes as $Rto0$, that integral must be $0$ (for all $Rgt2$). Thus, the sum of the residues is $0$. Since the residue at $x=0$ is equal to the residue at $x=-2$, both must be $0$.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 11:25
$begingroup$
@Diger: There are two singularities of $f(x)$: one at $x=0$ and one at $x=-2$. The integral of $f(x)$ around a circle $|x|=R$, for $Rgt2$, is $2pi i$ times the sum of the residues of $f(x)$ at those singularities. Since a simple bound of that integral vanishes as $Rto0$, that integral must be $0$ (for all $Rgt2$). Thus, the sum of the residues is $0$. Since the residue at $x=0$ is equal to the residue at $x=-2$, both must be $0$.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Dec 22 '18 at 11:25
$begingroup$
You mean as $Rrightarrowinfty$, or? I guess that was what confused me in the first place. Thx
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 11:38
$begingroup$
You mean as $Rrightarrowinfty$, or? I guess that was what confused me in the first place. Thx
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 22 '18 at 11:38
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I prefer Marko Riedels result, since it doesn‘t require prerequisites, but for the record:
$$
sumlimits_{ {0 le } k { le 2n} } {binom{2n+k}{2n} binom{2n}{k} {{left( frac{ - t}{2} right)^{k} }}} = P_{2n}(1-t)
$$
with the Legendre Polynomial $P_{2n}$. It is not too difficult to show, by using the recurrence for the Legendre polynomials $P_n(x)$ i.e.
$$
0 = (n+1) P_{n+1}(x) - (2n+1)xP_n(x) + nP_{n-1}(x) , .
$$
Plugging in the above expression for $n$ instead of $2n$ yields
begin{align}
sum_{k=0}^{n+1} left(frac{-t}{2}right)^k Bigg{ &(n+1) binom{n+1+k}{n+1} binom{n+1}{k} - 2(2n+1) binom{n+k-1}{n} binom{n}{k-1} \
&-(2n+1) binom{n+k}{n} binom{n}{k} + n binom{n-1+k}{n-1} binom{n-1}{k} Bigg} = 0
end{align}
which vanishes termwise after some lengthy but not difficult algebra after converting to factorials; here $binom{n}{k}=0$ if $k>n$.
Then
$$
int_0^1 P_{2n}(1-t) , {rm d}t = int_0^1 P_{2n}(t) , {rm d}t = frac{1}{2^{2n}(2n)!} frac{{rm d}^{2n-1}}{{rm d}t^{2n-1}} left( t^2 -1right)^{2n} Bigg|_{t=0}^{t=1} = 0
$$
by Rodrigues formula and the fact that an odd number of derivatives always leaves at least a single $t$ in each term and since $2n-1 < 2n$ each term will also contain a factor $(t^2-1)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I prefer Marko Riedels result, since it doesn‘t require prerequisites, but for the record:
$$
sumlimits_{ {0 le } k { le 2n} } {binom{2n+k}{2n} binom{2n}{k} {{left( frac{ - t}{2} right)^{k} }}} = P_{2n}(1-t)
$$
with the Legendre Polynomial $P_{2n}$. It is not too difficult to show, by using the recurrence for the Legendre polynomials $P_n(x)$ i.e.
$$
0 = (n+1) P_{n+1}(x) - (2n+1)xP_n(x) + nP_{n-1}(x) , .
$$
Plugging in the above expression for $n$ instead of $2n$ yields
begin{align}
sum_{k=0}^{n+1} left(frac{-t}{2}right)^k Bigg{ &(n+1) binom{n+1+k}{n+1} binom{n+1}{k} - 2(2n+1) binom{n+k-1}{n} binom{n}{k-1} \
&-(2n+1) binom{n+k}{n} binom{n}{k} + n binom{n-1+k}{n-1} binom{n-1}{k} Bigg} = 0
end{align}
which vanishes termwise after some lengthy but not difficult algebra after converting to factorials; here $binom{n}{k}=0$ if $k>n$.
Then
$$
int_0^1 P_{2n}(1-t) , {rm d}t = int_0^1 P_{2n}(t) , {rm d}t = frac{1}{2^{2n}(2n)!} frac{{rm d}^{2n-1}}{{rm d}t^{2n-1}} left( t^2 -1right)^{2n} Bigg|_{t=0}^{t=1} = 0
$$
by Rodrigues formula and the fact that an odd number of derivatives always leaves at least a single $t$ in each term and since $2n-1 < 2n$ each term will also contain a factor $(t^2-1)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I prefer Marko Riedels result, since it doesn‘t require prerequisites, but for the record:
$$
sumlimits_{ {0 le } k { le 2n} } {binom{2n+k}{2n} binom{2n}{k} {{left( frac{ - t}{2} right)^{k} }}} = P_{2n}(1-t)
$$
with the Legendre Polynomial $P_{2n}$. It is not too difficult to show, by using the recurrence for the Legendre polynomials $P_n(x)$ i.e.
$$
0 = (n+1) P_{n+1}(x) - (2n+1)xP_n(x) + nP_{n-1}(x) , .
$$
Plugging in the above expression for $n$ instead of $2n$ yields
begin{align}
sum_{k=0}^{n+1} left(frac{-t}{2}right)^k Bigg{ &(n+1) binom{n+1+k}{n+1} binom{n+1}{k} - 2(2n+1) binom{n+k-1}{n} binom{n}{k-1} \
&-(2n+1) binom{n+k}{n} binom{n}{k} + n binom{n-1+k}{n-1} binom{n-1}{k} Bigg} = 0
end{align}
which vanishes termwise after some lengthy but not difficult algebra after converting to factorials; here $binom{n}{k}=0$ if $k>n$.
Then
$$
int_0^1 P_{2n}(1-t) , {rm d}t = int_0^1 P_{2n}(t) , {rm d}t = frac{1}{2^{2n}(2n)!} frac{{rm d}^{2n-1}}{{rm d}t^{2n-1}} left( t^2 -1right)^{2n} Bigg|_{t=0}^{t=1} = 0
$$
by Rodrigues formula and the fact that an odd number of derivatives always leaves at least a single $t$ in each term and since $2n-1 < 2n$ each term will also contain a factor $(t^2-1)$.
$endgroup$
I prefer Marko Riedels result, since it doesn‘t require prerequisites, but for the record:
$$
sumlimits_{ {0 le } k { le 2n} } {binom{2n+k}{2n} binom{2n}{k} {{left( frac{ - t}{2} right)^{k} }}} = P_{2n}(1-t)
$$
with the Legendre Polynomial $P_{2n}$. It is not too difficult to show, by using the recurrence for the Legendre polynomials $P_n(x)$ i.e.
$$
0 = (n+1) P_{n+1}(x) - (2n+1)xP_n(x) + nP_{n-1}(x) , .
$$
Plugging in the above expression for $n$ instead of $2n$ yields
begin{align}
sum_{k=0}^{n+1} left(frac{-t}{2}right)^k Bigg{ &(n+1) binom{n+1+k}{n+1} binom{n+1}{k} - 2(2n+1) binom{n+k-1}{n} binom{n}{k-1} \
&-(2n+1) binom{n+k}{n} binom{n}{k} + n binom{n-1+k}{n-1} binom{n-1}{k} Bigg} = 0
end{align}
which vanishes termwise after some lengthy but not difficult algebra after converting to factorials; here $binom{n}{k}=0$ if $k>n$.
Then
$$
int_0^1 P_{2n}(1-t) , {rm d}t = int_0^1 P_{2n}(t) , {rm d}t = frac{1}{2^{2n}(2n)!} frac{{rm d}^{2n-1}}{{rm d}t^{2n-1}} left( t^2 -1right)^{2n} Bigg|_{t=0}^{t=1} = 0
$$
by Rodrigues formula and the fact that an odd number of derivatives always leaves at least a single $t$ in each term and since $2n-1 < 2n$ each term will also contain a factor $(t^2-1)$.
edited Dec 25 '18 at 1:24
answered Dec 21 '18 at 21:48
DigerDiger
1,7851414
1,7851414
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046755%2fprove-that-sum-k-02n-binom-2nkk-binom2nk-frac-1k2k-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown