Prove that the image of the bilinear application is not a vector space












1












$begingroup$



Prove that the image of the bilinear application
$$
mathbb{R}^2timesmathbb{R}^2
ni big((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2)big)
mapsto
varphi big((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2)big) =
(x_1y_1,x_1y_2,x_2y_1,x_2y_2)inmathbb{R}^4
$$
is not a vector space.




My work. If $mathrm{Im}(varphi)subseteqmathbb{R}^4$ is a subspace of $ mathbb{R}^{4}$ then for any scalars $mu,lambdainmathbb{R}$ and vectors
$$
p=(acdot c, acdot d, bcdot c, bcdot d)
qquad mbox{ and } qquad
q=(ucdot z, u cdot w, vcdot z, vcdot w)
$$
in $mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ we have
$$
mucdot p+lambdacdot q in mathrm{Im}(varphi).
$$

Therefore, if we can show that there are scalars $lambda,muinmathbb{R}$ and vectors $p,qin mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ such that
$$
mucdot p+lambdacdot q notin mathrm{Im}(varphi)
$$

then $mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ will not be a vector space. The relationship of non-pertinence above is equivalent to the following statement. For all vector $(x_1y_2,x_1y_2,x_2y_2,x_2y_2)inmathrm{Im}varphi$ the system below has no solution
$$
begin{array}{rcl}
mu a c+ lambda u z &=& x_1y_1\
mu a d+ lambda u w &=& x_1y_2\
mu b c+ lambda v z &=& x_2y_1\
mu b d+ lambda v w &=& x_2y_2\
end{array}
$$

But I have been unable to find real numbers $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$ and scalars $lambda$ and $mu$ for which the above system has no solution for $x_1$, $x_2$, $y_1$ and $y_2$ varying in $mathbb{R} $.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$



    Prove that the image of the bilinear application
    $$
    mathbb{R}^2timesmathbb{R}^2
    ni big((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2)big)
    mapsto
    varphi big((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2)big) =
    (x_1y_1,x_1y_2,x_2y_1,x_2y_2)inmathbb{R}^4
    $$
    is not a vector space.




    My work. If $mathrm{Im}(varphi)subseteqmathbb{R}^4$ is a subspace of $ mathbb{R}^{4}$ then for any scalars $mu,lambdainmathbb{R}$ and vectors
    $$
    p=(acdot c, acdot d, bcdot c, bcdot d)
    qquad mbox{ and } qquad
    q=(ucdot z, u cdot w, vcdot z, vcdot w)
    $$
    in $mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ we have
    $$
    mucdot p+lambdacdot q in mathrm{Im}(varphi).
    $$

    Therefore, if we can show that there are scalars $lambda,muinmathbb{R}$ and vectors $p,qin mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ such that
    $$
    mucdot p+lambdacdot q notin mathrm{Im}(varphi)
    $$

    then $mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ will not be a vector space. The relationship of non-pertinence above is equivalent to the following statement. For all vector $(x_1y_2,x_1y_2,x_2y_2,x_2y_2)inmathrm{Im}varphi$ the system below has no solution
    $$
    begin{array}{rcl}
    mu a c+ lambda u z &=& x_1y_1\
    mu a d+ lambda u w &=& x_1y_2\
    mu b c+ lambda v z &=& x_2y_1\
    mu b d+ lambda v w &=& x_2y_2\
    end{array}
    $$

    But I have been unable to find real numbers $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$ and scalars $lambda$ and $mu$ for which the above system has no solution for $x_1$, $x_2$, $y_1$ and $y_2$ varying in $mathbb{R} $.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$



      Prove that the image of the bilinear application
      $$
      mathbb{R}^2timesmathbb{R}^2
      ni big((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2)big)
      mapsto
      varphi big((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2)big) =
      (x_1y_1,x_1y_2,x_2y_1,x_2y_2)inmathbb{R}^4
      $$
      is not a vector space.




      My work. If $mathrm{Im}(varphi)subseteqmathbb{R}^4$ is a subspace of $ mathbb{R}^{4}$ then for any scalars $mu,lambdainmathbb{R}$ and vectors
      $$
      p=(acdot c, acdot d, bcdot c, bcdot d)
      qquad mbox{ and } qquad
      q=(ucdot z, u cdot w, vcdot z, vcdot w)
      $$
      in $mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ we have
      $$
      mucdot p+lambdacdot q in mathrm{Im}(varphi).
      $$

      Therefore, if we can show that there are scalars $lambda,muinmathbb{R}$ and vectors $p,qin mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ such that
      $$
      mucdot p+lambdacdot q notin mathrm{Im}(varphi)
      $$

      then $mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ will not be a vector space. The relationship of non-pertinence above is equivalent to the following statement. For all vector $(x_1y_2,x_1y_2,x_2y_2,x_2y_2)inmathrm{Im}varphi$ the system below has no solution
      $$
      begin{array}{rcl}
      mu a c+ lambda u z &=& x_1y_1\
      mu a d+ lambda u w &=& x_1y_2\
      mu b c+ lambda v z &=& x_2y_1\
      mu b d+ lambda v w &=& x_2y_2\
      end{array}
      $$

      But I have been unable to find real numbers $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$ and scalars $lambda$ and $mu$ for which the above system has no solution for $x_1$, $x_2$, $y_1$ and $y_2$ varying in $mathbb{R} $.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      Prove that the image of the bilinear application
      $$
      mathbb{R}^2timesmathbb{R}^2
      ni big((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2)big)
      mapsto
      varphi big((x_1,x_2),(y_1,y_2)big) =
      (x_1y_1,x_1y_2,x_2y_1,x_2y_2)inmathbb{R}^4
      $$
      is not a vector space.




      My work. If $mathrm{Im}(varphi)subseteqmathbb{R}^4$ is a subspace of $ mathbb{R}^{4}$ then for any scalars $mu,lambdainmathbb{R}$ and vectors
      $$
      p=(acdot c, acdot d, bcdot c, bcdot d)
      qquad mbox{ and } qquad
      q=(ucdot z, u cdot w, vcdot z, vcdot w)
      $$
      in $mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ we have
      $$
      mucdot p+lambdacdot q in mathrm{Im}(varphi).
      $$

      Therefore, if we can show that there are scalars $lambda,muinmathbb{R}$ and vectors $p,qin mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ such that
      $$
      mucdot p+lambdacdot q notin mathrm{Im}(varphi)
      $$

      then $mathrm{Im}(varphi)$ will not be a vector space. The relationship of non-pertinence above is equivalent to the following statement. For all vector $(x_1y_2,x_1y_2,x_2y_2,x_2y_2)inmathrm{Im}varphi$ the system below has no solution
      $$
      begin{array}{rcl}
      mu a c+ lambda u z &=& x_1y_1\
      mu a d+ lambda u w &=& x_1y_2\
      mu b c+ lambda v z &=& x_2y_1\
      mu b d+ lambda v w &=& x_2y_2\
      end{array}
      $$

      But I have been unable to find real numbers $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$ and scalars $lambda$ and $mu$ for which the above system has no solution for $x_1$, $x_2$, $y_1$ and $y_2$ varying in $mathbb{R} $.







      multilinear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 29 '18 at 20:28









      MathOverviewMathOverview

      8,95043164




      8,95043164






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Your claim is true as $,operatorname{Im}varphi,$ is $,$ not closed $,$ under addition:
          $$varphibig((1,0),(1,0)big) :=: (1,0,0,0)\
          varphibig((0,1),(0,1)big) :=: (0,0,0,1)$$



          Now consider the sum $(1,0,0,1)$ of both ...

          Can it be contained in $operatorname{Im}varphi$?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056225%2fprove-that-the-image-of-the-bilinear-application-is-not-a-vector-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Your claim is true as $,operatorname{Im}varphi,$ is $,$ not closed $,$ under addition:
            $$varphibig((1,0),(1,0)big) :=: (1,0,0,0)\
            varphibig((0,1),(0,1)big) :=: (0,0,0,1)$$



            Now consider the sum $(1,0,0,1)$ of both ...

            Can it be contained in $operatorname{Im}varphi$?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Your claim is true as $,operatorname{Im}varphi,$ is $,$ not closed $,$ under addition:
              $$varphibig((1,0),(1,0)big) :=: (1,0,0,0)\
              varphibig((0,1),(0,1)big) :=: (0,0,0,1)$$



              Now consider the sum $(1,0,0,1)$ of both ...

              Can it be contained in $operatorname{Im}varphi$?






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Your claim is true as $,operatorname{Im}varphi,$ is $,$ not closed $,$ under addition:
                $$varphibig((1,0),(1,0)big) :=: (1,0,0,0)\
                varphibig((0,1),(0,1)big) :=: (0,0,0,1)$$



                Now consider the sum $(1,0,0,1)$ of both ...

                Can it be contained in $operatorname{Im}varphi$?






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Your claim is true as $,operatorname{Im}varphi,$ is $,$ not closed $,$ under addition:
                $$varphibig((1,0),(1,0)big) :=: (1,0,0,0)\
                varphibig((0,1),(0,1)big) :=: (0,0,0,1)$$



                Now consider the sum $(1,0,0,1)$ of both ...

                Can it be contained in $operatorname{Im}varphi$?







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 29 '18 at 22:22









                HannoHanno

                2,469628




                2,469628






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056225%2fprove-that-the-image-of-the-bilinear-application-is-not-a-vector-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen